Great
Then in the HW divison all you need to do is add the uio-generic / hm2-uio
ip core in qsys at address 0x0004_.
And then the hm2 qip (include) file wire things up and add the config stuff.
If you are working in verilog / systemverilog I made an intermediary
upgrade of the original DE0_N
I got a USB OTG cable from Digikey and I am now able to boot the DE10-Nano
with an HDMI monitor, keyboard and mouse.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:49:21 AM UTC-7, mugginsac wrote:
>
> Charles,
>
> I understand how ignoring HDMI to start may be easier, however, the reason
> that I bought the DE
Charles,
I understand how ignoring HDMI to start may be easier, however, the reason
that I bought the DE10 instead of the DE0 is the HDMI. :-(
Alan
On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 4:01:07 AM UTC-7, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> Yes, it would be much easier to load a single FPGA image via U-Boot
Yes, it would be much easier to load a single FPGA image via U-Boot
rather than deal with partial reconfiguration.
I was planning on just ignoring the HDMI to start. :)
On 8/7/2017 11:05 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
> BTW
> It may be possible to boot configuring the fpga from u-boot with framebuffer
BTW
It may be possible to boot configuring the fpga from u-boot with
framebuffer and hm2 cores and then start machinekit hm2_soc_ol driver
without firmware=xxx.dtbo for easy DE10-Nano fb startup. (uio driver then
needs a uio entty in dts also to load).
On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 00:40:22 UTC+2
I would like to insert some notes from my own experiments with the DE10
Nano:
I you use the terasic supplied reference project as base you will need to
customize the device tree --> dtb
as the qsys system uses different addresses / bridges for the fpga ip cores.
they can boot with identical u-b
Since there seems to be interest, I've gone ahead and ordered a
DE10-Nano so I can do real-world tests.
I don't have lots of free time right now, but I ought to at least be
able to help get a bootable uSD card image generated (if no one beats
me to it) and migrate the DE0 project for the hostmot2
On 8/4/2017 6:51 PM, mugginsac wrote:
>
> So I have to figure out how to build a RT kernel for the DE10-nano. So I
> guess
> the first step is to figure out what the differences are between the kernel
> for
> DE0-Nano-SOC and the kernel for DE10-Nano. Also what do I need to download to
> my
OK, I got a new 1TB hard disk for my D525MW board, installed Debian Stretch
and the associated development software. I have ordered three of the DB25
boards that Charles designed.
I tried to follow the instructions from Robert Nelson's socfpga-kernel-dev
page on eewiki. I got down to the stuff
Charles,
The DE10 won’t boot from the DE0-Nano-SOC MachineKit image. I need to get an
adapter for USB female to Micro male (or USB OTG) so I can plug in my powered
USB hub or at the very least a USB keyboard with built in touch pad.
I guess I will try to set up so I can compile on the DE10-na
The DE0-Nano image will /probably/ boot on the DE10, but the FPGA will
not be programmed. If the DE10 doesn't boot, the issue is almost
certainly the kernel and/or device tree. If you use the kernel and
device tree from the DE10 image on a DE0 image you ought to be able to
boot with the DE0 uSD.
Charles,
OK, I got my DE10-nano. So let me ask another question, will the
DE0-Nano-Soc MachineKit image boot on the DE10-Nano board (as a starting
point for doing the implementation)? Or do I need to start with the
DE10-Nano image from Terasic?
Alan
On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 9:21:19 AM UT
I placed the order for a DE10-Nano.
Alan
On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 2:15:29 PM UTC-7, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
>
> I'll try to carve out some time to get an FPGA project setup for the
> DE10-nano, unless someone else feels up to the task.
>
> --
> Charles Steinkuehler
> cha...@steinku
On 7/26/2017 10:31 AM, mugginsac wrote:
>
> Bas and Charles,
>
> I think I will go ahead and order the DE10-Nano instead of the DE0-Nano also.
I'll try to carve out some time to get an FPGA project setup for the
DE10-nano, unless someone else feels up to the task.
--
Charles Steinkuehler
char.
On Monday, July 24, 2017 at 1:28:47 PM UTC-7, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 24 Jul 2017, at 20:56, Charles Steinkuehler > wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/24/2017 1:18 PM, mugginsac wrote:
> >> I just wondered if the machinekit image for a DE0-Nano-SOC board will
> run on a
> >> DE10-Nano?
> >
> >
> On 24 Jul 2017, at 20:56, Charles Steinkuehler
> wrote:
>
>> On 7/24/2017 1:18 PM, mugginsac wrote:
>> I just wondered if the machinekit image for a DE0-Nano-SOC board will run on
>> a
>> DE10-Nano?
>
> No.
>
> You'll need to import the pinout and HPS (Qsys) files from one of the
> DE10
On 7/24/2017 1:18 PM, mugginsac wrote:
> I just wondered if the machinekit image for a DE0-Nano-SOC board will run on
> a
> DE10-Nano?
No.
You'll need to import the pinout and HPS (Qsys) files from one of the
DE10 example projects (or otherwise modify things for the DE10 vs.
DE0) and recompile.
17 matches
Mail list logo
