Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato, lsp and website

At this point I see absolutely no purpose in hiding bug reports away in a code repository we may not even use. There's not even any code in LSP2, it should be deleted until a dedicated home is warranted. I don't understand your logic. I see TODO list out there: - New theme (try for simpler Goo

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato, lsp and website

Nothing wrong, I think we need to at least in terms of the cloud concept have that on the lsp tracker as well as its not only integrating it wiht lmms itself but integration into lsp. On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > 1) collaborato: integration of AWS into the sharing

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

I have another idea on a cloud solution but we are not limited on IO requests or bandwidth per se here. I am not being biased here. I am thinking the following. a vps from https://www.linode.com/pricing in particular the entry level vps. Then on that vps we would setup own cloud http://owncloud.

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato, lsp and website

> > 1) collaborato: integration of AWS into the sharing platform > What's wrong with this one? https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/661 -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run

[LMMS-devel] collaborato, lsp and website

Hey guys I am going to file some of these ideas in the LSP issue tracker. 1) collaborato: integration of AWS into the sharing platform 2) integration of LSP into CMS Is there anything else that I am potentially missing? -- Jonathan Aquilina -

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

I spoke with my brother (works for EMC deploying Atmos clouds) and he said Amazon (AWS) is the way to go for cloud storage. He mentioned a few others but said that the REST APIs that Amazon uses will be compatible with other services in the event we ever decide to switch providers. So, question,

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 13:44 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > WAIIT! > > All tap plugins don't load when opening songs. Try unfa - Spoken. Issue has been fixed - thanks for reporting! Any other critical issues/regressions? Please tell me ASAP so I can address them before 1.0.2. Otherwise I'm going to release 1.

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

I wonder if we could provide a list of urls integrated into the site of various artists and have when the page loads it randomly load a new song from their sound cloud or you tube etc. On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:55 PM, I'm Umcaruje wrote: > That could work, but again, you would need a way of sepe

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

That could work, but again, you would need a way of seperating good artists from bad artists. But I guess it wouldnt be so hard. Also, why not multiple artists of the day? That would be even better. Best regards, Uroš On 1 May 2014 23:34, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Very valid points What if

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

@tres this could go next to where we have the album player actually :) On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very valid points What if instead we scheduled in an artist of the day > section on the home page with a request box? That way we c

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

Very valid points What if instead we scheduled in an artist of the day section on the home page with a request box? That way we could rotate any artist on the front page for a day which gets replaced in a cycle. That would require less maintenance as we could approve or reject the requests fa

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

On 05/02/2014 12:23 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > yes commit 5b29142c284c68d3a7e56c007ec0517f8f941391 which actually is > supposed to fix a crash (on Linux I guess) breaks plugin instantiation > on Win32/Win64. I hope we can come up with a solution soon so we can > release 1.0.2 as a hotfix.

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

Well, that is basicly not a page, its just a soundcloud group. Its also not moderated, so anyone can put their songs there. Also, if I get in touch with him, I dont see the point, since you cant share playlists to groups. As for album judges approving content, the problem is that we are also skille

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Hi, yes commit 5b29142c284c68d3a7e56c007ec0517f8f941391 which actually is supposed to fix a crash (on Linux I guess) breaks plugin instantiation on Win32/Win64. I hope we can come up with a solution soon so we can release 1.0.2 as a hotfix. @Vesa: any idea? Toby

Re: [LMMS-devel] I'm trying neurofunk-y drum synthesis in LMMS

On 05/01/2014 10:23 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > @Unfa, > > I find the same problems of where to share. Soundcloud works well for > most people. You are welcome to post on behalf of yourself on the FB > page too. > > Since lmms-users is a dead list and the forums aren't extremely > active, its

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

Thanks for the info. Can you take charge in contacting the creator of that page and trying to combine forces? Agreed, I think the album judges would be a good start for content approval, of they are willing to help manage this. I'd hope this would be frequently changing and allow just about anyt

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

The moderator and the creator is https://soundcloud.com/munyajumo I never saw him in the community. Maybe an official LMMS soundcloud with a playlist would be better? And what will the criteria be to get on the home page? There has to be some quality control. Best regards, Uroš On 1 May 2014 21:

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

Yes, we should certainly create a community playlist that gets featured (and updated). Who maintains the soundcloud page(is it official?) This same person could be responsible for maintaining a playlist which we embed and also repost occasiona

Re: [LMMS-devel] I'm trying neurofunk-y drum synthesis in LMMS

Hmm... Can you try switching to yourself (rather than acting as LMMS?) The permissions allow user posing but your moderator account doesn't have permission to post as LMMS. Try switching to Tobiasz using the triangle in the upper right. Well, I've bumped you up from Moderator to Editor so that y

Re: [LMMS-devel] I'm trying neurofunk-y drum synthesis in LMMS

That's true, Tres. I hope the new LSP could serve us this way, or do we need another mailing list? :D Just joking. I seem to be unable to post anything on the LMMS Facebook page. I don't know why, I tried many times, but I just don't have the option. All I can do is write on my wall and mention L

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

*note, this assumes the storage increases at the same rate as the bandwidth which may never be the case, so prob safe to make the 10 mil closer to $35 and the 100mil closer to $350. -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated

Re: [LMMS-devel] I'm trying neurofunk-y drum synthesis in LMMS

@Unfa, I find the same problems of where to share. Soundcloud works well for most people. You are welcome to post on behalf of yourself on the FB page too. Since lmms-users is a dead list and the forums aren't extremely active, its hard to know where to get good feedback. -Tres - tres.finocchi

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

Great thanks Lukas. So here are some figures. Note, these are just ballpark figures. *1,000,000 request/month: **500MB storage, 26GB bandwidth, * - Bandwidth: $3/month - IO: $0.40/month - Storage: $1.00/month - *Total: About $5/month (1 Million requests/month)* *10,000,000 downl

Re: [LMMS-devel] I'm trying neurofunk-y drum synthesis in LMMS

That's right I just couldn't think of better place to reach this community. There is an active group on G+? I'll try that. 2014-05-01 18:20 GMT+00:00 I'm Umcaruje : > The developer list is not a place where you share songs. There are places > for sharing songs like the forums or the G+ community

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

Oh, note that this is only counting the files that did not get deleted. 2014-05-01 20:33 GMT+02:00 Lukas W. : > Nevermind, I managed to access the db. It took me quite some time to get > the data, as the phpmyadmin interface on SF really is *horribly* slow. > Using SQL queries, I get a total num

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

Nevermind, I managed to access the db. It took me quite some time to get the data, as the phpmyadmin interface on SF really is *horribly* slow. Using SQL queries, I get a total number of 4021 files, summing up to 348Mib in size. I don't know where those 1339 extra files on FTP come from, I guess fi

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > You mean the size of the shared files in the current LSP? As far as I can > see, those are 519MiB (or 544MB) counting 5360 files at the moment. > Fantastic, thank you. > I can't say anything about the download counts, as I still have no admin

Re: [LMMS-devel] I'm trying neurofunk-y drum synthesis in LMMS

The developer list is not a place where you share songs. There are places for sharing songs like the forums or the G+ community. This has really nothing to do with the development of lmms and is completly irrelevant. Please, dont share songs here. Best regards, Uroš On 1 May 2014 19:17, Tobiasz

Re: [LMMS-devel] Website updates

@Toby I hope you'll see this one day… May I have admin access on SF to fix those issues mentioned 7 posts above (and probably others in the future)? 2014-04-25 15:08 GMT+02:00 Lukas W. : > @Toby: Have a look at my post before last please. > > As I said, I'd need to be admin for this… > > 2014-04

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

You mean the size of the shared files in the current LSP? As far as I can see, those are 519MiB (or 544MB) counting 5360 files at the moment. I can't say anything about the download counts, as I still have no admin rights and therefore can't access the SQL database. 2014-05-01 15:38 GMT+02:00 Tr

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

On 05/01/2014 03:01 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > Looking good! > > Btw, I want to apply for "musicians who use LMMS". > Can I apply too? I don't know if you'd count me as a musician... -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Autom

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vision for new LSP?

> > As for server-side track rendering for previews: we would need a way to > bundle all samples with the project in a standardized way. > Possibly. If we go this direction, we shouldn't do projects right away, and if we do projects, we should do ones that only use the vanilla plugins from the sta

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vision for new LSP?

As for server-side track rendering for previews: we would need a way to bundle all samples with the project in a standarised way. On 1 May 2014 15:15, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > Unfa, > > I agree with all points. This is a good place to keep this conversation > going. The only issue with what

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

@Lukas, Do you have the ability to measure the approx LSP overall size (I mean the actual shared files)? I'd like to document how much space we're using and get at least a ballpark for storage requirements if it were to expand for 5 years. Also (this one is a stretch) but there is a "popularity"

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

> > Btw, I want to apply for "musicians who use LMMS". I think my last album > "Static" is a nice showcase and is pretty robust. Let me know if that is > possible. > I understand your concern here. I chose that album because it was a sanctioned LMMS competition. Perhaps a "more" button with a lin

Re: [LMMS-devel] Vision for new LSP?

Unfa, I agree with all points. This is a good place to keep this conversation going. The only issue with what you are describing it is takes the already delayed LSP project and adds more items to it. In terms of uploading rendered versions, I would really like to see down the road a server-side

[LMMS-devel] Vision for new LSP?

I started this message as a reply in another thread, but it has grown too big, so I decided to start another thread. If all this have already been discussed somewhere else - please point me there. * * * I am wondering if we have a mutual vision of how the new LSP is going to work? For example I

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

Stian is speaking on behalf of the Windows build. Seems to also affect 64-bit win. -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

On 27 Apr 2014 21:08, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > > May I add that there is still lots of work to do. > > @tres What do you think if we open up the graphical side of things to those that want to contribute? > > Also the site is a responsive site meaning it is viewable on mobile devices and the la

Re: [LMMS-devel] New Website

Looking good! Btw, I want to apply for "musicians who use LMMS". I think my last album "Static" is a nice showcase and is pretty robust. Let me know if that is possible. On 27 Apr 2014 21:06, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > Since Jonathan granted me access, I put together a mock-up home page as > we

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

WAIIT! All tap plugins don't load when opening songs. Try unfa - Spoken. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-0-1-tp8513p8528.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] collaborato

I was actually just thinking about that. Is there someone that can work on making the code RT-safe? Do we have any goals as to when we want RTS code by? On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Vesa wrote: > On 04/29/2014 03:52 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > I agree uploads at this point should not b

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.0.1

2014-05-01 2:05 GMT+02:00 Israel : > Here is the pending merge into utopic > https://code.launchpad.net/~israeldahl/ubuntu/utopic/lmms/lmms_1.0.1/+merge/217857 Thank you very much! Hopefully 1.0.1 will get in soon and also be backported to trusty. I also fixed the problem with finding WINE on amd6