Am 20.07.23 um 23:44 schrieb Edwin Burmeister:
Figure 1: Relationship between utility-space and gains-space
Note from the above that I have figured out how to increase the font
size for the caption, which entails first switching to math mode.
But I cannot figure out how to increase the
Hi--
I am using LyX 2.3.7 on a Mac (silicon chip) running OS Ventura 13.4.1.
[As an aside, months ago I discovered that Browse did not work
for inserting a graphic file and found the workaround.]
I have a different problem. In the PDF created by LyX, one sees, for example,
the following:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
But that's kind of the point. The package garamondx is NOT installed,
and the non-free fonts are NOT installed:
geek@liv-inspiron:~$ getnonfreefonts -l
[...]
garamond GaramondNo8 (URW) [not
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
status?
Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
status?
Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check that (we check if ugmr8r.tfm
is present), but we do not use this
On 2015-02-23, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
status?
Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check that (we check if ugmr8r.tfm
Guenter Milde wrote:
The *.tfm file may be misleading: for some non-free fonts, the *.tfm files
are installed by the tex-support package together with *.fd and *.sty.
However the actual font files (*pfa or similar) are not included but must be
installed separately.
Feel free to improve the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
But that's kind of the point. The package garamondx is NOT installed,
and the non-free fonts are NOT installed:
geek@liv-inspiron:~$ getnonfreefonts -l
[...]
garamond GaramondNo8 (URW) [not
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
status?
Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check that (we check if ugmr8r.tfm
is present), but we do not use this
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
status?
Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check
On 2015-02-23, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Liviu Andronic wrote:
Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
status?
Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check that (we check if ugmr8r.tfm
Guenter Milde wrote:
The *.tfm file may be misleading: for some non-free fonts, the *.tfm files
are installed by the tex-support package together with *.fd and *.sty.
However the actual font files (*pfa or similar) are not included but must be
installed separately.
Feel free to improve the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> But that's kind of the point. The package garamondx is NOT installed,
>> and the non-free fonts are NOT installed:
>> geek@liv-inspiron:~$ getnonfreefonts -l
>> [...]
>> garamond GaramondNo8 (URW)
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
> this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
> status?
Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check that (we check if ugmr8r.tfm
is present), but we do not use this
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
>> this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
>> status?
>
> Yes, it can do that. Actually, we
On 2015-02-23, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> Can LyX determine if the URW Garamond font is present by checking for
>> this non free font? And then correctly display installed/not installed
>> status?
> Yes, it can do that. Actually, we already check that (we check if
Guenter Milde wrote:
> The *.tfm file may be misleading: for some non-free fonts, the *.tfm files
> are installed by the "tex-support package" together with *.fd and *.sty.
> However the actual font files (*pfa or similar) are not included but must be
> installed separately.
Feel free to improve
-Original Message-
From: Liviu Andronic [mailto:landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 February 2015 13:31
To: Vinh Le Ngoc
Cc: lyx-users
Subject: Re: Font problem with LyX 2.1.3 on Ubuntu 14.04
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Vinh Le Ngoc vlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I installed LyX
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Sonntag 22 Februar 2015, 13:13:21 schrieb Julio Rojas:
I have Ubuntu 14.04 and Lyx 2.1.3 installed from the PPA and I can confirm
the problem using your Vinh's file. See the attachements. While Palatino
and Times Roman
Am Sonntag 22 Februar 2015, 13:13:21 schrieb Julio Rojas:
I have Ubuntu 14.04 and Lyx 2.1.3 installed from the PPA and I can confirm
the problem using your Vinh's file. See the attachements. While Palatino
and Times Roman work perfectly, Garamond is rendered as Computer Modern. I
am pretty
Liviu Andronic wrote:
But that's kind of the point. The package garamondx is NOT installed,
and the non-free fonts are NOT installed:
geek@liv-inspiron:~$ getnonfreefonts -l
[...]
garamond GaramondNo8 (URW) [not installed]
garamondx GaramondNo8 Expert (Michael Sharpe) [not installed]
-Original Message-
From: Liviu Andronic [mailto:landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 February 2015 13:31
To: Vinh Le Ngoc
Cc: lyx-users
Subject: Re: Font problem with LyX 2.1.3 on Ubuntu 14.04
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Vinh Le Ngoc vlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I installed LyX
Am Sonntag 22 Februar 2015, 13:13:21 schrieb Julio Rojas:
I have Ubuntu 14.04 and Lyx 2.1.3 installed from the PPA and I can confirm
the problem using your Vinh's file. See the attachements. While Palatino
and Times Roman work perfectly, Garamond is rendered as Computer Modern. I
am pretty
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Am Sonntag 22 Februar 2015, 13:13:21 schrieb Julio Rojas:
I have Ubuntu 14.04 and Lyx 2.1.3 installed from the PPA and I can confirm
the problem using your Vinh's file. See the attachements. While Palatino
and Times Roman
Liviu Andronic wrote:
But that's kind of the point. The package garamondx is NOT installed,
and the non-free fonts are NOT installed:
geek@liv-inspiron:~$ getnonfreefonts -l
[...]
garamond GaramondNo8 (URW) [not installed]
garamondx GaramondNo8 Expert (Michael Sharpe) [not installed]
ample.
>
> Regards,
> Vinh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Liviu Andronic [mailto:landronim...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 February 2015 13:31
> To: Vinh Le Ngoc
> Cc: lyx-users
> Subject: Re: Font problem with LyX 2.1.3 on Ubuntu 14.04
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12
Am Sonntag 22 Februar 2015, 13:13:21 schrieb Julio Rojas:
> I have Ubuntu 14.04 and Lyx 2.1.3 installed from the PPA and I can confirm
> the problem using your Vinh's file. See the attachements. While Palatino
> and Times Roman work perfectly, Garamond is rendered as Computer Modern. I
> am pretty
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag 22 Februar 2015, 13:13:21 schrieb Julio Rojas:
>> I have Ubuntu 14.04 and Lyx 2.1.3 installed from the PPA and I can confirm
>> the problem using your Vinh's file. See the attachements. While Palatino
>> and
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> But that's kind of the point. The package garamondx is NOT installed,
> and the non-free fonts are NOT installed:
> geek@liv-inspiron:~$ getnonfreefonts -l
> [...]
> garamond GaramondNo8 (URW) [not installed]
> garamondx GaramondNo8 Expert (Michael Sharpe) [not installed]
>
Hi,
I selected URW Garamond which shows up as installed.
Attached is an example.
Regards,
Vinh
-Original Message-
From: Liviu Andronic [mailto:landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 February 2015 13:31
To: Vinh Le Ngoc
Cc: lyx-users
Subject: Re: Font problem with LyX 2.1.3 on Ubuntu 14.04
Hi,
I installed LyX 2.1.3 via the PPA last night and I'm having a problem where
previews and exports do not use the font selected in document settings;
rather, it always uses nasty bitmapped Computer Modern.
I've tried different combinations of fonts and even tried reinstalling LyX
to no avail.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Vinh Le Ngoc vlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I installed LyX 2.1.3 via the PPA last night and I'm having a problem where
previews and exports do not use the font selected in document settings;
rather, it always uses nasty bitmapped Computer Modern.
What fonts
Hi,
I installed LyX 2.1.3 via the PPA last night and I'm having a problem where
previews and exports do not use the font selected in document settings;
rather, it always uses nasty bitmapped Computer Modern.
I've tried different combinations of fonts and even tried reinstalling LyX
to no avail.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Vinh Le Ngoc vlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I installed LyX 2.1.3 via the PPA last night and I'm having a problem where
previews and exports do not use the font selected in document settings;
rather, it always uses nasty bitmapped Computer Modern.
What fonts
Hi,
I selected URW Garamond which shows up as installed.
Attached is an example.
Regards,
Vinh
-Original Message-
From: Liviu Andronic [mailto:landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 February 2015 13:31
To: Vinh Le Ngoc
Cc: lyx-users
Subject: Re: Font problem with LyX 2.1.3 on Ubuntu 14.04
Hi,
I installed LyX 2.1.3 via the PPA last night and I'm having a problem where
previews and exports do not use the font selected in document settings;
rather, it always uses nasty bitmapped Computer Modern.
I've tried different combinations of fonts and even tried reinstalling LyX
to no avail.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Vinh Le Ngoc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed LyX 2.1.3 via the PPA last night and I'm having a problem where
> previews and exports do not use the font selected in document settings;
> rather, it always uses nasty bitmapped Computer Modern.
>
What
Hi,
I selected URW Garamond which shows up as installed.
Attached is an example.
Regards,
Vinh
-Original Message-
From: Liviu Andronic [mailto:landronim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 February 2015 13:31
To: Vinh Le Ngoc
Cc: lyx-users
Subject: Re: Font problem with LyX 2.1.3 on Ubuntu 14.04
On 2013-12-18, ZhuHao wrote:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: base64 --]
After using pdflatex (or luatex for that matter)
It does matter a lot, whether you use pdflatex or lualatex, even with
lualatex in 8-bit emulation mode (there are differences caused by bugs in
LyX and babel-greek).
On 2013-12-18, ZhuHao wrote:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: base64 --]
After using pdflatex (or luatex for that matter)
It does matter a lot, whether you use pdflatex or lualatex, even with
lualatex in 8-bit emulation mode (there are differences caused by bugs in
LyX and babel-greek).
On 2013-12-18, ZhuHao wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: base64 --]
> After using pdflatex (or luatex for that matter)
It does matter a lot, whether you use pdflatex or lualatex, even with
lualatex in 8-bit emulation mode (there are differences caused by bugs in
LyX and babel-greek).
After using pdflatex (or luatex for that matter), when printing my Lyx document
to the printer the greek \alpha character is missing from the printed (or
pre-printed) pdf document. I know it has something to do with fontloading into
the document but don't know how to resolve it. Exporting to
Can you see the \alpha in your pdf viewer? Which viewer do you use? Have
you tried printing the pdf from different viewers (evince, adobe reader)?
This look like the reader is trying to use the device (printer) fonts
and cannot find the proper glyph.
Can you upload a minimal example lyx file, and
After using pdflatex (or luatex for that matter), when printing my Lyx document
to the printer the greek \alpha character is missing from the printed (or
pre-printed) pdf document. I know it has something to do with fontloading into
the document but don't know how to resolve it. Exporting to
Can you see the \alpha in your pdf viewer? Which viewer do you use? Have
you tried printing the pdf from different viewers (evince, adobe reader)?
This look like the reader is trying to use the device (printer) fonts
and cannot find the proper glyph.
Can you upload a minimal example lyx file, and
After using pdflatex (or luatex for that matter), when printing my Lyx document
to the printer the greek \alpha character is missing from the printed (or
pre-printed) pdf document. I know it has something to do with fontloading into
the document but don't know how to resolve it. Exporting to
Can you see the \alpha in your pdf viewer? Which viewer do you use? Have
you tried printing the pdf from different viewers (evince, adobe reader)?
This look like the reader is trying to use the device (printer) fonts
and cannot find the proper glyph.
Can you upload a minimal example lyx file, and
Thanks Paul. I tried both to update formats and install packages with no
good results. I was kind of in a rush, so I reinstalled MikTeX and it
worked.
I have been having many problems with MikTeX 2.9... I am kind of fed up...
Regards.
-
Julio
Thanks Paul. I tried both to update formats and install packages with no
good results. I was kind of in a rush, so I reinstalled MikTeX and it
worked.
I have been having many problems with MikTeX 2.9... I am kind of fed up...
Regards.
-
Julio
Thanks Paul. I tried both to "update formats" and install packages with no
good results. I was kind of in a rush, so I reinstalled MikTeX and it
worked.
I have been having many problems with MikTeX 2.9... I am kind of fed up...
Regards.
-
Julio
Two things come to mind. First, open a DOS window and run the command
kpsewhich ecsi.mf
It should tell you where the ecsi font source code is installed (probably in
the jknappen package). If you get a blank line as the response, you need to
install a package containing the font.
If the font is
Two things come to mind. First, open a DOS window and run the command
kpsewhich ecsi.mf
It should tell you where the ecsi font source code is installed (probably in
the jknappen package). If you get a blank line as the response, you need to
install a package containing the font.
If the font is
Two things come to mind. First, open a DOS window and run the command
kpsewhich ecsi.mf
It should tell you where the ecsi font source code is installed (probably in
the jknappen package). If you get a blank line as the response, you need to
install a package containing the font.
If the font is
Dear all, I am trying to compile a beamer document using Palatino. The
following error is presented in the log:
!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file ecsi0800): Font ecsi0800 at 600 not found
It only appears when math is included in the presentation. Any idea on how
to solve this problem?
Thanks in
Dear all, I am trying to compile a beamer document using Palatino. The
following error is presented in the log:
!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file ecsi0800): Font ecsi0800 at 600 not found
It only appears when math is included in the presentation. Any idea on how
to solve this problem?
Thanks in
Dear all, I am trying to compile a beamer document using Palatino. The
following error is presented in the log:
!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file ecsi0800): Font ecsi0800 at 600 not found
It only appears when math is included in the presentation. Any idea on how
to solve this problem?
Thanks in
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
luca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
Stefan Bauer bauer at math.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
long as you are working on the formula.
S Bauer
If I type \Omega in the math
Am 11.01.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@princeton.edu:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
luca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
Stefan Bauer bauer at math.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
long as
Am 11.01.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net:
Am 11.01.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@princeton.edu:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
luca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
Stefan Bauer bauer at math.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
I have the same
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
luca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
Stefan Bauer bauer at math.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
long as you are working on the formula.
S Bauer
If I type \Omega in the math
Am 11.01.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@princeton.edu:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
luca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
Stefan Bauer bauer at math.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
long as
Am 11.01.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net:
Am 11.01.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@princeton.edu:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
luca.brandol...@unibg.it wrote:
Stefan Bauer bauer at math.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
I have the same
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
wrote:
> Stefan Bauer math.uni-bielefeld.de> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
>> long as you are working on the formula.
>>
>> S Bauer
>>
>>
>
> If I type \Omega
Am 11.01.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
> wrote:
>> Stefan Bauer math.uni-bielefeld.de> writes:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
Am 11.01.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Am 11.01.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Luca Brandolini
>> wrote:
>>> Stefan Bauer math.uni-bielefeld.de> writes:
>>>
I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
long as you are working on the formula.
S Bauer
I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
long as you are working on the formula.
S Bauer
I have the same setup. In the math edit mode the \Omega is invisible as
long as you are working on the formula.
S Bauer
I am running LyX under Mac OS X 10.7.5. In the math edit mode the mathematical
symbols are not displayed correctly. For example instead of an integral I get
an accented o.
I tried running LyX debug mode (-dbg mathed) and in the log I found lines of
the kind
font cmm not available and I
I am running LyX under Mac OS X 10.7.5. In the math edit mode the mathematical
symbols are not displayed correctly. For example instead of an integral I get
an accented o.
I tried running LyX debug mode (-dbg mathed) and in the log I found lines of
the kind
font cmm not available and I
I am running LyX under Mac OS X 10.7.5. In the math edit mode the mathematical
symbols are not displayed correctly. For example instead of an integral I get
an accented "o".
I tried running LyX debug mode (-dbg mathed) and in the log I found lines of
the kind
"font cmm not available and
On 2011-06-26, ölm wrote:
same problem with lyx 2.0.0 under ubuntu 11.04 64bit
but THE SAME document is working under WinXP32bitSP3
The Greek fonts are missing. With Debian or Ubuntu, install the package
texlive-lang-greek.
only the (pre)view using xetex is working without error, but all
On 2011-06-26, ölm wrote:
same problem with lyx 2.0.0 under ubuntu 11.04 64bit
but THE SAME document is working under WinXP32bitSP3
The Greek fonts are missing. With Debian or Ubuntu, install the package
texlive-lang-greek.
only the (pre)view using xetex is working without error, but all
On 2011-06-26, ölm wrote:
> same problem with lyx 2.0.0 under ubuntu 11.04 64bit
> but THE SAME document is working under WinXP32bitSP3
The Greek fonts are missing. With Debian or Ubuntu, install the package
texlive-lang-greek.
> only the (pre)view using xetex is working without error, but all
at description style. but thats another story.
regards,
- elmar -
--
View this message in context:
http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Font-Problem-with-Lyx-Metric-TFM-file-not-found-tp1675343p6518091.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
at description style. but thats another story.
regards,
- elmar -
--
View this message in context:
http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Font-Problem-with-Lyx-Metric-TFM-file-not-found-tp1675343p6518091.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
at "description" style. but thats another story.
regards,
- elmar -
--
View this message in context:
http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Font-Problem-with-Lyx-Metric-TFM-file-not-found-tp1675343p6518091.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb stefano franchi:
Ok, the file is enclosed, thanks Uwe.
The problem, I discovered, is somewhere with the additional latex code
that produces endnotes in memoir (without using external packages). In
my case the code resides in the memoir configuration package I wrote,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb stefano franchi:
Ok, the file is enclosed, thanks Uwe.
The problem, I discovered, is somewhere with the additional latex code
that produces endnotes in memoir (without using external packages).
Am 19.08.2010 16:36, schrieb stefano franchi:
I need a slightly more sophisticated formatting of endnotes than what
you describe in the manual. The edited book I am working on has all
endnotes at the back, grouped by chapter. Every block of endnotes
begins with a heading like Notes for chapter
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb stefano franchi:
Ok, the file is enclosed, thanks Uwe.
The problem, I discovered, is somewhere with the additional latex code
that produces endnotes in memoir (without using external packages). In
my case the code resides in the memoir configuration package I wrote,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb stefano franchi:
Ok, the file is enclosed, thanks Uwe.
The problem, I discovered, is somewhere with the additional latex code
that produces endnotes in memoir (without using external packages).
Am 19.08.2010 16:36, schrieb stefano franchi:
I need a slightly more sophisticated formatting of endnotes than what
you describe in the manual. The edited book I am working on has all
endnotes at the back, grouped by chapter. Every block of endnotes
begins with a heading like Notes for chapter
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb stefano franchi:
Ok, the file is enclosed, thanks Uwe.
The problem, I discovered, is somewhere with the additional latex code
that produces endnotes in memoir (without using external packages). In
my case the code resides in the memoir configuration package I wrote,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb stefano franchi:
>
>
> Ok, the file is enclosed, thanks Uwe.
>> The problem, I discovered, is somewhere with the additional latex code
>> that produces endnotes in memoir (without using external
Am 19.08.2010 16:36, schrieb stefano franchi:
I need a slightly more sophisticated formatting of endnotes than what
you describe in the manual. The edited book I am working on has all
endnotes at the back, grouped by chapter. Every block of endnotes
begins with a heading like "Notes for
Am 18.08.2010 01:40, schrieb stefano franchi:
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following
footnote (transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton}, celebrated by the Eleatic
school
which gives a pdf output of:
1. The
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Am 18.08.2010 01:40, schrieb stefano franchi:
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following
footnote (transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton},
Am 18.08.2010 01:40, schrieb stefano franchi:
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following
footnote (transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton}, celebrated by the Eleatic
school
which gives a pdf output of:
1. The
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Am 18.08.2010 01:40, schrieb stefano franchi:
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following
footnote (transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton},
Am 18.08.2010 01:40, schrieb stefano franchi:
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following
footnote (transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton}, celebrated by the Eleatic
school
which gives a pdf output of:
1. The
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 18.08.2010 01:40, schrieb stefano franchi:
>
> can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following
>> footnote (transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
>>
>> \footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to
Dear all,
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following footnote
(transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton}, celebrated by the Eleatic
school
through Zeno's well-known arguments.
which gives a pdf output of:
1. The
Dear all,
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following footnote
(transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton}, celebrated by the Eleatic
school
through Zeno's well-known arguments.
which gives a pdf output of:
1. The
Dear all,
can anyone help me o track down the error given by the following footnote
(transcribed in Latex-version from source window):
\footnote{The \emph{epagoghé eis to adunaton}, celebrated by the Eleatic
school
through Zeno's well-known arguments.
which gives a pdf output of:
1. The
Hi all,
there seems to be no relevant documentation about this issue at least for
Windows users (in my case Windows XP pro SP3 32bit). When installing on
different machines, some math symbols are not displayed (the \latexcode is
displayed instead). E.g. on my latest try the following symbols were
magneez schrieb:
When installing on
different machines, some math symbols are not displayed (the \latexcode is
displayed instead)...
I have installed (in windows system) all the Bakoma fonts that are located
in \Resources\fonts,
You don't need to do this. I would uninstall these fonts
Hi all,
there seems to be no relevant documentation about this issue at least for
Windows users (in my case Windows XP pro SP3 32bit). When installing on
different machines, some math symbols are not displayed (the \latexcode is
displayed instead). E.g. on my latest try the following symbols were
magneez schrieb:
When installing on
different machines, some math symbols are not displayed (the \latexcode is
displayed instead)...
I have installed (in windows system) all the Bakoma fonts that are located
in \Resources\fonts,
You don't need to do this. I would uninstall these fonts
Hi all,
there seems to be no relevant documentation about this issue at least for
Windows users (in my case Windows XP pro SP3 32bit). When installing on
different machines, some math symbols are not displayed (the "\latexcode" is
displayed instead). E.g. on my latest try the following symbols
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo