HI Tony:
Comments in line:
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 2:13 PM
To: David Allan I
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] On flooding, diameter, and degree
Dave,
Thanks very much for commenting. I’m a bit confused about your column “Receipt
Degree
HI Tony:
Re: draft-allan-lsr-flooding-algorithm….
My draft falls under the “bushy” class of solutions, to borrow your
terminology.
So mapping to your datapoints and translating what I presented in Bangkok to
actual numbers:
Graph Fault free Single FaultReplication Receipt
Hi Gents:
The algorithm in draft-allan actually has the notion of upstream, downstream
and both upstream and downstream FT adjacencies. However as a generalized
form is still a WIP and has yet to demonstrate merit against any of the
other approaches on the table, I'd not be looking to suggest a
:44 PM
To: David Allan I ; tony...@tony.li
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jakob Heitz (jheitz) ; Peter Psenak
(ppsenak)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Flooding Path Direction
Dave -
IGP flooding on a link is by specification bidirectional.
It is OK if A arbitrarily decides not to initiate flooding an LSP to
neighbor B
Got it,
thx
-Original Message-
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 3:59 PM
To: David Allan I
Cc: Peter Psenak ; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding
Hi Dave,
> My understanding of this whole endea
OK gents, sadly I’m losing the plot here..
My understanding of this whole endeavor is that:
- excessive flooding slows convergence
- so we are seeking to define a reduced flooding topology
- a failure that does not impact an FT adjacency is propagated throughout the
topology and the effects
Support
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 5:23 AM
To: Christian Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org
Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR
poll.
Speaking as a
Agreed
Cheers
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 4:26 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: cho...@chopps.org
Subject: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
Summary of where we are at with dynamic flooding reduction:
-
Makes sense to me, thanks for the clarity...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2019 12:14 PM
To: Robert Raszuk
Cc: Huaimo Chen ; lsr@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org;
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com; David Allan I
Subject: Re: [Lsr
Hi Huaimo:
Replies are in line….prefaced with DA>
1. The alternate backup path would appear to also require the criteria of
being link diverse with the FT if the goal is to protect against multiple
failures.
[HC]: Can you give some more details about this?
[DA] There is a
Hi Huaimo:
Thanks for replying, my comments in line prefaced with DA2>
1. The alternate backup path would appear to also require the criteria of
being link diverse with the FT if the goal is to protect against multiple
failures.
[HC]: Can you give some more details about
Hi Tony:
So for my edification/education, this is a general behavior that in the absence
of any specific algorithm is postulated. (?)
The piece I do not quite get is "adding until fixed". Is the working
assumption that things have broken down to the point that there is no
synchronization of
12 matches
Mail list logo
