Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:53:55PM -0500, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: Thanks. The fix was to add \usepackage{pslatex} to the preamble. Don't add this package manually. You can change the font in the document dialog. You can also get good PDF without changing the font. Read Extended.lyx

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Herbert Voss
Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: \usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times \usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like Hmm... I just tried this and get the error: LaTeX Error: Unknown option `scaled=0.9' for package `helvet'.

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: \usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times \usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like Hmm... I just tried this and get the error:

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: \usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times \usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like Hmm... I just tried this and get the error:

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Herbert Voss
Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: \usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times \usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like Hmm... I just tried this and

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Herbert Voss
Christian Ridderström schrieb: \ProvidesPackage{helvet} [1999/03/29 PSNFSS v.7.2 update this package Herbert -- http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: Christian Ridderström schrieb: \ProvidesPackage{helvet} [1999/03/29 PSNFSS v.7.2 update this package Herbert Thanks, I've told my systems administrator and hopefully he'll update the package. /Christian -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-790

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:53:55PM -0500, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: > > Thanks. The "fix" was to add \usepackage{pslatex} to the preamble. Don't add this package manually. You can change the font in the document dialog. You can also get "good" PDF without changing the font. Read

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Herbert Voss
Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: \usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times \usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like Hmm... I just tried this and get the error: LaTeX Error: Unknown option `scaled=0.9' for package `helvet'.

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: > Christian Ridderström schrieb: > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > >>\usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times > >>\usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like > >> > > > > Hmm... I just tried this and get the

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: > Christian Ridderström schrieb: > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > >>\usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times > >>\usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like > >> > > > > Hmm... I just tried this and get the

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Herbert Voss
Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: Christian Ridderström schrieb: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: \usepackage{mathptmx}% instead of package times \usepackage[scaled=0.9]{helvet} % or [scaled=0.92], if you like Hmm... I just tried this and

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Herbert Voss
Christian Ridderström schrieb: \ProvidesPackage{helvet} [1999/03/29 PSNFSS v.7.2 update this package Herbert -- http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-12 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Herbert Voss wrote: > Christian Ridderström schrieb: > > \ProvidesPackage{helvet} > > [1999/03/29 PSNFSS v.7.2 > > update this package > > Herbert Thanks, I've told my systems administrator and hopefully he'll update the package. /Christian -- Christian Ridderström,

Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand this. I have a document of 4 chapters and when I print them all to ps and convert to pdf via ps2pdfwr (or just ps2pdf) they look perfect. Nice letters, nice rendering. I have a coverpage using, I am all but certain, the same

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Les Denham
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 1523 pm, you wrote: but certain, the same fonts and sizes but when I convert it, it looks horrible with fuzzy text. What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Matej Cepl
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering coverpage? In Adobe Acrobat go to File/Document Info/Fonts (in some other versions of Acrobat the name is different) and

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:22 pm, Matej Cepl wrote: Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering coverpage? In

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Herbert Voss
Praedor Tempus Atrebates schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:22 pm, Matej Cepl wrote: Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the

Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand this. I have a document of 4 chapters and when I print them all to ps and convert to pdf via ps2pdfwr (or just ps2pdf) they look perfect. Nice letters, nice rendering. I have a coverpage using, I am all but certain, the same

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Les Denham
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 1523 pm, you wrote: but certain, the same fonts and sizes but when I convert it, it looks horrible with fuzzy text. What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Matej Cepl
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering coverpage? In Adobe Acrobat go to File/Document Info/Fonts (in some other versions of Acrobat the name is different) and

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:22 pm, Matej Cepl wrote: Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering coverpage? In

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Herbert Voss
Praedor Tempus Atrebates schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:22 pm, Matej Cepl wrote: Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the

Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand this. I have a document of 4 chapters and when I print them all to ps and convert to pdf via ps2pdfwr (or just ps2pdf) they look perfect. Nice letters, nice rendering. I have a coverpage using, I am all but certain, the same

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Les Denham
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 1523 pm, you wrote: > but certain, the same fonts and sizes but when I convert it, it looks > horrible with fuzzy text. > > What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference > between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Matej Cepl
Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: > What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference > between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly rendering coverpage? In Adobe Acrobat go to File/Document Info/Fonts (in some other versions of Acrobat the name is different) and

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:22 pm, Matej Cepl wrote: > Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: > > What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical > > difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the horribly > > rendering

Re: Still the ugly pdf output

2003-02-11 Thread Herbert Voss
Praedor Tempus Atrebates schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 11 February 2003 06:22 pm, Matej Cepl wrote: Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote: What does it take to fix this? How do I determine the critical difference between the nicely rendering chapters and the

Re: Re: pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-21 Thread Guenter Milde
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 04:34:31 +0200 wrote Robin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thursday 21 February 2002 03:40, Paul Johnson wrote: Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you see the same? Looks fine usng Export-PDF, but won't work with Export-pdflatex. It's

Re: Re: pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-21 Thread Guenter Milde
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 04:34:31 +0200 wrote Robin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thursday 21 February 2002 03:40, Paul Johnson wrote: Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you see the same? Looks fine usng Export-PDF, but won't work with Export-pdflatex. It's

Re: Re: pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-21 Thread Guenter Milde
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 04:34:31 +0200 wrote Robin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thursday 21 February 2002 03:40, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you > > see the same? > > Looks fine usng Export->PDF, but wo

pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-20 Thread Paul Johnson
Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you see the same? That's too bad, because pdf is the only feasible way I can take s computer slide show and offer it on a MS Windoze system. pj Guenter Milde wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:39:09 +0200 wrote Robin Turner [EMAIL

Re: pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-20 Thread Robin Turner
On Thursday 21 February 2002 03:40, Paul Johnson wrote: Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you see the same? Looks fine usng Export-PDF, but won't work with Export-pdflatex. It's probably that PDF bug to do with vector fonts that has launched a thousand posts

pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-20 Thread Paul Johnson
Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you see the same? That's too bad, because pdf is the only feasible way I can take s computer slide show and offer it on a MS Windoze system. pj Guenter Milde wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:39:09 +0200 wrote Robin Turner [EMAIL

Re: pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-20 Thread Robin Turner
On Thursday 21 February 2002 03:40, Paul Johnson wrote: Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you see the same? Looks fine usng Export-PDF, but won't work with Export-pdflatex. It's probably that PDF bug to do with vector fonts that has launched a thousand posts

pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-20 Thread Paul Johnson
Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you see the same? That's too bad, because pdf is the only feasible way I can take s computer slide show and offer it on a MS Windoze system. pj Guenter Milde wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:39:09 +0200 wrote Robin Tur

Re: pandora breaks pdf output ? (was Re: kewl resource

2002-02-20 Thread Robin Turner
On Thursday 21 February 2002 03:40, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hm. When I use the pandora package, my pdf output is no good. Do you > see the same? Looks fine usng Export->PDF, but won't work with Export->pdflatex. It's probably that PDF bug to do with vector fonts that has launche

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-29 Thread Joseph Reuter
Dekel Tsur wrote: Note that while using pslatex will give you type 1 fonts for text, latex will still use some Computer Modern fonts for some symbols, for example the minus sign. So you should always set up your ~/.dvips so dvips will use type1 fonts. My teTeX installation (1.06) has the

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-29 Thread Joseph Reuter
Dekel Tsur wrote: Note that while using pslatex will give you type 1 fonts for text, latex will still use some Computer Modern fonts for some symbols, for example the minus sign. So you should always set up your ~/.dvips so dvips will use type1 fonts. My teTeX installation (1.06) has the

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-29 Thread Joseph Reuter
Dekel Tsur wrote: > Note that while using pslatex will give you type 1 fonts for text, > latex will still use some Computer Modern fonts for some symbols, for > example the minus sign. So you should always set up your ~/.dvips so dvips > will use type1 fonts. My teTeX installation (1.06) has

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:30PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. I set fonts to pslatex in document settings and used export to pdf from. It looks pretty, except some of the math disappears. In particular, acrobat reader does not

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Matej Cepl
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:30PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: If I view the same pdf file in xpdf, there is an error message saying that the document uses Type 3 fonts and it can't use them. I read in the ps2pdf docs where it says it converts Type 3 fonts to high resolution bitmaps, so I'm

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Paul E Johnson
I got a good tip from Herbert and I think he emailed it just to me, not to the entire list. I hope he does not mind if I share the essence of it. Herbert suggested this btw: use the package tex2pdf from Steffen, it handles all the converting stuff. http://tex2pdf.berlios.de

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:30PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. I set fonts to pslatex in document settings and used export to pdf from. It looks pretty, except some of the math disappears. In particular, acrobat reader does not

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Matej Cepl
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:30PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: If I view the same pdf file in xpdf, there is an error message saying that the document uses Type 3 fonts and it can't use them. I read in the ps2pdf docs where it says it converts Type 3 fonts to high resolution bitmaps, so I'm

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Paul E Johnson
I got a good tip from Herbert and I think he emailed it just to me, not to the entire list. I hope he does not mind if I share the essence of it. Herbert suggested this btw: use the package tex2pdf from Steffen, it handles all the converting stuff. http://tex2pdf.berlios.de

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:30PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. > I set fonts to "pslatex" in document settings and used export to pdf > from. It looks pretty, except some of the math disappears. In > particular, acrobat reader

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Matej Cepl
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:23:30PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > If I view the same pdf file in xpdf, there is an error message > saying that the document uses Type 3 fonts and it can't use > them. I read in the ps2pdf docs where it says it converts Type > 3 fonts to high resolution bitmaps, so

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-28 Thread Paul E Johnson
I got a good tip from Herbert and I think he emailed it just to me, not to the entire list. I hope he does not mind if I share the essence of it. Herbert suggested this > > btw: use the package tex2pdf from Steffen, it handles > > all the converting stuff. > > http://tex2pdf.berlios.de > >

Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-27 Thread Paul Johnson
On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. I set fonts to pslatex in document settings and used export to pdf from. It looks pretty, except some of the math disappears. In particular, acrobat reader does not show the minus signs! There is no warning. If I view the same

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Johnson wrote: On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. I set fonts to pslatex in document settings and used export to pdf try times instead of pslatex Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-27 Thread Paul Johnson
On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. I set fonts to pslatex in document settings and used export to pdf from. It looks pretty, except some of the math disappears. In particular, acrobat reader does not show the minus signs! There is no warning. If I view the same

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Johnson wrote: On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. I set fonts to pslatex in document settings and used export to pdf try times instead of pslatex Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-27 Thread Paul Johnson
On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. I set fonts to "pslatex" in document settings and used export to pdf from. It looks pretty, except some of the math disappears. In particular, acrobat reader does not show the minus signs! There is no warning. If I view the same

Re: Type 3 font in pdf output turns invisible?

2002-01-27 Thread Herbert Voss
Paul Johnson wrote: > On RedHat 7.2 I'm running lyx 1.1.6fix3 with ghostscript 7.03. > I set fonts to "pslatex" in document settings and used export to pdf try times instead of pslatex Herbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

lyx-1.1.6pre3, PDF output tip

2001-01-08 Thread Adrian Ball
I was having trouble converting EPS images into usable versions for PDF output - images (which were originally bitmapped, then converted to EPS before including in Lyx) would look very fuzzy when exported/viewed in PDF. The solution (using Ghostscript 6.50) is to alter the PS-PDF convertor

lyx-1.1.6pre3, PDF output tip

2001-01-08 Thread Adrian Ball
I was having trouble converting EPS images into usable versions for PDF output - images (which were originally bitmapped, then converted to EPS before including in Lyx) would look very fuzzy when exported/viewed in PDF. The solution (using Ghostscript 6.50) is to alter the PS-PDF convertor

lyx-1.1.6pre3, PDF output tip

2001-01-08 Thread Adrian Ball
I was having trouble converting EPS images into usable versions for PDF output - images (which were originally bitmapped, then converted to EPS before including in Lyx) would look very fuzzy when exported/viewed in PDF. The solution (using Ghostscript 6.50) is to alter the PS->PDF conver

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-15 Thread Steffen Evers
As I am using GNU sed v3.02.80 which is actually a beta version (for 1 year now, so it's pretty stable), you might face some problems because I have sometimes used commands that doesn't work with earlier versions. So, version 3.02a should be fine, but version 3.02 could cause problems. You get

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-15 Thread Steffen Evers
As I am using GNU sed v3.02.80 which is actually a beta version (for 1 year now, so it's pretty stable), you might face some problems because I have sometimes used commands that doesn't work with earlier versions. So, version 3.02a should be fine, but version 3.02 could cause problems. You get

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-15 Thread Steffen Evers
As I am using GNU sed v3.02.80 which is actually a beta version (for 1 year now, so it's pretty stable), you might face some problems because I have sometimes used commands that doesn't work with earlier versions. So, version 3.02a should be fine, but version 3.02 could cause problems. You get

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Steffen Evers wrote: Hello, A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... indeed :-) i'm using pybliographer

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Steffen Evers
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote: On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote: A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! [...] Run pdflatex 9 times for runno in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 do echo echo " PDF Latex

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Steffen Evers
Herbert Voss wrote: Steffen Evers wrote: Hello, A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... indeed

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
The most important line I need for the regular expressions is this \makeatother command. I don't know what it does, but it was always directly behind my Latex preamble. in tex some variables have the @ in their name, like c@count. therefore it's forbidden to use this letter in own commands in

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Steffen Evers wrote: Hello, A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... indeed :-) i'm using pybliographer

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Steffen Evers
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote: On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote: A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! [...] Run pdflatex 9 times for runno in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 do echo echo " PDF Latex

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Steffen Evers
Herbert Voss wrote: Steffen Evers wrote: Hello, A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... indeed

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
The most important line I need for the regular expressions is this \makeatother command. I don't know what it does, but it was always directly behind my Latex preamble. in tex some variables have the @ in their name, like c@count. therefore it's forbidden to use this letter in own commands in

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Steffen Evers wrote: > > Hello, > > A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! > > Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some > parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... indeed :-) i'm using

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Steffen Evers
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote: > > > > A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! > > [...] > > > > Run pdflatex 9 times > > for runno in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > > do > >echo > >echo

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Steffen Evers
Herbert Voss wrote: > > Steffen Evers wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! > > > > Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some > > parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
>The most important line I need for the regular expressions is this \makeatother >command. I don't know what it does, but it was always directly behind my Latex >preamble. in tex some variables have the @ in their name, like c@count. therefore it's forbidden to use this letter in own commands in

lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Steffen Evers
Hello, A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... Thanks to Herbert Voss and Matej Cepl for telling me how the

Re: pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Steffen Evers
Matej Cepl wrote: PDFLaTeX cannot work with .eps files at all. You have to convert them into .pdf (yes, there are even small PDF files with just a picture) using an utility eps2pdf (or something like it -- it's a part of tetex). Then refer to them without an extension (i.e.,

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote: A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! [...] Run pdflatex 9 times for runno in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 do echo echo " PDF Latex run no. $runno *"

lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Steffen Evers
Hello, A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... Thanks to Herbert Voss and Matej Cepl for telling me how the

Re: pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Steffen Evers
Matej Cepl wrote: PDFLaTeX cannot work with .eps files at all. You have to convert them into .pdf (yes, there are even small PDF files with just a picture) using an utility eps2pdf (or something like it -- it's a part of tetex). Then refer to them without an extension (i.e.,

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote: A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! [...] Run pdflatex 9 times for runno in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 do echo echo " PDF Latex run no. $runno *"

lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Steffen Evers
Hello, A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! Maybe someone can make use of it or someone is in the mood to integrate some parts of it in the LyX code. A PDF-export function would be nice ... Thanks to Herbert Voss and Matej Cepl for telling me how the

Re: pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Steffen Evers
Matej Cepl wrote: > PDFLaTeX cannot work with .eps files at all. You have to convert > them into .pdf (yes, there are even small PDF files with just a > picture) using an utility eps2pdf (or something like it -- it's a part of > tetex). Then refer to them without an extension (i.e., >

Re: lyx2pdf - pdf output

2000-08-13 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote: > > A little shell script to translate lyx documents to pdf has come into being! > [...] > > Run pdflatex 9 times > for runno in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > do >echo >echo " PDF Latex run no. $runno

Re: pdf output

2000-08-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On 11 Aug 00, at 3:25, Steffen Evers wrote: Yes, I would also prefer pdflatex as this driver is able to break hyperlinks longer than one line in several parts, but two problems has come up: 1. pdflatex complains about my eps and ps figures: PDFLaTeX cannot work with .eps files at all. You

Re: pdf output

2000-08-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On 11 Aug 00, at 3:25, Steffen Evers wrote: Yes, I would also prefer pdflatex as this driver is able to break hyperlinks longer than one line in several parts, but two problems has come up: 1. pdflatex complains about my eps and ps figures: PDFLaTeX cannot work with .eps files at all. You

Re: pdf output

2000-08-11 Thread Matej Cepl
On 11 Aug 00, at 3:25, Steffen Evers wrote: > Yes, I would also prefer pdflatex as this driver is able to break > hyperlinks longer than one line in several parts, but two problems has > come up: > > 1. pdflatex complains about my eps and ps figures: PDFLaTeX cannot work with .eps files at

Re: pdf output

2000-08-10 Thread Matej Cepl
On 5 Aug 00, at 21:35, Steffen Evers wrote: \usepackage{pslatex} \usepackage[ps2pdf,pdftitle={Your Document Title},urlcolor=blue,linktocpage,letterpaper,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} And then use Export-Postscript and from the shell program ps2pdf ducument.ps or print-menu and output

Re: pdf output

2000-08-10 Thread Steffen Evers
Matej Cepl wrote: even better result you get by using PDFLaTeX. The only change necessary is to use pdftex is to use pdftex as a driver (i.e., instead of ps2pdf), export LaTeX instead of PostScript and use (maybe, more than once and bibtex) pdflatex instead of regular latex. PDFLaTeX should

Re: pdf output

2000-08-10 Thread Matej Cepl
On 5 Aug 00, at 21:35, Steffen Evers wrote: \usepackage{pslatex} \usepackage[ps2pdf,pdftitle={Your Document Title},urlcolor=blue,linktocpage,letterpaper,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} And then use Export-Postscript and from the shell program ps2pdf ducument.ps or print-menu and output

Re: pdf output

2000-08-10 Thread Steffen Evers
Matej Cepl wrote: even better result you get by using PDFLaTeX. The only change necessary is to use pdftex is to use pdftex as a driver (i.e., instead of ps2pdf), export LaTeX instead of PostScript and use (maybe, more than once and bibtex) pdflatex instead of regular latex. PDFLaTeX should

Re: pdf output

2000-08-10 Thread Matej Cepl
On 5 Aug 00, at 21:35, Steffen Evers wrote: > > \usepackage{pslatex} > > \usepackage[ps2pdf,pdftitle={Your Document > > Title},urlcolor=blue,linktocpage,letterpaper,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} > > > > And then use Export->Postscript and from the shell program ps2pdf > > > > or print-menu and

Re: pdf output

2000-08-10 Thread Steffen Evers
Matej Cepl wrote: > even better result you get by using PDFLaTeX. The only change > necessary is to use pdftex is to use pdftex as a driver (i.e., instead > of ps2pdf), export LaTeX instead of PostScript and use (maybe, > more than once and bibtex) pdflatex instead of regular latex. > PDFLaTeX

Re: pdf output

2000-08-05 Thread Steffen Evers
Herbert Voss wrote: in latex preamble \usepackage{pslatex} \usepackage[ps2pdf,pdftitle={Your Document Title},urlcolor=blue,linktocpage,letterpaper,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} And then use Export-Postscript and from the shell program ps2pdf ducument.ps or print-menu and output to a

Re: pdf output

2000-08-05 Thread Steffen Evers
Herbert Voss wrote: in latex preamble \usepackage{pslatex} \usepackage[ps2pdf,pdftitle={Your Document Title},urlcolor=blue,linktocpage,letterpaper,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} And then use Export-Postscript and from the shell program ps2pdf ducument.ps or print-menu and output to a

Re: pdf output

2000-08-05 Thread Steffen Evers
Herbert Voss wrote: > in latex preamble > > \usepackage{pslatex} > \usepackage[ps2pdf,pdftitle={Your Document > Title},urlcolor=blue,linktocpage,letterpaper,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} > > And then use Export->Postscript and from the shell program ps2pdf > > or print-menu and output to a

Re: pdf output

2000-08-04 Thread Steffen Evers
Ralph Boland wrote: WHAT EXACTLY DO THESE SETTINGS DO AND HOW DO I MAKE THEM TAKE EFFECT? The archives have several useful comments on how to convert my foilTex lyx documents to pdf files which I will now try. Any final advice welcome. I am using lyx-1.1.5fix1 When you figured out how

Re: pdf output

2000-08-04 Thread Herbert Voss
Steffen Evers wrote: Ralph Boland wrote: WHAT EXACTLY DO THESE SETTINGS DO AND HOW DO I MAKE THEM TAKE EFFECT? The archives have several useful comments on how to convert my foilTex lyx documents to pdf files which I will now try. Any final advice welcome. I am using

Re: pdf output

2000-08-04 Thread Steffen Evers
Ralph Boland wrote: WHAT EXACTLY DO THESE SETTINGS DO AND HOW DO I MAKE THEM TAKE EFFECT? The archives have several useful comments on how to convert my foilTex lyx documents to pdf files which I will now try. Any final advice welcome. I am using lyx-1.1.5fix1 When you figured out how

Re: pdf output

2000-08-04 Thread Herbert Voss
Steffen Evers wrote: Ralph Boland wrote: WHAT EXACTLY DO THESE SETTINGS DO AND HOW DO I MAKE THEM TAKE EFFECT? The archives have several useful comments on how to convert my foilTex lyx documents to pdf files which I will now try. Any final advice welcome. I am using

Re: pdf output

2000-08-04 Thread Steffen Evers
Ralph Boland wrote: > WHAT EXACTLY DO THESE SETTINGS DO AND HOW > DO I MAKE THEM TAKE EFFECT? > > The archives have several useful comments on how > to convert my foilTex lyx documents to pdf files > which I will now try. Any final advice welcome. > > I am using lyx-1.1.5fix1 When you figured

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >