> The difference between Olivier's setup and ours (assuming pfsense 2.1.1+), is > tuning
The only way to prove what you say is with numbers. Tuning pfSense won't fix this hardware problem, *if* it exists in your boards. >> As I said in my original post, I'm know the C2758 is capable according to >> its specs, however buyer beware... > >Again with the insult and denigration. Is it an insult that I think Intel's cpu is capable? Or is it that I suggest a person be cautious when buying these products? >That you are "concerned" is understandable, but also immaterial, >as it is clear from this thread that your understanding of the issues, >tools(!), terms of art and resolutions is limited. >... > Here, you perform an act commonly known as "I read it on the Internet" (so it > must be true.) This is a much better example of "insult and denigration". You don’t know me, my methods, or my thinking. > Do you own a C2758? Have you actually bothered to read anything I've said in this conversation? It's time to end this nonsense. Prove what you say, or shut up.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
