Outputting LaTeX from XML

Hi all, I've got the conversion programs for Stylz to intermediate XML, and to html and epub. Not a lot of features, but ePubs produced this way are no fatal errors, no errors, no warnings. Next step is to convert the intermediate XML to LaTeX. I'm not interested in xslt or docbook and the like,

Re: The tortured release of 2.3.0 Windows binaries

I may be wrong but my understanding of the discussion is that we are moving towards a situation where LyX can only be installed if the latest MikTeX is or has been installed. If this is so, then I have some doubts whether this is wise and practical: 2018-05-14 11:08 GMT+02:00 Bernt Lie

Re: The tortured release of 2.3.0 Windows binaries

On 05/14/2018 05:08 AM, Bernt Lie wrote: > A slight update on my indicated procedure in #2: I am, of course, no > developer and no computer scientist. So let me indicate some understanding > also for decisions made on things I don't understand. > > Suppose... updating MikTeX leads to the

Re: Testing

Got it, Wolfgang Am 14.05.2018 um 12:35 schrieb Baris Erkus: My e-mails do not appear in the list. This is a test. Sorry... BE.

Re: KMM 5.0.0 in Magaia 6

Michael, thanks for the reports. Please make sure to use a version based on the 5.0.1 released tar-ball. Unfortunately, the version that is printed by KMyMoney in the about box has not been updated so it is a bit harder to distinguish from a real 5.0.0 version. Please use

Testing

My e-mails do not appear in the list. This is a test. Sorry... BE.

Re: The tortured release of 2.3.0 Windows binaries

I do not why mails do not appear. I am sending again.. On 13-May-18 3:16 PM, Bernt Lie wrote: 1: I agree, and I didn't say so. Essentially, my point is that developers can not do that without compromising its OS agnostics. For various reasons, I use Windows myself. And I have full respect

KMM 5.0.0 in Magaia 6

Hello Thomas, I am very sorry for my below repeated premature statement re KMM 5.0.0 After digging deeper I must now advise Mageia 6 users to be extremely cautious when trying KMM 5.0.0. I continue using it for my everyday work while avoiding the dangerous parts/commands of it. Thomas, as I

RE: The tortured release of 2.3.0 Windows binaries

A slight update on my indicated procedure in #2: I am, of course, no developer and no computer scientist. So let me indicate some understanding also for decisions made on things I don't understand. Suppose... updating MikTeX leads to the following: * the latest MikTeX is not backwards

Re: The tortured release of 2.3.0 Windows binaries

On Mon, 14 May 2018 06:58:30 + Baris Erkus wrote: > On 13-May-18 3:16 PM, Bernt Lie wrote: > 1: I agree, and I didn't say so. Essentially, my point is that > developers can not do that without compromising its OS agnostics. For > various reasons, I use Windows myself.

Re: The tortured release of 2.3.0 Windows binaries

On 13-May-18 3:16 PM, Bernt Lie wrote: 1: I agree, and I didn't say so. Essentially, my point is that developers can not do that without compromising its OS agnostics. For various reasons, I use Windows myself. And I have full respect for others making different choices. I don't think the LyX