[Lsr] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

[Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Les, On 7/13/20, 11:53 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" wrote: Roman - Thanx for the review. Inline. > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw via > Datatracker > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:40 AM > To: The IESG > Cc:

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

2020-07-13 Thread ruoxin huang
I strongly support the adoption of the IS-IS TTZ draft. For the large scale network, if we just run the IS-IS in a large area, the LSDB will be very large. In addition, the convergence time will last for a long time. But TTZ is a good way to reduce the network size and the number of the Link

Re: [Lsr] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Murray - Thanx for your review - and for catching the editorial issue. We will address that in the next revision. Les > -Original Message- > From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 12:21 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

2020-07-13 Thread reta Yang
I support adoption of the IS-IS TTZ draft. It is very useful for the large network with abstracting a zone to a single virtual node. The size of the LSDB can be reduced dramatically. best, Reta From: Lsr on behalf of Toy, Mehmet Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Roman - Thanx for the review. Inline. > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw via > Datatracker > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:40 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; aretana.i...@gmail.com; cho...@chopps.org; draft- > ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Acee - Inline. > -Original Message- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 9:04 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Roman Danyliw > ; The IESG > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; aretana.i...@gmail.com; cho...@chopps.org; draft- > ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
On 7/13/20, 12:23 PM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" wrote: Acee - Inline. > -Original Message- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 9:04 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Roman Danyliw > ; The IESG > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

2020-07-13 Thread Kiran Makhijani
I support IS-IS TTZ adoption for its value in reducing LSDB through abstraction. -Kiran -Original Message- From: Lsr On Behalf Of Yanhe Fan Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 7:33 AM To: Donald Eastlake ; Huaimo Chen Cc: lsr@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption

[Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02

2020-07-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Leif - Thanx for your review. Les > -Original Message- > From: Leif Johansson via Datatracker > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 1:55 PM > To: sec...@ietf.org > Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv@ietf.org > Subject: Secdir last call review of

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Ben - Thanx for your review. Responses inline. > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 2:11 PM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; > lsr@ietf.org; > Christian Hopps ;

[Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02

2020-07-13 Thread Leif Johansson via Datatracker
Reviewer: Leif Johansson Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Les, On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:05:35PM +, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > Ben - > > > > Thanx for your review. My pleasure; this is a nice document. (A shame it's needed, of course, but that's neither here nor there.) > Responses inline. > > > > > -Original Message- > >

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-02.txt

2020-07-13 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs Authors : Acee Lindem Sharmila Palani

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Ben - I have prepared V3 of the draft to address your comments. As the window for draft submissions is temporarily closed, I have attached the diffs for your review. I will post the updated version once the window for submissions reopens. A few more remarks inline. > -Original

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

2020-07-13 Thread Huaimo Chen
I support the adoption of IS-IS TTZ draft. 1). It seems that Area Proxy can not be amended to IS-IS TTZ. IS-IS TTZ abstracts a zone to a single node. This abstraction is supported by the extensions to IS-IS, and some of these extensions are not defined in Area Proxy. For example, the

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

2020-07-13 Thread Huaimo Chen
Hi Tony, 1). It seems that Area Proxy can not be amended to IS-IS TTZ. IS-IS TTZ abstracts a zone to a single node. This abstraction is supported by the extensions to IS-IS, and some of these extensions are not defined in Area Proxy. For example, the extensions for the edge nodes of the zone

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Roman (and Acee) - After a suggestion from Ben, I have reworded the sentence to read: " When new protocol behaviors are specified that are not backwards compatible, it is RECOMMENDED that implementations provide controls for their enablement. This serves to prevent interoperability issues

Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

2020-07-13 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Les, Looks good, thanks for making these tweaks. (I was about to write "hopefully final" but I see that half the IESG still has to weigh in ... so I can't really expect this to be the last word quite yet.) -Ben On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 03:39:55AM +, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > Ben -

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

2020-07-13 Thread Tony Li
Hi Huaimo, > 1). It seems that Area Proxy can not be amended to IS-IS TTZ. IS-IS TTZ > abstracts a zone to a single node. This abstraction is supported by the > extensions to IS-IS, and some of these extensions are not defined in Area > Proxy. For example, the extensions for the edge nodes

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

2020-07-13 Thread Tony Li
Hi Huaimo, > 1). It seems that Area Proxy can not be amended to IS-IS TTZ. I feel that this is somewhat imprecise. From my perspective, our attempts to collaborate have been hampered by governmental regulations that are wholly out of our control. The suggestions that I’ve made for