Hallo,
On Monday 05 January 2009 16:31:33 Grant Likely wrote:
> DMA support is now in mainline, but it is disabled by
> default ...
I had problems using ATA DMA on an own MPC5200B board, too. This board
has no problems at all using DMA33 with DENX 2.4.25, with all kinds of
automotive disks from
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
wrote:
>> Hans, what ATA modes do you see this problem in? UDMA? MWDMA? Or does
>> just having the patch applied but still using PIO mode expose the problem?
>
>
> This problem occurs in MWDMA 2 mode.
Thanks Hans. DMA support
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
wrote:
> Tim, Grant,
>
> just an info.
>
> Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate a
> transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I have read
> something like that). A restart of
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Matt Sealey wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)
> wrote:
>>
>> Tim, Grant,
>>
>> just an info.
>>
>> Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate a
>> transaction over FEC and save the file to
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim, Grant,
>
> just an info.
>
> Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate a
> transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I have read
> something like t
e Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Tim Yamin
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2008 11:07
An: Grant Likely
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Betreff: [WW Spam: medium] Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <[
ly
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Betreff: [WW Spam: medium] Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it
> up for -next if everything else looks good.
Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it
up for -next if everything else looks good.
Here are the n
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it
>> up for -next if everything else looks good.
>
> Here are the new patches; tes
Tim Yamin-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it
>> up for -next if everything else looks good.
>
> Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3.
>
> Thanks,
>
> T
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it
> up for -next if everything else looks good.
Here are the new patches; tested against 2.6.27-rc3.
Thanks,
Tim
1) ata.h has dst_pa in the wrong place
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:06:27AM +0100, Tim Yamin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While on this topic; have you had a chance to address the comments you
> > received on v2 of your patch? I'm keen to get your change merged in,
> > but there ar
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While on this topic; have you had a chance to address the comments you
> received on v2 of your patch? I'm keen to get your change merged in,
> but there are a few more things that need to be sorted out.
I'm still trying t
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Schnell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ...
>>
>> Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate
>>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Schnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ...
>
> Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate
> the bestcomm data structures and functions. The only apparent difference
> is tha
Hi Tim,
Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ...
Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate
the bestcomm data structures and functions. The only apparent difference
is that you have a minimal data length of 2 bytes instead of 1. Does
this make any differenc
Hi,
Daniel Schnell wrote:
> Tim Yamin wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Schnell
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for testing this patch so late, but I get these if I apply
>>> your patch to 2.6.24.7 and use it with my Sandisk Extreme IV 4GB
>>> card:
>>
>> Hi,
Tim Yamin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Schnell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for testing this patch so late, but I get these if I apply your
>> patch to 2.6.24.7 and use it with my Sandisk Extreme IV 4GB card:
>
> Hi,
>
> What board are you using? DMA requi
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Schnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for testing this patch so late, but I get these if I apply your
> patch to 2.6.24.7 and use it with my Sandisk Extreme IV 4GB card:
Hi,
What board are you using? DMA requires a few more signals to be routed
Hi,
Tim Yamin wrote:
> This patch adds MDMA/UDMA support (using BestComm for DMA) on the
> MPC5200 platform.
>
> Based heavily on previous work by Freescale (Bernard Kuhn, John
> Rigby) and Domen Puncer.
>
> Using a SanDisk Extreme IV CF card I get read speeds of approximately
> 26.70 MB/sec.
20 matches
Mail list logo
