On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as
Aldus or
Renaissance
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable.
Hey Bruce
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
> Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus or
> Renaissance
>
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or TeX Gyre (or anyone else)
pro
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would be a
prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than Times,
Bruce,
They either use Times or the default san-serif face as a body text font.
Ugly and hard to read.
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would
be a prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than
Times, as the default typeface. Not only then
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Guenter Milde wrote:
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without a
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked "ff".
> Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
> Palatino fonts, if it just supersede
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Dear list members,
> I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> in ff, fi, ...).
Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.
Lo
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
>> clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less "ligature
>> pixels" than the Pagella. The latter features a
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less "ligature
pixels" than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuou
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
>> [1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
>
> Liviu,
>
> Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
> in the standa
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
Liviu,
Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
sta
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Thanks, that did the trick.
>
> I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
>
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
>> > Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
>> > "f
Thanks, that did the trick.
I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> > Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
> > "ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
> >
> > H
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
> "ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
>
> However, I don't see any ligature between "f" and "i", either in "fi" or
> "ffi".
>
> (I am under 1.6.9 so I w
First, thanks for your reply.
Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
> > I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> > noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> > in ff, fi, ...).
> >
> Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagel
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> in ff, fi, ...).
>
Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX G
Dear list members,
I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).
However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
these "ligatures"?
What do you think of this? I se
17 matches
Mail list logo