На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
P.S. Uwe
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 23:05, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlovemil_pavlovat mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this
your friend have everything involved (parent document, all child documents,
all image files etc.) or just what you posted here? If the latter, perhaps
you could send him everything (or, if he is unwilling, zip it all up and
send it to me). It's possible the bug requires extra pieces to manifest
the bug, but I cannot reproduce the version control lock
here, and perhaps neither could your friend. What happens if you open the
document without version control? (You might run the zipped copy from your
post.) If the bug does not manifest there, but continues to manifest with
version control
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
P.S. Uwe
Emil Pavlov emil_pavlov at mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 23:05, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlovemil_pavlovat mail.bg writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this
your friend have everything involved (parent document, all child documents,
all image files etc.) or just what you posted here? If the latter, perhaps
you could send him everything (or, if he is unwilling, zip it all up and
send it to me). It's possible the bug requires extra pieces to manifest
the bug, but I cannot reproduce the version control lock
here, and perhaps neither could your friend. What happens if you open the
document without version control? (You might run the zipped copy from your
post.) If the bug does not manifest there, but continues to manifest with
version control
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
regards Uwe
I am using Linux Mint 9, and Lyx is 1.6.7.
P.S. Uwe
Emil Pavlov mail.bg> writes:
>
> На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
> > Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
> >
> >> I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this problem with your file on LyX 1.6.7 on Windows.
> >
> > regards
На 27.10.2010 23:05, Paul Rubin написа:
Emil Pavlov writes:
На 27.10.2010 20:59, Uwe Stöhr написа:
Am 26.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Emil Pavlov:
I have experienced a very interesting problem with the spellcheck tool.
I cannot reproduce this
reproduce it. Now, what should I do?
>
Did your friend have everything involved (parent document, all child documents,
all image files etc.) or just what you posted here? If the latter, perhaps
you could send him everything (or, if he is unwilling, zip it all up and
send it to me). It's po
ce window shows the cursor being the "Quantum
correlations" subsection heading, with that listed as paragraph 124 in the
document. It's paragraph 150 now. Perhaps more importantly, the banner for the
LyX window in the picture shows "(version control, locking)". I have no idea
been able to check trac.
Cheers,
Rob
Begin forwarded message:
From: StefanPotyra stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Date: August 16, 2010 9:42:45 AM MDT
To: lyx-de...@oak-tree.us
Subject: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing
(main)
Reply-To: Bug 618690
Rob Oakes wrote:
It appears that the request for Feature Freeze exception has been
granted.
Good.
I'm now trying to whittle down the list of Launchpad bugs. Is
it just me, or are the LyX website and trac down?
Yes. Everything's down ATM.
Also, were the problems with platex solved per
been able to check trac.
Cheers,
Rob
Begin forwarded message:
From: StefanPotyra stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Date: August 16, 2010 9:42:45 AM MDT
To: lyx-de...@oak-tree.us
Subject: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing
(main)
Reply-To: Bug 618690
Rob Oakes wrote:
It appears that the request for Feature Freeze exception has been
granted.
Good.
I'm now trying to whittle down the list of Launchpad bugs. Is
it just me, or are the LyX website and trac down?
Yes. Everything's down ATM.
Also, were the problems with platex solved per
been able to check trac.
Cheers,
Rob
Begin forwarded message:
> From: StefanPotyra <stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> Date: August 16, 2010 9:42:45 AM MDT
> To: lyx-de...@oak-tree.us
> Subject: [Bug 618690] Re: Sync lyx 1.6.7-1 (universe) from Debian testing
> (
Rob Oakes wrote:
> It appears that the request for Feature Freeze exception has been
> granted.
Good.
> I'm now trying to whittle down the list of Launchpad bugs. Is
> it just me, or are the LyX website and trac down?
Yes. Everything's down ATM.
> Also, were the problems with platex solved
is that: Is this a feature of LyX
doing something like this? Or a bug with hope to a quite quick repair
in one of new versions?
Maybe any of you could suggest a better method for typesetting what I
want to achive: tk command, an arrow and python command in one verse
nicely aligned. All couple verses should have same
.
Now the VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION is that: Is this a feature of LyX
doing something like this? Or a bug with hope to a quite quick repair
in one of new versions?
It looks like a bug, but not a LyX bug. If you switch the language for
the tcl listings to some other language (any other language
is that: Is this a feature of LyX
doing something like this? Or a bug with hope to a quite quick repair
in one of new versions?
Maybe any of you could suggest a better method for typesetting what I
want to achive: tk command, an arrow and python command in one verse
nicely aligned. All couple verses should have same
.
Now the VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION is that: Is this a feature of LyX
doing something like this? Or a bug with hope to a quite quick repair
in one of new versions?
It looks like a bug, but not a LyX bug. If you switch the language for
the tcl listings to some other language (any other language
TION is that: Is this a feature of LyX
doing something like this? Or a bug with hope to a quite quick repair
in one of new versions?
Maybe any of you could suggest a better method for typesetting what I
want to achive: tk command, an arrow and python command in one verse
nicely aligned. All couple verses should
.
Now the VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION is that: Is this a feature of LyX
doing something like this? Or a bug with hope to a quite quick repair
in one of new versions?
It looks like a bug, but not a LyX bug. If you switch the language for
the tcl listings to some other language (any other language
I wrote to the author of tth:
Anyway, I wanted to alert you to a potential bug. When I use lyx's
hyperef feature to make a hyperlink (as opposed to embedding a URL,
where the text is the same as the href target), it generates a .tex
file that contains a line like this:
\usepackage[unicode
I wrote to the author of tth:
Anyway, I wanted to alert you to a potential bug. When I use lyx's
hyperef feature to make a hyperlink (as opposed to embedding a URL,
where the text is the same as the href target), it generates a .tex
file that contains a line like this:
\usepackage[unicode
I wrote to the author of tth:
> Anyway, I wanted to alert you to a potential bug. When I use lyx's
> "hyperef" feature to make a hyperlink (as opposed to embedding a URL,
> where the text is the same as the href target), it generates a .tex
> file that contains a line like
I am using Lyx 1.6.6 on Mac, in Lyx the Figure numbers are correctly
identifed as Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, etc. But when I reference them in the
text, the references get the section numbers instead. For example if I
reference figure 1.2 in section 1.6.2, in the printout it appears as in
Figure
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Artimess artim...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Lyx 1.6.6 on Mac, in Lyx the Figure numbers are correctly
identifed as Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, etc. But when I reference them in the
text, the references get the section numbers instead. For example if I
reference
I am using Lyx 1.6.6 on Mac, in Lyx the Figure numbers are correctly
identifed as Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, etc. But when I reference them in the
text, the references get the section numbers instead. For example if I
reference figure 1.2 in section 1.6.2, in the printout it appears as in
Figure
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Artimess artim...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Lyx 1.6.6 on Mac, in Lyx the Figure numbers are correctly
identifed as Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, etc. But when I reference them in the
text, the references get the section numbers instead. For example if I
reference
I am using Lyx 1.6.6 on Mac, in Lyx the Figure numbers are correctly
identifed as Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, etc. But when I reference them in the
text, the references get the section numbers instead. For example if I
reference figure 1.2 in section 1.6.2, in the printout it appears as "in
Figure
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Artimess wrote:
> I am using Lyx 1.6.6 on Mac, in Lyx the Figure numbers are correctly
> identifed as Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, etc. But when I reference them in the
> text, the references get the section numbers instead. For example if I
>
hi everyone,
My system is kubuntu 10.04, my lyx 1.65 was installed from the apt-get
install lyx in kubuntu's defaut sourcelist. At beginning, it worked well,
but recently when invoke insert float figure and table, it will close down
automatically, before it also arrived.
Is there anyone who has
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Wei-Dong Lian weidong.l...@gmail.comwrote:
hi everyone,
My system is kubuntu 10.04, my lyx 1.65 was installed from the apt-get
install lyx in kubuntu's defaut sourcelist. At beginning, it worked well,
but recently when invoke insert float figure and table,
hi everyone,
My system is kubuntu 10.04, my lyx 1.65 was installed from the apt-get
install lyx in kubuntu's defaut sourcelist. At beginning, it worked well,
but recently when invoke insert float figure and table, it will close down
automatically, before it also arrived.
Is there anyone who has
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Wei-Dong Lian weidong.l...@gmail.comwrote:
hi everyone,
My system is kubuntu 10.04, my lyx 1.65 was installed from the apt-get
install lyx in kubuntu's defaut sourcelist. At beginning, it worked well,
but recently when invoke insert float figure and table,
hi everyone,
My system is kubuntu 10.04, my lyx 1.65 was installed from the apt-get
install lyx in kubuntu's defaut sourcelist. At beginning, it worked well,
but recently when invoke insert float figure and table, it will close down
automatically, before it also arrived.
Is there anyone who has
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Wei-Dong Lian wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> My system is kubuntu 10.04, my lyx 1.65 was installed from the apt-get
> install lyx in kubuntu's defaut sourcelist. At beginning, it worked well,
> but recently when invoke insert float figure and
Thank you for the concise reply.
Thank you for the concise reply.
Thank you for the concise reply.
Paul A. Rubin ru...@... writes:
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
* Snip *
I wonder if this is a bug??
* Snip *
Am I missing something
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users-UqbJ+GOpo4+hPH1hqNUYSQ at
public.gmane.org/msg59654.html
/Paul
Sorry if this is not the appropriate place
Jacob bishop.ja...@... writes:
I have been experiencing the same problem. It seems to me that this IS a bug,
and while what has been proposed (use \underline instead of \underbar) works,
and is valuable input/information, it is a workaround to the bug, not a fix.
The bug still exists
Paul A. Rubin ru...@... writes:
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
* Snip *
I wonder if this is a bug??
* Snip *
Am I missing something
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users-UqbJ+GOpo4+hPH1hqNUYSQ at
public.gmane.org/msg59654.html
/Paul
Sorry if this is not the appropriate place
Jacob bishop.ja...@... writes:
I have been experiencing the same problem. It seems to me that this IS a bug,
and while what has been proposed (use \underline instead of \underbar) works,
and is valuable input/information, it is a workaround to the bug, not a fix.
The bug still exists
Paul A. Rubin <ru...@...> writes:
> Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
* Snip *
> > I wonder if this is a bug??
* Snip *
> > Am I missing something
> >
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users-UqbJ+GOpo4+hPH1hqNUYSQ
public.gmane.org/msg59654.html
>
> /Pau
Jacob <bishop.ja...@...> writes:
>
> I have been experiencing the same problem. It seems to me that this IS a bug,
> and while what has been proposed (use \underline instead of \underbar) works,
> and is valuable input/information, it is a workaround to the bug, not a fix
Dear all,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following. First x is italics. Ok. Second x comes with
underbar, but pdf is not italic. Final equation crashes
Let me add to this email that I'm using window-XP, Lyx 1.6.5.
Dear All,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following.
First, x is italics.
Second, OK, x comes
Am I missing something
I guess you should use \underline instead of \underbar (which is used
when pressing Ctrl+U).
Vincent
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
Dear all,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following. First x is italics. Ok. Second x comes with
underbar, but pdf is not italic
Erez Yerushalmi schrieb:
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
You don't need the braces, just press Spacebar to finish a command. For
more info about formulas, have a look at the Math manual that you find
in
Hi Uwe
Thanks to your points!
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
*However*, Yes, I usually do number 1 and 2 like you said. I just used them
as an example of progression towards the bug.
So, the *problem* arises when I'm in math mode, and I type as usual
Am 25.02.2010 19:53, schrieb Erez Yerushalmi:
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
So, the *problem* arises when I'm in math mode, and I type as usual:
\underbar space, \alpha space, and I get my equation. All seems fine.
However, when I PDF it, LyX *crashes*.
Thanks a lot !! Like always, I learn something new from you every time.
:-)
I appreciate it.
Erez
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2010 19:53, schrieb Erez Yerushalmi:
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
So, the
Dear all,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following. First x is italics. Ok. Second x comes with
underbar, but pdf is not italic. Final equation crashes
Let me add to this email that I'm using window-XP, Lyx 1.6.5.
Dear All,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following.
First, x is italics.
Second, OK, x comes
Am I missing something
I guess you should use \underline instead of \underbar (which is used
when pressing Ctrl+U).
Vincent
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
Dear all,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following. First x is italics. Ok. Second x comes with
underbar, but pdf is not italic
Erez Yerushalmi schrieb:
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
You don't need the braces, just press Spacebar to finish a command. For
more info about formulas, have a look at the Math manual that you find
in
Hi Uwe
Thanks to your points!
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
*However*, Yes, I usually do number 1 and 2 like you said. I just used them
as an example of progression towards the bug.
So, the *problem* arises when I'm in math mode, and I type as usual
Am 25.02.2010 19:53, schrieb Erez Yerushalmi:
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
So, the *problem* arises when I'm in math mode, and I type as usual:
\underbar space, \alpha space, and I get my equation. All seems fine.
However, when I PDF it, LyX *crashes*.
Thanks a lot !! Like always, I learn something new from you every time.
:-)
I appreciate it.
Erez
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Am 25.02.2010 19:53, schrieb Erez Yerushalmi:
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
So, the
Dear all,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following. First x is italics. Ok. Second x comes with
underbar, but pdf is not italic. Final equation crashes
Let me add to this email that I'm using window-XP, Lyx 1.6.5.
Dear All,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following.
First, x is italics.
Second, OK, x comes
>Am I missing something
I guess you should use \underline instead of \underbar (which is used
when pressing Ctrl+U).
Vincent
Erez Yerushalmi wrote:
Dear all,
I wonder if this is a bug??
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
What I get is the following. First x is italics. Ok. Second x comes with
underbar, but pdf is not italic
Erez Yerushalmi schrieb:
When I use the \underbar I get an error message. See them below.
In math box, I type
x
\underbar{x}
\underbar{\alpha}
You don't need the braces, just press Spacebar to finish a command. For
more info about formulas, have a look at the Math manual that you find
in
Hi Uwe
Thanks to your points!
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
*However*, Yes, I usually do number 1 and 2 like you said. I just used them
as an example of progression towards the bug.
So, the *problem* arises when I'm in math mode, and I type as usual
Am 25.02.2010 19:53, schrieb Erez Yerushalmi:
Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
So, the *problem* arises when I'm in math mode, and I type as usual:
\underbar space, \alpha space, and I get my equation. All seems fine.
However, when I PDF it, LyX *crashes*.
Thanks a lot !! Like always, I learn something new from you every time.
:-)
I appreciate it.
Erez
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 25.02.2010 19:53, schrieb Erez Yerushalmi:
>
> Yes, I'm now using \underline, instead, and problem solved! :-)
>>
>>
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Mehmet Bicak bica...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am getting following weird errors,
Latex error: Command \iint already defined
Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
Latex error: Command \nt already defined
...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Mehmet Bicak wrote:
I am getting following weird errors,
Latex error: Command \iint already defined
Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
Latex error: Command \nt already defined
...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
Your command was ignored.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Mehmet Bicak bica...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am getting following weird errors,
Latex error: Command \iint already defined
Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
Latex error: Command \nt already defined
...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Mehmet Bicak wrote:
I am getting following weird errors,
Latex error: Command \iint already defined
Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
Latex error: Command \nt already defined
...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
Your command was ignored.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Mehmet Bicak wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting following weird errors,
> Latex error: Command \iint already defined
> Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
> Latex error: Command \nt already defined
>
>
On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Mehmet Bicak wrote:
> I am getting following weird errors,
> Latex error: Command \iint already defined
> Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
> Latex error: Command \nt already defined
>
> ...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
>
> Your command was
Hi,
I am getting following weird errors,
Latex error: Command \iint already defined
Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
Latex error: Command \nt already defined
...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
Your command was ignored.
Hi,
I am getting following weird errors,
Latex error: Command \iint already defined
Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
Latex error: Command \nt already defined
...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
Your command was ignored.
Hi,
I am getting following weird errors,
Latex error: Command \iint already defined
Latex error: Command \iiint already defined
Latex error: Command \nt already defined
...d{\iint}{\DOTSI\protect\MultiIntegral{2}}
Your command was ignored.
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
EK
/
On 12/02/2009 01:41 PM, Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to
Lyx the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
I just tried it with one citation, and saw no error. What error do you get?
rh
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
There was a bug of that kind, but it was supposed to be fixed. However, we
have another report:
http://www.lyx.org
On 12/02/2009 03:15 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
There was a bug of that kind, but it was supposed
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
EK
/
On 12/02/2009 01:41 PM, Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to
Lyx the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
I just tried it with one citation, and saw no error. What error do you get?
rh
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
There was a bug of that kind, but it was supposed to be fixed. However, we
have another report:
http://www.lyx.org
On 12/02/2009 03:15 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
There was a bug of that kind, but it was supposed
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
EK
/
On 12/02/2009 01:41 PM, Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to
Lyx the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
I just tried it with one citation, and saw no error. What error do you get?
rh
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
> When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
> the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
> /Is this a bug or a feature?/
There was a bug of that kind, but it was supposed to be fixed. However, we
have another rep
On 12/02/2009 03:15 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Ehud Kaplan wrote:
When I delete some text that included groups of citations, trying to Lyx
the file produces errors unless I /Accept the changes.
/Is this a bug or a feature?/
There was a bug of that kind, but it was supposed
Uwe,
Installing the default MikTex via the Lyx installer fails. (A new bug?)
So I updated the old MikTex from 2.5 to 2.8 and deleted and reinstalled
Lyx 1.6 and referenced the tex.exe file in new MikTex .
Now I get a different messages when I click on the PDF icon to obtain a
PDF version
James Ronback wrote:
When I download from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Manuals and attempt to view
the The LyX User's Guide by the LyX TeamVersion 1.6.x as a PDF file by
clicking on the PDF icon (View pdflatex) I get the following error message:
tex\latex\subfig\subfig.sty is missing:
When I say
601 - 700 of 4145 matches
Mail list logo