Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 30/12/2021 à 17:30, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:44:27AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, dem 27.12.2021 um 22:00 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Good news. Still, I'd like to hear Jürgen's thoughts on that. Go ahead. If it's carefully tested I have n

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:44:27AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 27.12.2021 um 22:00 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > Good news. Still, I'd like to hear Jürgen's thoughts on that. > > Go ahead. If it's carefully tested I have no objections. JMarc, I suggest you commit.

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Montag, dem 27.12.2021 um 22:00 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Good news. Still, I'd like to hear Jürgen's thoughts on that. Go ahead. If it's carefully tested I have no objections. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list l

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 27/12/2021 à 17:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I did not check carefully, but I *think* the patch fixes the following ctest that was failing: export/doc/ja/Tutorial_pdf5_systemF Good news. Still, I'd like to hear Jürgen's thoughts on that. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 07:40:38PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:32:39 -0500 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:16:08PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500 > > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 1

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:32:39 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:16:08PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500 > > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > Le 09/12/20

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:16:08PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 09/12/2021 à 05:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > > I did some brief tests on othe

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:47:34 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 09/12/2021 à 05:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > I did some brief tests on other documents and it works fine from what I > > > can see. Small typo: "an n

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:39:52AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/12/2021 à 05:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > I did some brief tests on other documents and it works fine from what I > > can see. Small typo: "an non" -> "a non". > > Thanks. > > > > What else could I try to be convin

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 09/12/2021 à 05:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I did some brief tests on other documents and it works fine from what I can see. Small typo: "an non" -> "a non". Thanks. What else could I try to be convinced that it works? Do we have font torture tests? What would font torture tests do? Do

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:17:03PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 03/12/2021 à 17:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:46:13PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 31/10/2021 � 18:11, Scott Kostyshak a �crit�: > > > > See the attached file. On master, \

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 03/12/2021 à 17:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:46:13PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 31/10/2021 � 18:11, Scott Kostyshak a �crit�: See the attached file. On master, \normalsize is included inside the footnote, which is different from 2.3.x. Here is

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 12:46:13PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 31/10/2021 � 18:11, Scott Kostyshak a �crit�: > > See the attached file. On master, \normalsize is included inside the > > footnote, which is different from 2.3.x. > > Here is my take on how to properly fix this issu

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 31/10/2021 à 18:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : See the attached file. On master, \normalsize is included inside the footnote, which is different from 2.3.x. Here is my take on how to properly fix this issue. I do not know however what it does in other situations. Scott, do you have magic sc

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 02/11/2021 à 15:52, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : With inheritFont() == false, we end up in unnecessary font switches at footnote start, e.g. \footnote{\normalsize text ...} in section headings (see Scott's example), and I want to avoid that. Agreed. However it seems that the code 1/ looks a

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:12:55AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Scott Kostyshak schrieb am Mi., 3. Nov. 2021, 02:44: > > > > > Thanks for taking a look. I see, so master behavior is correct. I think > > in most cases the intent is to not have it bold, i.e., I might look into > > removing th

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Scott Kostyshak schrieb am Mi., 3. Nov. 2021, 02:44: > > Thanks for taking a look. I see, so master behavior is correct. I think > in most cases the intent is to not have it bold, i.e., I might look into > removing the bold in the .lyx files if I am motivated. > I think a non-bold footnote symbo

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:33:47AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 01.11.2021 um 15:27 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > Fixes the original issue from what I can see, although I know nothing > > about the code. I'm not sure if the following is a related issue. See > > attached. I

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Dienstag, dem 02.11.2021 um 15:52 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > With inheritFont() == false, we end up in unnecessary font switches > at footnote start, e.g. \footnote{\normalsize text ...} in section > headings (see Scott's example), and I want to avoid that. And note that this is not on

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Dienstag, dem 02.11.2021 um 15:40 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Why do you want to inherit anything for the footnote? OK, it turns > out that using \normalfont (as \footnotetext does) resets everything > but the font size (I believe), but footnote does reset the font > completely. With

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 02/11/2021 à 14:45, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Dienstag, dem 02.11.2021 um 14:08 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: I do not see the needed for treating the screen differently from the lyx file. My point was to differentiate inheritance of font properties on screen from inheritance in

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Dienstag, dem 02.11.2021 um 14:08 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > I do not see the needed for treating the screen differently from the > lyx file.  My point was to differentiate inheritance of font properties on screen from inheritance in the TeX output (nothing to do with the LyX file).

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Le 01/11/2021 à 10:29, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Montag, dem 01.11.2021 um 09:56 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: (2.) revert b37929fd to correct the workarea font in footnotes (which otherwise inherits the font of the context, e.g. section) JMarc, what do you think about (2.)? It was pa

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Montag, dem 01.11.2021 um 15:27 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > Fixes the original issue from what I can see, although I know nothing > about the code. I'm not sure if the following is a related issue. See > attached. It's hard to see, but the in-line footnote number itself is > now bold on mas

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 01.11.2021 um 10:29 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > On another look I tend to think that, rather than overwriting metrics > > and draw in individual insets, we would need a method similar to > > inheritFont()

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Montag, dem 01.11.2021 um 10:29 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > On another look I tend to think that, rather than overwriting metrics > and draw in individual insets, we would need a method similar to > inheritFont() which only applies to screen font (I thought that > resetsFonEdit() is that

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Montag, dem 01.11.2021 um 09:56 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > (2.) revert b37929fd to correct the workarea font in footnotes (which > otherwise inherits the font of the context, e.g. section) > > JMarc, what do you think about (2.)? It was part of your series to > address #12204. On anot

Re: Footnote size is larger on master (\normalsize is prepended)

Am Sonntag, dem 31.10.2021 um 13:11 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > See the attached file. On master, \normalsize is included inside the > footnote, which is different from 2.3.x. To fix this, one needs  (1.) to set inheritFont() in InsetFootlike to true (i.e., back to default) in order to preve

Re: footnote numbering in boxes

On 11/19/2016 11:39 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 19/11/2016 à 10:25, Michael Berger a écrit : Dear all, I observe that numbering of footnotes in boxes is automatically changing to 'lettering' - see screen shot. Is this intended behavior or could it be specific to classicthesis? I am not

Re: footnote numbering in boxes

On 11/20/2016 08:15 AM, edu Gpl wrote: Please see this link: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/106306/using-footnotemark-with-letters Best regards بتاريخ ١٩‏/١١‏/٢٠١٦ ١٢:٢٧ م، كتب "Michael Berger" >: Dear all, I observe that numbering of footnotes in

Re: footnote numbering in boxes

Le 19/11/2016 à 10:25, Michael Berger a écrit : Dear all, I observe that numbering of footnotes in boxes is automatically changing to 'lettering' - see screen shot. Is this intended behavior or could it be specific to classicthesis? I am not sure to like it or not. Hello Michael, All I know i

Re: Footnote inset layout is undefined

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: It seems something broke the footnote layout recently... Removing my user lyx directory fixed the problem... Abdel.

Re: footnote in caption

Richard Heck wrote: > Can someone file a bug report about this? The footnote-insert LFUN > should be disabled in floats if it doesn't work. It works if you put a minipage in the float. Jürgen

Re: footnote in caption

riginal Message -------- Subject: Re: footnote in caption From: Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Alexander Sklar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed Oct 24 2007 04:37:30 GMT+0200 Alexander Sklar wrote: Well...it compiles, but doesn't produced the expected result :) (see attached pdf,

Re: (Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think so personally. I'll shove it in later today if I get no objections. > After it gets good testing, it could even go in > 1.4.x. Yes, would be nice. I'll port it back to my working version of 1.4, where it'll get some real life testing. Jürgen

Re: (Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> I don't care. I named it DISSOLVE to please Lars and you. The Juergen> attached patch also is improved in the way that it restores Juergen> the cursor position. Juergen> OK to go in trunk? I think so personally. After i

Re: (Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

Martin Vermeer wrote: > (I remember though also having code to dissolve an inset when pressing > Delete in last position.) Trivial. See, here the extra effort in code already pays off. > I don't like the name -- easily misunderstood. DISSOLVE or MELT would be > better. I don't care. I named it D

(Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I didn't bother to save it properly > > It's in the archieves: > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg84275.html Great! (I remember though also having code to dissolve an inset w

Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Martin Vermeer wrote: | > I didn't bother to save it properly | | It's in the archieves: | http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg84275.html | | However, I prefer the attached. A bit more code, but cleaner. And I think it's |

[PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

Martin Vermeer wrote: > I didn't bother to save it properly It's in the archieves: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg84275.html However, I prefer the attached. A bit more code, but cleaner. And I think it's worth to reserve an lfun for it. Opinions? Jürgen Index: src/LyX

Re: Footnote to normal text

On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 13:56 +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I used to have a patch for this in my tree... > > You know, I would have betted on that ;-) > > > backspace on first position > > inside the inset "dissolves" the inset, just like in math. > > Hm, why no

Re: Footnote to normal text

On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 11:30:18AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > I used to have a patch for this in my tree... backspace on first position > inside the inset "dissolves" the inset, just like in math. > > If there's any interest, I could hunt for it. Yes, please. Andre'

Re: Footnote to normal text

Martin Vermeer wrote: > I used to have a patch for this in my tree... You know, I would have betted on that ;-) > backspace on first position > inside the inset "dissolves" the inset, just like in math. Hm, why not. Do you also have an lfun for that? I think it could be useful especially for

Re: Footnote to normal text

On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:11:25AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > > But it should be implemented differently. Pressing the "insert footnote" > > button to change a footnote to normal text is bad UI IMHO > > I suppose a good UI would involve context menus. However, being a

Re: Footnote to normal text

Georg Baum wrote: > But it should be implemented differently. Pressing the "insert footnote" > button to change a footnote to normal text is bad UI IMHO I suppose a good UI would involve context menus. However, being able to remove character style markup without copying and pasting is a must-have

Re: Footnote to normal text

Am Samstag, 8. Juli 2006 22:32 schrieb Alex: > I hope it will come back, for me it is a good function. But it should be implemented differently. Pressing the "insert footnote" button to change a footnote to normal text is bad UI IMHO: Georg

Re: Footnote to normal text

Thanks for the answer. Any comments from the developers? >> "In additon, you can change regular text to a footnote, by selecting it >> and hitting the Insert footnote button; change a footnote to regular >> text by clicking the Insert footnote button when the cursor is in the >> footnote." > > I

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

"Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | It occurs to me that in the cases where footnote numbering would be | useful, numbering the footnotes that exist on loading the document would | be sufficient--these are the only ones that can already be on paper or | in someone else's hands .

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Angus Leeming wrote: | | > Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: | | > * You would like some on-screen way to differentiate between | > different footnotes. | | Correct. | | > * Lars thinks that you really need footnote labels. | | False. I do n

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > I have also created bug number 838 and added your patch as > attachment. Good. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > > This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...) > > Sorry, I searched for footnote and footnotes and did not find my old bug, You need to change the default search setting to include closed bugs too, it's quite

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

John Levon wrote: > This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...) Sorry, I searched for footnote and footnotes and did not find my old bug, nor did I get sent the additional responses.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:11:59PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: > even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper > corrections ("can you change this in footnote 6") to the right place in lyx > is a bit of a hassle... It occurs to me that in the cases where footnote numberin

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > I will :-) I have also created bug number 838 and added your patch as > attachment. This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...) regards john -- "When you start off by telling those who disagree with you that

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: >> [...] > > Here we go. Very quick&dirty and only barely functional (it takes a while > after an insertion until the change has "propagated") Thanks, I will try it out immediately :-) Great stuff, I

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Angus Leeming wrote: > Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > * You would like some on-screen way to differentiate between > different footnotes. Correct. > * Lars thinks that you really need footnote labels. False. I do not need these labels. > * André and myself both think that preview-latex is

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > [...] Here we go. Very quick&dirty and only barely functional (it takes a while after an insertion until the change has "propagated") Moritz could apply this in hid local tree and remind us during the 1.4 cycle to discuss

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tuesday 21 January 2003 17:20, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > The argument goes like this: > > "Mr. Moeller-Herrmann, in footnote 477, your argument is wrong and you have > to cite XYZ". > > At the moment I have to compile the lyx document, check the dvi, find > footnote 477, look for and reme

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > I am sick of getting this argument against implementing a fscking > simple footnote counter in lyx. So after reading your very long > answer, I can only conclude, that lyx does not and will never have a > useful implementation to see the footnote number, either usin

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

José Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:57, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> > What would you like to see the footnote number or mark? What benefits >> > does it give? >> One can e.g. make the (sequential!) numbers appear in print as well. >> Going back from the proofs to the .lyx would be easy

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Edwin Leuven wrote: > even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper > corrections ("can you change this in footnote 6") to the right place in lyx > is a bit of a hassle... One way to solve this problem is to implement "inverse search" http://bugzilla.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | If you had ever tried editing a document with more than 1000 footnotes >> | all of them labeled as "[foot]" in lyx, because lyx is unable to show >> | the footnote number, you would see why it is helpf

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:57, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > What would you like to see the footnote number or mark? What benefits > > does it give? > > Actually I accept his argument that a sequential numbering of all footnotes > might be some navigation help if the number of footnotes gets large. >

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper corrections ("can you change this in footnote 6") to the right place in lyx is a bit of a hassle... Ed.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | If you had ever tried editing a document with more than 1000 footnotes all > | of them labeled as "[foot]" in lyx, because lyx is unable to show the > | footnote number, you would see why it is helpful to see the footnote ma

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:50:05PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > >> How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature > >> myself? > > > > Two months. > > How long would it take you Depends on the end of the feature freeze. Probably less than two months. > and how m

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Andre Poenitz wrote: | | > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: | >> How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature | >> myself? | > | > Two months. | | How long would it take you and

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > LyX uses a little box saying "foot" (possibly translated) to show a | > footnote. Would you write better documents if LyX displayed some | > symbol or other? I doubt it. Sure, we /could/ do it, at the cost of | > complicating the code (read i

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: >> How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature >> myself? > > Two months. How long would it take you and how much money would you (or anyone else on this list) want for it?

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: > How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature myself? Two months. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jeffer

Re: Footnote Bug in Math-Environment

On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:23:43PM +0200, Michael Abshoff wrote: > 1. If you (manually) add a footnote in an eqn-array the resulting > TeX-Code doesn't do > the job right. It does display the footnote-symbol, but eats the > footnote itself. > The attached file demonstrates that case. This is a

Re: Footnote inside Tabulars (Reminder;-)

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Am Montag, 17. September 2001 22:56 schrieb Dekel Tsur: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 06:59:50PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > there were two footnote packages, the one of robin fairbanks > > > is now footmisc, the otherone is afaik no more part of the > > > tools

Re: Footnote inside Tabulars (Reminder;-)

Am Montag, 17. September 2001 22:56 schrieb Dekel Tsur: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 06:59:50PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > there were two footnote packages, the one of robin fairbanks > > is now footmisc, the otherone is afaik no more part of the > > tools package. > > Mark Wooding's footnote.sty

Re: Footnote inside Tabulars (Reminder;-)

On 17-Sep-2001 Herbert Voss wrote: > anyway, with package tabularx footnotes are no more a problem > without any preamble stuff. Well for that with longtable too. We could just output a longtable if we see that we use footnotes in the tabular, but probably it would be better to have some preamb

Re: Footnote inside Tabulars (Reminder;-)

On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 06:59:50PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > there were two footnote packages, the one of robin fairbanks > is now footmisc, the otherone is afaik no more part of the > tools package. Mark Wooding's footnote.sty is still a part of mdwtools. > anyway, with package tabularx foot

Re: Footnote inside Tabulars (Reminder;-)

Dekel Tsur wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > If a footnote is used inside a tabular which is > > > - outside floats > > > - not in a minipage > > > - no long-tabular > > > the following two lines have to be inserted to the preamble (according > > > to

Re: Footnote inside Tabulars (Reminder;-)

On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > If a footnote is used inside a tabular which is > > - outside floats > > - not in a minipage > > - no long-tabular > > the following two lines have to be inserted to the preamble (according > > to Dekel): > > \usepackage{footnote} >

Re: Footnote inside Tabulars (Reminder;-)

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > Just to remind you that this issue is still unsolved ;-) > If a footnote is used inside a tabular which is > - outside floats > - not in a minipage > - no long-tabular > the following two lines have to be inserted to the preamble (according > to Dekel): > \usepacka

Re: footnote problem (bug) in 1.1.6fix2 and cvs

> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 29-Jun-2001 Herbert Voss wrote: >>> sorry, the promblem is not the second %, but the linebreak before >>> the space, which lyx inserts in the tex-output.

Re: footnote problem (bug) in 1.1.6fix2 and cvs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Juergen> On 29-Jun-2001 Herbert Voss wrote: > >> sorry, the promblem is not the second %, but the linebreak before > >> the space, which lyx inserts in the tex-output. > > Juergen> Yes! We should re

Re: footnote problem (bug) in 1.1.6fix2 and cvs

> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 29-Jun-2001 Herbert Voss wrote: >> sorry, the promblem is not the second %, but the linebreak before >> the space, which lyx inserts in the tex-output. Juergen> Yes! We should remove the linebreak for the time being (and Ju

Re: footnote problem (bug) in 1.1.6fix2 and cvs

On 29-Jun-2001 Herbert Voss wrote: > sorry, the promblem is not the second %, but the linebreak before > the space, which lyx inserts in the tex-output. Yes! We should remove the linebreak for the time being (and until we find a good solution!) Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._

Re: footnote problem (bug) in 1.1.6fix2 and cvs

Herbert Voss wrote: > > a part of my tex-output > > - begin > als kryptisch bezeichnet werden, was Leslie Lamport\footnote{% > \url{http://www.research.compaq.com/SRC/personal/lamport/}}% > bereits Anfang 1980 veranlasste, eine Sammlung von Makropaketen zu > entwickeln, welche als \

Re: footnote

Hi I am using UNIX platform version 1.1.2. Thanks On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Sencer Ecer wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > It seems footnotes don't wotk properly. They sometimes don't appear except > > a line in the bottom of the text, otherwise without any numbers. > What version

Re: footnote

Sencer Ecer wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems footnotes don't wotk properly. They sometimes don't appear except > a line in the bottom of the text, otherwise without any numbers. What version of LyX are you using? What platform? Garst