I think the face of the man was painted by someone else. Possibly Mr. Bean.
Ed Durbrow
Saitama, Japan
http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
https://soundcloud.com/ed-durbrow
http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
Dear David,
Yes, what I was attempting to suggest is that the lute is simply a prop
and the sitter
is not actually playing it. It's there to symbolize something like
harmonious love.
And does the left hand position have additional symbolism. I guess one
could really make a
On 2015-11-25 10:16 AM, AJN wrote:
I must agree it doesn't look like an
original painting by a Dutch master.
This discussion has been fun, but I hope whoever paid $194,500 for this
painting never sees this!
My favourite of the theories is that it is some kind of joke. Even if
this wasn't
Does the inside joke have anything to do with the violist's right hand
disappearing behind the lady's skirts??? She seems slightly enraptured,
he looks amused.
Leonard
On 11/24/15, 8:19 AM, "Gary Boye" wrote:
> Martyn,
> There
To: [2]Stuart Walsh; [3]David Van Edwards
Cc: [4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
That's my take. A 17th century blond joke.
RT
On 11/24/2015 1:47 PM, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> Somebody with the intention and the skill and knowledge to create a
f
Walsh; [3]David Van Edwards
Cc: [4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
the painting technique looks pretty genuine to me. so do garment
fashions.
RT
On 11/24/2015 2:22 PM, Stuart Walsh wrote:
Definitely 17th century
Dear Stuart,
No you're right. I cannot see how it could possibly be genuine. And I
thought I'd been pretty clear in the article, but maybe my lightly
ironic tone doesn't make it across the pond.
Best wishes,
David
At 17:08 + 24/11/15, WALSH STUART wrote:
On 24/11/2015 15:36, David
" <da...@vanedwards.co.uk>
Sent: â24/â11/â2015 17:22
To: "WALSH STUART" <s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
Cc: "lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Dear Stuart,
No you're right. I cannot see how it could possibly
;[6][6][8]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 13:19
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Martyn,
There seems to be an inside joke we're not privy to here. It may
just
be that the artist liked the 90 degree angle created by the 2
On 24/11/2015 15:36, David Van Edwards wrote:
However I think the painting I discussed was simply copying the prop[s]
from Eglon van der Neer's works! The physical impossibility of holding
such a lute in such a position without grossly disturbing the diapason
strings makes me
The lute was exactly that - a symbol familial harmony, even in the hands
of whores in Dutch paintings, where is was meant so - sarcastically.
RT
On 11/24/2015 9:38 AM, AJN wrote:
There are paintings of the interiors of artists' studios that show
props used in pictures:
busts,
be the equivalent of a sort of folly?
-Original Message-
From: "David Van Edwards" <da...@vanedwards.co.uk>
Sent: тАО24/тАО11/тАО2015 17:22
To: "WALSH STUART" <s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
Cc: "lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: [LUTE] Re
Message-
From: "David Van Edwards" <da...@vanedwards.co.uk>
Sent: ‎24/‎11/‎2015 17:22
To: "WALSH STUART" <s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
Cc: "lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Dear Stuart,
No
mouth.edu" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
That's my take. A 17th century blond joke.
RT
On 11/24/2015 1:47 PM, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> Somebody with the intention and the skill and knowledge to create a fake 17th
> century Dutch master would sure
There are paintings of the interiors of artists' studios that show
props used in pictures:
busts, skulls, ornate chairs, drapes and sometimes (iirc) musical
instruments. Such
props are even listed in tax inventories, I understand.
Art historians have traced some from painting to
Message d'origine
De : Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date : 24/11/2015 12:14 (GMT+01:00)
A : David Van Edwards <da...@vanedwards.co.uk>, lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Objet : [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Very interesting David.
It m
Very interesting David.
It may be simply a fashionable couple wanting to be portrayed
performing but in fact unable to play a note! Perhaps the painter who,
as you point out, might be thought to have known better was laughing up
his sleeve...
Or perhaps, and maybe more likely
boy...@appstate.edu>
To: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: David Van Edwards <da...@vanedwards.co.uk>; "lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
<lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 13:19
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Martyn,
Great one! Reminds me of an old joke:
"A saw a blond today in a red convertible, with the license plate that
said "Blonds are not stupid!". The plate was upside down."
RT
On 11/24/2015 5:50 AM, David Van Edwards wrote:
Dear All,
My Lute of the Month series has dwindled to lute of the
__
From: Gary Boye <[2][2]boy...@appstate.edu>
To: Martyn Hodgson <[3][3]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: David Van Edwards <[4][4]da...@vanedwards.co.uk>;
"[5][5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
<[6][6]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 Nove
Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 13:19
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Martyn,
There seems to be an inside joke we're not privy to here. It may
just
be that the artist liked the 90 degree angle created by the 2
instruments when held th
id Van Edwards <[4][5]da...@vanedwards.co.uk>;
"[5][6]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
<[6][7]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 13:19
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Martyn,
There seems to be an inside
outh.edu"
[8]<[6][7]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 13:19
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?
Martyn,
There seems to be an inside joke we're not privy to here. It may
just
be that the art
23 matches
Mail list logo