get a stable base and my patched work then I'll submit them.
SAM
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Brocard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 2:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dream weaver
>
>
> Matthews Sim
> > DREAMWEAVER 3.0- Training Dates Now Available!
> > ==
> > With Dreamweaver being adopted by up to 90% of development companies
> > worldwide, Focus Group are now providing cost effective, scheduled and
> > company specific Dreamweaver training, offer
* at 25/01 15:56 - Robert Shiels said:
> Subject: RE: Dream weaver
>
> Just got sent this:
>
> DREAMWEAVER 3.0- Training Dates Now Available!
> ==
> With Dreamweaver being adopted by up to 90% of development companies
> wo
Subject: RE: Dream weaver
Just got sent this:
DREAMWEAVER 3.0- Training Dates Now Available!
==
With Dreamweaver being adopted by up to 90% of development companies
worldwide, Focus Group are now providing cost effective, scheduled and
company
Title: RE: Dream weaver
>>
>>> >>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
>>> >>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
>>> >>
>>> >>Anyone?
>>> >>
>>> >>Michael
>>>
>&
Matthews Simon sent the following bits through the ether:
> Our solution to this has been to write some perl
> code to convert Word documents (marketers tool of choice) into
> Template::Toolkit templates that we use internally.
IIRC, you had patched wvware to output XML. Has this patch made it
i
At Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:43:47 -, Mark Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
> >>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
> >>
> >>Anyone?
> >>
> >>Michael
>
> I'd love to but the last time I spoke about Dreamweaver with Dave
> Cross ar
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:43:47PM -, Mark Kitching wrote:
> >>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
> >>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
> >>Anyone?
> >>Michael
> I'd love to but the last time I spoke about Dreamweaver with Dave Cross
> around
> it turned into a LOOON
Title: RE: Dream weaver
>>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
>>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
>>
>>Anyone?
>>
>>Michael
I'd love to but the last time I spoke about Dreamweaver with Dave Cross around
it turned into a LOOONG lunchtime.
Mark.
At Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:37:24 +, Michael Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
> Dreamweaver side of this argument...
>
> Anyone?
Wouldn't it go along the lines of:
"ooh! pretty!"
Dave...
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:46PM -, Matthews Simon wrote:
> As someone who's been using templates and perl to do web sites since January
> 96 I can see both sides of the argument. We (perl people) are all much
> happier with the idea of building pages from bits it appeals to our
> laziness.
As someone who's been using templates and perl to do web sites since January
96 I can see both sides of the argument. We (perl people) are all much
happier with the idea of building pages from bits it appeals to our
laziness. There are however end users to consider. Much as I have tried I
canno
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:09:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Pretty much !
>
> Having started the web site project here without much knowledge of developing
> websites (having mostly been doing corporate network support before that) I
> allowed the designer to choose the tools. I chose ap
Roger Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed 24 Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask)
>
>But I must ! You are only the second person I have heard of who has used
>it...
>
[snip]
>Am I right in thinking that what CS said made as much sense as "We don't
On Wed 24 Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask)
But I must ! You are only the second person I have heard of who has used
it...
In November I was asked by a Judge to convert a court guide written in Word
into HTML. Only real problem was the index which was good,
15 matches
Mail list logo
