operation (\qquad + Space).
If you want to align the text strings to the right, the simplest is probably to
but the math expression into a table.
From: lyx-users On Behalf Of A-Imam Al-Sammak
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2024 7:48 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Text within Equation
Dear all
I
Dear Richard
Thank you for your help.
The first option does not work, but the choice (Edit> Math> Text
Properties) is excellent, and I prefer it as it is menu driven.
Thanks again Richard, Alexander and everybody for your support.
Best regards.
A-Imam
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 4:18 PM Richard Ki
equation and also we
can use ALL text fraction, but I don't know how to use a mixture of
them as illustrated in the example above. Any help on this issue?
You can use the \text or \mathrm macros around the parts you want to
be text. \text will copy the text style of the outside environment,
On 8/2/24 9:03 AM, A-Imam Al-Sammak wrote:
Thank you Alexander for your reply.
I could not figure it out. Can you show me how to change (bits/symbol)
to text??
image.png
Highlight the text parts, and then type "\text" or "\mathrm", and then
Return (Enter). On Linux, at least, you can also g
een normal text and math
>>>
>>> image.png
>>>
>>> I know we can use normal ALL math symbols in an equation and also we can
>>> use ALL text fraction, but I don't know how to use a mixture of them as
>>> illustrated in the example ab
r all
> I need to type something like the following formula in LyX where I have a
> mixture between normal text and math
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> I know we can use normal ALL math symbols in an equation and also we can
> use ALL text fraction, but I don't know how to use a
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024, at 1:47 AM, A-Imam Al-Sammak wrote:
> Dear all
> I need to type something like the following formula in LyX where I have a
> mixture between normal text and math
>
> image.png
>
> I know we can use normal ALL math symbols in an equation and also w
Dear all
I need to type something like the following formula in LyX where I have a
mixture between normal text and math
[image: image.png]
I know we can use normal ALL math symbols in an equation and also we can
use ALL text fraction, but I don't know how to use a mixture of them as
illust
> There are two relevant document class options:
>
> * "fleqn" (flush left equation), which aligns the equation to the left. Used
> by itself, though, it leaves the equation number on the right.
>
> * "leqno" (left equation number), which puts the e
On 12/4/22 19:57, Dan wrote:
I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to
be in the following type of format:
Eq. 1.1 (equation)
Eq. 1.2 (equation)
indented slightly. IMO I don't like having them centered like the
usual Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does
I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to be in
the following type of format:
Eq. 1.1 (equation)
Eq. 1.2 (equation)
indented slightly. IMO I don't like having them centered like the usual
Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does.
I know LaTeX supports defin
What is with all these single word subject lines?
"How do I highlight an equation?" is much more informative as a
subject. ("in LyX" is probably not necessary when sending to a LyX
Users mailing list. In most cases I would presume you were asking
about how to do it in L
El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 1:26, Carlos Knauer ()
escribió:
> How do I highlight an equation in LyX?
>
To change the text&symbols color, just select the whole equation and Right
click → Text properties → Customize.
To change the background, you can either follow section 9 of the M
How do I highlight an equation in LyX?
Carlos Fernando Knauer
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
I’m using lyx 2.631 and the tikzlings package, and put
\protect\tikz\protect\panda in an equation \tag. But after saving the .lyx
file and reopening it the \protect vanishes.
Obviously more of an annoyance for having to retype the \protect than a serious
bug, but is there a known solution
Le 03/10/2018 à 23:35, Klaus-Dieter Bauer a écrit :
Hello!
As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of
the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically
meaningful label names (e.g. "eq:maxwell-equations-in-vacuum"), this
Sorry I was hopeful but I never use a numbered equation so I was just
guessing. The module is handy in other places.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 at 05:39, Klaus-Dieter Bauer <
bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Insets cannot be used inside LyX equations sadly.
>
> On Thu, Oct 4,
auer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of
>>> the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically
>>> meaningful label names (e.g. "eq:
Thanks Andrew.
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 17:58, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:36 PM Klaus-Dieter Bauer <
> bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of
>> the equa
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:36 PM Klaus-Dieter Bauer <
bauer.klaus.die...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of
> the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically
> meaningful lab
Hello!
As it is currently implemented, equation labels are displayed as part of
the equation number in LyX's editor. Sadly, for longer, semantically
meaningful label names (e.g. "eq:maxwell-equations-in-vacuum"), this throws
off the formatting in the editor buffer: Instead o
} symbolHowever, if you tried any online latex equation editors likehttps://www.codecogs.comhttps://arachnoid.com/latex/etc.You will find the latex code copied from mathtype is perfect with any redundant { }So I think the latex equation interpretation in lyx should be improved. This issue should be solved
one, which is a good thing IMO.
>
> Could you give an example of what you do not like?
Attached. I have two nonsense displayed equations. The top is with
align, the bottom with eqnarray. The extra spacing, as you call it,
justifies the two sides of the equation consistently with eqnarray. I
t
Le 19/05/2018 à 16:08, David L. Johnson a écrit :
I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather than
AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2, with the
= in the middle. That way, following lines will have the = sign
aligned, which IMO is how it should be.
Le 19/05/2018 à 16:08, David L. Johnson a écrit :
But LyX doesn't understand them as delimiters unless they are written
as such.
Since 2.3, LyX knows the class (mathopen, mathclose, matrel...) of the
insets. This has been used actually to generalize the old code which
only looked at = sign AF
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +, David L. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2018 11:14:16 -0400
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > > I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather
> > > than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2,
> > > with the = in th
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 01:02:05PM +, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will
> > turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an &q
On Sat, 19 May 2018 11:14:16 -0400
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I would prefer to have it go into the eqnarry environment rather
> > than AMS align, or at least default to three columns rather than 2,
> > with the = in the middle. That way, following lines will have the
> > = sign aligned, which I
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:08:43PM +, David L. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2018 01:04:31 -0400
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX
> > will turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the defaul
On Sat, 19 May 2018 01:04:31 -0400
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX
> will turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an
> "align" environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your
The automatic detection is a hack,
and I am not sure it is the best solution. A solution would be to split
at the point where the cursor is, but maybe not add a new line when
transforming from display equation to 1-line align.
JMarc
>>> When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will
>>> turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align"
>>> environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equation into
>>>
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:39:09AM +, Baris Erkus wrote:
> I may recommend to develop a tool where you can slide the location of "&" in
> the equation. Something like tab sign in Word.
I can see how that would be useful, especially for when there are many
lines. I think
On 5/19/2018 8:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will
turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align"
environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equation into
When in a math display equation, if you press "ctrl + return", LyX will
turn it into a multi-line equation. I think the default is an "align"
environment. To do this, LyX tries "split" your current equation into
two parts. For example, if the equation is:
y = 3x
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> So it's true: great minds think alike!
Indeed, I played with negative spaces previously but didn't get anything
useful. I was hoping there might be a more elegant, e.g., preamble-only,
approach to redefine spacings for equations. Regardle
On 04/06/2017 10:23 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote:
A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the
vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent
because of going between "standard" and "itemize&q
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Joel Kulesza wrote:
A minor complaint (and why I didn't go this route originally), the
vertical spacing before/after the second equation is not consistent
because of going between "standard" and "itemize". It's subtle, but is
there a known fix?
gt; If this is a frequent issue, you might consider writing either a module or
> a macro for it (unless, of course, one already exists).
>
Thank you for your explanation and worked example (I really appreciate it
when people take the time to demonstrate a fix). A minor complaint (and
On 04/05/2017 04:20 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
Colleagues:
My goal is to have equations on a Beamer frame center-aligned relative
to the frame and not the indent level of the current environment.
This issue is surprisingly hard to search for (e.g., most discussion
addresses equation alignment
Colleagues:
My goal is to have equations on a Beamer frame center-aligned relative to
the frame and not the indent level of the current environment.
This issue is surprisingly hard to search for (e.g., most discussion
addresses equation alignment with things such as \align). One approach I
Right, Center
>
> Preamble
>
> \usepackage{mdframed}
>
> \usepackage{xcolor}
>
> \newenvironment{bluec}
>
> {\begin{mdframed}[backgroundcolor=blue!10,linecolor=blue!10,roundcorner=10pt]\quotation}
>
> {\endquotation\end{mdframed}}
>
> EndPreamble
>
> En
> >
> > AlignPossible Block, Left, Right, Center
> >
> > Preamble
> >
> > \usepackage{mdframed}
> >
> > \usepackage{xcolor}
> >
> > \newenvironment{bluec}
> >
> > {\begin{mdframed}[backgroundcolor=blue!10,linecolor=blue!10,roun
:00 Paul Smith :
> Dear All,
>
> How can one box a equation with a specified color?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Paul
>
Dear All,
How can one box a equation with a specified color?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:07:06 -0700
Tim Wescott wrote:
> A reader contacted me asking why I left out the equals signs in the
> equations. It turned out that the equals signs did not render
> correctly in his web reader plug-in, but did render correctly in the
> related stand-alone reader.
Tim,
On 2016-04-15, Tim Wescott wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
> I posted this paper to my website yesterday:
> http://wescottdesign.com/articles/pid/pidWithoutAPhd.pdf.
> A reader contacted me asking why I left out the equals signs in the
> equations. It turned out that the equal
The equal sign shows up well for me in both Chrome and Safari. I've had
good luck with Foxit on Windows; however, I suspect this is can be blamed
on it.
It might be interesting to force embedding the fonts in the PDF and see if
the user can see the equal signs then.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:29
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:40:24PM +0530, Madhusudan Singh wrote:
> Have you considered the use of MathJax?
>
> If your math is web only, that is a compelling alternative.
> On Apr 15, 2016 10:37 PM, "Tim Wescott" wrote:
>
> > I posted this paper to my website yesterday:
> > http://wescottdesign
Have you considered the use of MathJax?
If your math is web only, that is a compelling alternative.
On Apr 15, 2016 10:37 PM, "Tim Wescott" wrote:
> I posted this paper to my website yesterday:
> http://wescottdesign.com/articles/pid/pidWithoutAPhd.pdf.
>
> A reader contacted me asking why I lef
> Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta}
>
> Guillaume
>
Beautiful! Thank you Guillaume!
Best regards
Le 16/12/2015 23:05, Franci Žižek a écrit :
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
> I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
> equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
> between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
> (2.3.3)DELTA
Franci Žižek gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
> variant?
>
> Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
>
> For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)
Hi
Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
variant?
Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ
The counting is continuous, some equations just have an additional DELTA at
the end
to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a
shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot!
Best,
Chen
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Chen Lian wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I need to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a
> shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot!
>
> Best,
> Chen
Hi Chen,
See the answer her
Hi there,
I need to use the function of equation labelling everyday. How can i set up a
shortcut for it? I google a lot and fail to find a solution. Thanks a lot!
Best,
Chen
It works now. Last time I checked (a few months ago) it did not.
Thank you!
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Marduk Bolaños wrote:
> I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard
> without having to open the source pane.
>
This should work from within LyX. Simply select the math inset and
copy it. Then you should get the LaTeX co
I would like to copy the LaTeX source of an equation to the clipboard
without having to open the source pane. If this is not possible without
modification to the source code of LyX, at least I would like to know
how to call an arbitrary external script "myscript" with math-extern. I
alr
In a math environment (display or environment), you can switch to an
EqnArray environment with Ctrl Enter or Shift Enter.
If there is already an equation, it will be automatically split into columns
on particular symbols, including "=" and a few other operators and arrows.
Unfortu
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
> > I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of
> my
> > equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good
> on a
> > slide. I put
> > \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempt
Neal Becker wrote:
> I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my
> equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a
> slide. I put
> \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty
>
> so crop will work.
>
> When exported export/pdf(crop), it loo
I have the misfortune to be commanded to produce ppt. So I took one of my
equations, in lyx. I chose beamer so I get something that'll look good on a
slide. I put
\beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty
so crop will work.
When exported export/pdf(crop), it looks OK, but it's too small. I imp
On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
> I only label some of them ?
For this, I have in my "latex preamble":
% Gleichungen
% ---
% Alle Gleichungen nummerieren
\renewcommand\[{\begin{equat
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de
On 04/02/2012 08:38 PM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote:
Hello...
Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a
formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the
pdf.
The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance!
It'd be mo
Hello...
Idon't know why when I'm trying to compile the pdf after creating a
formula or equation in lyx I'm getting an error and I can't see the
pdf.
The description i attached in txt file. Thankyou in advance!
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.3-1.40.12 (MiKTeX 2.9
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Richard Heck wrote:
Well, this does give you a space, but it doesn't conform to typesetting
conventions, because the text is treated as a bunch of variables. You can
enter math-text mode by hitting Ctrl-M, then type normally. The font
choices are also availalbe under Edit> M
On 03/29/2012 09:20 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote:
You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a
menubar on
the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives
various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a me
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David L. Johnson wrote:
You have several options. When in math-mode, you might have a menubar on
the bottom of the window. One option looks like \_/ in red. That gives
various spaces. Ctrl-Shift-Space should also give you a medium space.
Thank you, David. I prefer the
On 03/28/2012 08:03 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I have an equation that contains words, such as '0.75 * Total Stream
Length'. I looked in Herbert's "Typesetting Mathematics with LaTeX" and
found a single index reference to 'space' that referred to something
I have an equation that contains words, such as '0.75 * Total Stream
Length'. I looked in Herbert's "Typesetting Mathematics with LaTeX" and
found a single index reference to 'space' that referred to something
different. Ctrl-space does nothing.
How do
On 03/20/2012 07:34 AM, Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I have a new problem. I have a long, numbered equation, that does not
fit into the page width, so that I need to break it into two lines.
LyX has some provisions for doing this, but I cannot figure out how exactly
to proceed. If I press CTRL-ENTER
Hi,
I have a new problem. I have a long, numbered equation, that does not
fit into the page width, so that I need to break it into two lines.
LyX has some provisions for doing this, but I cannot figure out how exactly
to proceed. If I press CTRL-ENTER within the numbered formula, I get two
On 01/18/2012 05:06 AM, Lesław Bieniasz wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to learn how to use the math equation editor in LyX,
and I have encontered a problem. The manual says that while writing integrals
one should pay special attention to correctly writing the "d" letter, which
is an operator
Hi,
I am trying to learn how to use the math equation editor in LyX,
and I have encontered a problem. The manual says that while writing integrals
one should pay special attention to correctly writing the "d" letter, which
is an operator, hence it should be written as an upright
On 2012-01-16, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I've now tried your "equation editor/picture cropper" at
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7839 using GSview for postscript and
> Acroreader for pdf.
> For both template files, EPS.lyx and PDF-cropped.lyx, I had to reduce
>
Hullo Liviu,
I've now tried your "equation editor/picture cropper" at
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7839 using GSview for postscript and
Acroreader for pdf.
For both template files, EPS.lyx and PDF-cropped.lyx, I had to reduce
the \lyxformat from 416 to 413 for them to be
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I've never dug into the reason for this,
Paul,
Neither have I because I need it so infrequently.
... but I think that some packages (and "rotating" may be one of them, if
that's the correct name) only work with PDF output.
Looks reasonable.
Rich Shepard appl-ecosys.com> writes:
>I do the above, save the document, and look at the dvi preview. It's not
> rotated but in the upper right corner of the page and off both margins. But
> ... A-ha! It is rotated in the pdflatex output.
>
>It occurred to me that sometimes the dvi pre
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only inline formulas are
allowed inside tables." So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
Perhaps this should be directed to whomever maintains t
Rich Shepard writes:
>Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only inline formulas are
> allowed inside tables." So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
--
Enrico
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give
you margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you
access to multiline equation formats.
Paul,
Er, ... according to the detailed Math man
access to
multiline equation formats.
Paul,
In the text the equations fit well as inline. I was copying them to the
table cells. I can retype them as multiline and see if that works. It
should. I looked to see if I could convert from inline to multiline but did
not see how to do this.
2. Rotati
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
multiline equation formats.
2. Rotati
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
table within \being{sidewaystable} and \end{sidewaystable}, or
\being{landscape} and \end{landscape}.
See? It's that sort of a day. Those should be \begin{... and not
\being{...
Sigh,
Rich
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
Is there a way to do this?
I found the rotating package, but I'm having difficulty using it. Perhaps
I need to modify the LaTeX output manually?
Rich
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
Making the font a smaller size is one sol
David B gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hello,In LyX pre-2.0 I was able to put a cross-reference to an equation
inside a
> formula, so that it would look something like in this
image:
http://www.latex-community.org/forum/download/file.php?id=4130If I try to
do this in LyX 2.0 the re
Wolfgang Engelmann uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> >
> > Maybe you tried in text mode?
> > It works only if the cursor is inside the
> > equation.
> >
> > Günter
>
> Thanks, Günther,
>
> but doing this does not help, and I tried it
> bef
e list of shortcuts shows Alt+M N
> >
> > I am using Lyx 2.0.1 and Debian squeeze
> >
> > Whats wrong?
>
> Maybe you tried in text mode?
> It works only if the cursor is inside the
> equation.
>
> Günter
Thanks, Günther,
but doing this does not help, and I tried it
before. Do I have to include something in the
preamble?
Wolfgang
ext mode?
It works only if the cursor is inside the equation.
Günter
Hello,
In LyX pre-2.0 I was able to put a cross-reference to an equation inside a
formula, so that it would look something like in this image:
http://www.latex-community.org/forum/download/file.php?id=4130
If I try to do this in LyX 2.0 the reference ends up immediately above the
formula, but
For
Bearbeiten->Mathe->Nummerierung an/aus
(Tastenkürzel Alt+M N)
I get:
command deactivated
but the list of shortcuts shows Alt+M N
I am using Lyx 2.0.1 and Debian squeeze
Whats wrong?
Wolfgang
On 03/10/2011 10:25 PM, David L. Johnson wrote:
The justification is different in LyX than it is in the output, which
might be something to worry about in the future.
I also have found that the display in LyX of the alignment of math
columns can get confused, although when you close and reopen
align environment, with
equation= in the first column, equation in the second column, nothing
in the third column, and the annotation in the last column. This gets
me exactly what I had in pure LaTeX, which makes sense.
The problem really is in the default alignments that AMS-LaTeX uses
here. I don&#
Thanks, after pasting in the text and then examining it I was able to
figure out the correct approach. It appears my earlier alignment
difficulty stemmed from placing the equals sign in its own column. Now
I create a four-column structure in the align environment, with
equation= in the first
1 - 100 of 725 matches
Mail list logo
