Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > > Unfortunately, I don't recall the comment exactly. Same here. But I have a vague concept of what you mean. The last read mark, by now, has become something I don't even notice... for the sake of my own sanity. :_) dha -- Dav

Re: sub BEGIN {}

David H. Adler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:43AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > > > > dha, how's your "last read" mark? > > Eh? An obscure reference to a remark you made in Penderel's Oak after yapc::Europe 19100. Something to the effect that you have a mark which indicates, in your MU

Re: sub BEGIN {}

David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:10:02PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > > Grr. I don't *want* to turn into an elitist wanker > > > > I seem to solve this by being one all along... > > 'Elitis

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:08:09 +0100 (BST), Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > Paul, whose uni got nicked in fscking cambridge. "Ooh, it's got a wheel! > > Not the usual two, but fuck it, let's steal it anyway!" > > Ah, but people so often have quick release

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:19:54PM +0100, Dean wrote: > Well i mean Martin what kind of freak would build a wearable for personal > use... Even going so far as to hack the hardware in a webcam and a touch > pad? ;) Well I would actually. It's really rather pleasant to have the world visible thr

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:10:02PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > Grr. I don't *want* to turn into an elitist wanker > > I seem to solve this by being one all along... 'Elitist' implies to me that one is applying unreasonable, arbitr

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:19:54PM +0100, Dean wrote: > Well i mean Martin what kind of freak would build a wearable for personal > use... Even going so far as to hack the hardware in a webcam and a touch > pad? ;) This guy -- http://eyetap.org/mann/ I set up one of his exhibits http://www.wearc

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > Grr. I don't *want* to turn into an elitist wanker I seem to solve this by being one all along... -- VMS must die!

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:43AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > > dha, how's your "last read" mark? Eh? -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ We honestly don't want to see another technicolored cow. - the #macintosh faq

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:54:25PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > A while back. It was the time with the wearable computers demo. > Neill's, I take it, rather than one of my impromptu borgings? I've no > idea who most of those people were. Some kind of gargoyle groupie effect > ... I heard some d

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:54:25PM +0100, wrote: > > All this said, there were an obscene number of people at Lonix last > night, who once again I have no idea about other than that they were > being given advice by the people I steer clear of for asking long, slow > and stupid questions. > > Gr

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Dean wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > > Last time I went to Lonix, it was full of w4r3z d00dz. :( The kind of > > > people who only used linux because

Re: sub BEGIN {}

> Yes. But some were too old to be students. Oh well.. how old is that exactly =)

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Dean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > > > Last time I went to Lonix, it was full of w4r3z d00dz. :( The kind of > > > > people who only used linux becau

RE: sub BEGIN {}

From: Janet Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 05 April 2001 10:15 > > Dean: > > Ah the one at the uni near Angel tube. Those weren't w4r3z d00dz > > they were far far worse... Students ;) > > Dean, it happens to the best of us. =) Happened to some of us for a bloody long time. Dave... [seven ye

Re: sub BEGIN {}

> Dean: > Ah the one at the uni near Angel tube. Those weren't w4r3z d00dz they were > far far worse... Students ;) Dean, it happens to the best of us. =) I am worse even than that, I am a wannabe student...! signed patient grasshopper

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > > Last time I went to Lonix, it was full of w4r3z d00dz. :( The kind of > > > people who only used linux because they didn't have to pay for it. > A

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:57:40AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:19:32PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > Paul, whose uni got nicked in fscking cambridge. > > "*think* *think* Don't they have enough universities of their own?" I've been in the US too long, that joke wo

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Dean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > Last time I went to Lonix, it was full of w4r3z d00dz. :( The kind of > > people who only used linux because they didn't have to pay for it. > How long ago was this? I'm worried now in case

Re: sub BEGIN {}

Simon Wistow sent the following bits through the ether: > I'm not threading. I order my mail by date. Ptt. No wonder you're getting confused! :-P Leon -- Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/ yapc::Europehttp://yapc.org/Europe/ ... I'm

Re: sub BEGIN {}

Leon Brocard wrote: > Simon, I think your mail reader has broken threading: > http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html > > Any chance you could use a decent one? I suggest mutt. I'm not threading. I order my mail by date. Ptt.

Re: sub BEGIN {}

Simon Wistow sent the following bits through the ether: > Dean I think your clock is out by an hour which really screws up my > threading/archiving/tiny little mind - any chance you could fix it. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (WinNT; U) Simon, I think your mail reader has broken threading: http

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:04:56 +0100, Dean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Dean I think your clock is out by an hour which really screws up my threading/archiving/tiny little mind - any chance you could fix it.

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Dean wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:14:48AM +0100, Dean wrote: > > Lonix is normally pub, pub, food, pub maybe club. It covers as much Linux > > as the London PM social nights do Perl ;) > > Last

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:52:32PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > Last time I went to Lonix, it was full of w4r3z d00dz. :( The kind of > people who only used linux because they didn't have to pay for it. How long ago was this? I'm worried now in case i was there and looked like a w4r3z d00

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Dean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:14:48AM +0100, Dean wrote: > Lonix is normally pub, pub, food, pub maybe club. It covers as much Linux > as the London PM social nights do Perl ;) Last time I went to Lonix, it was full of w4r3z d00dz. :( The kind of people who only use

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:14:48AM +0100, Dean wrote: > > > I'm not sure I'll be able to make it though - I've got things to prepare > > > for this talk at GLLUG on Saturday. While i'm doing this i might as well plug the Lonix tonight (www.lonix.org.uk) Lonix is normally pub, pub, food, pub mayb

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:19:32PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > Paul, whose uni got nicked in fscking cambridge. "*think* *think* Don't they have enough universities of their own?" -- Britain has football hooligans, Germany has neo-Nazis, and France has farmers. -The Times

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:02:14PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote: > > > > I'm not sure I'll be able to make it though - I've got things to prepare > > for this talk at GLLUG on Saturday. > > > Details? Location? URL? -Paste >The next GLLUG meeting will be on Saturday

Re: sub BEGIN {}

Neil Ford sent the following bits through the ether: > Details? Location? URL? http://gllug.linux.co.uk/ Leon -- Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/ yapc::Europehttp://yapc.org/Europe/ ... "Suicide Hotline... please hold"

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:06:14AM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:28:24PM +0100, Dean S Wilson wrote: > > > > Stick with drunks, it'll save time. And the meetings on Thursday so > > you announced yourself just in time! ;) > > I'm not sure I'll be able to make it though -

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:41:46AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:12:57PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > > Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time > > > and no-one told me? > > > > And drunks!

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:14:28AM +0100, Dean wrote: > > > I'm not sure I'll be able to make it though - I've got things to prepare > > for this talk at GLLUG on Saturday. > > Which is on a subject a lot of people on the list are interested in, > wireless networking and the Consume.net project

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:06:14AM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > I'm not sure I'll be able to make it though - I've got things to prepare > for this talk at GLLUG on Saturday. Which is on a subject a lot of people on the list are interested in, wireless networking and the Consume.net project so you

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:28:24PM +0100, Dean S Wilson wrote: > > Stick with drunks, it'll save time. And the meetings on Thursday so > you announced yourself just in time! ;) I'm not sure I'll be able to make it though - I've got things to prepare for this talk at GLLUG on Saturday. Martin

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:08:09AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > > I raise you (at least) two accomplished unicyclists... > > Doesn't that make a bicyclist? No, trust me. > > Paul, whose uni got nicked in fscking cambridge. "Ooh, it's got a wheel! > > Not the usual two, but fuck it, let'

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:22:38AM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > > > Yeah, yeah drunks, skateboarders, musicians . > > ...geeks, goths, jugglers, Natscis. And that's just me. ex-natscis too. :) > I raise you (at least) two accomplished unicyclist

Re: sub BEGIN {}

Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:31:12PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > Indeed, that was just my observation on a few posts' worth. > > Who *knows* what I might conclude about a whole day's traffic.. > > ..that you need to put your London.pm folder on its own spanning > compress

Re: sub BEGIN {}

At 21:12 03/04/2001, you wrote: >Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time >and no-one told me? Yeah. Sorry. We should probably make that clearer :) Dave... -- SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data Munging with Perl

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:22:38AM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > > Yeah, yeah drunks, skateboarders, musicians . > > ...geeks, goths, jugglers, Natscis. And that's just me. I raise you (at least) two accomplished unicyclists... Paul, whose uni got nicked in fscking cambridge. "Ooh, it's g

Re: sub BEGIN {}

* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:12:57PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time > > and no-one told me? > > And drunks! Don't forget drunks! > drunk crazy buffy fans -- Greg McCarroll

Re: sub BEGIN {}

Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, David H. Adler wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:12:57PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > > Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time > > > and no-one told me? > > And drunks! Don't forget drunks! > > > > Yeah, yeah drunk

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:31:12PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > Indeed, that was just my observation on a few posts' worth. Who *knows* > what I might conclude about a whole day's traffic.. ..that you need to put your London.pm folder on its own spanning compressed partition. Paul

Re: sub BEGIN {}

-Original Message- From: Martin Ling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> YOu havent been around here very long have you :) >Indeed, that was just my observation on a few posts' worth. Who *knows* >what I might conclude about a whole day's traffic.. Stick with drunks, it'll save time. And the meeti

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:23:15PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > > > > Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time > > and no-one told me? > > YOu havent been around here very long have you :) Indeed, that was just my observation on a few posts' worth. Who *knows* what

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, David H. Adler wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:12:57PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > > Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time > > and no-one told me? > > And drunks! Don't forget drunks! > Yeah, yeah drunks, skateboarders, musicians . /J

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Martin Ling wrote: > Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time > and no-one told me? > YOu havent been around here very long have you :) /J\

Re: sub BEGIN {}

On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:12:57PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time > and no-one told me? And drunks! Don't forget drunks! dha -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ No, I don't have a ministry of ca

sub BEGIN {}

Oh, so this list was a bunch of nutters and Buffy fans the whole time and no-one told me? Martin