> There are two relevant document class options:
>
> * "fleqn" (flush left equation), which aligns the equation to the left. Used
> by itself, though, it leaves the equation number on the right.
>
> * "leqno" (left equation number), which puts the equation number on the left.
> Used by
On 12/4/22 19:57, Dan wrote:
I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to
be in the following type of format:
Eq. 1.1 (equation)
Eq. 1.2 (equation)
indented slightly. IMO I don't like having them centered like the
usual Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does.
I
I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to be in
the following type of format:
Eq. 1.1 (equation)
Eq. 1.2 (equation)
indented slightly. IMO I don't like having them centered like the usual
Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does.
I know LaTeX supports defining a
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
> I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
> equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
> between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
> (2.3.3)DELTA.
>
Le 16/12/2015 23:05, Franci Žižek a écrit :
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.
> Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta}
>
> Guillaume
>
Beautiful! Thank you Guillaume!
Best regards
Franci Žižek gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
> variant?
>
> Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
>
> For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)
Hi
Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
variant?
Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ
The counting is continuous, some equations just have an additional DELTA at
the end
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de
On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
For this, I have in my latex preamble:
% Gleichungen
% ---
% Alle Gleichungen nummerieren
\renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}}
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de
On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
For this, I have in my latex preamble:
% Gleichungen
% ---
% Alle Gleichungen nummerieren
\renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}}
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de
On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
> I only label some of them ?
For this, I have in my "latex preamble":
% Gleichungen
% ---
% Alle Gleichungen nummerieren
\renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}}
On 2011-08-05, Richard Heck wrote:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote:
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are
correct if I
On 2011-08-05, Richard Heck wrote:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote:
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are
correct if I
On 2011-08-05, Richard Heck wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --]
> On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
>> The equation numbering on the lyx GUI
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct
if I convert them View pdflatex.
For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows
the correct numbering
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote:
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are
correct if I convert them View pdflatex.
For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct
if I convert them View pdflatex.
For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows
the correct numbering
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote:
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are
correct if I convert them View pdflatex.
For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct
if I convert them View pdflatex.
For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows
the correct numbering
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
> The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are
> correct if I convert them View pdflatex.
> For example, equation is
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part
number beside
On 08/12/2010 07:25 AM, Amir Fathi wrote:
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation
Am 12.08.2010 15:33, schrieb Richard Heck:
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part
number beside
On 08/12/2010 07:25 AM, Amir Fathi wrote:
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation
Am 12.08.2010 15:33, schrieb Richard Heck:
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using "Report" Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as "(2.6)"
I want them simply to be numbered as "(6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I want
On 08/12/2010 07:25 AM, Amir Fathi wrote:
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using "Report" Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as "(2.6)"
I want them simply to be numbered as "(6) or instead having
Am 12.08.2010 15:33, schrieb Richard Heck:
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using "Report" Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as "(2.6)"
I want them simply to be numbered as "(6) or instead having the
chapter n
. But I want
it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the
document.
For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package.
Thanks in advance for your help
--
View this message in context:
http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Equation-numbering-tp5282127p5282127.html
Sent from
alpking alpking at hotmail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
that : (4.13),
. But I want
it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the
document.
For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package.
Thanks in advance for your help
--
View this message in context:
http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Equation-numbering-tp5282127p5282127.html
Sent from
alpking alpking at hotmail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
that : (4.13),
. But I want
it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the
document.
For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package.
Thanks in advance for your help
--
View this message in context:
http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Equation-numbering-tp5282127p5282127.html
Sent from
alpking hotmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
>
> Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
> before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
> that : (4.13),
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if
you have a solution.
Thx,
Nosrat
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if
you have a solution.
Thx,
Nosrat
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if
you have a solution.
Thx,
Nosrat
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Thanks,
EK
E. Kaplan schrieb:
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Your solution is the only one.
regards Uwe
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Thanks,
EK
E. Kaplan schrieb:
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Your solution is the only one.
regards Uwe
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Thanks,
EK
E. Kaplan schrieb:
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Your solution is the only one.
regards Uwe
I am using an article document class, and have equations in the body of
the article and in the appendix. I would like the equations to be
numbered sequentially, and the numbering restarted in the appendix and
appear as: A1, A2, etc.
How do I do that? I tried the various suggestions on the
I am using an article document class, and have equations in the body of
the article and in the appendix. I would like the equations to be
numbered sequentially, and the numbering restarted in the appendix and
appear as: A1, A2, etc.
How do I do that? I tried the various suggestions on the
I am using an article document class, and have equations in the body of
the article and in the appendix. I would like the equations to be
numbered sequentially, and the numbering restarted in the appendix and
appear as: A1, A2, etc.
How do I do that? I tried the various suggestions on the
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal
Ivan Werning wrote:
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's the
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and
make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3)
and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do
all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really
value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation
numbering natively, given how standard it is.
-Ivan
On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal
Ivan Werning wrote:
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen
by default because it comes after (4). That's the
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and
make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3)
and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do
all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really
value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation
numbering natively, given how standard it is.
-Ivan
On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen
by default because it comes after "(4)". That's the correct normal
Ivan Werning wrote:
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen
by default because it comes after "(4)". That's
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and
make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3)
and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do
all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting
is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really
value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation
numbering natively, given how standard it is.
-Ivan
On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go
Hi all,
I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I
disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
Hi all,
I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I
disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed
only in math mode.
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
Hi all,
I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I
disable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed
only in math mode".
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed
only in math mode".
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
ork around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document - Settings. On the Document
Class page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
=
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document - Settings. On the Document
Class page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
=
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document -> Settings. On the "Document
Class" page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
Universidad de los Andes
(56 2) 412-9650
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Avda. San
Right click and choose Toggle Labeling/Numbering
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert Math numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document - Settings... - Document Class.
/Paul
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
Universidad de los Andes
(56 2) 412-9650
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Avda. San
Right click and choose Toggle Labeling/Numbering
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert Math numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document - Settings... - Document Class.
/Paul
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
Universidad de los Andes
(56 2) 412-9650
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Avda. San
Right click and choose "Toggle Labeling/Numbering"
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias
> How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
> LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert > Math > numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document -> Settings... -> Document Class.
/Paul
in LyX?
Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no
solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant
preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16077712
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in LyX?
Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no
solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant
preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16077712
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
>>
>
>
Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no
solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant
preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
--
View this mess
and that its caused somewhere in the instant
> preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
>
-
David Hewitt
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in
the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16071319.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16073725.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
