On 11/20/2009 05:21 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
... that's because you'll have to tell the lyx2lyx script that you want
the 1.6.x file format. It would be wrong to save the documents in 1.6.x
format by default (losing new features on the road).
On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>>> >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx
>>> >converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to
>>> >previous versions' file formats.
>>> What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new
>> >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx
>> >converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to
>> >previous versions' file formats.
>>
>> What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file
>> format (of course) and the older LyXes don'
>> >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx
>> >converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to
>> >previous versions' file formats.
>>
>> What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file
>> format (of course) and the older LyXes don
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <
v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
> >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather
> >the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still
> >unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats.
>
> What do you mean by un
Hi Vince,
I was aware that newer versions of LyX use a different file format. I
meant only that you have to manually export the document to an older
version of LyX. The lyx2lyx script is not capable of doing so on its
own.
My fault for not being clear.
Cheers,
Rob
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 21:33
>I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather
>the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still
>unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats.
What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file
format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about the ne
I updated to the svn trunk version this morning and I can verify that
any file modified by the new version, indeed, cannot be reverted be read
by v1.6 or earlier. When I was playing with the svn version back in
August, this would have been an enormous problem since it seemed
extremely unstable.
I
Richard,
I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx
converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous
versions' file formats. Last time I tried trunk (2 or 3 months ago, I
believe), I found out that every file it touched could no longer be opened
b
http://konx.net/biblatex-mla/
but I don´t know if I have to install both of those files, or if
biblatex version 0.8d is sufficient.
Is it convenient to just replace the old files with these and to do
a texhash then?
Well, I´ve tried that now, and again I just get errors when compiling:
Ma
Dear Dominik, dear list,
I think the problem is, that I did not update biblatex, and I do not
know how to do that – maybe someone could help. In the wiki I can just
find instructions, how to install biblatex, not how to update. I also
do not know, where to find a current biblatex-version. W
jezZiFeR wrote:
> I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I
> can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors:
> LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined.
> Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined.
Did you update both biblatex and bibla
On 11/20/2009 10:18 AM, Rob Oakes wrote:
Hi Günter,
Thank you for the thoughts and the links.
"Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document
with XeTeX. (Export with File>Export>LaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?)"
If someone hasn't already said so, I should add that
Hi Günter,
Thank you for the thoughts and the links.
"Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document
with XeTeX. (Export with File>Export>LaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?)"
I set up LyX according to the instructions on the LyX wiki:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/XeTeX
Briefly,
Dear Dominik, dear list,
I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I
can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors:
LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined.
Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined.
I did the update by just removing th
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Manolo Martínez
wrote:
> Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX
> document, right?
>
> M
>
> Uwe Stöhr escribió:
>
> Adam Hoffman schrieb:
>>
>> I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an
>>> issue
Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX
document, right?
M
Uwe Stöhr escribió:
Adam Hoffman schrieb:
I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm
having an
issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP
SP3
and Vist
Adam Hoffman schrieb:
I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an
issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP SP3
and Vista 64 SP1 system.
Whenever I try to generate a pdf/dvi/ps file from a file path that includes
spaces, I get an error m
Marcus schrieb:
I migrated a LaTex project into Lyx. (karmic, Lyx1.3)
LyX 1.3 is extremely out of date. I recommend to use LyX 1.6.
The document has many numbers with a unit like 2.5 µl or 280 nm² etc.
In LaTex I used the
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/unitsdef.html
Dear Dominik,
thanks!
The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not
date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month
will
come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which
is the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the option
On 2009-11-19, Rob Oakes wrote:
> ... While reading through the old emails, I was able to
> resolve the problem.
Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document
with XeTeX. (Export with File>Export>LaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?)
> To solve it, I went to Tools->Prefere
On 2009-11-19, Steve Litt wrote:
> What's the difference between \RequirePackage and \usepackage?
see clsguide.pdf (in the LaTeX base-doc)::
LaTEX has three types of command.
There are the author commands, such as \section, \emph and \times: most
of these have short names, all in lower
jezZiFeR schrieb:
The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not
date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month will
come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which is
the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the options
'urld
23 matches
Mail list logo