Re: Wassenhoven ans lastchecked-option

jezZiFeR schrieb: The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month will come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which is the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the options

Re: XeLaTeX, fontenc, LyX and Stubborn Fonts

On 2009-11-19, Rob Oakes wrote: ... While reading through the old emails, I was able to resolve the problem. Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with FileExportLaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?) To solve it, I went to

Re: Wassenhoven ans lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, thanks! The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month will come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which is the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the

Re: Package unitsdef does not work correctly

Marcus schrieb: I migrated a LaTex project into Lyx. (karmic, Lyx1.3) LyX 1.3 is extremely out of date. I recommend to use LyX 1.6. The document has many numbers with a unit like 2.5 µl or 280 nm² etc. In LaTex I used the http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/unitsdef.html

Re: Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces

Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP SP3 and Vista 64 SP1 system. Whenever I try to generate a pdf/dvi/ps file from a file path that includes spaces, I get an error

Re: Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces

Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX document, right? M Uwe Stöhr escribió: Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP SP3 and

Re: Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Manolo Martí­nez man...@austrohungaro.comwrote: Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX document, right? M Uwe Stöhr escribió: Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, dear list, I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors: LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined. Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined. I did the update by just removing

Re: XeLaTeX, fontenc, LyX and Stubborn fonts

Hi Günter, Thank you for the thoughts and the links. Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with FileExportLaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?) I set up LyX according to the instructions on the LyX wiki: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/XeTeX Briefly,

XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 11/20/2009 10:18 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Hi Günter, Thank you for the thoughts and the links. Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with FileExportLaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?) If someone hasn't already said so, I should add that

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

jezZiFeR wrote: I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors: LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined. Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined. Did you update both biblatex and

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, dear list, I think the problem is, that I did not update biblatex, and I do not know how to do that – maybe someone could help. In the wiki I can just find instructions, how to install biblatex, not how to update. I also do not know, where to find a current biblatex-version.

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

http://konx.net/biblatex-mla/ but I don´t know if I have to install both of those files, or if biblatex version 0.8d is sufficient. Is it convenient to just replace the old files with these and to do a texhash then? Well, I´ve tried that now, and again I just get errors when compiling:

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

Richard, I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. Last time I tried trunk (2 or 3 months ago, I believe), I found out that every file it touched could no longer be opened

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I updated to the svn trunk version this morning and I can verify that any file modified by the new version, indeed, cannot be reverted be read by v1.6 or earlier. When I was playing with the svn version back in August, this would have been an enormous problem since it seemed extremely unstable.

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about the new

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

Hi Vince, I was aware that newer versions of LyX use a different file format. I meant only that you have to manually export the document to an older version of LyX. The lyx2lyx script is not capable of doing so on its own. My fault for not being clear. Cheers, Rob On Fri, 2009-11-20 at

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl wrote: I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 11/20/2009 05:21 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: ... that's because you'll have to tell the lyx2lyx script that you want the 1.6.x file format. It would be wrong to save the documents in 1.6.x format by default (losing new features on the

Re: Wassenhoven ans lastchecked-option

jezZiFeR schrieb: The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month will come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which is the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the options

Re: XeLaTeX, fontenc, LyX and Stubborn Fonts

On 2009-11-19, Rob Oakes wrote: ... While reading through the old emails, I was able to resolve the problem. Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with FileExportLaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?) To solve it, I went to

Re: Wassenhoven ans lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, thanks! The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month will come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which is the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the

Re: Package unitsdef does not work correctly

Marcus schrieb: I migrated a LaTex project into Lyx. (karmic, Lyx1.3) LyX 1.3 is extremely out of date. I recommend to use LyX 1.6. The document has many numbers with a unit like 2.5 µl or 280 nm² etc. In LaTex I used the http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/unitsdef.html

Re: Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces

Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP SP3 and Vista 64 SP1 system. Whenever I try to generate a pdf/dvi/ps file from a file path that includes spaces, I get an error

Re: Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces

Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX document, right? M Uwe Stöhr escribió: Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP SP3 and

Re: Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Manolo Martí­nez man...@austrohungaro.comwrote: Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX document, right? M Uwe Stöhr escribió: Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, dear list, I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors: LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined. Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined. I did the update by just removing

Re: XeLaTeX, fontenc, LyX and Stubborn fonts

Hi Günter, Thank you for the thoughts and the links. Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with FileExportLaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?) I set up LyX according to the instructions on the LyX wiki: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/XeTeX Briefly,

XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 11/20/2009 10:18 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Hi Günter, Thank you for the thoughts and the links. Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with FileExportLaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?) If someone hasn't already said so, I should add that

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

jezZiFeR wrote: I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors: LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined. Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined. Did you update both biblatex and

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, dear list, I think the problem is, that I did not update biblatex, and I do not know how to do that – maybe someone could help. In the wiki I can just find instructions, how to install biblatex, not how to update. I also do not know, where to find a current biblatex-version.

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

http://konx.net/biblatex-mla/ but I don´t know if I have to install both of those files, or if biblatex version 0.8d is sufficient. Is it convenient to just replace the old files with these and to do a texhash then? Well, I´ve tried that now, and again I just get errors when compiling:

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

Richard, I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. Last time I tried trunk (2 or 3 months ago, I believe), I found out that every file it touched could no longer be opened

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I updated to the svn trunk version this morning and I can verify that any file modified by the new version, indeed, cannot be reverted be read by v1.6 or earlier. When I was playing with the svn version back in August, this would have been an enormous problem since it seemed extremely unstable.

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about the new

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

Hi Vince, I was aware that newer versions of LyX use a different file format. I meant only that you have to manually export the document to an older version of LyX. The lyx2lyx script is not capable of doing so on its own. My fault for not being clear. Cheers, Rob On Fri, 2009-11-20 at

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl wrote: I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 11/20/2009 05:21 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: ... that's because you'll have to tell the lyx2lyx script that you want the 1.6.x file format. It would be wrong to save the documents in 1.6.x format by default (losing new features on the

Re: Wassenhoven ans lastchecked-option

jezZiFeR schrieb: The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month will come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which is the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the options

Re: XeLaTeX, fontenc, LyX and Stubborn Fonts

On 2009-11-19, Rob Oakes wrote: > ... While reading through the old emails, I was able to > resolve the problem. Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with File>Export>LaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?) > To solve it, I went to

Re: Wassenhoven ans lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, thanks! The next thing is, I gave you not the correct hint, since it's not date=long, but urldate=long for the urldate. Note that the month will come out abbreviated as long as you use 'abbreviate=true' (which is the default). Thus, for a full month, you should use the

Re: Package unitsdef does not work correctly

Marcus schrieb: I migrated a LaTex project into Lyx. (karmic, Lyx1.3) LyX 1.3 is extremely out of date. I recommend to use LyX 1.6. The document has many numbers with a unit like 2.5 µl or 280 nm² etc. In LaTex I used the http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/unitsdef.html

Re: "Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces"

Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP SP3 and Vista 64 SP1 system. Whenever I try to generate a pdf/dvi/ps file from a file path that includes spaces, I get an error

Re: "Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces"

Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX document, right? M Uwe Stöhr escribió: Adam Hoffman schrieb: I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system, and I'm having an issue that is not common to my previous LyX installs (1.6.?) on an XP SP3 and

Re: "Directory path to the document cannot contain spaces"

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Manolo Martí­nez wrote: > Just in case, the document in question is the LyX document, not a BibTeX > document, right? > > M > > Uwe Stöhr escribió: > > Adam Hoffman schrieb: >> >> I recently installed LyX 1.6.4-1 on a Windows 7 system,

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, dear list, I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors: LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined. Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined. I did the update by just removing

Re: XeLaTeX, fontenc, LyX and Stubborn fonts

Hi Günter, Thank you for the thoughts and the links. "Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with File>Export>LaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?)" I set up LyX according to the instructions on the LyX wiki: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/XeTeX

XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 11/20/2009 10:18 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Hi Günter, Thank you for the thoughts and the links. "Unfortunately, you still did not write, how you process your document with XeTeX. (Export with File>Export>LaTeX (XeTeX) or something alike?)" If someone hasn't already said so, I should add

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

jezZiFeR wrote: > I now updated to (or at leat I tried) biblatex-dw.tds-1 2, and now I > can´t compile the pdf at all, because I get the following errors: > LaTeX Error: \...@macro@editor+othersstrg undefined. > Package keyval Error: idemtracker undefined. Did you update both biblatex and

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

Dear Dominik, dear list, I think the problem is, that I did not update biblatex, and I do not know how to do that – maybe someone could help. In the wiki I can just find instructions, how to install biblatex, not how to update. I also do not know, where to find a current biblatex-version.

Re: Wassenhoven and lastchecked-option

http://konx.net/biblatex-mla/ but I don´t know if I have to install both of those files, or if biblatex version 0.8d is sufficient. Is it convenient to just replace the old files with these and to do a texhash then? Well, I´ve tried that now, and again I just get errors when compiling:

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

Richard, I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. Last time I tried trunk (2 or 3 months ago, I believe), I found out that every file it touched could no longer be opened

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

I updated to the svn trunk version this morning and I can verify that any file modified by the new version, indeed, cannot be reverted be read by v1.6 or earlier. When I was playing with the svn version back in August, this would have been an enormous problem since it seemed extremely unstable.

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

>I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather >the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still >unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file format (of course) and the older LyXes don't know about the

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

Hi Vince, I was aware that newer versions of LyX use a different file format. I meant only that you have to manually export the document to an older version of LyX. The lyx2lyx script is not capable of doing so on its own. My fault for not being clear. Cheers, Rob On Fri, 2009-11-20 at

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW < v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote: > >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather > >the lyx2lyx converter that deals with it) is still > >unable to revert back to previous versions' file formats. > > What do you mean by

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

>> >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx >> >converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to >> >previous versions' file formats. >> >> What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file >> format (of course) and the older LyXes

RE: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

>> >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx >> >converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to >> >previous versions' file formats. >> >> What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a new file >> format (of course) and the older LyXes

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: >>> >I wonder if the file format used in trunk (or rather the lyx2lyx >>> >converter that deals with it) is still unable to revert back to >>> >previous versions' file formats. >>> What do you mean by unable to revert back ? LyX trunk uses a

Re: XeLaTeX in LyX 1.7/2.0

On 11/20/2009 05:21 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-11-20, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: ... that's because you'll have to tell the lyx2lyx script that you want the 1.6.x file format. It would be wrong to save the documents in 1.6.x format by default (losing new features on the