On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:52:02 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote:
Dear Users,
I had to change to a Linux machine (Fedora 10). When I read a document,
made in Windows-Lyx, into the Lyx in Fedora, everything is allright,
except the (numerous) eps figures. Their sizes are appropriate
(correspond to
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 18:52:02 Dr. Gyorgy Pota wrote:
> Dear Users,
>
> I had to change to a Linux machine (Fedora 10). When I read a document,
> made in Windows-Lyx, into the Lyx in Fedora, everything is allright,
> except the (numerous) eps figures. Their sizes are appropriate
>
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:00:51 Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using the CLI interface of lyx:
/usr/bin/lyx -e pdf somefile.lyx
What happens if you use pdf2 or even pdf3 instead of pdf?
pdf, pdf2 and pdf3 are different routes to convert the document to pdf.
Inside the lyx
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:00:51 Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using the CLI interface of lyx:
/usr/bin/lyx -e pdf somefile.lyx
What happens if you use pdf2 or even pdf3 instead of pdf?
pdf, pdf2 and pdf3 are different routes to convert the document to pdf.
Inside the lyx
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:00:51 Matthias Coy wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm using the CLI interface of lyx:
>
> /usr/bin/lyx -e pdf somefile.lyx
What happens if you use pdf2 or even pdf3 instead of pdf?
pdf, pdf2 and pdf3 are different routes to convert the document to pdf.
> Inside the
Hi all,
in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for
feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0
I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid
the
transient state that occurs after the release. We are now in a better way to
Hi all,
in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for
feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0
I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid
the
transient state that occurs after the release. We are now in a better way to
Hi all,
in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for
feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0
I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid
the
transient state that occurs after the release. We are now in a better way to
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:13:29 Ethan Metsger wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:48:26 -0500, José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have done before if I had not been victim of a cold. :-)
I'm currently recovering from one, too--no worries about the delay.
What are the problems
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:13:29 Ethan Metsger wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:48:26 -0500, José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have done before if I had not been victim of a cold. :-)
I'm currently recovering from one, too--no worries about the delay.
What are the problems
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:13:29 Ethan Metsger wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:48:26 -0500, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would have done before if I had not been victim of a cold. :-)
>
> I'm currently recovering from one, too--no worries about
On Friday 21 November 2008 16:18:35 Ethan Metsger wrote:
Hi, all.
I promise I'll be quiet after this post--I don't mean to pester (or imply
by any stretch that I'm unhappy with LyX in general!). But can anyone
comment on this?
I would have done before if I had not been victim of a cold.
On Friday 21 November 2008 16:18:35 Ethan Metsger wrote:
Hi, all.
I promise I'll be quiet after this post--I don't mean to pester (or imply
by any stretch that I'm unhappy with LyX in general!). But can anyone
comment on this?
I would have done before if I had not been victim of a cold.
On Friday 21 November 2008 16:18:35 Ethan Metsger wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I promise I'll be quiet after this post--I don't mean to pester (or imply
> by any stretch that I'm unhappy with LyX in general!). But can anyone
> comment on this?
I would have done before if I had not been victim of a
On Saturday 15 November 2008 20:05:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
Pending some polish to the update text, the push request will be
soonish. See:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.0-1.fc8
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.0-1.fc9
Feedback welcome.
It should be noticed that
On Saturday 15 November 2008 20:05:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
Pending some polish to the update text, the push request will be
soonish. See:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.0-1.fc8
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.0-1.fc9
Feedback welcome.
It should be noticed that
On Saturday 15 November 2008 20:05:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Pending some polish to the update text, the push request will be
> soonish. See:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.0-1.fc8
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.0-1.fc9
>
> Feedback welcome.
It should be
On Friday 14 November 2008 12:51:11 rgheck wrote:
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
Cool! i'm currently using v1.5.6 and a v1.6 update isn't yet available
for my platform (FC8 rpm)
Yes, but it's easy to compile yourself on FC8. Hard to know if 1.6 will
get packaged for FC8.
I suppose that it could
On Friday 14 November 2008 12:51:11 rgheck wrote:
Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
Cool! i'm currently using v1.5.6 and a v1.6 update isn't yet available
for my platform (FC8 rpm)
Yes, but it's easy to compile yourself on FC8. Hard to know if 1.6 will
get packaged for FC8.
I suppose that it could
On Friday 14 November 2008 12:51:11 rgheck wrote:
> Manoj Rajagopalan wrote:
> > Cool! i'm currently using v1.5.6 and a v1.6 update isn't yet available
> > for my platform (FC8 rpm)
>
> Yes, but it's easy to compile yourself on FC8. Hard to know if 1.6 will
> get packaged for FC8.
I suppose that
On Thursday 13 November 2008 10:54:11 icebna wrote:
the output to the printer, no print the graphic ant.eps, because say :
don't find the graphic, and the graphic is there !!
Someone idea ?
What class are you using?
I remember that in beamer we had to remove the file prefix. And then
On Thursday 13 November 2008 10:54:11 icebna wrote:
the output to the printer, no print the graphic ant.eps, because say :
don't find the graphic, and the graphic is there !!
Someone idea ?
What class are you using?
I remember that in beamer we had to remove the file prefix. And then
On Thursday 13 November 2008 10:54:11 icebna wrote:
> the output to the printer, no print the graphic ant.eps, because say :
> don't find the graphic, and the graphic is there !!
>
> Someone idea ?
What class are you using?
I remember that in beamer we had to remove the file prefix. And then
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 15:33:02 Steve Litt wrote:
I don't remember if you can have 2 parboxes or whatever side by side, or
whether you'd need to use a table.
It is possible to have two (or more) minipages side by side.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 15:33:02 Steve Litt wrote:
I don't remember if you can have 2 parboxes or whatever side by side, or
whether you'd need to use a table.
It is possible to have two (or more) minipages side by side.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 15:33:02 Steve Litt wrote:
> I don't remember if you can have 2 parboxes or whatever side by side, or
> whether you'd need to use a table.
It is possible to have two (or more) minipages side by side.
--
José Abílio
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing
based on the structure of your documents, not their appearance. It
is released under a Free Software /
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing
based on the structure of your documents, not their appearance. It
is released under a Free Software /
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX is a document processor that encourages an approach to writing
based on the structure of your documents, not their appearance. It
is released under a Free Software /
On Sunday 09 November 2008 19:15:42 Myriam Abramson wrote:
hello,
I'm not sure if there's anything to do with LyX but I'm having a
problem with one of my figure and I thought that maybe somebody on
this forum would know the answer. I don't know if attaching the figure
is okay on this list
On Sunday 09 November 2008 19:15:42 Myriam Abramson wrote:
hello,
I'm not sure if there's anything to do with LyX but I'm having a
problem with one of my figure and I thought that maybe somebody on
this forum would know the answer. I don't know if attaching the figure
is okay on this list
On Sunday 09 November 2008 19:15:42 Myriam Abramson wrote:
> hello,
>
> I'm not sure if there's anything to do with LyX but I'm having a
> problem with one of my figure and I thought that maybe somebody on
> this forum would know the answer. I don't know if attaching the figure
> is okay on this
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 5)
=
We are pleased to announce the fifth release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 15 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 5)
=
We are pleased to announce the fifth release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 15 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 5)
=
We are pleased to announce the fifth release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 15 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just after we should make
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just after we should make
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
> > conversion is taking place.
>
> And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
> this is
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
> > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
> > making it correc
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 4)
=
We are pleased to announce the fourth release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 14 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 4)
=
We are pleased to announce the fourth release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 14 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 4)
=
We are pleased to announce the fourth release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 14 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 15:39:44 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I have been using beamer off and on for a few years. I am currently using
lyx 1.5.4 and my beamer is from pkgsrc package teTeX-texmf-3.0nb5.
I am trying to get a logo printed on every slide (PDF page). I have this
in a ERT:
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 15:39:44 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I have been using beamer off and on for a few years. I am currently using
lyx 1.5.4 and my beamer is from pkgsrc package teTeX-texmf-3.0nb5.
I am trying to get a logo printed on every slide (PDF page). I have this
in a ERT:
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 15:39:44 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I have been using beamer off and on for a few years. I am currently using
> lyx 1.5.4 and my beamer is from pkgsrc package teTeX-texmf-3.0nb5.
>
> I am trying to get a logo printed on every slide (PDF page). I have this
> in a ERT:
>
>
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 3)
=
We are pleased to announce the third release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 14 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 3)
=
We are pleased to announce the third release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 14 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 3)
=
We are pleased to announce the third release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 14 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 2)
=
We are pleased to announce the second release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 12 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 2)
=
We are pleased to announce the second release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 12 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 2)
=
We are pleased to announce the second release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 12 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
On Thursday 28 August 2008 18:22:59 killermike wrote:
I've just written an overview of the new features in the forthcoming 1.6
release for Linux.com. Apologies to the developers if significant
features had to be marginalised because I had to prioritise. A big
thanks for pulling off another
On Thursday 28 August 2008 18:22:59 killermike wrote:
I've just written an overview of the new features in the forthcoming 1.6
release for Linux.com. Apologies to the developers if significant
features had to be marginalised because I had to prioritise. A big
thanks for pulling off another
On Thursday 28 August 2008 18:22:59 killermike wrote:
> I've just written an overview of the new features in the forthcoming 1.6
> release for Linux.com. Apologies to the developers if significant
> features had to be marginalised because I had to prioritise. A big
> thanks for pulling off another
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 09:39:00 José Matos wrote:
all the packages have the right license (allow us to redistribute and
modify) with the non-commercial clause (as an example).
Just for correctness sake I should mention that I meant *without* any non-
commercial clause, for example. Any non
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 09:39:00 José Matos wrote:
all the packages have the right license (allow us to redistribute and
modify) with the non-commercial clause (as an example).
Just for correctness sake I should mention that I meant *without* any non-
commercial clause, for example. Any non
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 09:39:00 José Matos wrote:
> all the packages have the right license (allow us to redistribute and
> modify) with the non-commercial clause (as an example).
Just for correctness sake I should mention that I meant *without* any non-
commercial clause, for example. A
On Monday 25 August 2008 19:15:38 Steve Litt wrote:
Second, I'm really bent out of shape (American idiom for extremely angry)
because those fool packagers at Mandriva put in a 2004 Memoir package into
Mandriva 2008.1. I've got nine months to get over my anger, but right now
I'm inclined to
On Monday 25 August 2008 19:15:38 Steve Litt wrote:
Second, I'm really bent out of shape (American idiom for extremely angry)
because those fool packagers at Mandriva put in a 2004 Memoir package into
Mandriva 2008.1. I've got nine months to get over my anger, but right now
I'm inclined to
On Monday 25 August 2008 19:15:38 Steve Litt wrote:
> Second, I'm really bent out of shape (American idiom for extremely angry)
> because those fool packagers at Mandriva put in a 2004 Memoir package into
> Mandriva 2008.1. I've got nine months to get over my anger, but right now
> I'm inclined to
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 07:45:18 Manveru wrote:
I think explanation to the problem is fact that Mac new line character
(EOL) is CR, Windows is CR+LF, and Unix is LF. For compatibility most Unix
based applications ported to Windows handles only LF from these two, so on
Windows options were
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 07:45:18 Manveru wrote:
I think explanation to the problem is fact that Mac new line character
(EOL) is CR, Windows is CR+LF, and Unix is LF. For compatibility most Unix
based applications ported to Windows handles only LF from these two, so on
Windows options were
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 07:45:18 Manveru wrote:
> I think explanation to the problem is fact that Mac new line character
> (EOL) is CR, Windows is CR+LF, and Unix is LF. For compatibility most Unix
> based applications ported to Windows handles only LF from these two, so on
> Windows options
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 06:35:32 Graham Smith wrote:
I have asked in another question (sa far without a solution) about
problems with getting a Lyx file created on a Mac to compile on
Windows (it compiles fine on Linux).
As I intend sharing files with a Windows user, is this a common
On Thursday 14 August 2008 19:38:24 Brian Larsen wrote:
I am trying to get a publication ready for Geophysical Research
Letters, an AGU journal. I would love to be able to use the AGU
article (SGML) document class but no matter what I try I can't seem to
find the right files to put in my
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 06:35:32 Graham Smith wrote:
I have asked in another question (sa far without a solution) about
problems with getting a Lyx file created on a Mac to compile on
Windows (it compiles fine on Linux).
As I intend sharing files with a Windows user, is this a common
On Thursday 14 August 2008 19:38:24 Brian Larsen wrote:
I am trying to get a publication ready for Geophysical Research
Letters, an AGU journal. I would love to be able to use the AGU
article (SGML) document class but no matter what I try I can't seem to
find the right files to put in my
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 06:35:32 Graham Smith wrote:
> I have asked in another question (sa far without a solution) about
> problems with getting a Lyx file created on a Mac to compile on
> Windows (it compiles fine on Linux).
>
> As I intend sharing files with a Windows user, is this a common
>
On Thursday 14 August 2008 19:38:24 Brian Larsen wrote:
> I am trying to get a publication ready for Geophysical Research
> Letters, an AGU journal. I would love to be able to use the AGU
> article (SGML) document class but no matter what I try I can't seem to
> find the right files to put in my
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 15:47:05 José Matos wrote:
Prebuilt binaries (rpms for linux distributions, Mac OS X and Windows
installers) should soon be available at
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/devel/
For what is worth the right address is (the second lyx was missing):
ftp
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 15:47:05 José Matos wrote:
Prebuilt binaries (rpms for linux distributions, Mac OS X and Windows
installers) should soon be available at
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/devel/
For what is worth the right address is (the second lyx was missing):
ftp
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 15:47:05 José Matos wrote:
> Prebuilt binaries (rpms for linux distributions, Mac OS X and Windows
> installers) should soon be available at
> ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/devel/
For what is worth the right address is (the second lyx was miss
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 1)
=
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 12 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 1)
=
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 12 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 1)
=
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 12 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
or you have some particular
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
or you have some particular
On Thursday 24 July 2008 13:07:19 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> frankly - these are nice dreams, but there is not manpower to do it.
> my feeling is that the xml-branch commit activity pefectly shows what will
> happen after the worst bugs will be repaired in xml merged trunk.
>
> or you have some
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:24:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
this depends on what you master. i'm used on the bunch of small unix
utilities so i gave that sed example. if you know python you will do in
python. my point was not propose the best tools but to groan and moan about
xml :)
FWIW this chunk
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:16:49 Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
One feature I think would be really helpful in LyX would be
search-for-environment and search-for-character-style. That way I wouldn't
need to go into Vim every time I wanted to locate a specific character
style.
Thanks
SteeveT
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:24:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
this depends on what you master. i'm used on the bunch of small unix
utilities so i gave that sed example. if you know python you will do in
python. my point was not propose the best tools but to groan and moan about
xml :)
FWIW this chunk
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:16:49 Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
One feature I think would be really helpful in LyX would be
search-for-environment and search-for-character-style. That way I wouldn't
need to go into Vim every time I wanted to locate a specific character
style.
Thanks
SteeveT
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:24:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> this depends on what you master. i'm used on the bunch of small unix
> utilities so i gave that sed example. if you know python you will do in
> python. my point was not propose the best tools but to groan and moan about
> xml :)
FWIW this
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 19:16:49 Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One feature I think would be really helpful in LyX would be
> search-for-environment and search-for-character-style. That way I wouldn't
> need to go into Vim every time I wanted to locate a specific character
> style.
>
> Thanks
>
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 00:19:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
by 'outside' i mean tweakings which i regularly do and watching users list
power users do that too _and_ are happy about the current simplicity of
format.
tweaks like assembling of the whole file for various datasets, global
changes of
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 12:19:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
i've done incorrect file, it's my fault if lyx crashes. i take my
responsibility, no problem.
trial method is the fastest if you want something quickly.
If LyX crashes that is a bug. LyX should not ever crash, it can refused to
load a file
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 15:33:16 Steve Litt wrote:
The trouble is, XML tags can be anywhere -- spacing and linefeeds are
immaterial. That means you can no longer parse based on position, such as:
/^begin_layout/
because technically the whole XML file could be in a single line. Or a
single
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 15:20:59 Steve Litt wrote:
When the discussion reverts to your thingamabob is from another
decade/century so it must not be good by today's standards, you know that
thingamabob is pretty darn good, or else there would have been a more
powerful argument against it.
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 15:58:56 Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Pavel,
Perhaps our best hope of continuing tweakability of native LyX is to create
1.5.x to XML and XML to 1.5.x converters. Then all the parsing/tweaking can
continue to be done in the 1.5.x format.
I will advise against such practice.
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 14:49:12 Manveru wrote:
Guys,
Have you even looked at TinyXML?
Thanks for the link. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 00:19:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
by 'outside' i mean tweakings which i regularly do and watching users list
power users do that too _and_ are happy about the current simplicity of
format.
tweaks like assembling of the whole file for various datasets, global
changes of
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 12:19:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
i've done incorrect file, it's my fault if lyx crashes. i take my
responsibility, no problem.
trial method is the fastest if you want something quickly.
If LyX crashes that is a bug. LyX should not ever crash, it can refused to
load a file
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 15:33:16 Steve Litt wrote:
The trouble is, XML tags can be anywhere -- spacing and linefeeds are
immaterial. That means you can no longer parse based on position, such as:
/^begin_layout/
because technically the whole XML file could be in a single line. Or a
single
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 15:20:59 Steve Litt wrote:
When the discussion reverts to your thingamabob is from another
decade/century so it must not be good by today's standards, you know that
thingamabob is pretty darn good, or else there would have been a more
powerful argument against it.
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 15:58:56 Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Pavel,
Perhaps our best hope of continuing tweakability of native LyX is to create
1.5.x to XML and XML to 1.5.x converters. Then all the parsing/tweaking can
continue to be done in the 1.5.x format.
I will advise against such practice.
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 14:49:12 Manveru wrote:
Guys,
Have you even looked at TinyXML?
Thanks for the link. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 00:19:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> by 'outside' i mean tweakings which i regularly do and watching users list
> power users do that too _and_ are happy about the current simplicity of
> format.
>
> tweaks like assembling of the whole file for various datasets, global
> changes
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 12:19:16 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i've done incorrect file, it's my fault if lyx crashes. i take my
> responsibility, no problem.
> trial method is the fastest if you want something quickly.
If LyX crashes that is a bug. LyX should not ever crash, it can refused to
load a
301 - 400 of 965 matches
Mail list logo
