t is that when dealing with vintage equipment like the Model T or
> even an external modem do not assume that a female DB25 is a parallel port
> as IBM have (re)defined it.
>
> m
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> *From:* Brian White <bw.al...@gmail.com>
>
o: m...@bitchin100.com
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [M100] M100 Digest, Vol 80, Issue 9
It's wired as DTE, but with a female connector. *That's* what makes it
backwards, not merely the female connector by itself.
If it were a female connector, and wired as DCE, that wo
err good grief yet another correction. I missed your very last line Josh,
which obviates my entire post. "oh well" indeed ;)
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Brian White wrote:
> I didn't notice that last post didn't include any quoting. Meant to reply
> to Josh, and neither
I didn't notice that last post didn't include any quoting. Meant to reply
to Josh, and neither contradicting nor adding to what Mike already said.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Brian White wrote:
> It's wired as DTE, but with a female connector. *That's* what makes it
>
It's wired as DTE, but with a female connector. *That's* what makes it
backwards, not merely the female connector by itself.
If it were a female connector, and wired as DCE, that would be unusual for
a computer, but it would still be conforming to the same conventions as
everything else.
When
he parallel port.
m
- Original Message -
From: Josh Malone
To: m...@bitchin100.com
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [M100] M100 Digest, Vol 80, Issue 9
Depends on whether you consider the M100 to be "communications equipment" or
"termin
Depends on whether you consider the M100 to be "communications equipment"
or "terminal equipment". From the perspective of "this is a device to be
hooked up to your main PC" then female makes sense, somewhere. But I think
the port is wired as terminal equipment, which then puts it (technically)
in
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Brian White wrote:
>
> * I heard someone suggest that actually the M100 was probably technically
> correct according to the standards of the time, and predated the PC, and
> it's actually the IBM PC that came along, backwards, and essentially
A zip parallel plug would physically fit on a M100 thanks to the M100's
backwards* gender, so some confusion is understandable.
* I heard someone suggest that actually the M100 was probably technically
correct according to the standards of the time, and predated the PC, and
it's actually the IBM
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 3:06 PM, Kurt McCullum wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> Those early Zip drives were Parallel or SCSI, not serial. If your drive has a
> male DB25 cable then that would be the cable that connected to a printer port
> on a PC.
The external Zip drives with
Robert,
Those early Zip drives were Parallel or SCSI, not serial. If your drive has a
male DB25 cable then that would be the cable that connected to a printer port
on a PC.
Kurt
On Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:55 PM, Robert Prather
wrote:
Hi All,
I'm
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Robert Prather
wrote:
> Another idea I had was the iomega Zip drive. One time on an eBay auction
> (I go there frequently to watch for new model 100 stuff), I noticed someone
> who was selling a model 100 with a zip drive and several
Hi All,
I'm putting the floppy disk idea on hold for the time being. Another idea I
had was the iomega Zip drive. One time on an eBay auction (I go there
frequently to watch for new model 100 stuff), I noticed someone who was
selling a model 100 with a zip drive and several zip disks. Apparently
13 matches
Mail list logo