Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote:
|What is the Xlib symbol name for oe ? Lower case ? What is your $LANG
|
| How can I know the name of this symbol ? I cannot type the lower case
| (AltGr-S-g) ; this is what says
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote:
|What is the Xlib symbol name for oe ? Lower case ? What is your $LANG
|
| How can I know the name of this symbol ? I cannot type the lower case
| (AltGr-S-g) ; this is what says
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote:
| > > What is the Xlib symbol name for oe ? Lower case ? What is your $LANG
| >
| > How can I know the name of this symbol ? I cannot type the lower case
| > (AltGr-S-g) ; this is what
This is the third prerelease of LyX 1.3.0. The first and second
prerelase did not have too many problems so it is hoped that this
prerelease will be more or less equal to the final release.
Howerver as with all preleases and new version of a program, you
should backup your documents before
This is the third prerelease of LyX 1.3.0. The first and second
prerelase did not have too many problems so it is hoped that this
prerelease will be more or less equal to the final release.
Howerver as with all preleases and new version of a program, you
should backup your documents before
This is the third prerelease of LyX 1.3.0. The first and second
prerelase did not have too many problems so it is hoped that this
prerelease will be more or less equal to the final release.
Howerver as with all preleases and new version of a program, you
should backup your documents before
I have just uploaded the tarball and the rpms to ftp.devel.lyx.org.
A lot of small fixes has been applied since (the unannounced) first
prerelease.
Even if I am not aware of any serious problems with pre2, you should
be careful to backup your documents before trying this one out.
The rpms are
I have just uploaded the tarball and the rpms to ftp.devel.lyx.org.
A lot of small fixes has been applied since (the unannounced) first
prerelease.
Even if I am not aware of any serious problems with pre2, you should
be careful to backup your documents before trying this one out.
The rpms are
I have just uploaded the tarball and the rpms to ftp.devel.lyx.org.
A lot of small fixes has been applied since (the unannounced) first
prerelease.
Even if I am not aware of any serious problems with pre2, you should
be careful to backup your documents before trying this one out.
The rpms are
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi,
|
| translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get
| more/all the english strings into french.
|
| I looked into the fr.po file but everything is correctly translated...
| Maybe the po file needs to be regenerated to reflect
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| If nobody noticed, there was an article about LyX in the latest Linux
| Magazine. It looked like it would have continuation in later issues.
| (I think there's probably many Linux Magazines, this one looked like the UK
| one).
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi,
|
| translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get
| more/all the english strings into french.
|
| I looked into the fr.po file but everything is correctly translated...
| Maybe the po file needs to be regenerated to reflect
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| If nobody noticed, there was an article about LyX in the latest Linux
| Magazine. It looked like it would have continuation in later issues.
| (I think there's probably many Linux Magazines, this one looked like the UK
| one).
Aide Florent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| > translations. By making the french translation up to date you will get
| > more/all the english strings into french.
|
| I looked into the fr.po file but everything is correctly translated...
| Maybe the po file needs to be regenerated to
Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| If nobody noticed, there was an article about LyX in the latest Linux
| Magazine. It looked like it would have continuation in later issues.
| (I think there's probably many Linux Magazines, this one looked like the UK
| one).
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Do spill ...
|
| here it is:
|
| http://hector.homeip.net/lyx-130cvs1.png
|
| you can see the document parameter dialog, obviously there are many portions
| which remain in English whereas some others are obviously (too mee) French...
|
| There are
Aide Florent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Do spill ...
|
| here it is:
|
| http://hector.homeip.net/lyx-130cvs1.png
|
| you can see the document parameter dialog, obviously there are many portions
| which remain in English whereas some others are obviously (too mee) French...
|
| There are
Aide Florent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Do spill ...
|
| here it is:
|
| http://hector.homeip.net/lyx-130cvs1.png
|
| you can see the document parameter dialog, obviously there are many portions
| which remain in English whereas some others are obviously (too mee) French...
|
| There
Lars Forseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi!
|
| I have tried to compile lyx 1.2.1 on my new SuSE 8.1. But it failes. Can
| anyone explain this?
|
| Below my signature you will find the output of configure an make in one of my
| failures.
Did you try this with a clean tree?
The configure
Lars Forseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi!
|
| I have tried to compile lyx 1.2.1 on my new SuSE 8.1. But it failes. Can
| anyone explain this?
|
| Below my signature you will find the output of configure an make in one of my
| failures.
Did you try this with a clean tree?
The configure
Lars Forseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi!
|
| I have tried to compile lyx 1.2.1 on my new SuSE 8.1. But it failes. Can
| anyone explain this?
|
| Below my signature you will find the output of configure an make in one of my
| failures.
Did you try this with a clean tree?
The configure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Christian Ridderström wrote:
|
| On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Steve Litt wrote:
| If you write long documents, use Linux, and need an outline processor, you
| might like the new VimOutliner 0.2.0. It uses VI keystrokes plus some
| enhanced commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Christian Ridderström wrote:
|
| On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Steve Litt wrote:
| If you write long documents, use Linux, and need an outline processor, you
| might like the new VimOutliner 0.2.0. It uses VI keystrokes plus some
| enhanced commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Christian Ridderström wrote:
|
| > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Steve Litt wrote:
| > > If you write long documents, use Linux, and need an outline processor, you
| > > might like the new VimOutliner 0.2.0. It uses VI keystrokes plus some
| > > enhanced
Norman Kabir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| LyX is a phenomenal text editor.
|
| Has anyone considered building a code editor on top of LyX? I think it
| would be very useful to be able to mingle formulas, text, images and
| source code.
Well... LyX has been used for (and is still beeing used?)
Norman Kabir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| LyX is a phenomenal text editor.
|
| Has anyone considered building a code editor on top of LyX? I think it
| would be very useful to be able to mingle formulas, text, images and
| source code.
Well... LyX has been used for (and is still beeing used?)
Norman Kabir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| LyX is a phenomenal text editor.
|
| Has anyone considered building a code editor on top of LyX? I think it
| would be very useful to be able to mingle formulas, text, images and
| source code.
Well... LyX has been used for (and is still beeing
slitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| John -- has anyone started character styles yet? This is just a wild guess,
| but could it be accomplished by a translation to
| \begin{\whatever}\begin{\whichever}text to
| format\end{\whichever}\end{\whatever}?
|
| So maybe in the LyX file, it would look
slitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| John -- has anyone started character styles yet? This is just a wild guess,
| but could it be accomplished by a translation to
| \begin{\whatever}\begin{\whichever}text to
| format\end{\whichever}\end{\whatever}?
|
| So maybe in the LyX file, it would look
slitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John -- has anyone started character styles yet? This is just a wild guess,
| but could it be accomplished by a translation to
| \begin{\whatever}\begin{\whichever}text to
| format\end{\whichever}\end{\whatever}?
|
| So maybe in the LyX file, it would look
Daniel Clark/Cambridge/IBM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think what maybe I didn't explain well enough is that $Log$ expands to
| multiple lines, and CVS takes anything before $Log$ as the language's
| comment character. So the suggestions you give end up expanding to things
| that are syntax
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 24 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| $Log$
| \end{verbatim}
|
| what happens if you put this in a ERT?
|
| I don't use CVS, but trying with hand: when this is saved, it'll look in
| .lyx file something like
Daniel Clark/Cambridge/IBM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think what maybe I didn't explain well enough is that $Log$ expands to
| multiple lines, and CVS takes anything before $Log$ as the language's
| comment character. So the suggestions you give end up expanding to things
| that are syntax
Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 24 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| $Log$
| \end{verbatim}
|
| what happens if you put this in a ERT?
|
| I don't use CVS, but trying with hand: when this is saved, it'll look in
| .lyx file something like
Daniel Clark/Cambridge/IBM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I think what maybe I didn't explain well enough is that $Log$ expands to
| multiple lines, and CVS takes anything before $Log$ as the language's
| comment character. So the suggestions you give end up expanding to things
| that are
Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 24 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >\begin{verbatim}
| >$Log$
| >\end{verbatim}
| >
| >what happens if you put this in a ERT?
|
| I don't use CVS, but trying with hand: when this is saved, it'll look in
| .ly
Takashi Soma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have the same problem. I found that eps files by GNUPLOT works fine
| but
not by IDL.
What do you mean by IDL? In any case, even EPS files from gnuplot
are not rendered ok. They are converted to xpm (don't know why)
and an error occurs when they
Takashi Soma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have the same problem. I found that eps files by GNUPLOT works fine
| but
not by IDL.
What do you mean by IDL? In any case, even EPS files from gnuplot
are not rendered ok. They are converted to xpm (don't know why)
and an error occurs when they
"Takashi Soma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I have the same problem. I found that eps files by GNUPLOT works fine
| but
>> > not by IDL.
>>
>> What do you mean by IDL? In any case, even EPS files from gnuplot
>> are not rendered ok. They are converted to xpm (don't know why)
>> and an
I forwarded your message to the lyx mailinglist, to possibly get some
wider attention and discussion.
---BeginMessage---
Paolo Saggese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
following feedback message on the LyX home page:
I forwarded your message to the lyx mailinglist, to possibly get some
wider attention and discussion.
---BeginMessage---
Paolo Saggese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
following feedback message on the LyX home page:
I forwarded your message to the lyx mailinglist, to possibly get some
wider attention and discussion.
--- Begin Message ---
Paolo Saggese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
following feedback message on the LyX home page:
Thomas Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| For my own documents i am using a file with a lot of \newcommand's
| like
| \newcommand{\company} [1] {\textbf{#1}}
yes...
| and then
| \newcommand{\redhat} {\company{RedHat}\xspace}
but this would be a combination of what I call (static)
Thomas Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| For my own documents i am using a file with a lot of \newcommand's
| like
| \newcommand{\company} [1] {\textbf{#1}}
yes...
| and then
| \newcommand{\redhat} {\company{RedHat}\xspace}
but this would be a combination of what I call (static)
Thomas Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For my own documents i am using a file with a lot of \newcommand's
| like
| \newcommand{\company} [1] {\textbf{#1}}
yes...
| and then
| \newcommand{\redhat} {\company{RedHat}\xspace}
but this would be a combination of what I call (static)
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I
| started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key
| for the second
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I
| started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key
| for the second
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > >> I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I
| > >> started writing a text and got a strange behaviour.
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:27:26PM +0200, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I
started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key
for the second time , e.g. mm
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:27:26PM +0200, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I
started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key
for the second time , e.g. mm
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:27:26PM +0200, Thorsten Fischer wrote:
>
>> I'm using lyx 1.2 for a couple of weeks now and is is great. However today I
>> started writing a text and got a strange behaviour. Everytime I press a key
>> for the second time ,
Niklas Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This is easy to solve, once you know it
| compile with CXXFLAGS=-O -whatever-else-you-want
| somehow the code is broken as to give above error when optimising more
| than -O ;-(
More likely the compiler than the code...
--
Lgb
Niklas Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This is easy to solve, once you know it
| compile with CXXFLAGS=-O -whatever-else-you-want
| somehow the code is broken as to give above error when optimising more
| than -O ;-(
More likely the compiler than the code...
--
Lgb
Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is easy to solve, once you know it
| compile with CXXFLAGS=-O -whatever-else-you-want
>
| somehow the code is broken as to give above error when optimising more
| than -O ;-(
More likely the compiler than the code...
--
Lgb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Based on the forwarded message below, I think it is necessary that you
| inform list subscribers that the list is to be publicly archived at a
| place where their addresses will be in full view for crawlers, in
| particular to email address collectors that sell the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Based on the forwarded message below, I think it is necessary that you
| inform list subscribers that the list is to be publicly archived at a
| place where their addresses will be in full view for crawlers, in
| particular to email address collectors that sell the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Based on the forwarded message below, I think it is necessary that you
| inform list subscribers that the list is to be publicly archived at a
| place where their addresses will be in full view for crawlers, in
| particular to email address collectors that sell the
Jacek Pop³awski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hello Lyx gurus!
| I am Lyx user for many years, so you may be suprised I don't know so simple
| stuff, but...
| I asked this questions few months ago, but I still don't know answer, so here I
| go again:
| let's say I want to create simple document:
Jacek Pop³awski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hello Lyx gurus!
| I am Lyx user for many years, so you may be suprised I don't know so simple
| stuff, but...
| I asked this questions few months ago, but I still don't know answer, so here I
| go again:
| let's say I want to create simple document:
Jacek Pop³awski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello Lyx gurus!
>
| I am Lyx user for many years, so you may be suprised I don't know so simple
| stuff, but...
| I asked this questions few months ago, but I still don't know answer, so here I
| go again:
>
| let's say I want to create simple
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi All,
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Andre,
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say?
--
Lgb
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi All,
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Andre,
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does rpm -qa | grep gcc say?
--
Lgb
fb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is the
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi All,
>
| I am using RedHat 7.0 and so thought I needed to rebuild the new LyX 1.2.0
| Things seemed to go well ... until the end when the build process
| aborted with:
>
| % source='insetexternal.C' object='insetexternal.lo' libtool=yes \
| %
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Andre,
>
| g++ --version says: 2.96
then what does "rpm -qa | grep gcc" say?
--
Lgb
fb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Lars,
| Here is the answer :
>
| % rpm -qa | grep gcc
| gcc-java-2.96-54
| gcc-g77-2.96-54
| gcc-c++-2.96-54
| kgcc-1.1.2-40
| gcc-2.96-54
| gcc-objc-2.96-54
| gcc-chill-2.96-54
>
>
| I think I must upgrade my gcc yes?
Yes.
For RH-7.0 it seems that this is
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every
second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
Sometimes LyX refuses I
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every
second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes 'wiling'. The
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Martijn Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
Sometimes LyX refuses I
Martijn Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
>>
>> > Sometimes LyX refuses I encouter the problem that lyx refuses every
>> > second identical keystroke. So 'willing' becomes
Martijn Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Martijn Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:32, John Levon wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 22, 2002
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:52:47AM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
I have several problems with the new 1.2.0 version. Some of these are
| Which 1.2.0 version ?
The one on ftp.devel.lyx.org of course.
a) When I open a file created by Lyx-1.1.6fix4 (which
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:52:47AM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
I have several problems with the new 1.2.0 version. Some of these are
| Which 1.2.0 version ?
The one on ftp.devel.lyx.org of course.
a) When I open a file created by Lyx-1.1.6fix4 (which
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:52:47AM +0300, Amir Seginer wrote:
>
>> I have several problems with the new 1.2.0 version. Some of these are
>
| Which 1.2.0 version ?
The one on ftp.devel.lyx.org of course.
>> a) When I open a file created by Lyx-1.1.6fix4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi!
| I tried to compile and install the program on a sun ultra 5 under solaris 8.
| The c compiler is sun ver. 3.0 and the c++ compiler is the one contained in the
| forte developer 6 update 2.
How recent is that compiler?
| Configuration is ok but the compilation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi!
| I tried to compile and install the program on a sun ultra 5 under solaris 8.
| The c compiler is sun ver. 3.0 and the c++ compiler is the one contained in the
| forte developer 6 update 2.
How recent is that compiler?
| Configuration is ok but the compilation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi!
>
| I tried to compile and install the program on a sun ultra 5 under solaris 8.
| The c compiler is sun ver. 3.0 and the c++ compiler is the one contained in the
| forte developer 6 update 2.
How recent is that compiler?
| Configuration is ok but the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, 13 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
what happens after edit-reconfigure and restart of LyX?
| There's no reconfigure on the edit menu! Only cut, copy, paste, and
| emphasize.
| When the program opens there is only a file menu. When I open a new or old
| doc,
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 08 May 2002 11:07 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Does this work both ways?
Yes it does. (cool)
Thanks to whoever set this up.
Ok, there is a newserver up and running with a gateway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, 13 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
what happens after edit-reconfigure and restart of LyX?
| There's no reconfigure on the edit menu! Only cut, copy, paste, and
| emphasize.
| When the program opens there is only a file menu. When I open a new or old
| doc,
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 08 May 2002 11:07 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Does this work both ways?
Yes it does. (cool)
Thanks to whoever set this up.
Ok, there is a newserver up and running with a gateway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, 13 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> what happens after edit->reconfigure and restart of LyX?
>
| There's no reconfigure on the edit menu! Only cut, copy, paste, and
| emphasize.
>
| When the program opens there is only a file menu. When I open a new or old
|
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 08 May 2002 11:07 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>> | Does this work both ways?
>>
>> Yes it does. (cool)
>>
>> Thanks to whoever set
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 12:45 pm, Wayan wrote:
Dear LyX-users,
could you please explain me how to omit the blank area from rotating
images? I have imported an eps/ps figure created by xmgrace. Without
rotate command, the image will be landscape... If
Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease
before 1.2.0 proper is released.
Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger
ones, but nothing major.
There are still some small glitches, but nothing really bad. (knock wood)
This prelease can be found
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 12:45 pm, Wayan wrote:
Dear LyX-users,
could you please explain me how to omit the blank area from rotating
images? I have imported an eps/ps figure created by xmgrace. Without
rotate command, the image will be landscape... If
Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease
before 1.2.0 proper is released.
Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger
ones, but nothing major.
There are still some small glitches, but nothing really bad. (knock wood)
This prelease can be found
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 12:45 pm, Wayan wrote:
>> Dear LyX-users,
>>
>> could you please explain me how to omit the blank area from rotating
>> images? I have imported an eps/ps figure created by xmgrace. Without
>> rotate command, the image will be
Ok, this will hopefully be the last (or next to last) prerelease
before 1.2.0 proper is released.
Since pre4 several small problems have been fixed, and a few bigger
ones, but nothing major.
There are still some small glitches, but nothing really bad. (knock wood)
This prelease can be found
I forwarded your message to the LyX users list.
I think you can get some help there.
---BeginMessage---
Hi!
I modified amsmaths.inc, amsmath-plain.inc and amsmaths-seq.inc. Now LyX
offers me Satz instead of Theorem etc., but if I compile the DVI-file,
there's the Theorem again !?!
Can you
I forwarded your message to the LyX users list.
I think you can get some help there.
---BeginMessage---
Hi!
I modified amsmaths.inc, amsmath-plain.inc and amsmaths-seq.inc. Now LyX
offers me Satz instead of Theorem etc., but if I compile the DVI-file,
there's the Theorem again !?!
Can you
I forwarded your message to the LyX users list.
I think you can get some help there.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
I modified amsmaths.inc, amsmath-plain.inc and amsmaths-seq.inc. Now LyX
offers me "Satz" instead of "Theorem" etc., but if I compile the DVI-file,
there's the "Theorem" again !?!
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Or Lars.
I did one several years ago...
| Well dg eeet up !
I just got Licks smacked in my forehead... so I do not thing so. You
english speaking cretins are not able to hear the difference between
LyX and Licks.
--
Lgb
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:59:13AM -0500, bcr wrote:
hello. i've been using lyx for a while now, love it, and am just about to
start my thesis. I cant wait. But i tried to convince a friend to use
lyx, and i felt pretty stupid. because I cont know
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Or Lars.
I did one several years ago...
| Well dg eeet up !
I just got Licks smacked in my forehead... so I do not thing so. You
english speaking cretins are not able to hear the difference between
LyX and Licks.
--
Lgb
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:59:13AM -0500, bcr wrote:
hello. i've been using lyx for a while now, love it, and am just about to
start my thesis. I cant wait. But i tried to convince a friend to use
lyx, and i felt pretty stupid. because I cont know
301 - 400 of 1520 matches
Mail list logo
