On 23/01/2007, at 4:40 AM, Barney Carroll wrote:
Jon Gunderson wrote:
Got good readings for my latest site, bumped into two failings:
1. No headings preceding navigation uls (debatable intrinsic worth).
2. No navigation areas.
I think point 1 is a clue to what qualifies: navigation area ==
Many thanks Bill.
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bill scheider
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 4:53 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] IE7/CSS issues on a site
I work for a state agency which deals with a great deal of money (Oregon
Department of Revenue) who are very careful about software we install
for security reasons which is the main problem with installing IE7 since
there are absolutely no plans to update anytime soon to this new
version. I
**
This is a one-way list for WSG Announcements
**
This email covers:
- Links for light reading
- WSG and Industry events
- Web standards related jobs (2 jobs this week)
Hi all,
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve the quality of this
article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_thumbnail_and_caption.asp
Demo:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/thumbnail_and_caption/gallery_of_thumbnails.asp
Thanks.
---
Regards,
Thierry |
Hey Thierry,
Looks good!
One question that people may ask you is how would this system work with
different sized images or different length captions.
The entire layout could fall to pieces if one caption in the middle of the
page is much longer. The following floats may be caught by this long
Does any one can recommend me a good CMS software?
Regards,
Enrique | boundlessenergy.net
_
FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo buy and sell with people
you know
Hi Russ,
Looks good!
Thanks
One question that people may ask you is how would this system work
with different sized images or different length captions.
The entire layout could fall to pieces if one caption in the middle
of the page is much longer. The following floats may be caught by
On 1/23/07, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/01/2007, at 4:40 AM, Barney Carroll wrote:
Jon Gunderson wrote:
Got good readings for my latest site, bumped into two failings:
1. No headings preceding navigation uls (debatable intrinsic worth).
2. No navigation areas.
I think
I was actually a judge for the AIMIA awards and it was interesting going
through the judging criteria. Accessibility and Usability were judged
together, I think for a total of 15 or 20 points.
The first thing I looked at was the code on all the sites - out of the 5
sites I was judging, 4 of them
What about W3C validation especially for business.gov.au 60 HTML
errors, meta tags, alt tags?
I haven't worked on the business.vic.gov.au site since early 2006, but at
the time it had almost perfect validation. There were some errors still
remaining in various pockets of content transferred
On 1/24/07, Cheryl Lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did write a lot of comments about it though so hopefully these comments
will make it back to the site owners. It's just such a shame that in 2006
(when the judging was done) the majority of companies are still so unaware
of accessibility
AIMIA is traditionally very multimedia-based rather than web-based,
which influences the types of entries, I think. In previous years it's
always been the Flash-driven and very flashy sites that have won over
the usable and accessible.
So true - I wanted the usable accessible sites to win in
So indicative of the fine line between good design and good
business, which often do not seem to take notice of each other until
someone truly inspired gets a chance to make an impression on the
delivery method. True online accessibility must also be visually
appealing, while
[...] Nothing bugs me more than a super-cool looking site that shows off the
ability of the artist who built it, yet does nothing for the idea, product
or service it promotes.
Art for art's sake is fantastic. Businesses need more.
Noah
But any design without art, feeling and emotions
Quoth Noah at 01/24/07 11:10...
Nothing bugs me more than a super-cool looking site
that shows off the ability of the artist who built it, yet does nothing
for the idea, product or service it promotes.
Or, of course, breaks the law. Accessibility is a legal requirement in
Australia[1],
Quoth Milosz A. Lodowski - New Media Designer at 01/24/07 11:32...
But any design without art, feeling and emotions is trivial and boring
We can be artistic and accessible, and need to prove it time and time
again to dispel the myth that accessible is ugly. Artists and techies
can work
We can be artistic and accessible, and need to prove it time and time
again to dispel the myth that accessible is ugly. Artists and techies
can work together - I've done it before AND we were still talking to each
other at the end ;-)
--
Matthew Smith
Of course Matthew - You've got right
It's really the only way to go if you want to deliver true value to
your clients and provide forward-thinking results on the cutting edge.
Anybody can make pretty pictures; true value is in making those
designs do more than just look good.
Noah
Quoting Matthew Smith [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Smith
Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:13 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AIMIA finalists
Quoth Noah at 01/24/07 11:10...
Nothing bugs me more than a
It's really the only way to go if you want to deliver true value to your
clients and provide forward-thinking results on the cutting edge. Anybody
can make
pretty pictures; true value is in making those designs do more than just
look good.
Noah
Yep I know Noah, and after a small
No Andreas
http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/AustWeb.html
Australian gov websites are not tested for accessibility before they
are launched.
They are not even changed years later when someone points out the
errors.
They stay are they were launched full of the same errors
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 1:19 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] AIMIA finalists
No Andreas
http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/AustWeb.html
Asfar as I know accessibility compliance is a requirement for every new govt
website project that is out for tender.
Yes that is right. I am involved at the moment of a redesign of a gov website
and we have to create the website to cover level 3 standards...
They are flawed and stay flawed everyday. Get real Andreas.
Everyone please take a deep breath and calm down. We are all on the same
side. No need for friendly fire. :)
Russ
(Admin - with flack jacket on)
***
List Guidelines:
Those people could speak for themselves the many who will disagree
with me. You presume to speak for many others. Me generalising, when
you speak for many others. Really Andrea!
No I am not generalising, I am quoting from some research I did on
.gov.au websites 22 federal .gov.au sites.
A
Some of the comments on the AIMIA thread seem to indicate that the
authors believe accessibility is solely about validation and testing,
and that art is only about pretty pictures. I believe that both views
are flawed.
Accessibility is/should be a way of life for anyone building websites. I
Web professionals are not doctors and doctors, in Australia at the very
least,
would have their licenses revoked if they did exactly what their
patients asked them to do.
Web professionals however have no licences and do not deal with
life-threatening situations.
The fact of the matter is if
Yes I need work as well, but I would have to warn a client in writing
that I would proceed to make a website as specified unless they took
the responsibility under the 1992 Discrimination Act.
The doctor must do what is best practice evidence based medicine, not
what the client wants. Web
Yeah I totally agree. I seriously doubt there are architects writing into
lists saying we have to design a building that is beautiful AND
accessible; they just incorporate both into every design.
Web should be the same, it should go without saying that it will be
accessible and it should look as
If the title attribute is ignored by screen readers, still, it would read
the alt attribute of the image which would include a meaningful description
of where the link is taking them to. Is this an annoying hurdle for screen
reader users - having an alt attribute to go by rather than a plain text
31 matches
Mail list logo
