Re: [lsc-users] Newbie question

2016-09-19 Thread Bruno MORAZZONI
Hi Clément, There is a firewall in between, yes. But ldap ports (389 and 636) are opened so it shouldn't be an issue here. I will try to test the connection bypassing the FW just to be sure though. I am not using ldapsearch here but with Apache Directory Studio, it works perfectly fine, at lea

Re: [lsc-users] Newbie question

2016-09-19 Thread Bruno MORAZZONI
Hi Clément, This is what I get when I set the timeout to 10sec. So you are right, LSC expects something but doesn't get an answer... sept. 19 11:08:21 - ERROR - Error while looking for (cn=TEST TEST) in cn=PBX0: javax.naming.CommunicationException: Request: 2 cancelled; remaining name ''

Re: [lsc-users] Newbie question

2016-09-19 Thread Bruno MORAZZONI
Clément, Sorry to spam you with my posts but, I tried to search through the directory using ldapsearch: ldapsearch -h xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -p 389 -b -x -D "test" -w "test"  -b "cn=PBX0" "cn=*" And I get the correct results: [...] # TEST, PBX0 dn: cn=TEST,cn=PBX0 cn: TEST e164: 3445 pbx::

[lsc-users] Object metamorphism, change the structural objectClass of an LDAP object

2016-09-19 Thread Nikos Voutsinas
Dear all, The symptom: An ldap user object in the source DIT is built around the Structural ObjectClass :inetOrgPerson. When the user leaves the organisation then the deprovisioning process requires her/his ldap object to change to a new form which is now built around a new Structural Objec

Re: [lsc-users] Object metamorphism, change the structural objectClass of an LDAP object

2016-09-19 Thread Clément OUDOT
2016-09-19 7:20 GMT-04:00 Nikos Voutsinas : > Dear all, Hello Nikos, > > The symptom: > > An ldap user object in the source DIT is built around the Structural > ObjectClass :inetOrgPerson. > > When the user leaves the organisation then the deprovisioning process > requires her/his ldap object to

Re: [lsc-users] Newbie question

2016-09-19 Thread Clément OUDOT
2016-09-19 8:27 GMT-04:00 Bruno MORAZZONI : > Hello Clément, > > Last post for today, I promise! > From the printscreen below, on the left, the trace from Apache Directory > Studio. > On the right, the trace from LSC. > > The only difference is the controlType line : would it explain why the > LDA

[lsc-users] ./baseDn Tip?

2016-09-19 Thread Joel Levin
Hi There: We have a directory structure -- which correlates to a Library index naming convention -- where the parent, and immediate child, may have the same name. Example: Location>Stack>Topic>example.com 'Location' and 'example.com' are static. Samples; Foobar>Physics>Physics>example>com Foo

Re: [lsc-users] ./baseDn Tip?

2016-09-19 Thread Joel Levin
"When running LSC, the OUs for the 'Stack' tier are created as long as the immediate child OU - i.e. 'Topic' -- does not share the same name." My apologies -- I meant to say the 'Topic' OU tier is created as long as it does not share same name as the parent OU (i.e. the 'Stack' tier). Any ideas o

Re: [lsc-users] Newbie question

2016-09-19 Thread Bruno MORAZZONI
Many thanks for your help Clément, it works like a charm now! Le 19 septembre 2016 à 15:32, Clément OUDOT a écrit : 2016-09-19 8:27 GMT-04:00 Bruno MORAZZONI : Hello Clément, Last post for today, I promise! From the printscreen below, on the left, the trace from Apache Directory S

Re: [lsc-users] ./baseDn Tip?

2016-09-19 Thread Clément OUDOT
2016-09-19 12:36 GMT-04:00 Joel Levin : > "When running LSC, the OUs for the 'Stack' tier are created as long as the > immediate child OU - i.e. 'Topic' -- does not share the same name." > > My apologies -- I meant to say the 'Topic' OU tier is created as long as it > does not share same name as th