h an attempt.
Alex Kamantauskas wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>
>> Question to the list : anyone familiar with Texas law? Is the public
>> posting of a message here for a meeting that does not exist a
>> violation of any Texas Laws? If someone
NS nameserver software code.
> 2) those who run the local DNS servers which end users reference,
What about those who run their own local DNS servers for their own use,
with no end users other than themselves? Would they fall under this
category?
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
le.
>
As long as the 'reference' is not exclusionary. Hypothetically, levying a
$8,000/year fee will probably guarantee a certain level of
professionalism, but it would exclude those people, such as myself, who
could not afford the fee. That would be my only concern.
__
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
l be impacted by the net.
ASO:Any entity that will be impacted by the net.
Which, to me, makes the entire ICANN/SO relationship a moot point.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
es, benefits or quanitities whichy they
do not have or that a person has a sponsorship, approval, status,
affiliation, or connection which he does not"
Since 'INEG' has offered goods and services in the past (I want a
shrinkwrapped copy of 'bindles+'), you can p
, scan the
SMU law degree.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
onal in nature, so I ask that you
>> specifically state that you grant permission for it to be published.
>
> I understood him to have give permission.
>
As did I.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
root zone and nameservers which I use, and
which are used by several other people who want to use their own TLD's,
mostly to stop spamming. I delegate the TLD's to them directly, and they
control the zone files for them, yet they don't lose their ability to use
.com, .net, .gov, etc.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
> was going to say album but that would have dated me) we would take to a
> desert island (I was going to say Niue but I know Bill Semich has a
> collection of MP3 files there on his server). Who wants to go first? No
> greatest hits CDs allowed.
>
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
s, are not sufficient for everyone to formulate an opinion on
> their own.
>
I fully agree.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE for
public interest, IOHO. Of course, parish the thought, right?
>
Yes, that would have been nice. Take what you can get. I, for one, thank
Jay for letting us know what went on.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the dig
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, jeff Williams wrote:
> Alex and all,
>
> Alex Kamantauskas wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, jeff Williams wrote:
>>
>>> Jay and all,
>>>
>>
>>
>>> It is odd to us anyway that the ORSC would participate in such
; It is odd to us anyway that the ORSC would participate in such a CLOSED
> meeting given the public statements in the ORSC's opposition to such
> meetings.
>
It makes perfect sense to me. They went so that they could relay what
happened in that meeting to the general public, thu
sensus of this listthat it should be allowed
> or encouraged, thats different. But I dount very much that
> is the case.
>
>
I personally can't stand it when HTML is posted. In fact, I have a
procmail recipe that just deletes it before it even gets to me, I detest
it so mu
o:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END
>
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
_
as this is also a destabilizing posture as
well."
Pot. Kettle. Jeff.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROT
t; This is patently incorrect as Alex is well aware of.
>
Jeff, its time to stop the fantasy.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE f
replace INEGroup with INEG. INC. LTD.
>
In case anyone has any doubt or is wondering, there is no such
organization, and what Mr. Williams says is completely untrue.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the digest version instea
.
>
> Can't speak for your musical ability, but the name of the group needs work.
>
>
I wonder if Jeff will let us borrow 'Information Network Blues Group'?
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the
l themselves over the
> >> Internet Governance.
> >>
> >> Roberto Gaetano
> >> Tenor Sax
> >
> >I used to play a nice arrangement of "Take Five" for classical guitar,
> >in E minor.
>
> Great. All we need now a a drummer. And so
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> What is the value of unenforced rules?
>
What is the value of the IFWP list?
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END_
NSI's 'secret' root server system.
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRI
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>> You're a bunch of lousy hypocrites. Nothing more and nothing less.
>
> On that remark, this discussion just ended, as far as I'm concerned.
>
Yeah, me too. I've always considered myself to be a fairly well p
ny more UNEQUIVOCAL in my response. he
>> sent the e-mail out at 2:30 am and i responded at approx 8:am to every
>> maillist in sight within 10 minutes of reading it.
>>
>> hoping that the future finds us with the opportunity to resolve what Mr.
>> Kidder refers to as a
eceive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTE
26 matches
Mail list logo
