Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

jie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Zhibo, On 11/12/2020 11:06, Huzhibo wrote: Hi peter: As you said, IGP does not distinguish between IP and

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Zhibo, On 11/12/2020 11:06, Huzhibo wrote: > Hi peter: > > As you said, IGP does not distinguish between IP and

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Zhibo, On 11/12/2020 10:39, Huzhibo wrote: Hi Peter: Following this approach, IP and SR Flex-Algo can also be distinguished by using different FA

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

[mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 5:59 PM To: Huzhibo ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Zhibo, On 11/12/2020 10:39, Huzhibo w

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hi Robert, Please see inline: From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 5:16 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) Cc: Peter Psenak ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks&quo

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Hi Jimmy, On 10/12/2020 13:02, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: In Flex-Algo draft, it says: "Application-specific

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 5:13 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Hi Jimmy, On 11/12/2020 09:17, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hi Jie, > But if node A sends SRv6 packets with node C's SRv6 SID in FA 128 as the > destination address, when the packet arrives at E, it will be dropped, > because node E does not have the forwarding entry for C's SRv6 SID in FA > 128. * How can E be on the SRv6 SID list if it did not

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

ithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Hi Jimmy, On 10/12/2020 13:02, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: In Flex-Algo draft, it says: "Application-specific Flex-Algorithm participation advertisements MAY be topology specific or MAY be topology indepen

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hi Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 9:22 PM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > ; lsr > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > (Flex-Algorithm)

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hello - I have read through the draft and support the WG adoption. Best .. Ian From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 4:13 PM To: lsr Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm)

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hi Jimmy, On 10/12/2020 13:02, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: In Flex-Algo draft, it says: "Application-specific Flex-Algorithm participation advertisements MAY be topology specific or MAY be topology independent, depending on the application itself." The preassumption of current IP Flex-Algo

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

ay, December 9, 2020 9:06 PM > >> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > >> ; lsr > >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > >> (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 > >> > >&

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

cee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Jimmy, On 09/12/2020 11:10, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: Hi authors, Here is one comment following the previous discussion on the mail list and the I

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

i.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) <mailto:acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>; lsr <mailto:lsr@ietf.org> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Hi Jimmy, On 09

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

December 9, 2020 6:45 PM > >> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) > >> ; lsr > >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > >> (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 > >> > >>

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

ecember 09, 2020 8:04 PM To: Peter Psenak ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Hello Peter, follow-up questions with [Zhenqiang]. FA calculati

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

ongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) >> ; lsr >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms >> (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 >> >> Jimmy, >> >> On 09/12/2020 11:10, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

;Acee Lindem (acee);lsr; 日 期 ：2020年12月09日 20:44 主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Hi Zhibo, On 09/12/2020 13:05, Huzhibo wrote: > Hi Peter: > > If Ti-LFA can protect IP flex

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

*Acee Lindem (acee) *Sent:* Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM *To:* lsr *Subject:* [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and dep

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

] Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 6:46 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: RE: WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 IP Algorithm SUBTLV indicate the participation for particular flex alg

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

, December 9, 2020 7:16 PM To: Huzhibo ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Zhibo, On 09/12/2020 11:50, Huzhibo wrote: Hi authors, Here are some comments about I

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Zhibo, On 09/12/2020 11:50, Huzhibo wrote: > Hi authors, > > Here are some comments about IP flexalgo as follows: > > 1.In Flex-Algo draft, there is des

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

algo draft. thanks, Peter Best regards, Zhibo *From:*Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Acee Lindem (acee) *Sent:* Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM *To:* lsr *Subject:* [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonic

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Attribute (ASLA) MUST be used for IP Flex-Algo path computation? Best regards, Zhibo From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm)

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

: Lsr On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy) Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 3:40 PM To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi auth

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

bject:* [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally support for WG adoption.

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

) Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and deployment prior t

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Li; Robert Raszuk CC: lsr; Acee Lindem \(acee\) Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Anything else than IGP metric based SPT is considered TE. Looking holistically - topology virtualization (

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hi, I support the WG adoption. This is a useful work. Stephane From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: mardi 1 décembre 2020 22:13 To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-f

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

> Can't we associate multiple Flex-Algorithms with one >> loopback address, which means we want to reach the loopback address through >> different paths? Pragmatically, this is not a big deal. Most implementations allow many loopback interfaces, so this just costs a single /32 or /128.

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

:* lsr <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; Acee Lindem \(acee\) <mailto:acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Anything else than IGP me

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

China Telecom From: Jeff Tantsura Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 11:45 AM To: Aijun Wang Cc: Tony Li ; Robert Raszuk ; lsr ; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hi Ron IP Flex Algo provides one half of the puzzle control plane framework, however just as Flex Algo built for SR is instantiated on SR data plane, I remember you had mentioned an IPV6 data plane “non SR” based framework possible a new RH would be used for the loose or strict path

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

+1 for IP flex algo for operators toolbox Thanks On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:54 PM Jeff Tantsura wrote: > I’m very much in favor of being able to provide a number of technologies > that help operators with different requirements and constraints to provide > their services in a most optimized

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I’m very much in favor of being able to provide a number of technologies that help operators with different requirements and constraints to provide their services in a most optimized way, hence my support for flex-algo, either labeled or not as a technology on the dynamic spectrum of the

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

; Aijun Wang > China Telecom > > From: lsr-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 9:18 AM > To: Tony Li ; Robert Raszuk > Cc: lsr ; Acee Lindem (acee) > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms >

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 9:18 AM To: Tony Li ; Robert Raszuk Cc: lsr ; Acee Lindem (acee) Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Anything else than IGP me

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

In fact the concept of traffic engineering has been around for a long time using simple IGP metric manipulation to steer traffic using the IGP. I had designed in my past life a costing algorithm where you use highest bandwidth links and lowest latency as the crow flies point A to point B such

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Anything else than IGP metric based SPT is considered TE. Looking holistically - topology virtualization (or similar) could have been a better name. Cheers, Jeff On Dec 3, 2020, 4:25 PM -0800, Robert Raszuk , wrote: > Hi Tony, > > The moment I hit "Send" I knew that this response may be coming

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hi, I support adoption of this draft. However I really do not think that what Flexible Algorithm offers can be compared or even called as Traffic Engineering (MPLS or SR). Sure Flex Algo can accomplish in a very elegant way with little cost multi topology routing but this is not full TE. It can

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I support the WG adoption of this document. It covers an important piece of the FlexAlgorith solution space. Thanks, Ketan From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 02 December 2020 02:43 To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm)

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Hello Parag: From: Parag Kaneriya Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 2:08 PM To: Aijun Wang ; 'Acee Lindem (acee)' ; 'lsr' Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 Hello Aijun, Ev

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

normal traffic. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom From: lsr-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org> mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM To: lsr mailto:lsr@ietf.org>> Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption C

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

; *From:* lsr-boun...@ietf.org *On Behalf Of *Acee > Lindem (acee) > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM > *To:* lsr > *Subject:* [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms > (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 > > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

(acee) Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and deployment p

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

20 at 4:13 PM To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01 This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally s

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I read this draft and I support its adoption. Regards, Tarek > On Dec 1, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) > > wrote: > > This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases > and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Speaking as WG member: I have read this draft and support adoption. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 4:13 PM To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks"

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I support WG adoption. This is another useful tool to support traffic engineering in real world deployments. Les From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2020 1:13 PM To: lsr Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm)

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Yes/support - very useful work! Cheers, Jeff On Dec 1, 2020, 1:13 PM -0800, Acee Lindem (acee) , wrote: > This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases > and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally support for WG > adoption. This begins a two week

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I have read this draft, and followed the discussion on the list. This seems a useful and sensible piece of work. I support adoption. Yours, Joel On 12/1/2020 4:12 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and deployment prior

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Would very much support and appreciate adoption as well for same reasons. It would be amazing to have that option to segment large backhaul networks without shims or encapsulations. More exploration of what is described in section 8, in relationship to LFA would be of interest. Yan Viasat

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

I support adopting this draft. Traffic engineering without MPLS? Yes, please. Tony > On Dec 1, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) > wrote: > > This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases > and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally

[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use cases and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally support for WG adoption. This begins a two week WG adoption call. Please indicate your support or objection to WG adoption on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on