On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Mohammed Riswan jolie_...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Hi all,
please answer my quesion if anybody knows, is ltsp is works like a citrix
metaframe? can we create an individual sessions same like citrix for all the
users?
I appreciate if any1 could help me to
Works just fine with Jaunty. Unfortunately no backports - yeah means
certainly a lot of work.
2009/4/24 Peter Stein peterstei...@googlemail.com:
Ok, I added the line as suggest to reenable the non-removable device
support. It doesn't really matter for us if users can access the thin
clients'
The hardware of my clients is very poor : PII 200 mhz + 64 mb.
They works quite well, but during my tests i saw that booting time and
performances are proportionally at dimension of chroot image
(/opt/ltsp/images/i386.img). I would try to create a small chroot image to
see if the clients works
On Wednesday 29 Apr 2009, Mohammed Riswan wrote:
please answer my quesion if anybody knows, is ltsp is works like a citrix
metaframe? can we create an individual sessions same like citrix for all
the users?
We use metaframe and ltsp, so I should be able to answer. Once the users have
logged
On Tuesday 28 Apr 2009, ebarde...@iris-group.it wrote:
Hi, do you know how to create a small chroot environment for ltsp clients?
I have created the default one with ltsp-build-client but the i386.img
became 186 mb with xubuntu 9.04 and 150mb with ubuntu 8.04.
thank you!
You don't usually
Of course the other key difference is the lack of group policies for
controlling users. I use kiosk-tool for kde (which is dreadful) and I
understand there is pessalus for gnome (about which I know nothing).
--
Chris Roberts
+--+--+
| Distribution | Debian
Following the installation manual I run ltsp-build-client and it create the
chroot image automatically.
There is another way? I miss to do something?
I have to work inside this directory
(/usr/share/ltsp/plugins/ltsp-build-client/Ubuntu) ?
How big is your i386.img?
thank you
Emanuele
Chris Roberts wrote:
Of course the other key difference is the lack of group policies for
controlling users. I use kiosk-tool for kde (which is dreadful) and I
understand there is pessalus for gnome (about which I know nothing).
Yes, this is a pain - but I doubt Citrix metaframe server
On Tuesday 28 Apr 2009, Chris Roberts wrote:
Actually it is failing at 10-minutes not 20-minutes, and it is at the exact
moment that the screen goes off.
I am not quite as sure about this as I was, it seems that sometimes it
survives the screen blanking at 10 minutes, but if it does survive,
We use citrix (SP4), we are migrating to ltsp because the last ica client
(needed by new citrix version) does not work with W9X and without ltsp, that
provide boot from lan, we would have had to change 200 old pcs
Emanuele
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Chris Roberts
On Wednesday 29 Apr 2009, ebarde...@iris-group.it wrote:
Following the installation manual I run ltsp-build-client and it create the
chroot image automatically.
There is another way? I miss to do something?
I have to work inside this directory
Ok...i'll try LDM_DIRECTX
now i'm formatting my server with xubuntu 8.04 because I think that is a
little bit thin...
in lts.conf I have putted this parameters:
XSERVER=vesa
X_COLOR_DEPTH=16
X_MODE_0=1024X768
SOUND=False
NBD_SWAP=False
On Wednesday 29 Apr 2009, ebarde...@iris-group.it wrote:
now i'm formatting my server with xubuntu 8.04 because I think that is a
little bit thin...
in lts.conf I have putted this parameters:
XSERVER=vesa
X_MODE_0=1024X768
Only if your client needs them, and if it does
Gotta love it that Long Term Support. Trust me it will not be the last
time you curse it. /rant
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:23, Peter Stein peterstei...@googlemail.com wrote:
Works just fine with Jaunty. Unfortunately no backports - yeah means
certainly a lot of work.
--
Dan Maranville
http://laserjock.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/sru-needs-you/
=)
Dan Maranville wrote:
Gotta love it that Long Term Support. Trust me it will not be the last
time you curse it. /rant
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:23, Peter Stein peterstei...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Works just fine with
On Wednesday 29 Apr 2009, Chris Roberts wrote:
So this issue is nothing whatsoever to do with power management. Has
anyone else experienced random lock-ups with rdesktop?
Any suggestions for debugging this problem?
Bizarrely this issue turned out to be a routing problem, very occasionally
So after reading through your thread I would ask if you found any
documentation on how the routing should be setup. Specifically a best
practice for LTSP environments. I have seen other problems with LTSP
performance because we do not use an internal DNS, and ended up creating a
large host file
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:21:55PM -0400, Dan Maranville wrote:
Gotta love it that Long Term Support. Trust me it will not be the last
time you curse it. /rant
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against them
because they don't backport new features from more current
Just in case someone needs the same thing, to re-enable the Alt+Ctrl
+Backspace shortcut in Jaunty I created
/opt/ltsp/i386/usr/share/ltsp/screen-session.d/XS96-disable-dontzap
with the following line as contents:
X_ARGS=$X_ARGS -retro
It would be nice to have an lts.conf option for that...
Alkis, X_ARGS, IIRC, *is* an lts.conf option.
Alkis Georgopoulos wrote:
Just in case someone needs the same thing, to re-enable the Alt+Ctrl
+Backspace shortcut in Jaunty I created
/opt/ltsp/i386/usr/share/ltsp/screen-session.d/XS96-disable-dontzap
with the following line as contents:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:26:40PM +0200, Marius Flage wrote:
Jordan Erickson wrote:
I would propose a temporary user of sorts that pulls from the
skel/template you created, does a pam makehomedir or whatever it is,
and removes it upon logout. This way, you have separate user accounts
Στις 29-04-2009, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 13:04 -0700, ο/η Jordan Erickson
έγραψε:
Alkis, X_ARGS, IIRC, *is* an lts.conf option.
Yeah, Lns you made my day :)
X_ARGS=-retro in lts.conf works fine :)
--
Register Now Save for
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against them
because they don't backport new features from more current releases into older
ones. As far as I know, LTSP current isn't being backported into either
Fedora
3 or Debian Sarge.
LTS means they fix the security and
...Or, as an alternative to installing the latest greatest, you could
actually help backport these features into LTS.
Community success requires community involvement. Period.
Cheers,
Jordan/Lns
Dan Maranville wrote:
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:05:50PM -0500, Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:21:55PM -0400, Dan Maranville wrote:
I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against them
because they don't backport new features from more current releases into older
ones. As
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
*snip*
so the desires or needs for a backport may be a little different, as
different distros progress in different ways.
And most definitely they are different as user/environment upgrade
schedules are always different. For instance, I don't dare run Jaunty
(or
I am going to leave it with this:
I didn't speak of LTSP in any negative way, I was simply making a
statement about _MY_ experiences with the current LTS (bugs in this
instance). Some are related to LTSP but not always, most are problems
known about for greater than 1 year in mainline Ubuntu. If
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 15:53:20 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
I would propose a temporary user of sorts that pulls from the
skel/template you created, does a pam makehomedir or whatever it is,
and removes it upon logout. This way, you have separate user accounts
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 15:53:20 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
The hardware of my clients is very poor : PII 200 mhz + 64 mb.
They works quite well, but during my tests i saw that booting time and
performances are proportionally at dimension of chroot image
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 05:22:22PM -0400, Dan Maranville wrote:
It is because they recommend you install the latest non-lts to see if
your problems are fixed. Period.
Well, that's a valid request to see if the issues been fixed in newer versions.
Either:
1) It DOES work in newer versions, and
30 matches
Mail list logo
