I am well-aware of Olivier’s work in this area, as are many in the FreeBSD
community.
There is no proof, except that which is documented and reproducible. We're
doing something like science here.
Hmm, proof. Well, maybe a scientist like yourself can appreciate my concern
over this
Good morning, I have a Pfsense 32bit running currently on a vmware host and
am going to create a new one, but 64bit and using the 64bit install. If I
replicate the hardware on the vm, except I'm going to add more ram and
cpu's to the host, is there any config issues to restore the 32bit backup
to
On Oct 16, 2014, at 2:06 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
I am well-aware of Olivier’s work in this area, as are many in the FreeBSD
community.
There is no proof, except that which is documented and reproducible. We're
doing something like science here.
Hmm, proof. Well,
Is there any reason I would want to keep debug.debugger_on_panic set
to 1 on my production firewall?
Would the right way to set it to 0 be to add a line to /boot/loader.conf.local?
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
I have spent way too many hours scouring the net for info and need a little
direction here ...
I'm trying to set up security for my OpenVPN connections. I would like to use
Radius or LDAP but need to have user-level policies.
The stock solution for this problem appears to be Client Specific
The difference between Olivier's setup and ours (assuming pfsense 2.1.1+), is
tuning
The only way to prove what you say is with numbers. Tuning pfSense won't fix
this hardware problem, *if* it exists in your boards.
As I said in my original post, I'm know the C2758 is capable
I mostly lurk on this mailing list for the informative discussions, and while
this thead is amusing to follow, do you realize who you’re arguing with
compdoc? Have you looked at the last part of his email address? If Jim
tells us his version of that hardware will do it, I’ll take his word
On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:14 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
The difference between Olivier's setup and ours (assuming pfsense 2.1.1+),
is tuning
The only way to prove what you say is with numbers. Tuning pfSense won't fix
this hardware problem, *if* it exists in your boards.
do you realize who you’re arguing with compdoc?
Yeah, I'm arguing with a guy that not only attacked me for suggesting a person
be careful about buying certain hardware, he also attacked the work of Olivier
from BSDRP.
___
List mailing
On Oct 16, 2014, at 12:45 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
do you realize who you’re arguing with compdoc?
Yeah, I'm arguing with a guy that not only attacked me for suggesting a
person be careful about buying certain hardware, he also attacked the work of
Olivier from
10 matches
Mail list logo
