alaulikar
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 11:35 AM
> *To: *Acee Lindem
> *Cc: *lsr , "draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
> , "Goethals, Dirk (Nokia
> - BE/Antwerp)"
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extens
Antwerp)"
mailto:dirk.goeth...@nokia.com>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
Hi Acee,
The routing for anycast is transparent but there are features and use cases
Hegde
> *Cc:* Yingzhen Qu ; Acee Lindem (acee) 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>; lsr ;
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for
> SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Add
em (acee)
; lsr ;
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha,
Thanks for your response.
of "Acee Lindem (acee)"
Date: Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM
To: lsr
Cc: "draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
r
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 18, 2022 11:28 PM
>> *To:* Shraddha Hegde
>> *Cc:* Yingzhen Qu ; Acee Lindem (acee) > 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>; lsr ;
>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Exten
*From: *Ketan Talaulikar
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 11:04 AM
> *To: *Acee Lindem
> *Cc: *lsr , "draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
> , "Goethals, Dirk (Nokia
> - BE/Antwerp)"
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for &qu
Hi Dhruv,
Thanks for your review and feedback. Will incorporate your suggestions in
the upcoming update.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 7:54 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I support WG LC. It is in good shape!
>
> It might be a good idea to include some text (perhaps in the appendix)
Hi,
I support WG LC. It is in good shape!
It might be a good idea to include some text (perhaps in the appendix) on
why a new LSA is used for SRv6 Locator LSA. Any reviewer and future reader
would wonder why this decison was made.
BTW, do expand LSA on first use.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Fri, Jul 29,
ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
Hi, All:
I have the following comments for this draft, and would like to support
its forwarding when th
agree there is no relevance, but its important to specify there is
> no relevance and describe what should be filled while sending.
>
KT2> We don't have these fields in the SRv6 Locator TLV so there is nothing
to be filled in there. I believe you are suggesting clarification on how
these fields n
SPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha,
Thanks for your detailed review and please check inline below for responses.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 5:15 PM Shraddha Hegde
mailto:shrad...@j
g
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 5:55 PM
> To: 'Acee Lindem (acee)' ; 'lsr'
>
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Correc
] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
Hi, All:
I have the following comments for this draft, and would like to support
its forwarding when the below concerns are addressed.
1. For
sions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The
extra week is to account for PIST (Post-IETF Stres
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Yingzhen Qu
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 5:22 AM
> To: Acee Lindem (acee)
> Cc: lsr ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for
> SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv
22 5:22 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: lsr ; draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
I support pr
ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org>"
mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org>>,
"Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)"
mailto:dirk.goeth...@nokia.com>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-iet
"Goethals, Dirk (Nokia
> - BE/Antwerp)"
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for
> SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
>
>
>
> Hi Acee,
>
>
>
> Please check inline below.
>
>
-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org>>,
"Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)"
mailto:dirk.goeth...@nokia.com>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
Hello Acee/
Cc: *lsr , "draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
> , "Goethals, Dirk (Nokia
> - BE/Antwerp)"
> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for
> SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
>
Hi Yingzhen,
From: Yingzhen Qu
Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 7:52 PM
To: Acee Lindem
Cc: lsr , "draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.tx
SPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
Hello Acee/All,
There has not been any further comment/feedback on the point that Dirk brought
up in the thread below:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/_4HcJEsteNQxjxuot1uLdoXeH6s/
I want to
Hello Acee/All,
There has not been any further comment/feedback on the point that Dirk
brought up in the thread below:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/_4HcJEsteNQxjxuot1uLdoXeH6s/
I want to point out that not just the LA-flag, but also the P-flag is
required for propagation of the SRv6
Hi Yingzhen,
Thanks for your review and please check inline below for responses.
The changes as discussed below will be reflected in the upcoming update of
the draft.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 5:22 AM Yingzhen Qu wrote:
> I support progressing this draft.
>
> I have the following minor
I support progressing this draft.
I have the following minor comments for the authors to consider:
The title of Section 4 of this draft is “Advertisement of SRH Operation
Limits”, and really it only covers the advertisements of MSDs, so may consider
to change the title to be consistent with
: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022,
-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draf
I support publication of this specification for the SRV6 OSPFV3 extension
as the SRV6 ISIS extension is in RFC queue.
Do we have any implementations of this OSPFv3 extension?
Thanks
Gyan
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 1:17 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this
for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
Support. It provides necessary OSPF extensions for SRv6 which is equivalent to
the IS-IS SRv6 extensions. Best re
king Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The
extra week is to acco
.org"
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-sr
-ospfv3-srv6-extensions
时 间：2022-07-30 01:17:42
主 题：Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions.
-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-o
: Friday, July 29, 2022 10:17 AM
To: lsr
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The
extra week is to account for PIST (Post-IETF Stress Syndrome). The
corresponding IS-IS draft is already on the RFC Queue and there are
37 matches
Mail list logo
