I mostly lurk on this mailing list for the informative discussions, and while this thead is amusing to follow, do you realize who you’re arguing with compdoc? Have you looked at the last part of his email address? If Jim tells us his version of that hardware will do it, I’ll take his word for it barring someone having real proof otherwise. Maybe you need to get one of his boards and run some real tests on it, then report back to the list with what you found.
From: List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of compdoc Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:15 AM To: 'pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List' Subject: Re: [pfSense] NIC support > The difference between Olivier's setup and ours (assuming pfsense 2.1.1+), is > tuning The only way to prove what you say is with numbers. Tuning pfSense won't fix this hardware problem, *if* it exists in your boards. >> As I said in my original post, I'm know the C2758 is capable according to >> its specs, however buyer beware... > >Again with the insult and denigration. Is it an insult that I think Intel's cpu is capable? Or is it that I suggest a person be cautious when buying these products? >That you are "concerned" is understandable, but also immaterial, >as it is clear from this thread that your understanding of the issues, >tools(!), terms of art and resolutions is limited. >... > Here, you perform an act commonly known as "I read it on the Internet" (so it > must be true.) This is a much better example of "insult and denigration". You don’t know me, my methods, or my thinking. > Do you own a C2758? Have you actually bothered to read anything I've said in this conversation? It's time to end this nonsense. Prove what you say, or shut up.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
