maybe you can work with joseph to running these patches on rpi. He also
want these patches on a rpi and since we did code sharing with blte
6lowpan the backport isn't easy. (oh well for me it's easy but I don't
have any time right now.) Sorry!
- Alex
--
Hi,
short answer:
fragmentation isn't rfc complaint and has a lot of other issues.
good news:
patches is in my queue, checkout [1].
I will resend them "without as RFC (since nobody screams in netdev that
I make weird things)" today after my discrete maths exam.
- Alex
[1]
https://github.com/
Hi,
have a raspberry pi equipped with a MRF24j40 RF module. raspberry pi has
6lowpan stack installed.
I also have a telosb node install
with contiki/examples/ipv6/rpl-udp/udp-server.c
Communication between two linux node has no probelm. I am trying to make
contiki node and linux node communicate w
Hai Stephen...
Do you have any patch that can be update the BLIP stack as per RFC6282 complaint
? . .
-Bhadram
On February 20, 2014 at 2:07 AM Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Stephen Dawson-Haggerty wrote:
> > I did the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) a couple ye
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Stephen Dawson-Haggerty wrote:
> I did the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) a couple years ago and the version in
> there implements draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06; we were able to interop with
> Contiki implementation of the same but I imagine the world has moved
> f
I did the TinyOS 6lowpan stack (blip) a couple years ago and the version in
there implements draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06; we were able to interop with
Contiki implementation of the same but I imagine the world has moved
forward since then...
Steve
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Alexander Aring w
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:46:15PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> Hai Alex,
>
>
> On February 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM Alexander Aring wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > okay I will try to answer all question in this mail.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> > > This is the p
Hai Alex,
On February 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi,
>
> okay I will try to answer all question in this mail.
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> > This is the packet i received from TinyOS node :
> >
> > 41 c8 00 22 00 ff ff c6 0f 7c 50 45 6d
Hi,
okay I will try to answer all question in this mail.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:32:48PM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> This is the packet i received from TinyOS node :
>
> 41 c8 00 22 00 ff ff c6 0f 7c 50 45 6d 12 00 6b 3b 00 40 e0 3a 02 85 00 12 be
> 00
> 00 00 00 01 02 c6 0f 7c 50 45 6d 12
This is the packet i received from TinyOS node :
41 c8 00 22 00 ff ff c6 0f 7c 50 45 6d 12 00 6b 3b 00 40 e0 3a 02 85 00 12 be 00
00 00 00 01 02 c6 0f 7c 50 45 6d 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 16 ec
I put some debug messges in the kernel the results are as follows:
[ 65.724839] Bhadra : ieee802154_r
Hai..
May i know the status of 6LoWPAN implementation in the kernel.. Is it
implemented according to RFC6282/4944 ?
Right now i am testing integration of 6LoWPAN with TinyOS . When i received the
packet ,it is reaching upto 6lowpan layer but not reaching to IP Layer.
Regards,
Bhadram
---
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:26:12AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 19:21 +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
>
> > no problem. Maybe you can try to give me some explanation what you did
> > there?
> >
> > I see you make a lockdep_set_class for each tx queue and assign the
> > lowpan
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 19:21 +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
> no problem. Maybe you can try to give me some explanation what you did
> there?
>
> I see you make a lockdep_set_class for each tx queue and assign the
> lowpan_netdev_xmit_lock_key. So why it's better to make a own
> "lock_key".
This
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:16:26AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 18:33 +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 04:41:47AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > Please try the following fix, thanks for this report !
> > >
> > > diff --
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 18:33 +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 04:41:47AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > Please try the following fix, thanks for this report !
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c
> > index 48b25c0af4d0..0
Hi Eric,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 04:41:47AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Please try the following fix, thanks for this report !
>
> diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c
> index 48b25c0af4d0..069af33013c4 100644
> --- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c
> +++ b/net/ieee802154
On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 11:20 +0100, Alexander Aring wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got some locking issues with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled and need help.
>
> Full output:
>
> =
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 3.13.0-08605-g8f2b630-dirty #105 Not
Hi,
I got some locking issues with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled and need help.
Full output:
=
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.13.0-08605-g8f2b630-dirty #105 Not tainted
-
agetty/841 is trying
Hi,
> Sorry I dont intend to be a wet blanket here. I would like to add rather
> than building the ZigBee stack on Linux user space it would be better to
> use a modem based approach.
> In todays market there are a lot of certified modules avaliable in the
> market and they are cheap too. So if i
Hi Alex
Sorry I dont intend to be a wet blanket here. I would like to add rather
than building the ZigBee stack on Linux user space it would be better to
use a modem based approach.
In todays market there are a lot of certified modules avaliable in the
market and they are cheap too. So if i see fr
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:41:20PM +0200, Sascha Herrmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Could it be related somehow to ZigBee lincense ? (http://www.zigbee.org/)
> > Moreover, I saw in a lecture:
> > http://elinux.org/images/7/71/Wireless_Networking_with_IEEE_802.15.4_and_6LoWPAN.pdf
> > from 201
Hi,
> Could it be related somehow to ZigBee lincense ? (http://www.zigbee.org/)
> Moreover, I saw in a lecture:
> http://elinux.org/images/7/71/Wireless_Networking_with_IEEE_802.15.4_and_6LoWPAN.pdf
> from 2012, by Alan Ott:
Maybe you can get some more information about this issue from this
artic
hello...
The attached documents are patches for implementing the RFC6775. Please check
the patches and give me suggestions if any changes are required. I did not
submit these patches to the ipv6 linux community. After any suggestions from
linux-zigbee-devel i will submit my patches to ipv6-linux co
Hi, all,
>I don't know if there was any licensing issues.
Programmers don't have time to read non code...
This is what the wiki says:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/linux-zigbee/
. . .
"While this project was originally started to create a ZigBee
implementation for Linux, licensing restrictions p
Hi Ralph,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:48:16PM +, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
> Let me try to clarify the situation. Note that anything I've contributed
> here is my own personal opinion and not any kind of official statement from
> ZigBee Alliance (ZA), Cisco or any legal opinion...
>
> ZA
On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:16 PM 9/20/13, Alexander Aring
wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:48:16PM +, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
>> Let me try to clarify the situation. Note that anything I've contributed
>> here is my own personal opinion and not any kind of official state
Hello, Varka
>I am adding the code to already existing IPv6-ND(RFC4861) which is there >in
>net/ipv6/ndisc.c and include/net/ndisc.h
I do not see these DAR and DAC messages there.
I an not sure what do you mean. May I ask - are you preparing and
sending such patches to the networking IPv6/netdev m
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:27:21PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hi, all,
> >I don't know if there was any licensing issues.
> Programmers don't have time to read non code...
> This is what the wiki says:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/linux-zigbee/
> . . .
> "While this project was origina
Let me try to clarify the situation. Note that anything I've contributed here
is my own personal opinion and not any kind of official statement from ZigBee
Alliance (ZA), Cisco or any legal opinion...
ZA has published a collection of specifications that are not IP-based. I don't
know much abo
Hello ,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 07:21:09PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote :
> And last one - is there intention to implement RFC 6775
> "Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless
> Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)" in this protocol ? >
In RFC6775 6lowpan-ND added two icmpv6 me
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 07:21:09PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hello,
> I saw somewhere on the web that the focus of linux-zigbee
> moved to 6LoWPAN, beacuse of licensing issues of zigbee itself.
>
I don't know if there was any licensing issues. I remember a mailinglist
entry to rename
Hello,
I saw somewhere on the web that the focus of linux-zigbee
moved to 6LoWPAN, beacuse of licensing issues of zigbee itself.
My question is this:
is currently the development of linux-zigbee intended to be
integrated into the maininline linux kernel? (or already integrated)?
And does the linux
> 3. Why we have a list of slaves in the mac802154 implementation? To handle
>one device with different channels? I don't know how this could work
>with tx packets.
I don't understand this point too. One point could be a device with more
than one phy which is able to send on more than one c
Hi guys,
I currently working on the fragmentation part to work with contiki devices.
There are some issues with the datagram_size so we need to do some work
on the fragmentation and reassemble part.
I have a dirty fix for this which get this working, but I got some
trouble with wireshark and null
I've been trying to set up a 6LoWPAN network similar to what's
described on the "Getting Started" page [1], only that this is a
mix of Linux and Contiki. It works after solving the uncompression
issues I mentioned in my last post, but there are still a few
things I wonder about:
- why configure al
Hello,
there is a 6LoWPAN interoperability test coming up in July in Berlin, cf. the
email below. Is anyone of the contributors to the Linux 15.4 stack planning to
join?
Best regards,
Thomas Pötsch
Thomas Pötsch, M.Sc.
Ph.D Student
Communicatio
Hi Alan,
Am 12.03.2013 um 22:00 schrieb Alan Ott :
> On 03/05/2013 10:48 AM, Wolf-Bastian Pöttner wrote:
>> That means: the stack is using my 6lowpan address as sender (and receiver)
>> in the IEEE 802.15.4 packets.
>
> Looking closely at my captures, I see this as well. 6lowpan.c (line 611,
>
On 03/05/2013 10:48 AM, Wolf-Bastian Pöttner wrote:
> finally I have 6lowpan running. However, acknowledgement of frames is not
> working. When I enable address filtering in the at86rf230, I only receive
> broadcast frames and no unicast frames anymore.
>
> The reason seems to be the addressing.
Hey guys,
finally I have 6lowpan running. However, acknowledgement of frames is not
working. When I enable address filtering in the at86rf230, I only receive
broadcast frames and no unicast frames anymore.
The reason seems to be the addressing. I have setup my wpan0 device to use this
address
Hi!
Am 04.03.2013 um 20:04 schrieb Sascha Herrmann :
> I'm not using lowpan, but one reason you can get this messages is, that
> your interface is already up when you try to set the mac address. Maybe
> try a ifconfig lowpan0 down before configuring it. On my raspberry the
> ifplugd of the raspia
Hi,
> $ sudo iz add wpan-phy0
> $ sudo ip link set wpan0 address a0:a0:a0:a0:a0:a0:a0:a0
> $ sudo ifconfig wpan0 up
> $ sudo iz set wpan0 0x780 0x0004 23 // PAN 0x780, short addr 4, channel 23
> $ sudo ip link add link wpan0 name lowpan0 type lowpan
> $ sudo ip link set lowpan0 address a0:0:0:0:0
Hi again,
I have another problem when using 6lowpan. I am sending a separate email to
avoid mixing things up. I am still using a raspberry pi with an Atmel at86rf231
attached to it on kernel 3.6.11. I have patched the iz tool to allow manually
setting the short address as well as the channel w
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Alexander Smirnov
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I want to sync Linux 6lowpan implementation with Contiki one, so how
> can I derive latest 6lowpan fixes?
> Do you have any tracking system or may be just a list with bugs were fixed?
>
> Or 'git log' must be my favorite tool?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:21:06PM +0400, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I want to sync Linux 6lowpan implementation with Contiki one, so how
> can I derive latest 6lowpan fixes?
> Do you have any tracking system or may be just a list with bugs were fixed?
>
> Or 'git log' must be my favo
Mar should know what is going on. He tracks this more closely than I do.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Alexander Smirnov
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I want to sync Linux 6lowpan implementation with Contiki one, so how
> can I derive latest 6lowpan fixes?
> Do you have any tracking system or may be ju
Hi Jon,
I want to sync Linux 6lowpan implementation with Contiki one, so how
can I derive latest 6lowpan fixes?
Do you have any tracking system or may be just a list with bugs were fixed?
Or 'git log' must be my favorite tool? :-)
Thanks,
Alex
---
Alexander Smirnov scrisse:
> Got it!
> Hm, definitely it's possible, but I suspect that it looks more like
> ugly hack. The more appropriate solution I guess will be usage of fake
> drivers. I've set reminder to check this possibility, hope there will
> be some free time slot this week :-(
A simi
2012/4/9 Alexander Smirnov :
> Got it!
> Hm, definitely it's possible, but I suspect that it looks more like
> ugly hack. The more appropriate solution I guess will be usage of fake
> drivers. I've set reminder to check this possibility, hope there will
> be some free time slot this week :-(
An ex
Got it!
Hm, definitely it's possible, but I suspect that it looks more like
ugly hack. The more appropriate solution I guess will be usage of fake
drivers. I've set reminder to check this possibility, hope there will
be some free time slot this week :-(
With best regards,
Alex
9 апреля 2012 г. 23
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Alexander Smirnov
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> do you mean to send 6lowpan packets over Ethernet?
Yes. If it is simple to hook up it would provide an easy testbed for
people that don't have the radio hardware and want to play with the
protocol.
>
> Alex
>
> 2012/4/9, jon
Hi Jon,
do you mean to send 6lowpan packets over Ethernet?
Alex
2012/4/9, jonsm...@gmail.com :
> Is there some simple way to hook the 6lowpan code up to the Ethernet
> interface (private Ethertype maybe)? That would make an easy way to
> test things on multiple machines (or VMs) without needing
Is there some simple way to hook the 6lowpan code up to the Ethernet
interface (private Ethertype maybe)? That would make an easy way to
test things on multiple machines (or VMs) without needing 802.15.4
radios.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
Hi Jon,
First of all thank you a lot for the hint!
I'll take a look to the 6lowpan code in Contiki.
With best regards,
Alex
пятница, 23 марта 2012 г. пользователь jonsm...@gmail.com <
jonsm...@gmail.com> писал:
> Is anyone watching the Contiki 6lowpan source for bug patches to the
> 6lowpan code
Is anyone watching the Contiki 6lowpan source for bug patches to the
6lowpan code? Problems found and patched there are likely in the
linux-zigbee code too since it is derived from Contiki. Contiki has
definitely fixed multiple problems in their code.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
---
Hi Alexander
On 10/27/11, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> please drop patches I sent to list 2 days ago. There were problems
> with locking on fragments receive site.
>
> Could you please review the following patches only.
>
> P.S. And also please let me know if you can't do it in next
Hi Dmitry,
please drop patches I sent to list 2 days ago. There were problems
with locking on fragments receive site.
Could you please review the following patches only.
P.S. And also please let me know if you can't do it in next several
days. I'm working on a article and I want to mention about
Hi Dmitry,
could you please review the following patch.
BTW: internet on my workplace was completely fucked up (as usual), so I
use my home network, but there is windows OS only. So I'm going to
send the patch as attachements. Sorry... :-(
Improvements since my last submit:
1.
Hi all,
the following patch series provides basic support for 6lowpan
Thank you,
Alexander
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Alexander Smirnov
> wrote:
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> currently I'm working on 6lowpan support for zigbee linux.
>> I'm trying to rework your patch and make it more suitable for linux mainline
>> according Dmitry
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Alexander Smirnov
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> currently I'm working on 6lowpan support for zigbee linux.
> I'm trying to rework your patch and make it more suitable for linux mainline
> according Dmitry's help.
> So do you have any updates or progress with this deal sinc
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Alexander Smirnov
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> currently I'm working on 6lowpan support for zigbee linux.
> I'm trying to rework your patch and make it more suitable for linux mainline
> according Dmitry's help.
> So do you have any updates or progress with this deal sinc
Hi Jon,
currently I'm working on 6lowpan support for zigbee linux.
I'm trying to rework your patch and make it more suitable for linux mainline
according Dmitry's help.
So do you have any updates or progress with this deal since last year?
Thank you,
Alexander
--
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Klaus Lynggard Hougesen wrote:
> for 6lowpan in linux zigbee:
> why not use the excellent lib6lowpan from BLIP (berkely OpenWSN).
> http://openwsn.berkeley.edu/browser/tinyos-2.x/support/sdk/c/blip/lib6lowpan/lib6lowpan.c?rev=620
> should be EASY to implement!
Work
Just thought I'd speak up since I saw this reference to lib6lowpan (I'm the
developer). That version is actually out of date -- the latest one is here
(
http://code.google.com/p/tinyos-main/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fsupport%2Fsdk%2Fc%2Fblip%2Flib6lowpan).
It implements draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06
for 6lowpan in linux zigbee:
why not use the excellent lib6lowpan from BLIP (berkely OpenWSN).
http://openwsn.berkeley.edu/browser/tinyos-2.x/support/sdk/c/blip/lib6lowpan/lib6lowpan.c?rev=620
should be EASY to implement!
--
Hi,
thanks for code and advices. I have some small experience already. I
have done simple driver hack to some easy cc2420 driver to make IPv6
work over 802.15.4 as my bachelor thesis. Because of deadline I didn't
have time to implement standard.
I worked with 2 iMote2 sensor nodes, I can use th
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Tomas Mazak wrote:
> Hi folks,
> is somebody working on 6LoWPAN implementation for linux, please? I'm
> considering to do it as my university thesis. linux-zigbee project looks
> like very good entry point.
I started on porting 6lowpan over to Linux. If you'd lik
Hi folks,
is somebody working on 6LoWPAN implementation for linux, please? I'm
considering to do it as my university thesis. linux-zigbee project looks
like very good entry point.
Best regards,
Tomas Mazak
--
Sell apps
68 matches
Mail list logo
