I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
out how to do it exactly.
Ok, before we seriously start this kind of implementation I would really
like to have this Which scripting languange?
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010502 09:36]:
I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
out how to do it exactly.
Ok, before we seriously start this kind of implementation I would
There's an archive of most of the previous discussions at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/
Do you really want repeat all that again? For a fourth time?
Allan. (ARRae)
Amir == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Amir Sorry for my lack of clarity. v1.0 is me or my wife. It's not my
Amir joke; it's recycled from JMarc, so accuse him if it didn't make
Amir sense.
It's probably that I read too much about Linus v2.0 at the time. So it
is some kind of
Ulrich == Ulrich Günther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ulrich 1.1.6fix1 has a number of nasty bugs in tables (highlighting,
Ulrich maneuvering is broken, it is not possible any more to apply
Ulrich formatting to the entire table ...).
Ulrich Is there still a change to get a 1.1.6fix2?
I'd like to
Maybe we could have a small that of tasks that are likely to be solved with
scripting langauage and compare how easy it is to solve them with the
different languages.
To be read as:
Maybe we could have a compiliation of a small set of tasks that are
likely to be solved with scripting
Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on Which scripting
language? why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
language to be optional and let the user choose?
Good point. If you leave out Python off the core, I won't argue.
On the other hands there are a few tasks
I'd like to get fix2 out this week, but I have to warn you that it
does not solve most of the table problems... These need more major
surgery and are 1.2.0-only changes.
So what is the officially recommended Last Stable Version now?
I keep recommending 1.1.5fixsomething or even
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre So what is the officially recommended Last Stable Version
Andre now?
Andre I keep recommending 1.1.5fixsomething or even
Andre 1.1.4fixsomething, but I do not really know what I am talking
Andre about.
I'd say that 1.1.6fix? is fine for
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010502 10:28]:
Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on Which scripting
language? why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
language to be optional and let the user choose?
Good point. If you leave out Python off the core, I
I just commited the attached patch to cvs. It only matters when using
lyxstring. It is afaik harmless, but since mathed is such a sensitive
beast, I thought I'd just post it there too.
JMarc
Index: src/mathed/ChangeLog
===
RCS
Yann == Yann MORERE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yann Hello the dream team... I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1
Yann release of lyx
Replace your xforms package with the one found in
ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx. This is a better one.
For the warning with _, I don't know what this means. Do you
Michael == Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael you never stop learning new options. Enclosed please find the
Michael output of cvs diff -u.
Note that with a .cvsrc like
cvs -z6
diff -u
rdiff -u
update -dP
you will get the right options automatically, and a few other things.
I
It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
programmers, the example given there is Amirs Mom, I'm pretty sure she
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
programmers, the example
I just commited the attached patch to cvs. It only matters when using
lyxstring. It is afaik harmless, but since mathed is such a sensitive
beast, I thought I'd just post it there too.
Nice move ;-)
Andre'
PS: I am still sloppier than I'd like to be with std:: *sigh*
--
André Pönitz
I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
code in LyX proper right now,
I do hope he is ;-)
so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
Lars, will you make a concession to accept
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
Lars, will you make a concession to accept the embedding code into a
branch? It might be better anyhow to work this out
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
| code in LyX proper right now,
|
| I do hope he is ;-)
| so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
| to maintain such a thing without having it
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
| return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
| 1.2.0
Yes, please.
--
Lgb
Moving this comment over here (if it hasn't already been moved here) since it
has been suggested this is a more appropriate location:
On Tuesday 01 May 2001 14:44, Laura Jackson wrote:
Why couldn't LyX allow the user to type 2 spaces between sentences and 1
space between words? It's
In most of the C++ files incuding Lsstream.h, this file is just after
config.h, and even before LString.h and the implementation pragmas.
This makes LString.h output an error with gcc 2.95.3+lyxstring. Is it
OK if I move it later in the include list or is there some subtle
reason I am missing?
running latex on my doc with amsmath-option gave a lot
of errors, thats amsmath detected always dublicated
labels in equations. don't really know, what's going
on there i tested math-labeling.
it's possible to insert a label for the blue math box,
but it's never saved and displayed, always the
running latex on my doc with amsmath-option gave a lot
of errors, thats amsmath detected always dublicated
labels in equations. don't really know, what's going
on there i tested math-labeling.
Labels and numbers are currently completely broken.
I am right now rewriting the multiline stuff,
On 2 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
| return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
| 1.2.0
Yes, please.
yeah, being able to kill
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| In most of the C++ files incuding Lsstream.h, this file is just after
| config.h, and even before LString.h and the implementation pragmas.
| This makes LString.h output an error with gcc 2.95.3+lyxstring. Is it
| OK if I move it later in the
* John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010502 22:37]:
On 2 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
| return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable
In the latest CVS,
Double quotes in footnotes are inserted as '' (instead of `` followed
by '' when you close the quote).
Copying/pasting the correct quote from another part of the document
works as a workaround.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:50:21PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
In the latest CVS,
Double quotes in footnotes are inserted as '' (instead of `` followed
by '' when you close the quote).
Copying/pasting the correct quote from another part of the document
works as a workaround.
This is
> I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> out how to do it exactly.
Ok, before we seriously start this kind of implementation I would really
like to have this "Which scripting languange?"
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 09:36]:
> > I've tried to look into embedding python into lyx, it seems possible as
> > the interpreter was designed for embedding though I haven't yet figured
> > out how to do it exactly.
>
> Ok, before we seriously start this kind of implementation
There's an archive of most of the previous discussions at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/
Do you really want repeat all that again? For a fourth time?
Allan. (ARRae)
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> Sorry for my lack of clarity. v1.0 is me or my wife. It's not my
Amir> joke; it's recycled from JMarc, so accuse him if it didn't make
Amir> sense.
It's probably that I read too much about Linus v2.0 at the time. So it
is some kind
> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ulrich> 1.1.6fix1 has a number of nasty bugs in tables (highlighting,
Ulrich> maneuvering is broken, it is not possible any more to apply
Ulrich> formatting to the entire table ...).
Ulrich> Is there still a change to get a 1.1.6fix2?
> Maybe we could have a small that of tasks that are likely to be solved with
> scripting langauage and compare how easy it is to solve them with the
> different languages.
To be read as:
> Maybe we could have a compiliation of a small set of tasks that are
> likely to be solved with scripting
> Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on "Which scripting
> language?" why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
> language to be optional and let the user choose?
Good point. If you leave out Python off the core, I won't argue.
On the other hands there are a few
> I'd like to get fix2 out this week, but I have to warn you that it
> does not solve most of the table problems... These need more major
> surgery and are 1.2.0-only changes.
So what is the officially recommended "Last Stable Version" now?
I keep recommending 1.1.5fix or even 1.1.4fix, but I
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> So what is the officially recommended "Last Stable Version"
Andre> now?
Andre> I keep recommending 1.1.5fix or even
Andre> 1.1.4fix, but I do not really know what I am talking
Andre> about.
I'd say that 1.1.6fix? is fine for
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 10:28]:
> > Ok, before we serious start this kind of discussion on "Which scripting
> > language?" why don't we agree that the best thing is for scripting
> > language to be optional and let the user choose?
>
> Good point. If you leave out Python off
I just commited the attached patch to cvs. It only matters when using
lyxstring. It is afaik harmless, but since mathed is such a sensitive
beast, I thought I'd just post it there too.
JMarc
Index: src/mathed/ChangeLog
===
RCS
> "Yann" == Yann MORERE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yann> Hello the dream team... I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1
Yann> release of lyx
Replace your xforms package with the one found in
ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx. This is a better one.
For the warning with "_", I don't know what this
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> you never stop learning new options. Enclosed please find the
Michael> output of "cvs diff -u".
Note that with a .cvsrc like
cvs -z6
diff -u
rdiff -u
update -dP
you will get the right options automatically, and a few other
> > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
>
> Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> programmers, the example given there is Amirs Mom, I'm pretty sure
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > It works rather well if you really have people familiar with the languages.
> >
> > Hmmm, ok. But one thing that raised in the former discussion is the fact
> > that we need to target the language at novices and those who are not
> > programmers,
> I just commited the attached patch to cvs. It only matters when using
> lyxstring. It is afaik harmless, but since mathed is such a sensitive
> beast, I thought I'd just post it there too.
Nice move ;-)
Andre'
PS: I am still sloppier than I'd like to be with std:: *sigh*
--
André Pönitz
> I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
> code in LyX proper right now,
I do hope he is ;-)
> so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
> to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
>
> Lars, will you make a concession to
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
> > to maintain such a thing without having it in CVS.
> >
> > Lars, will you make a concession to accept the embedding code into a
> > branch? It might be better anyhow to work
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I think Lars is already bored with saying that he doesn't want any such
| > code in LyX proper right now,
|
| I do hope he is ;-)
| > so this whole embedding stuff is to be delayed, it will be pretty hard
| > to maintain such a thing without
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
| return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
| 1.2.0
Yes, please.
--
Lgb
Moving this comment over here (if it hasn't already been moved here) since it
has been suggested this is a more appropriate location:
On Tuesday 01 May 2001 14:44, Laura Jackson wrote:
> Why couldn't LyX allow the user to type 2 spaces between sentences and 1
> space between words? It's
In most of the C++ files incuding Lsstream.h, this file is just after
config.h, and even before LString.h and the implementation pragmas.
This makes LString.h output an error with gcc 2.95.3+lyxstring. Is it
OK if I move it later in the include list or is there some subtle
reason I am missing?
running latex on my doc with amsmath-option gave a lot
of errors, thats amsmath detected always dublicated
labels in equations. don't really know, what's going
on there i tested math-labeling.
it's possible to insert a label for the blue math box,
but it's never saved and displayed, always the
> running latex on my doc with amsmath-option gave a lot
> of errors, thats amsmath detected always dublicated
> labels in equations. don't really know, what's going
> on there i tested math-labeling.
Labels and numbers are currently completely broken.
I am right now rewriting the multiline
On 2 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
> Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
> | return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it presentable in
> | 1.2.0
>
> Yes, please.
yeah, being able
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In most of the C++ files incuding Lsstream.h, this file is just after
| config.h, and even before LString.h and the implementation pragmas.
| This makes LString.h output an error with gcc 2.95.3+lyxstring. Is it
| OK if I move it later in the
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010502 22:37]:
> On 2 May 2001, Lars Gullik [iso-8859-1] Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | I have no problem delaying everything until 1.2.0, I should probably
> > | return to InsetGraphics to complete it or at least make it
In the latest CVS,
Double quotes in footnotes are inserted as '' (instead of `` followed
by '' when you close the quote).
Copying/pasting the correct quote from another part of the document
works as a workaround.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:50:21PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> In the latest CVS,
>
> Double quotes in footnotes are inserted as '' (instead of `` followed
> by '' when you close the quote).
>
> Copying/pasting the correct quote from another part of the document
> works as a workaround.
58 matches
Mail list logo
