Re: Chainsaw as seperate CVS module?

On Feb 22, 2005, at 11:18 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Chainsaw is getting big. What does everyone think about moving Chainsaw out into it's own CVS module and making it a 'client' of the log4j library? If you were going to consider that, you should also consider moving Chainsaw to Subversion and

Re: Reverting Appender interface

On Feb 22, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Curt Arnold wrote: On Feb 22, 2005, at 2:30 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Bad timing, I just reverted it. I wanted to make sure it was live for the next Gump iteration and I assumed that there was not going to be a response from you given the late time. Fortunately, it wa

Re: Chainsaw as seperate CVS module?

Chainsaw is getting big. What does everyone think about moving Chainsaw out into it's own CVS module and making it a 'client' of the log4j library? If you were going to consider that, you should also consider moving Chainsaw to Subversion and spinning Chainsaw off as a distinct subproject of

Re: Chainsaw as seperate CVS module?

On Feb 22, 2005, at 8:44 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Hey All, Chainsaw is getting big. What does everyone think about moving Chainsaw out into it's own CVS module and making it a 'client' of the log4j library? If you were going to consider that, you should also consider moving Chainsaw to Subversion

Chainsaw as seperate CVS module?

Hey All, Chainsaw is getting big. What does everyone think about moving Chainsaw out into it's own CVS module and making it a 'client' of the log4j library? In Eclipse one can make a Project have a dependency on another project, so that makes it nice from a developer point of view, and from a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29726] - DailyRollingFileAppender : log4j:ERROR Failed to rename

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Reverting Appender interface

At 09:31 PM 2/22/2005, you wrote: I thought our convention was that we were free to break compatibility within the spi package, but that we tried to maintain compatibility for public classes/interfaces outside of that package. The spi package is not really special. Classes such as Logger(Category

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33166] - chainsaw.bat invocation appears to miss some UGLI classes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Reverting Appender interface

On Feb 22, 2005, at 2:30 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Hello Curt, I am in the process of recovering from a hardware faulire. Sorry for not responding earlier. We are allowed to break existing implementations of Appenders. Existing implementations of Appender need to keep up if they want to be compatib

Re: Reverting Appender interface

On Feb 22, 2005, at 2:30 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote: Hello Curt, I am in the process of recovering from a hardware faulire. Sorry for not responding earlier. We are allowed to break existing implementations of Appenders. Existing implementations of Appender need to keep up if they want to be compatib

RE: Reverting Appender interface

I thought our convention was that we were free to break compatibility within the spi package, but that we tried to maintain compatibility for public classes/interfaces outside of that package. -Original Message- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 2/22/2005 12:30

Re: Reverting Appender interface

Hello Curt, I am in the process of recovering from a hardware faulire. Sorry for not responding earlier. We are allowed to break existing implementations of Appenders. Existing implementations of Appender need to keep up if they want to be compatible. Please do not revert this change without fu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j AbstractAppenderTest.java

carnold 2005/02/22 12:25:32 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j Appender.java tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j AbstractAppenderTest.java Log: Reverting Appender interface change Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +0 -22 logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33166] - chainsaw.bat invocation appears to miss some UGLI classes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

I don't see my change to tests/build.xml in the list of workspace modifications at http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/logging-log4j/gump_file/ changes_to_logging-log4j.txt.html. So I'm assuming that the change didn't propagate to the anonymous CVS in time for that Gump run and the buil

Re: HiveMind GUMP build failures

Curt, Curt Arnold apache.org> writes: > I agree with your analysis of the problem. If you need to restore Gump > immediately, backing up to log4j 1.2 would be the most expedient > approach. I don't think the recent changes got the amount of > discussion that was warranted for a breaking cha

RE: Reverting Appender interface

+1 -Original Message- From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 2/22/2005 8:50 AM To: Log4J Developers List Cc: Subject:Reverting Appender interface The recent breaking change to the Appender interface had no or little discussion before being committed.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29726] - DailyRollingFileAppender : log4j:ERROR Failed to rename

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Reverting Appender interface

The recent breaking change to the Appender interface had no or little discussion before being committed. I do not think it is desirable to break existing implementations of Appender without such a discussion. I'd like to propose attempting to restore the Appender interface to its previous stat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

I committed a change to tests/build.xml that fixed the issue on my machine. The commit time was several hours prior to the Gump run and my log4cxx commits at approximately the same time fixed the log4cxx build issues. I thought there used to be a way to see the CVS changes in the Gump result

Re: Help me for FallbackErrorHandler

On Feb 22, 2005, at 3:20 AM, Jayant Dusane wrote: Hi all I am using the log4cxx in my application,But facing the problem to write the xmlconfigurator for the Errorhandler ,i wrote the xml file but not working well.this is my property file.If u have send me a solution for this This question is no

Re: HiveMind GUMP build failures

On Feb 22, 2005, at 6:25 AM, Knut Wannheden wrote: Hi, For the last few GUMP builds of Jakarta HiveMind we got build failure notifications. We are building against the latest build of log4j and get the following error message: [junit] log4j:INFO Returning existing logger [org.apache.hivemind

HiveMind GUMP build failures

Hi, For the last few GUMP builds of Jakarta HiveMind we got build failure notifications. We are building against the latest build of log4j and get the following error message: [junit] log4j:INFO Returning existing logger [org.apache.hivemind] in repository [default]. [junit] 6 [ma

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

xml file for FallbackErrorHandler

Sorry i send the file ,but it discarded format so i send itagain log4j:configuration SYSTEM "log4j.dtd"> xmlns:log4j='http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/'> name="FALLBACK" class="org.apache.log4j.net.SocketAppender"> name="Port" value="6045"/> value="5000"/>

Help me for FallbackErrorHandler

Hi all I am using the log4cxx in my application,But facing the problemto write the xmlconfigurator for the Errorhandler ,i wrote the xml filebut not working well.this is my property file.If u have send me asolution for this xmlconfigurator : encoding="UTF-8" ?> "log4j.dtd"> xmlns:log4j='http://