Perumal
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 6:26 PM
To: Robert Raszuk
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura ; Stefano Previdi
(IETF)
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions
Robert,
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Robert Raszuk
mailto:rob...@raszuk.net>> wrote:
Muthu,
How is the measurement interv
Robert,
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Muthu,
>
>
>> How is the measurement interval and filter coefficients described in the
>> draft related to dissemination?
>>
>
> It is directly related. If you see the title of the section is:
> "Announcement Thresholds and Filt
Muthu,
> How is the measurement interval and filter coefficients described in the
> draft related to dissemination?
>
It is directly related. If you see the title of the section is:
"Announcement Thresholds and Filters"
So measurement interval does not intend to describe how often you act
t;
>
> From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
> Sent: 05 June 2018 17:19
> To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> Cc: Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions
>
>
>
> Sounds reasonable to me..
&g
2018 17:52
To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Cc: Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions
If these are only implementation specific aspects and shouldn't get into the
draft, what is the point of sections 5,6,7? Why would it hurt to say
>
>
>
> *From:* Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
> *Sent:* 05 June 2018 17:19
> *To:* Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> *Cc:* Stefano Previdi (IETF) ; lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions
>
>
>
> Sounds reasonable to me..
>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions
Sounds reasonable to me..
Adding a clarification note in the draft would be useful, IMHO.
Regards,
Muthu
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
mailto:ket...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Muthu,
The Sections 5, 6 and 7 of these draf
ano Previdi (IETF)
> *Cc:* lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions
>
>
>
>
>
> Please see inline..
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Stefano Previdi (IETF)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 31,
Previdi (IETF)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Jeff Tantsura
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IGP TE Metric Extensions
Please see inline..
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Stefano Previdi (IETF)
mailto:s...@previdi.net>> wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018, 6:15 PM Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
mailto:muthu.a...@gmail.com&g
Please see inline..
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Stefano Previdi (IETF)
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018, 6:15 PM Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <
> muthu.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Jeff. Would be good to have this clarified in
>>
>> draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis. My original messag
On Thu, May 31, 2018, 6:15 PM Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
wrote:
> Thanks, Jeff. Would be good to have this clarified
> in draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis. My original message seems to have been
> stripped off, so including it again for the lsr list..
>
> Both RFC 7810 and RFC 7471 say that:
>
>
Thanks, Jeff. Would be good to have this clarified
in draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis. My original message seems to have been
stripped off, so including it again for the lsr list..
Both RFC 7810 and RFC 7471 say that:
The measurement interval, any filter coefficients, and any
advertisement
Muthu,
LSR would be a more suitable list to post to, CCed.
Regards,
Jeff
> On May 30, 2018, at 18:06, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
> wrote:
>
> Muthu
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
13 matches
Mail list logo
