aaa yes that helps a lot, thanks for thatOn 11/3/06, Peter Asquith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/11/2006, at 4:17 PM, Germ wrote:
Im designing a website for my university design exhibition and it looks fine in IE (6 i think it is) but in firefox the bunch of links overlap the white content
Hya,
I have a domain 'jungaling.com. Its a web site (eventually about Asia's
flora and fauna. Someone else has the domain 'Wild Asia'.
I found for the Mambo this awesome template. Its green, the logo has a
beautiful Butterfly and under that is the name 'Digital Eye'. I want to
change the Digital
On 11/3/06, kate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hya,I have a domain 'jungaling.com. Its a web site (eventually about Asia'sflora and fauna. Someone else has the domain 'Wild Asia'.I found for the Mambo this awesome template. Its green, the logo has a
beautiful Butterfly and under that is the name
kate wrote:
I found for the Mambo this awesome template. Its green, the logo has a
beautiful Butterfly and under that is the name 'Digital Eye'. I want to
change the Digital Eye to Wild Asia is this legal?
Questions about legal issues, like copyright, are off-topic for this
list. Check the
kate wrote:
I want to
change the Digital Eye to Wild Asia is this legal?
Not without permission to do so.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Ok thanks Lachlan
Kate
- Original Message -
From: Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Legal or Ilegal
kate wrote:
I found for the Mambo this awesome template. Its green, the logo has a
beautiful
Hya Steve,
Being new to WSG and first post I made an error
asking that question.
I got it from a Mambo source which is open source.
I can buy into Template club to get the PSD but asking around the graphic was
too complicated to edit the text which DE said would be ok. Anyway I believe
Hya Brian,
They know about the change of text and maybe, just maybe they hinted they
would do the change for me this morning when I went to the forum.The
question now is to what? The site is about Asia wildlife etc.
Thanks Brian.
Kate
- Original Message -
From: Brian Cummiskey [EMAIL
Hi All,
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/
I have another version here, with the columns background shown, to help
you see how out of alignment it is in IE:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/columns.html
The page displays as intended in Opera and Firefox 2, but in IE is a
*mess*. I don't quite know
Andreas, you elucidate what I mean pretty well. Christian - I know it's
a shame that the only way I could express myself somehow makes
standardistas look bad through implication. I don't want to give that
idea at all. As for naming and shaming, I object to the notion strongly.
The kind of
on 03/11/2006 00:59 Matthew Hodgson said the following:
snip
In the end, we learned the following lessons about vision impaired users
and screen readers:
a) Only a completely blind person used the screen reader.
snip
Although you were talking about visually-impaired users and screen
on 03/11/2006 07:50 kate said the following:
What about users with cognitive disibilities? Its a very wide
catagorie which includes, simple dyslexia to extreme mental retardation.
Apparently these people regularly use the web as a primary imformation
source so must be considered.
Would they
For your home page, this in base.css:
body { text-align: center; margin: 0 auto; width: 770px;}
seems to be conflicting with what you're trying to do in index.css.
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:59:31 +1000, Rahul Gonsalves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/
I have
Bruce wrote:
I have been following this with great interest.
What I have been considering (I know its been covered before) is putting
a link at the top of the page,
go to text version
Go to menu
I would think that screen reader users would find that a good addition
to be able to read an
Which is semantically worse, and why?
1. Just manually putting the extra space in the markup.
2. Manually putting an extra inline element around the full stop and
styling said element to create a presentational space.
To me, they seem just as bad as each other - in the first instance
because
John Faulds wrote:
For your home page, this in base.css:
body { text-align: center; margin: 0 auto; width: 770px;}
seems to be conflicting with what you're trying to do in index.css.
Whoops!
Thanks for catching that - I meant to make the pages dependent on
completely separate style
@Matthew Hodgson:
That's brilliantly useful information, Matthew. It is interesting you
mention screen magnifying, because it is my company's policy to use ems
as measurements as far as possible, based on the conjecture that
partially-sighted people would probably want to increase their
Bruce wrote:
I would think that screen reader users would find that a good addition
to be able to read an article in text only, and a shortcut to scan
articles which also have brief title tags in addition to descriptive
titles.
In my design content comes first already...
Not really at
BarneyThere is effectively no semantic difference. To stop the spread of grey goo on the net, the only semantics we shoud be worried about are those which are picked up by search engines, and a span class=sentence means equally as little as nbsp;nbsp; to these. It is also of little consequence to
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/columns.html
The page displays as intended in Opera and Firefox 2, but in IE is a
*mess*. I don't quite know where to start, I wonder whether anybody
has any solutions?
1. Why is the header (Rahul Gonsalves...) so much lower in IE? Fix?
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
This article seems to be good food for thought (and it references the
earlier study that I did ;-) ).
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/workingwithothers
It was after reading this that I found the guts to question Talibani
standards tyrants. It's an absolutely
on 03/11/2006 10:50 Rahul Gonsalves said the following:
snip
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/ozewai2005/
I wonder whether any of the conclusions that were drawn in the study,
are still valid, or whether there has been further research to either
supplement or contradict it?
on 03/11/2006 11:18 Barney Carroll said the following:
snip
By the way, could anyone elaborate on what tab-indexing is? And how does
the Alt+# system work? These seem to be crucial elements of screen
reader browsing but I have a very limited grasp of their convention and
application.
Just to clear up my confusion.
I've been in the habit of setting font-size on body to 100.01% because
AIUI it stops IE doing silly small font sizes when you use ems elsewhere
and the .01 is for Opera and a weird rounding issue.
recently I picked up the habit of setting body to 62.5% from
TonyI would stick with the original approach and then re-size up using ems. The clagnut article recommended first scaling everything down to 62.5% for ease of calculation when scaling back up using ems. The premise was that a 'default' text size of 16pt would be scaled down to 10pt and then you
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/index.html
1. Why is the header (Rahul Gonsalves...) so much lower in IE? Fix?
To fix it, add...
#logo p#access {float: left; width: 100%;}
Note the specificity.
2. The h2s are all out of alignment. Does this have
On 11/3/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas, you elucidate what I mean pretty well. Christian - I know it's
a shame that the only way I could express myself somehow makes
standardistas look bad through implication. I don't want to give that
idea at all. As for naming and shaming,
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/ozewai2005/
I wonder whether any of the conclusions that were drawn in the study,
are still valid, or whether there has been further research to either
supplement or contradict it? Specifically, one observation, The
majority of screen reader users
On 11/3/06, Rob Kirton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do believe that somebody else (can't find source right now) suggested first scaling down to 76% and then resizing up. Not for ease of calculation, as per clagnut, but as a result of empirical tests which showed that this produced the most
Hi, I'm out of the office and will return on Wednesday 8 November.
I look forward to responding to your query on Wednesday.
Regards
Rob Scherer
Seek Ltd
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Derek recently said:
Perhaps we are doing a pretty darn good job. Sadly though, we are
not in the majority. And therein lies the difficulty. When we talk about
we doing a pretty darn good job, we're talking about - what - maybe 5%
of web professionals worldwide? More, less? I'm not sure but
On 11/3/06, Chris Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how are we doing, does anybody know? I'd be very interested to seeeven rough figures on the percentage of standards andaccessibility-aware designers/developers compared to others. AdmittedlyI spend my time reading, writing and talking with other
Tony Crockford wrote:
Just to clear up my confusion.
I've been in the habit of setting font-size on body to 100.01% because
AIUI it stops IE doing silly small font sizes when you use ems
elsewhere and the .01 is for Opera and a weird rounding issue.
recently I picked up the habit of setting
On 11/3/06, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/06, Chris Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how are we doing, does anybody know? I'd be very interested to see
even rough figures on the percentage of standards and
accessibility-aware designers/developers compared to others.
Hello there,
I've been putting my CV together but I don't have a mac for testing,
a friend of mine who does said that when the page loads up in safari it
immediately jumps to where it says 'Web designer and developer'. I'm
stumped as to what might be causing it.
The page in question is at
On 2006/11/03 12:41 (GMT) Tony Crockford apparently typed:
I've been in the habit of setting font-size on body to 100.01% because
AIUI it stops IE doing silly small font sizes when you use ems elsewhere
and the .01 is for Opera and a weird rounding issue.
Wasn't Opera fixed in that regard
Nice page Rob, I like the scrolling mark-up.
On 11/3/06, Rob O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello there, I've been putting my CV together but I don't have a mac for testing,a friend of mine who does said that when the page loads up in safari it
immediately jumps to where it says 'Web designer
I'm running Safari 2.0 and it does jump. However, it does not jump
immediately. When you hover over a link the page reloads and this is when it
jumps (not always to the same place). The same happens if you press the Tab
key after the page loads. It does this even if JavaScript is turned off.
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
http://rahulgonsalves.com/v2/index.html
The only small, niggling thing left is that whenever there is a
paragraph preceded by a h2, it seems to be adjusted, only by a pixel
or two, to the right. Any ideas as to how I could fix this? It's a
small thing, but since the
On 3 Nov 2006, at 16:32:27, Felix Miata wrote:
3-IE truncates the 62.5% to 62%:
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/bugs/browsers/css/IE-Win/
ie_percent_test.html
Just a quick note: this remains the case in IE 7.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Felix Miata wrote:
Consider asking the client if he has troubled himself to appropriately
adjust his own browser(s) so that unstyled text is the size he prefers.
Once he understands that this is the right thing to assume everyone has
done, even though some subset of the universe actually goes to
Return Receipt
Your [WSG] Legal or Ilegal
document:
Steve Green wrote:
I'm running Safari 2.0 and it does jump. However, it does not jump
immediately. When you hover over a link the page reloads and this is when it
jumps (not always to the same place). The same happens if you press the Tab
key after the page loads. It does this even if JavaScript
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:23:49 +0800, Nick Cowie wrote:
I would expect my layout to expand beyond the browser window width when
zoomed (either page zoom in IE or Opera or text zoom in any browser), my
layout width is em based and uses a little javascript when the page is
loading to change the
Wow, it's even worse now (or maybe it would have done this before but I
never tried it).
If I hover the mouse over a link and leave it there, the page continuously
reloads and it jumps up and down between the Cocktail Bartender and Web
Designer subheadings. It gets slower and slower till the
Steve Green wrote:
Wow, it's even worse now (or maybe it would have done this before but I
never tried it).
If I hover the mouse over a link and leave it there, the page continuously
reloads and it jumps up and down between the Cocktail Bartender and Web
Designer subheadings. It gets slower and
On 3 Nov 2006, at 19:13:00, Rob O'Rourke wrote:
Steve Green wrote:
Wow, it's even worse now (or maybe it would have done this before
but I
never tried it).
If I hover the mouse over a link and leave it there, the page
continuously
reloads and it jumps up and down between the Cocktail
It seems better but when I hover over a link it still reloads, jumps down to
the Cocktail Bartender subheading then up to the Web Designer subheading. At
least it doesn't bounce up and down continuously and crash the browser.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
It's now jumping on load to the bit where you have:
object style=display:none; data=#robert-orourke class=include
type=text/html/object
just before
h3 class=summary titleWeb Designer and Developer/h3
so it looks like something to do with the object referencing part of
the page via a URL
Greetings and sorry for the off topic post.
On this page: http://essay.sitesbyjoe.com/create_account.asp I'm trying
to set focus on the first field in the form. It should be simple, but I
can't get the darn thing to work!
My javascript:
function create_account_focus() {
var
Steve Green wrote:
It seems better but when I hover over a link it still reloads, jumps down to
the Cocktail Bartender subheading then up to the Web Designer subheading. At
least it doesn't bounce up and down continuously and crash the browser.
Steve
Is that even with the objects removed?
Joseph R. B. Taylor:
my_field.focus;
my_field.focus();
/AndersN
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Green wrote:
No, it's ok now. My last post was before you removed the objects.
Steve
WooHoo! I was all ready to drown my sorrows in lager but this deserves a
martini =]
Nice one
Rob O
***
List Guidelines:
Dwain Alford wrote:
Where I am (Ithaca NY), there's very little CSS-based work; they even
teach outdated practices:
http://www.christianmontoya.com/2006/11/02/advanced-html/
where i am (winfield, alabama) they still use frames and tables and do
it wysiwyg. they know nothing of
As a new member to this list, I can't believe throwing span
class=sentence / around EVERY SENTENCE IN YOUR CONTENT is being
seen as even a remotely valid solution. Is the use of Javascript
frowned upon on this list? Why not use that?
--
Nathan de Vries
On 11/4/06, Nathan de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a new member to this list, I can't believe throwing span
class=sentence / around EVERY SENTENCE IN YOUR CONTENT is being
seen as even a remotely valid solution. Is the use of Javascript
frowned upon on this list? Why not use that?
How is
On 11/3/06, Nathan de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/11/2006, at 1:22 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:
Because the solution (yes, solution for a silly problem) has to work
when the document is PRINTED. That means that it has to be either a
plain HTML or print CSS technique.
When I open up
On 04/11/2006, at 2:13 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:
Oh, in that case it's fine, but it's not really a big difference.
Not a big difference? Unnecessary spans wrapped around every sentence
in your content seems a _little_ bit different to plain content with
post-processing done by
58 matches
Mail list logo
