Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Perumal Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 6:26 PM To: Robert Raszuk Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura ; Stefano Previdi (IETF) Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions Robert, On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Robert Raszuk mailto:rob...@raszuk.net>> wrote: ​Muthu,​ ​How is the measurement in

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Robert Raszuk
​Muthu,​ > ​How is the measurement interval and filter coefficients described in the > draft related to dissemination?​ > ​It is directly related. If you see the title of the section is: "Announcement Thresholds and Filters"​ So measurement interval does not intend to describe how often you

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread stefano previdi
> > From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal > Sent: 05 June 2018 17:19 > To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) > Cc: Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura > > > > Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions > > > > Sounds reasonable to me.. > &

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
2018 17:52 To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions If these are only implementation specific aspects and shouldn't get into the draft, what is the point of sections 5,6,7? Why would it hurt to say what

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
> > > *From:* Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal > *Sent:* 05 June 2018 17:19 > *To:* Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) > *Cc:* Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura > > > *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions > > > > Sounds reasonable to me.. > >

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions Sounds reasonable to me.. Adding a clarification note in the draft would be useful, IMHO. Regards, Muthu On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) mailto:ket...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Muthu, The Sections 5, 6 and 7 of these

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
ano Previdi (IETF) > *Cc:* lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura > *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions > > > > > > ​Please see inline..​ > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Stefano Previdi (IETF) > wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 3

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-06-05 Thread Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
​Please see inline..​ On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Stefano Previdi (IETF) wrote: > > > On Thu, May 31, 2018, 6:15 PM Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal < > muthu.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, Jeff. Would be good to have this clarified in >> ​​ >> draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis. My original

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-05-31 Thread Stefano Previdi (IETF)
On Thu, May 31, 2018, 6:15 PM Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal wrote: > Thanks, Jeff. Would be good to have this clarified > in draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis. My original message seems to have been > stripped off, so including it again for the lsr list.. > > ​Both RFC 7810 and RFC 7471 say that: > >

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-05-31 Thread Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
Thanks, Jeff. Would be good to have this clarified in draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis. My original message seems to have been stripped off, so including it again for the lsr list.. ​Both RFC 7810 and RFC 7471 say that: The measurement interval, any filter coefficients, and any advertisement

Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions

2018-05-31 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Muthu, LSR would be a more suitable list to post to, CCed. Regards, Jeff > On May 30, 2018, at 18:06, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal > wrote: > > Muthu ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr