Re: [MacPorts] #54594: mariadb-10.1 @10.1.24: update to 10.1.26

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 02:37:12PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: Is there a pull request? Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) No, there isn't. This update fixes 3 CVEs but I don't have the time to test this port, so I created the ticket. On Aug 11, 2017, at 9:02 PM, MacPorts

Re: should cxx11 1.1 PortGroup also blacklist older clangs (< 600, say) during libc++ builds?

I’m sorry - retract this. I see there is already a section where this is done that I had glossed past before. I’ll have to look into why I still need to fiddle with this sometimes. Sorry for noise. Ken > On Aug 12, 2017, at 3:02 PM, Ken Cunningham > wrote:

should cxx11 1.1 PortGroup also blacklist older clangs (< 600, say) during libc++ builds?

The libstdc++ section of this portgroup forces clang 4.0, and the PPC section forces gcc6. Those cover almost all current port compiler requirements. But there is still a hole in the libc++ section, and it happens often enough that older clangs (< 600 or so) have to be blacklisted on older

Re: Possible patch for sox build failure on 10.7

On 2017-8-13 01:12 , Ken Cunningham wrote: Thank you Josh. I missed ./configure --disable-silent-libtool. I am a bit confused about this. According to , disable-silent-rules is the default. For

Re: [GSoC] migration

> > That was a suggested design; if you're already doing it differently then > I guess you don't need a design. I disagree with the last sentence though, > a snapshot can be viewed as precisely the state of the original tables at a > previous time. > > If that is the case, we can simply (insert

Re: [GSoC] migration

> > Later, I am planning to keep information on the manual portgroups in the > snapshot, if there are any. > > > > What would this information be used for? > > > > I am under the impression that a user can categorize and classify the > ports into portgroups, so it should be better if we migrate

Re: [MacPorts] #54594: mariadb-10.1 @10.1.24: update to 10.1.26

Is there a pull request? Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) > On Aug 11, 2017, at 9:02 PM, MacPorts wrote: > > #54594: mariadb-10.1 @10.1.24: update to 10.1.26 > --+-- > Reporter: l2dy | Owner: pixilla >

Re: [GSoC] migration

> On Aug 11, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Umesh Singla wrote: > > Hi Josh, > > And then again, I am sensing a confusion with the idea of > snapshot with Josh, like when he says "remove ports when they > are no longer referenced by any snapshot". > > >

Re: [GSoC] migration

> On Aug 11, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > > On 2017-8-11 21:14 , Umesh Singla wrote: >> Hi >>And then again, I am sensing a confusion with the idea of >>snapshot with Josh, like when he says "remove ports when they >>are no longer referenced

configure.compiler=macports-clang-devel doesn't work. Is there a proper value?

Doesn’t seem to be an entry for clang-devel in > and some trial and error didn’t find it easily… Also, can’t spot an entry in

Re: Possible patch for sox build failure on 10.7

> Thank you Josh. I missed ./configure --disable-silent-libtool. I am a bit confused about this. According to >,

Re: Possible patch for sox build failure on 10.7

On Aug 12 10:56:57, mo...@macports.org wrote: > On 12 August 2017 at 10:36, Jan Stary wrote: > > > > libtool: link: /usr/bin/grep -E -e > >

Re: Possible patch for sox build failure on 10.7

On 12 August 2017 at 10:36, Jan Stary wrote: > > libtool: link: /usr/bin/grep -E -e >

Re: Possible patch for sox build failure on 10.7

On Aug 10 06:30:12, j...@macports.org wrote: > On 2017-8-9 23:15 , Jan Stary wrote: > > On Aug 09 15:06:35, ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I can work with you on this. I'll build a failing version and email you > > > the entire log off-list tonight. > > > > Thank you Ken. > > > >