Thanks Kyle for the rant!
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:52 PM, sanga collins sanga.coll...@gmail.comwrote:
my home devices are always juniper ssg so not really worried about IPv6.
My provider (Comcast) already configures new modems for residential and
business customers with IPv6. Especially
Mobile Device space is really where the impact could be huge, but unless
you are serving up web pages and hosting quake tournments from a tablet or
smartphone I dont see why NAT will be a deal breaker.
Fair enough. What about VoIP? Many, if not most, VoIP solutions require
some NAT hole-punching
Yes VOIP and NAT definitely do not play well, but majority of the modern
SIP clients and VOIP phones handle quite easily these days. This is
assuming the SIP server does have a public IP without NAT interfering.
If you are however, genius enough to have an app the acts as a SIP server
on your
Guys,
Now that I have you ALL here :)
Can you tell me about VOIP over the IXP? If datanet is offering free local
data, then.
From: lug-boun...@linux.or.ug [mailto:lug-boun...@linux.or.ug] On Behalf Of
sanga collins
Sent: 24 July 2013 18:03
To: Uganda Linux User Group
Subject: Re: [LUG]
If you are however, genius enough to have an app the acts as a SIP server
on your mobile device/tablet, I can see the need for public IP on that
device.
It's really not just about that. It's about independence, about being able
to communicate client-to-client without having to rely on a server to
Great post. +1
On Jul 24, 2013 8:30 PM, Benjamin Tayehanpour benja...@sandslott.org
wrote:
If you are however, genius enough to have an app the acts as a SIP server
on your mobile device/tablet, I can see the need for public IP on that
device.
It's really not just about that. It's about
Benjamin,
This is why I want to see native IPV6 deployment not NATV6 which will
just bring back all the problems you have highlighted. Sanga as an
alternative to DropBox did u try checking out Bitorrents new
client-client app or OwnCloud?
On 24 July 2013 19:55, Kyle Spencer k...@stormzero.com
Food for thought..
http://www.iddsalim.com/blog/2013/07/08/3-reasons-why-silicon-semenya-kenya-will-never-match-silicon-valley-us/
P.
___
The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug
Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to:
Hi,
This is going to be a bit of an off-topic angry rant, but I'll add my two
cents here:
I'm really sick of going to tech events and watching panels of fly-in's
from the World Bank, established corporations, or whatever, tell us we need
to think bigger or that we should look at Silicon Valley
Hi Kyle
Very good summary completely concur.. people forget that each situation
(Time, Place and Resources) are often different so difference approaches are
required, what works for one does not mean it will work for the other.
I am also tired of experts that live in bubbles completely
I agree with Kyle's points mostly, I think you can get around not having a
public IP by using Dynamic DNS type services, but in the long run it is not
the most Ideal solution. Having that fat pipe of bandwidth is IMO the most
crushing aspect.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Peter Atkin
No Sanga, you are thinking of not having static IPs. That can be alleviated
with dynamic DNS services. Not having a *public* IP is something entirely
different.
I agree with everything Kyle says. The problem ultimately boils down to
Uganda's not being a democracy. If the government operated under
sanga collins wrote thus on 7/23/13 9:26 PM:
Hi Benjamin, I see what you mean. That actually is even worse. I
must admit I am complete spoiled living where I live not having a
public IP is unthinkable!
I'm afraid the unthinkable may be upon you soon, get ready.
The American IP address
ISPs could solve this problem by deploying IPv6.
The problem is, even if they deploy IPv6, they may still NAT mobile devices
because it keeps them in a position of control.
On Jul 23, 2013 10:34 PM, Mwirima Byaruhanga e...@afrigeek.net wrote:
sanga collins wrote thus on 7/23/13 9:26 PM:
Hi
sanga collins wrote thus on 7/23/13 4:27 PM:
I agree with Kyle's points mostly, I think you can get around not
having a public IP by using Dynamic DNS type services,
Only if your WAN interface has a unicast address, and this is
sometimes not the case.
eb
15 matches
Mail list logo
