On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43:47PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > It's interesting especially in the light of a recent discussion in
> > Debian which of the "traditional" Unix tools should no longer have
> > priority standard and thus be
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:11:34PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 11:09:47 Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hey,
> > You rock! Thanks, it was indeed a missing build-depedency on bc.
>
> That requirement is there for all the 2.1.x releases. Until I found that it
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:37:18PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> > I just tried to jump in before the next Debian freeze and tried to
> > do an ad-hoc bump of the LyX package to 2.1.2. Sadly my naive attempt
> > to build it failed with:
>
>
Hi,
I just tried to jump in before the next Debian freeze and tried to
do an ad-hoc bump of the LyX package to 2.1.2. Sadly my naive attempt
to build it failed with:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I.. -I../../src -pthread
-I/usr/include/enchant -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib/x86_64-
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:03:39PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > I've no idea about hunspell spell checking, I would've to try a build with
> > hunspell. I switched the package to enchant only some time ago. For the
> > thesaurus the default
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:23:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi,
> i have a question for people on various linux distros. does hunspell
> dictionaries and thesaurus working on your box automatically? (now i mean
> vanilla lyx, not packages already fixed by distro packagers).
I've no idea about
Hi,
I would appreciate it if someone would sent me the wiki password required
to approve new links. Alternatively someone could just approve the changes
made on http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian
Thanks in advanced,
Sven
--
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a r
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:09:03PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from
> Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a
> Xen domU with -static. (sounds scary? yes it is!)
Hm passing -stati
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:06:25PM +0700, Andrei Lomov wrote:
> May be anywhere is the binary i686 LyX 1.5.7 (statically linked)?
Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from
Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a
Xen domU with -static
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:35:32PM +0300, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Andrei Lomov wrote:
> > I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze.
> > No success, ./configure returns
> >
> >
> > ** qt 4 library not found !
> >
> Did you try installin
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:47:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 12:06 PM, Andrei Lomov wrote:
> >I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze.
> >No success, ./configure returns
> >
> You've got the qt4-devel package installed, right? Dumb question,
> I'm su
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:12:56PM +1000, Brendon Higgins wrote:
Hi,
I currently fail to help with debugging this problem any further so maybe
someone here has an idea how to proceed.
Summary:
Export options only appear when reconfigure just ran and LyX got restarted.
After a second restart they'
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
Hi,
> Any idea what might have happened?
I guess I should've forwarded
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332
but I never found a way to reproduce it. :(
And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the iss
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 08:23:21PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 07:10:55PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi Enrico,
> > I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible
> > I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsa
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> We can go on ...
Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this
time ...) so far.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No
Hi,
this is so wide spread that I hesitate to sent a patch.
I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible
I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsable collapsible
It's even in a file name src/insets/InsetCollapsable.cpp.
Is someone interested to fix this
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:09PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hi,
> Can you please report this as LyX bug?
Done:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6708
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Hi,
> Please keep branch in freeze until we know 1.6.6 is OK.
Oh and lintian again found a common misspelling in the source ...
Maybe you'd like to apply this for 1.6.7.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I've put the tarballs here:
>
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.gz
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.bz2
>
> Please test, build, report back.
Build and seems to work with m
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> > Maybe, I don't understand this well enough, but anyway, why do we
> > require automake 1.10.1 for everyone ? Even for people not using make
> > dist or the tarball at all.
>
> automake < 1.10.1 w
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:27:17AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 2010 14:37:24 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > anybody already using python 3 with lyx?
> > what is the situation with different distros and our compatibility with 3?
> > (gentoo has 3(.1) still in testing but slow
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:28:45PM -0700, Marcelo Acuña wrote:
> > > I have debian lenny with g++ 4.3.2, qt 4.6.2.
> >
> > Usually, you use a different run-time version of Qt as the
> > one you used in the compilation.
> >
> > Vincent
>
> I have only one qt installed.
Since Debian/Lenny shipp
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:48:21PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 05:45 PM, venom00 wrote:
> >Hi! Why don't you create a IRC chan for quick discussions? It would be very
> >interesting! Maybe on Freenode.
> >Let me know!
> >
> Do you know how to create such a thing? If so, please do, and then
Hi,
a few weeks ago we received a bugreport that LyX currently fails to link
with gold in Debian (Google provided a new implementation of ld some time
ago for those who haven't heard of it so far).
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=80
This is not much of an issue currently and e
Hi,
while packaging the 1.6.5 release lintian, one the Debian
helpers to check your package, noted some small spelling errors in the
binary. I tried to track them down without fixing them in other places
like comments aswell.
Would be nice if someone could commit them to trunk and branch for 1.6.6
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:04:00PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Hi,
> So it seems we have resolved almost all critical bugs, and in view of the
> large list of changes, I think we should get out LyX 1.6.5 soon.
[...]
> Objections? Any bugs that should be considered in your opinion? Vincent?
Hi,
I've nearly no time currently so it would be amazing if one of
you guys could take a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548519
It's a crash, plus backtrace and a proposed patch by Jonas Baggett.
Thanks,
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, wo
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> If I remember my tests correctly 1.6.3 with ext-boost 1.38.0, Qt 4.5.2 and
> gcc-4.4
> worked but I'll better run that build again to be sure.
This definetly works.
Branch with the same libs and compiler doesn
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > Note that LyX does run fine when make-installed.
>
> this means segfault?
>
> > Idea: Is this a general problem with the "without-included-boost" and
> > run-in-place combination?
>
> wasn't confirmed that ex
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:02:50PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
>
> This is a fresh install of F11, and I've done a fresh checkout of
> the tree, too. When I try to run trunk (in place, as I've not
> installed it), I get a segfault. Thus:
I see the same problem for branch. Build with gcc 4.4, external bo
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:11:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > Ok now that 1.6.3 is released here's a fresh version
> > of the changes. Would be nice if someone could commit it.
>
> its in
> pavel
Thanks.
Sven
--
forevermore
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Hi,
> > Attached is a patch to get the desired behaviour. Works here[tm]. ;)
>
> No objections from me (once 1.6.4svn is open again).
Ok now that 1.6.3 is released here's a fresh version
of the changes. Would be nice if someone
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:28:25PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/06/2009 15:01, Rex Dieter a écrit :
>>> to sum it up: i'm completely against that "for majority of users this
>>> works others will fix it themselves."
>>
>> It's fair to say that we agree to disagree at this point, and t
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> > Is xdg-open now fixed/enhanced to solve the mentioned problems?
>
> i have asked in bugzilla without success and was tired to fight for it
> on their devel list.
According to https://bu
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:28:21PM +, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> Mandriva includes this patch to open files in the default applications in
> the user's desktop with xdg-open. Maybe you want to include this patch in
> the official sources.
Debian and Fedora too.
See this thread for the discussio
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Hi,
> would it be feasible to search for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?
Maybe I missed something but just this morning it all seems to be a lot
easier.
Attached is a patch to get the desired behaviour. Works h
Hi,
would it be feasible to search for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?
I don't know how other distributions handle software written in scripting
languages which reside somewhere in a bin or sbin directory but in Debian
filetype extensions are removed.
For now I've added a patch to the Debia
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23:56PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > I don't know what other distributions currently do with relation to the
> > boost
> > changes. At least Fedora seems to provide the single threaded version with
> > the old namin
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Hi,
> I learned that Sven Hoexter has already a workaround, so I believe it can
> wait for 1.6.4.
I'm just adding the -mt suffix in all .in and the common.am file. This
doesn't ensure any portability it just keeps it
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:52:09AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-04-29, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hi,
> For Linux distributions this would mean a "recommendation" or
> "suggestion" in the lyx package. (Hopefully there will be an elyxer
> Debian package soon.)
These terms (recommends and sug
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:13:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 15/03/2009 11:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Sven Hoexter wrote:
>>
>>> Now I just need to meet you to verify your key or find a trustpath to
>>> you. :) Hm no sigs on the key. Ba
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Hi,
> No point in wasting effort if all you where objecting like mad...
Not that I'm objecting in any way but I guess that all old links to
the bugreports will break or is there some mod_rewrite voodoo possible
to retain the ol
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your
> > system?
>
> I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be
> sufficient?
Sure. Tha
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Hi Juergen,
> LyX 1.6.2 is here:
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable
Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your
system?
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in pe
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:56:06AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
Hi,
> My favourite is berlios.de, an advertisement-free, clean open-source
> forge with bug-tracking, GIT and other tools (see
> http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=26&group_id=2
> for details).
AFAIK Joerg Schil
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Hi,
> In this respect, I'd favor hosting from free software projects like
> alioth (debian), launchpad (ubuntu,although this is a company) or
> savannah (GNU).
Alioth is strictly Debian only so
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:22:58AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Hi,
> | I need to upgrade that server to Centos 5.2, but once that's done
>
> You are aware that Centos 5.3 will be out in a couple of weeks?
In almost all cases that will be a rather smooth upgrade. I've some RHEL 5
here
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:33:02AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi,
> Sven, have you looked on it again or should we put the original patch
> into the tree?
Nope sorry. If you like you can put in the original patch or just let it be.
I'll rewrite/reformat the whole thing when I've some spare time.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:03:17AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> "Sven Hoexter" writes:
Hi,
> > With this patch applied there are only two warnings waiting to be fixed.
> > $ LANG=C man --warnings -l tex2lyx.1 >/dev/null
> > :43: warning: `Tr'
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:16:30PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
>> attached is a small patch to set the comments right in the tex2lyx manpage.
>>
>>
> I'm happy to commit this, but someone who actually knows about this
> should have a qu
Hi,
attached is a small patch to set the comments right in the tex2lyx manpage.
With this patch applied there are only two warnings waiting to be fixed.
$ LANG=C man --warnings -l tex2lyx.1 >/dev/null
:43: warning: `Tr' not defined
:584: warning: `IX' not defined
For the first one I've still no
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:07:38PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> >> donno if you care about not yet released GCC versions but the Debian
> >> QA people do.
> >
> > its in.
&
Hi,
donno if you care about not yet released GCC versions but the Debian
QA people do.
Sven
- Forwarded message from Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:59:20 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:43:45PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> It is intended. This is where we can define icons for user-defined
>>> commands.
>>
>> Hm user-defined stuff in /usr sounds like a bad idea to me but I guess
>> this is only a missunderstanding of the idea on my side.
>
> OK,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:51:25AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> "Sven Hoexter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > currently make install creates an empty directory share/lyx/images/commands.
> > Is this done by intention or just something left over or should t
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:35:22PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > Sure. Now diffed against the proper lyx.1in file.
>
> It's in (1.5.7 and 1.6.1).
Thanks.
Sven
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 06:00:40PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> Can you send this as an attachment?
Sure. Now diffed against the proper lyx.1in file.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
Index: lyx-1.6.0/lyx.1in
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 06:44:18PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Moin,
> Ok I've prepared 1.6.0 in our repository but I've no answer so far from Per
> (mailed him on Friday) so I don't think we'll make it in time. I don't know
> if Per is on holiday or just away f
Hi,
this one is very small for the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ LANG=C man --warnings -l lyx-unfixed.1 >/dev/null
:125: warning: `Sp' not defined
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ diff -ur lyx-unfixed.1 lyx.1
--- lyx-unfixed.1 2008-11-09 20:22:42.0 +0100
+++ lyx.1 2008-11-09
Hi,
currently make install creates an empty directory share/lyx/images/commands.
Is this done by intention or just something left over or should there be
some files in there?
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:30:14PM +, José Matos wrote:
Hi guys,
> This way we would have binary packages for the users to try when they
> read
> the announce. Larger projects follow this scheme and I would like to give it
> a
> try this time.
>
> I intend to release the anno
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 01:18:57AM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> likely to keep these here for a short time:
>
> http://feanor.sssup.it/~tommaso/lyx/
>
> I hacked very quickly debian/changelog (renamed last
> commit by somebody from 1.5.6 to 1.6.0) and deps in
> debian/control (was depending o
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > You have one now. If you need it or not. ;) It's at least clear now that
> > other packagers
> > are safe to pick the file up and distribute it if they think it's usefull.
>
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 04:31:58PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi Pavel,
> i see some response in bugzilla. i'm not sure whats the status for such kind
> of contributed
> stuff. do we need blanket permission for inclusion in the tarball?
> > [2] http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4753
You ha
Hi Julien, hi Cengiz,
ok you might wonder why I'm mailing you so here's the story:
Cengiz Gunay modified your bash_completion file for inkscape to work with
LyX and submitted it for inclusion in the Debian package.[1]
I picked it up and added it to the Debian LyX package and proposed it upstream
t
> Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
Hi,
> >i am a mandriva contributor and i would like to see this bug fixed for us
> >to.
> >
> >would it be possible to obtain that patch please ?
you can always take a look at our packaging/patches in the svn repo here:
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-lyx/lyx/trunk/
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hi Abdel,
> It seems that setting a message triggers a draw of the working area with
> 4.4. So, as it is not safe to do anything inside the paint event that
> triggers another paint event, this patch fixes the crash.
Yay! You
[Notice: lyx-devel is subscribers only so if you dislike to receive any
held for moderation notice etc. just kick it and I'll forward mails if needed]
Hi,
with Qt 4.4.0rc1-2 hitting unstable we noticed that LyX fails badly. I've
no clue if it's a problem of LyX with the new Qt version or a proble
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >Can we do that without reinstalling a newer linux distribution?
>
> Why not upgrading to the latest Fedora by the way? I guess (hope) that
> Fedora provide easy upgrade without the need to reinstal
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:22:02PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > I noticed/suspected too that you were browsing trac at the time where
> > > > the
> > > > bump happened on the graph. Do you use rss feeds?
> > >
> > > No, I just browsed it with a plain web browser (konqueror). I used nothing
>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:27:13PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > >> watch out, the real fun starts right now.
> >
> > Can you tell me at what time it started?
>
> cat ~sanda/log
> first offense seems to be around 10am today.
>
> btw i dont think that just restart is the way how to solve it.
> th
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:54:45PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> The machine (Athlon 2000+) has been bought from the project's fund and
>> from time to time Lars asks on lyx-users whether somebody could renew
>> the lyx.org name. That is
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:22:56PM +0100, Dominik Böhm wrote:
> Hi to whomever I am writing right now,
>
> I would like to download a development version of LyX 1.6.0. but wasn't able
> to find an according download link for it. So, could you please provide me
> with the location where I can get t
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:49:18PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> What about something like this:
>>>
>>> cp -a /var /home/var
>>> umount /var
>>> ln -s /home/var /var
>>
>> uhh.. when the server apps are running? what about the open files; i'm not
>> sure
>> everything i
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:15:32AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi,
> > they should configure it properly. If they don't want to use xdg-open,
> > then get rid of xdg-utils and LyX configure will pick the next possible
> > viewer...
>
> you can not rid of xdg-utils simply - they are in dependencie
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:36:50PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > If it's really too much pain to fix xdg-open then I've to agree that it
> > would make more sense to revert the change.
>
> have you some experience how much are xdg devs communicative about the
> run-mailcap
> thing ?
Nope but I'v
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:14:43PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
>> We've been using xdg-open as the first choice for the Debian packages and
>> subsequently the Ubuntu packages for over a year now and didn't receive such
>> a problem report so I suspect that it makes more sense to fix the broken
>> setup
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:45:14AM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> xdg-open is supposed just to open whatever viewer you have defined for
>>> the relevant file type. If you're not using one of the desktops for which
>>> it is defined (KDE, Gnome, XFCE) and, moreover, don't have mime
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:57:15PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
>
> > Developers, please let me know if you have pending patches;
>
> I have the two following patches in my tree.
>
> - last.diff is just documenting the fact that last files a
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> > Some news on those small modifications? Are you going to commit them for
> > 1.5.3 and 1.6?
>
> I'll leave this to somebody else. I'm currently busy enough with ot
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:02:37PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
Hi,
> > > we've still two patches in the Debian package for LyX 1.5.2 you might
> > > be interested in.
> > >
> > >
> > > 05.configure.py_prog_prefer is mostly about adding
> > > xdg-open/sensible-editor as
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:17:16AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:14:51PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi Andre,
> > 05.configure.py_prog_prefer is mostly about adding xdg-open/sensible-editor
> > as the first option in configure.py.
>
> I've n
Hi,
we've still two patches in the Debian package for LyX 1.5.2 you might
be interested in.
05.configure.py_prog_prefer is mostly about adding xdg-open/sensible-editor
as the first option in configure.py.
Documentation for xdg-open: http://jbot.de/BdoaD
Patch in the pkg-lyx svn: http://jbot.de/g
Hi,
we've had some arguments about the fact that we turned assertions on
in the LyX Debian package. ATM we're rethinking our position and I
would like to get some input from you on the topic.
The main argument for turning assertions on is that in cases of an
assertion getting cought the chance for
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:53:28PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any automated script to build a .deb package for LyX ?
>
Well you can always check out the debian directory from the pkg-lyx
svn on alioth and use that to build with dpkg-buildpackage and related
tools. http://w
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:48:08PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, this could be. We should simply NOT use the static solution.
> > Does attached patch work on Debian? If yes we could
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Hi,
> Yes, this could be. We should simply NOT use the static solution.
> Does attached patch work on Debian? If yes we could remove BugfixSignal, and
> create the signal at runtime. But we then have to clean up correctly.
Ok I tried y
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:18:03AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > Hi,
> > while preparing a Debian package for the upcoming 1.5 release I've
> > experienced a huge performance problem with 1.5rc1. Now I tried to find a
> > reason and had to
Hi,
while preparing a Debian package for the upcoming 1.5 release I've
experienced a huge performance problem with 1.5rc1. Now I tried to find a
reason and had to find out that the current trunk will segfault when I build
it with the boost libs provided in the Debian archive.
I don't know if someo
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Sven" == Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sven> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:49:34PM +0100, Sam Lewis wrote:
> Sven> Hi Sam,
>
> >> I've mo
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:49:34PM +0100, Sam Lewis wrote:
Hi Sam,
> I've moved a 1.5rc2 binary for ubuntu dapper to incoming ftp.lyx.org.
> Could someone please place in the appropriate folder. Many thanks!
I don't like to bother other people with licence issue but there's no
diff.gz avaible s
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:38:41AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> Hi,
> since the new available latex on linux, will be texlive instead of
> tetex, I think it 's time to support the texlive instead of tetex.
> [ Now the required latex for lyx 1.4.2 (is tetex) ] or I am wrong ??
AFAIK LyX wo
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:30:04PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Sven Hoexter wrote:
>
> > To be honest I'm still unsure if this is a good way to handle the
> > translations. I donno how you worked with changes of translated text
> > in the past.
>
> The standar
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:51:01AM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 November 2006 1:37 pm, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > here is a patch proposal for the FSF address change
> > needed in the /po/*.po files including a translation for
> > the de.po file.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 03:22:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Sven" == Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven> What's missing is the translation update for the address. I
> Sven> didn't touch the po files because I
Hi guys,
I hope that this one is not something like a well known bug. At least I could
not find a fitting but in the Bugzilla yet but aehm well it's quite hard to
find something without reading a few hundred bugreports ...
If I do the following with LyX 1.4.3:
touch foo.lyx
lyx-qt
File->New
File
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:12:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Sven" == Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Sven> What's missing is the translation update for the address. I
> Sven> didn't touch the po files b
Hi,
attached you can find a diff against the 1.4.x branch where I started to
update the FSF postal address.
I also updated the LyX-Team copyright up to 2006 if you disagree remove this
change and please list the current copyright holders.
What's missing is the translation update for the address. I
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:54:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hi,
> BTW, how comes that lyx on debian triggers assertions? Do you keep them
> on intentionally?
s/intentionally/historically/ would be the better term. As far as I can travel
back in our svn they've been always enabled. They'
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 07:33:40PM -0400, Mark Carroll wrote:
Hello Mark, hello *,
I'm not sure if there is still someone interested in fixing bugs in the
xforms frontend. I'd suggest you to try out the qt frontend by installing
the lyx-qt package.
Moreover I'm forwarding this bug to the lyx-deve
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
