Re: svn commit: r1375282 - /incubator/lucene.net/trunk/src/core/Util/Parameter.cs

2012-08-20 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
This will probably require releasing the core again as well as a new RC... The spatial module was updated, still doing some integration tests, will send more updates soon On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:14 AM, synhers...@apache.org wrote: Author: synhershko Date: Mon Aug 20 22:14:01 2012 New

Re: svn commit: r1375282 - /incubator/lucene.net/trunk/src/core/Util/Parameter.cs

2012-08-20 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
. On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: This will probably require releasing the core again as well as a new RC... The spatial module was updated, still doing some integration tests, will send more updates soon On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:14 AM

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-08-02 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Nowadays git works just great for Windows, and it's much easier to work with than Hg On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Zachary Gramana zgram...@feature23.comwrote: On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: And for heaven's sake, can we move to git when graduating? Given

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-08-02 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
that they are willing to post somewhere, I would be glad to use it. - Zack On Jul 27, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: The cleanup consists mainly of going file by file with ReSharper and trying to get them as green as possible. Making a lot of fields readonly, removing unused

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-08-02 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
and see where it landed. It's probably a good idea for us to build rules though. - Zack On Jul 27, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: The cleanup consists mainly of going file by file with ReSharper and trying to get them as green as possible. Making a lot of fields readonly

Re: Lucene Nuget

2012-08-01 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Yes, with the due release. I, for once, always mistake one for another. On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote: There are two packages Lucene packages on nuget that are depreciated. With some updates nuget made a while ago, we have the ability to remove

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-08-01 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
be ready as it is. I am eager to start working on porting 3.6. Thanks, Christopher On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: I still have plenty to go on, but on a second thought we could do that work just the same when we work

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-08-01 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
forward with the project. Thoughts either way on this? On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: I agree What about the spatial stuff? you guys want to wait for it? On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Christopher Currens currens.ch...@gmail.com

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-08-01 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: I agree What about the spatial stuff? you guys want to wait for it? On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Christopher Currens currens.ch...@gmail.com wrote: I think that while it would be nice to get it done

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-07-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
done. Thanks, Christopher On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: The cleanup consists mainly of going file by file with ReSharper and trying to get them as green as possible. Making a lot of fields readonly, removing unused vars and stuff like

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-07-21 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
. On 2012-07-08 20:44, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: What's the status on the failing tests we had? On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote: Three issues left that I see

Re: Outstanding issues for 3.0.3

2012-07-08 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
What's the status on the failing tests we had? On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote: Three issues left that I see: Fixing the build output, I did some work, but I'm good on this, we can move the rest of work to 3.6

Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?

2012-07-08 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
+1 for graduation I still think graduation should be in sync with the 3.0.3 release and a press release on work towards 3.6 and 4.0 releases. On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote: Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net

Re: svn commit: r1353075 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_3_5/

2012-06-23 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Why 3.5 and not 3.6? In my opinion we should skip all versions in between 3.0.3 and 3.6, and just port 3.6 after we released 3.0.3. Lucene 4 will probably be released by the time we are done, and then we could move on to porting it. On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, pnas...@apache.org wrote:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-495) Use of DateTime.Now causes huge amount of System.Globalization.DaylightTime object allocations

2012-06-17 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393629#comment-13393629 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495: -- 1. IMO

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-495) Use of DateTime.Now causes huge amount of System.Globalization.DaylightTime object allocations

2012-06-17 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393633#comment-13393633 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495: -- Makes sense

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-495) Use of DateTime.Now causes huge amount of System.Globalization.DaylightTime object allocations

2012-06-16 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13393363#comment-13393363 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495: -- +1 Take a look

Re: Lets talk graduation

2012-06-15 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
+1 for releasing after graduation, then With some careful PR and our sponsorship offer, we can get the project flying There's still some work to do anyway On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2012-06-14, Christopher Currens wrote: I've gone back and

Releasing 3.0.3

2012-06-14 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Where do we stand with this? I want to push to a 3.0.3 release, what items are still pending? Itamar.

Re: Lets talk graduation

2012-06-14 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
IMHO, whatever brings more attention to the project, and I'm not sure graduation is what this project needs right now. In the end it's just semantics. I'd focus those efforts on getting more work done and having more frequent releases. Hence our proposition to sponsor dev, which still stands. On

Re: Releasing 3.0.3

2012-06-14 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Ok, and is the code in 100% compliance with the 3.0.3 Java code? I'll be spending some time on fixing the index corruption issue, and it is probably best for Chris to wrap up the work he has started Anyone else on board to close some tickets? On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Prescott Nasser

Re: Corrupt index

2012-06-14 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
is empty. Add it in, and I get 755 files in the index after it crashes. Thanks, Christopher On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: Yes, reproduced in first try. See attached program - I referenced it to current trunk. On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3

Re: Releasing 3.0.3

2012-06-14 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sorry, misread your question This can be easily done with xUnit, using Theories. On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.comwrote: Something like: Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = cultureInfo; Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture = cultureInfo; And setting

Re: Corrupt index

2012-06-14 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
is definitely expected, but it's not expected to see segments_N files unless you pass autoCommit=true. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: Not what I'm seeing. I actually see a lot of segments created

Re: Corrupt index

2012-06-13 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
files on commit)? Those are very important for an index to be intact after OS/JVM crash or power loss. More responses below: On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: I'm a Lucene.Net committer, and there is a chance we have a bug in our

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-438) replace java doc notation with ms style xml comments notation.

2012-06-12 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293983#comment-13293983 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-438: -- This should be made

Sponsoring porting work

2012-06-11 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Hi devs, We are looking to sponsor porting work, to help with keeping up the pace of development and help Lucene.Net be closer to Java Lucene. Unfortunately the amount of work I can put on this is very limited, and being up to speed with Lucene is important to us, hence the idea to offer

Re: EOLs in Code

2012-06-02 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Yes, seems like all of them. Will look into it. On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2012-06-02, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: I'm using git-svn, with auto-crlf set to true I'm not familiar enough with git-svn. auto-crlf will cover the git side but I

New Spatial module checked in

2012-05-30 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
I was finally able to get git and svn talk to one another, and pushed my recent changes into trunk. The new Spatial contrib is bearing the non-standard version of 2.9.9, on purpose. It also contains Spatial4n in a binary form, mimicking the way it works in Java Lucene. The few tests that present

Re: Welcome Simon Svensson as a new committer

2012-05-24 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Welcome! On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Simon DIGY -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:06 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Welcome Itamar Syn-Hershk​o as a new committer

2012-05-23 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Thanks guys On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:14 AM, zoolette gaufre...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome in Itamar ! 2012/5/22 Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com Hey all, I'd like to officially welcome Itamar as a new committer. I know the community appreciates the work you've been doing with the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

2012-05-21 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13280126#comment-13280126 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- That's not the newest

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

2012-05-21 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13280266#comment-13280266 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- This code isn't mine

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

2012-05-21 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13280552#comment-13280552 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- Great. I updated

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-462) Spatial Search skipping records with small radius e.g. 1 mile

2012-05-19 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279642#comment-13279642 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-462: -- This is now fixed

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

2012-05-19 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279643#comment-13279643 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- This should be fixed

Re: Spatial4n

2012-04-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
No, but let me know what do I need to do. On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote: Itamar, have you filed an ICLA? If so we are good to go on this, and I'll put this in place of the current spatial code in contrib From: geobmx...@hotmail.com To:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-484) Some possibly major tests intermittently fail

2012-04-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264399#comment-13264399 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-484: -- That's probably a matter

Spatial4n

2012-04-26 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Hi again, I completed the port of the external Spatial library, and now am moving to porting the Lucene integration. The library, Spatial4n, is under ASL2 and can be found here https://github.com/synhershko/Spatial4n Anyone who can chip in and help port the tests, that would greatly help. There

Spatial4n

2012-04-26 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Hi again, I completed the port of the external Spatial library, and now am moving to porting the Lucene integration. The library, Spatial4n, is under ASL2 and can be found here https://github.com/synhershko/Spatial4n Anyone who can chip in and help port the tests, that would greatly help. There

Re: Spatial contrib bug fixing

2012-04-24 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
to divide work between other committers, we can arrange that, and create issues for it, that is, if the other committers don't object to this. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: Thanks for your reply. Aside from the original port which had many

Re: Spatial contrib bug fixing

2012-04-23 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
For starters - CartesianPolyFilterBuilder.GetBoxShape() is not an exact port - do you remember why? Anyway, if it was never fully ported as you say maybe I'll just go ahead and complete that For your reference, here are 2 failing tests which pass in Java Lucene (can send the java file) -

Re: Spatial contrib bug fixing

2012-04-23 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
One more thing - what's the deal with ChainedFilter? I can see a commit by DIGY on 7/7/2011 but it seems to have been removed since? On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.comwrote: For starters - CartesianPolyFilterBuilder.GetBoxShape() is not an exact port - do

Spatial contrib bug fixing

2012-04-22 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Hi all, We encountered several bugs with the Sparial contrb, and the ones we tested with Java Lucene worked there (with 2.9.4). There are about 3 open tickets in the Jira bug tracker on similar issues. I'm now sitting with the ultimate goal of fixing this once and for all, but some code parts

Re: [Lucene.Net] SpellChecker Bug

2011-11-03 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
It should probably implement IDisposable instead 2011/11/3 Björn Kremer b...@patorg.de Hello, there is a little bug in the SpellChecker.cs class. The finalizer of this class calls the close method even if the SpellChecker is already closed. This causes an unhandled exception. This should

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 RC1

2011-10-30 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Any chance you guys fix and merge this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-450 before releasing? On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote: Alright- this took me way too long, I'm sorry for that. Could you guys please take a look at:

Re: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts

2011-09-21 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Use a Lucene.Net core package for the core, and separate packages for each contrib. That makes the most sense, and that is how most projects work. This is also how Java Lucene does. Don't create a nightly nuget package - nuget should only be used for distribution packages On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

2011-09-20 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Big OK from our end Sorry to be nagging on this again, but it would be very nice if you could incorporate https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431 in 2.9.4 as well. It is one of those bugfixes that really fix a lot more than they can possible break, so I hope this will justify a small

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

2011-09-12 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431 DIGY On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to measure memory usage among other things. There is one show

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

2011-09-10 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
/browse/LUCENE-1930 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431 DIGY On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to measure memory usage among other things. There is one

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

2011-09-07 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
What version is going to make it to nuget? 2.9.4 or 2.9.4g? 2011/9/7 digy digy digyd...@gmail.com You are right. I forgot to add a patch related with type-casting. Summary of the long story: Since CharArraySet inherits from Hashtable, some unimplemented methods such as Add(object,object)

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

2011-09-07 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431 DIGY On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote: Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to measure memory usage among other

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

2011-09-06 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for potential memory leaks

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

2011-09-05 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for potential memory leaks Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly signed patch applied to it? 2011/9/6 Digy digyd...@gmail.com

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
NHibernate has a much bigger community and more active devs afaict. The proposed changes as I understand them are not about changing class structure or APIs, but merely touch hunks of code and rewrite them to use better .NET practices (yield, generics, LINQ etc). In conjunction with a move

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

2011-06-23 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13053692#comment-13053692 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-426: -- I think we already went

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

2011-06-23 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13053692#comment-13053692 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko edited comment on LUCENENET-426 at 6/23/11 8:02 AM

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

2011-06-16 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
: Lucene.Net Contrib Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.2, Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 3.x, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g Reporter: Itamar Syn-Hershko Priority: Minor Without marking methods in BaseFragmentsBuilder as virtual, it is meaningless to have FragmentsBuilder deriving from a class

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

2011-06-16 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENENET-426: - Attachment: fvh.patch Patch fixing this Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods

Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516)

2011-05-08 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
Making release 2.9.4 and performance tuning are the hottest items IMHO. If you ask me, there's no need for Luke.NET. Luke is just a tool, and we can run it just fine in Java. Same goes for docs - the Java version has this covered. Itamar. On 08/05/2011 23:29, Troy Howard wrote: All,

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-407) Signing the assembly

2011-03-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
, Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 3.x Reporter: Itamar Syn-Hershko Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.2, Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 3.x For our usage of Lucene.NET we need the assembly to be signed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-407) Signing the assembly

2011-03-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENENET-407: - Attachment: signing.patch Lucene.NET.snk snk file and a patch

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-408) Mark assembly as CLS compliant; make AlreadyClosedException serializable

2011-03-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
Issue Type: Improvement Components: Lucene.Net Core Reporter: Itamar Syn-Hershko Priority: Minor Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.2, Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 3.x * Making sure that the AlreadyClosedException exception can be serialized * Making

Re: [Lucene.Net] Patches for signed assembly and other minor stuff

2011-03-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
wrote: Itamar, The best way to have changes incorporated in to the trunk is to create JIRA issues. You will find the Lucene.Net JIRA at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET. Scott -Original Message- From: Itamar Syn-Hershko [mailto:ita...@code972.com] Sent: Monday, March

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-408) Mark assembly as CLS compliant; make AlreadyClosedException serializable

2011-03-28 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENENET-408: - Attachment: commit-40f81a3.patch Attaching patch Mark assembly as CLS