2010/3/25 Henrik Hedberg henrik.hedb...@innologies.fi:
Henrik Hedberg wrote:
It seems that packages are not imported into Extras-devel after the
builder has succeeded with them. Here is an example:
I think I found the reason. The builder is creating empty packages.
I doubt that.
For
2010/3/8 Aldon Hynes aldon.hy...@orient-lodge.com:
Graham, (et al.)
I appreciate your concern about shared resources, but it seems to me that
you are overstating the problem.
Not at all. If you look here: http://www.gronmayer.com/it/ you'll find
a proof of what people are refering to when
2010/2/16 ds d...@physik.de:
Some minutes ago this worked:
https://garage.maemo.org/builder/diablo/vncviewer_0.6.6-fremantle1/armel.build.log.OK.txt
checking for intltool = 0.23... 0.35.0 found
a little bit later with minor changes (which I even tried to reverse)
2010/2/7 Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org:
On 07/02/2010 01:30, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/2/7 Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org:
On 06/02/2010 22:11, Ed Bartosh wrote:
As far as I remember autobuilder doesn't use 'Maintainer' or any other
field to prevent spamming of innocent people from
2010/2/6 Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org:
Hey,
I just uploaded my first package to extras-devel, which was rejected
(for valid reason), but I had to dig the cauldron list archive to get
that mail.
I don't really want to subscribe to that list, I'm already subsribed to
2010/2/7 Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org:
On 06/02/2010 22:11, Ed Bartosh wrote:
As far as I remember autobuilder doesn't use 'Maintainer' or any other
field to prevent spamming of innocent people from upstream projects.
It uses email from /etc/passed instead. Your email should be put
2010/2/5 ma...@bitblit.net:
Is running dpkg inside scratchbox the best way to get a list of all the
packages that are installed on a standard device?
I want to check to see what packages are part of a standard device.
ssh your device ip/hostname dpkg -l
:)
--
BR,
Ed
2010/1/27 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 12:20:32 you wrote:
2010/1/26 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 02:02:52 you wrote:
2010/1/26 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Monday 25 January 2010 15:02:57 Ed Bartosh wrote:
[chop
2010/1/26 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Jan 25, 2010, at 22:27, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/25 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
There are other build tools which are better documented and more flexible
than sdbmock. Debian has a complete toolchain which
2010/1/26 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Monday 25 January 2010 15:02:57 Ed Bartosh wrote:
[chop]
# Additional apt-get parameters
config_opts['apt-get_options'] = '-o APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=1'
# Command to run after rootstrap unpacking
config_opts['after_rootstrap'] = 'fakeroot
2010/1/26 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Jeremiah Foster skrev:
On Jan 25, 2010, at 22:27, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/25 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
There are other build tools which are better documented and more
2010/1/26 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
What about tools like qemu and dpkg-cross? Can't they be used to build debs
without scratchbox?
And my goal is not to necessarily get rid of scratchbox, but rather enable
alternatives to the current build toolchain.
I still don't
2010/1/26 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
What about tools like qemu and dpkg-cross? Can't they be used to build debs
without scratchbox?
And my goal is not to necessarily get rid of scratchbox, but rather enable
alternatives to the current build toolchain.
I still don't
2010/1/26 Anderson Lizardo anderson.liza...@openbossa.org:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com wrote:
- support for building tags from garage VCS(svn and git)
Would be nice to also allow fetching code from external VCS hosting
services (gitorious for instance
2010/1/25 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
There are other build tools which are better documented and more flexible
than sdbmock. Debian has a complete toolchain which is obviously good at
building debs and is completely open and well supported.
Interesting. Can you point me
2010/1/25 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Saturday 23 January 2010 04:07:48 you wrote:
BTW, what do you think about to prepare guide for developers for easy
setup of local buld configurations identical to autobuilder ones? I
can provide whatever information you need for that.
Ok, I pushed
2010/1/23 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
Could the configuration files of the build server and related scripts be put
up on the wiki or mailed here or something?
I had a build fail due to a small difference between the SDK and the
buildbox. I would like to be able to have an identical
2010/1/22 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering s.g.picker...@bath.ac.uk
wrote:
I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email
address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but there is the
slight problem of what
2010/1/18 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Monday 18 January 2010 14:08:07 Jeff Moe wrote:
Take note, since the service restoration, the Maemo 5 SDK rootstraps have
been (silently?) updated with no changes to timestamps:
Thanks Jeff for noticing this.
Niels or Ed, do you have any idea what
2010/1/11 Valerio Valerio vdv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds d...@physik.de wrote:
Hello,
some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
The packages have to pass 10 days
Hi guys,
Do you happen to know who switched off armel builds and why?
As I can see from yesterday evening autobuilder performs only i386 builds.
If i386 packages are uploaded to the extras-devel it would lead to
even more confusion among developers,
because armel versions are not built, but
2010/1/3 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 15:39, Jeremiah Foster
jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com wrote:
On Jan 2, 2010, at 21:54, Andrew Flegg wrote:
For the record, you don't even need to do that now. All you need to do
is opt-in to the autobuilder doing optification for
2010/1/1 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Hi,
Attempting to upload a new version of vim to the Fremantle
auto-builder, I get the following failure:
https://garage.maemo.org/builder/fremantle/vim_7.2-0maemo6/armel.root.log.FAILED.txt
Should be fixed now:
2010/1/1 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Jan 1, 2010, at 15:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Hi,
Attempting to upload a new version of vim to the Fremantle
auto-builder, I get the following failure:
https://garage.maemo.org/builder
2010/1/1 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Friday 01 January 2010 11:12:47 Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Jan 1, 2010, at 15:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Hi,
Attempting to upload a new version of vim
2010/1/1 Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com:
2010/1/1 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Friday 01 January 2010 11:12:47 Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Jan 1, 2010, at 15:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Hi,
Attempting
Hi,
Does anybody know how to get current hw keyboard language and how to
switch between them programmatically?
Here is what I did so far:
1. I could get list of configured layouts by reading gconf variables
/apps/osso/inputmethod/int_kb_layout and
/apps/osso/inputmethod/ext_kb_layout
2.
2009/12/27 Arkadiy Glazov uglobs...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Look the head of file /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/nokia_vndr/rx-51 and see
some answers :)
I can't see any answers there, only new questions :(
Also I wrote package xkblayouts-rx51-ru that set russian phonetic hardware
layout. You can look
2009/12/24 Benoît HERVIER kher...@khertan.net:
So now maemo optify is automatically added on extras builder ?
It was added lont time ago and discussed in details on this mailing list.
Seems to have some problems :
https://garage.maemo.org/builder/fremantle/python2.5-py2deb_0.5.3-1/
2009/12/24 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
2009/12/24 Benoît HERVIER kher...@khertan.net:
So now maemo optify is automatically added on extras builder ?
Is it? Are Ed/Marius around to confirm?
Yes it was. Long time ago, as we all agreed, with 'none' as default.
Is there a way to unactivate it
2009/12/24 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:22, Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com wrote:
Bug #7309 is still valid, of course, and can be used as the hook in
which the Python-based heuristics for maemo-optify are done.
No, it's not valid.
I think everyone's seen
2009/12/24 David Greaves da...@dgreaves.com:
Ed... 2 questions:
1. are you happy that /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure: No such file or directory
is a bug (as you said a couple of emails back)?
Yes, I am.
2. what section do you think the bug should be against?
Product: Development Platform
2009/12/23 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
Can anyone provide me with sample configs for sbdmock and fremantle? Like a
file
like this?
~/.sbdmock/maemo-fremantle-armel-extras-devel.cfg
Please, find it attached.
BTW, it would be great if somebody added Fremantle configuration to this wiki:
2009/12/23 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 06:38:11 you wrote:
2009/12/23 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
Can anyone provide me with sample configs for sbdmock and fremantle? Like
a file like this?
~/.sbdmock/maemo-fremantle-armel-extras-devel.cfg
Please,
2009/12/16 Antonio Aloisio antonio.aloi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I've some problem building jam into the autobuilder for X86... and I can't
understand where is the problem.
I'm able to build it for both architectures on my Maemo5 SDK.
Most probably you've installed bison in your environment from
2009/12/11 David Greaves da...@dgreaves.com:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:34 +0100, Cornelius Hald wrote:
What am I missing?
In the general sense: A way to specify per-build-target .dsc files (for
pre-calculation of the build-deps setup of the chroot
Well, I investigated this issue using
2009/11/9 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
When autobuilder expected to start to optify packages without
debian/optify in them?
I don't know. We certainly need to tune the heuristic of maemo-optify
first to handle Python.
As far as I see Python is optified now. When we should do
2009/12/2 Anderson Lizardo anderson.liza...@openbossa.org:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/9 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
When autobuilder expected to start to optify packages without
debian/optify in them?
I don't know. We certainly
2009/11/9 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
When autobuilder expected to start to optify packages without
debian/optify in them?
I don't know. We certainly need to tune the heuristic of maemo-optify
first to handle Python.
Just in case you need my help. I'm here for this week. My 2
2009/11/6 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
I've discussed this with sbdmock author and we decided to make small
change to sbdmock: New configurable action will be introduced. This
action will be executed by sbdmock between unpacking rootstrap
Hi,
2009/11/2 Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com:
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
[ Jussi, we would like to get a new debian-etch devkit for Maemo 5 with
the attached patch. Please advise how to best go about this.
]
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
I can also help
2009/11/4 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
Has anybody tried this devkit? Does it work as expected?
I tried it by building (slightly modified versions of) xournal, hermes,
and libliqbase, and everything went as expected.
Can you elaborate
2009/11/4 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
2009/11/3 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
Luckily, with apt-get upgrade being run during build, we don't need
to change dpkg-checkbuilddeps and we can just update build-essential.
(Unless I
2009/11/3 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Monday 02 November 2009 21:52:48 Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:27, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2009/11/2 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Nov 1, 2009, at 18:05, Ed Bartosh wrote:
Idea of having separate queue for Extras
2009/11/3 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Monday 02 November 2009 12:16:57 Ed Bartosh wrote:
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
The buildbot would need to run apt-get install maemo-optify at the
right time. Any idea of how to do that?
Right way to do it is to include
2009/11/3 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net writes:
On Monday 02 November 2009 12:16:57 Ed Bartosh wrote:
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
The buildbot would need to run apt-get install maemo-optify at the
right time. Any idea
2009/11/3 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
We can hack dpkg-checkbuilddeps to unconditionally add maemo-optify to
the list of build dependencies.
Ouch. That's very desperate.
May be. But not as desperate as calling apt-get install from
dpkg
2009/11/3 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
2009/11/3 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
We can hack dpkg-checkbuilddeps to unconditionally add maemo-optify to
the list of build dependencies
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
So, I can see this way of implementing this:
- give optification scripts to SDK developers and ask them to prepare
Debian devkit for Fremantle with patched dpkg-buildpackage as fast as
possible
2009/11/2 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Ed wrote:
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
Would maemo-optify be part of that devkit as well, or would it be in the
rootstrap?
I prefer to leave maemo-optify in the rootstrap: that way, we can update
it much easier, which is
2009/11/2 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Nov 1, 2009, at 18:05, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2009/11/1 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
On Sunday 01 November 2009 07:46:55 you wrote:
So, you propose to have one more queue, which would use only SDK? Or
only Extras? or both? Sorry, your
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
OK, we can make dependency from dpkb-buildpackage to maemo-optify not
so strict. If maemo-optify is present it will be called from
dpkg-buildpackage. With this approach we can put maemo-optify
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
Right way to do it is to include it into SDK rootstrap. Other ways I
can think of look hackish.
(I think this is a good example of what is wrong with Maemo: normally,
we would just upload a patched
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net writes:
On Thursday 29 October 2009 11:12:45 Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Alberto Mardegan ma...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
b) A control file field makes the most sense to
control the build process.
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
[ Jussi, we would like to get a new debian-etch devkit for Maemo 5 with
the attached patch. Please advise how to best go about this.
]
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
I can also help with building devkit if needed.
I didn't
2009/11/1 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
Are you sure it works this way? I thought that packages are built with
dependencies from unstable in Debian, just like they're built against
extras-devel in Maemo.
You're right you can't change pinning on the *builder* within the *same*
queue, that
2009/10/31 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
I have a small issue with the autobuilder. The whole thing started out by
having a package that compiled nice in the SDK but not in the autobuilder due
to a versioning mismatch (in my case python-dbus, but it's a generic problem
as you'll see). After
2009/10/29 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 22:50:25 Ed Bartosh wrote:
Somehow I don't like the idea of doing anything with the package
without developer being aware of this. I'd rather implement check on
autobuilder side to insure that packages are optified
2009/11/1 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
On Sunday 01 November 2009 07:46:55 you wrote:
So, you propose to have one more queue, which would use only SDK? Or
only Extras? or both? Sorry, your proposal is still unclear to me and
I doubt it would be clear for other devs.
First we need to
2009/11/1 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Sunday 01 November 2009 09:02:34 Ed Bartosh wrote:
So, what should we do?
My proposal is to make dpkg-buildpackage to call maemo-optify. With
this we can solve 2 problems - autobuilder will optify packages and
developers will have their packages
2009/10/31 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
I have a small issue with the autobuilder. The whole thing started out by
having a package that compiled nice in the SDK but not in the autobuilder due
to a versioning mismatch (in my case python-dbus, but it's a generic problem
as you'll see). After
2009/10/31 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
On Saturday 31 October 2009 14:49:24 Ed Bartosh wrote:
is IMHO that the repository priorities seem to be wrong. The autobuilder
should be using the highest version in the TOP PRIORITY repository that
satisfies a dependency to avoid breakage because
2009/10/29 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 22:50:25 Ed Bartosh wrote:
Somehow I don't like the idea of doing anything with the package
without developer being aware of this. I'd rather implement check on
autobuilder side to insure that packages are optified
2009/10/29 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Ed wrote:
2009/10/29 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
Nobody likes doing something to the package automatically but, after a long
discussion at the BOF, we agreed that the alternatives were even worse [1].
Then let's find the way to do it better.
2009/10/29 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org writes:
I suggest the header is XS-Maemo-Optify, and has the following values:
none: no optification should be done, or considered, by the autobuilder.
manual: the application author will do
/opt it would be considered a
build failure.
auto: maemo-optify would be run if certain heuristics were met (e.g.
no entries in /opt, no Python dependency)
force: maemo-optify would always be run
Marius: are you taking ownership of talking to Ed Bartosh, and anyone
else
2009/10/28 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Ed wrote:
I've put together a suggested spec for the decision, taken at the
summit during the /opt BOF[1], that the auto-builder would run some
maemo-optify version during the build process (controlled by a control
file header):
Sorry, I seem
2009/10/29 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
I think we should do the second item before Ed goes on holiday, even if it
means deferring the multiple package builds. We can then test it (setting
the header to auto in various packages) while Ed is away but there is minimal
danger of problems
2009/10/27 Luca Donaggio donag...@gmail.com:
Linking /opt against /targets/links/opt did the trick!
Now I can install my packages with dpkg, at least - apt-get will still
complain about /opt and the base-files package I think.
No, it shouldn't complain. At least it doesn't complain in my
2009/10/26 Luca Donaggio donag...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I've succesfully built a new version of my packages and optified them, but
now if I try to install them in the SDK to see if they works as expected
before pushing them to extras-testing, all I've got is:
dpkg: error processing
2009/10/26 Luca Donaggio donag...@gmail.com:
The output from dpkg is exactly the same.
What do you mean by Have you tried to install your optified packages after
you created
/opt directory inside your target? ?
I thought it was failing before you re-created /opt. Probably I
misunderstood the
2009/10/26 Luca Donaggio donag...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/26 Luca Donaggio donag...@gmail.com:
The output from dpkg is exactly the same.
What do you mean by Have you tried to install your optified packages
after
you created
2009/10/26 Alberto Mardegan ma...@users.sourceforge.net:
Hi,
I noticed just now that a few days ago someone committed some code
into maemo-mapper, but I have no idea who did. I will ask in the project
forum, but in case the author is not following it, is it possible to
find out who the
2009/10/24 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
I don't think you will get anywhere. Isn't this a known issue? The manual
installation instructions for the SDK
(http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/Maemo5_Final_Installation#Manual_Installation)
include:
In order to facilitate installing
2009/10/24 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:03:18AM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2009/10/24 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
I think sbdmock needs to do the same thing after installing the rootstrap.
I don't think so. It looks like a hack to remove something provided
2009/10/22 Kamen Bundev bun...@gmail.com:
Hmm, yes, that seems to be the problem. In the final SDK /opt is a symlink
but in the latest beta SDK it is not. I didn't upgrade my development
machine, but I have the final on another so I can compare. I'll report back
if successful.
You're right.
this is what you are asking:
FREMANTLE_ARMEL cs2007q3-glibc2.5-arm7
FREMANTLE_X86cs2007q3-glibc2.5-i486
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Ed Bartosh [mailto:bart...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 4:03 PM
To: Nathan Anderson
Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re
Hi,
I restarted Nathan's build and autobuilder seems to be able to install
all build-deps.
You can see autobuilder logs here soon:
https://garage.maemo.org/builder/fremantle/sword_1.6.0a-0maemo1/
2009/10/22 Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Please read my last message. The issue is fixed
2009/10/22 Niels Breet ni...@maemo.org:
On Thu, October 22, 2009 15:31, gary liquid wrote:
There is no interface to pull apps manually.
if testing identifies a blocker, the maintainer has no way but to leave it
there wasting the other testers time.
This reminds me. If a maintainer votes his
2009/10/22 Nathan Anderson nat...@andersonsplace.net:
Ed,
I resubmitted my package; and it decided to ignore one of my
dependency. (But it did pull in the optified packages! g)
https://garage.maemo.org/builder/fremantle/sword_1.6.0a-0maemo1/armel.root.l
og.OK.txt Shows:
2009-10-22
2009/10/22 Julius Luukko julle.luu...@quicknet.inet.fi:
But did you forgot to do it for x86 target? armel builds now fine, but i386
does not [1]:
Oops, sorry. My bad.
Done. Should work now.
Just in case someone wants to do the same for their rootstraps. This
is what I did:
gunzip
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson nat...@andersonsplace.net:
...
Selecting previously deselected package clucene-core.
Unpacking clucene-core (from .../clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb (--unpack):
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson nat...@andersonsplace.net:
Ed,
I have actually installed all the packages I have built and
submitted to extras _inside_ my scratchbox from extras(-devel/testing)
Good. In this case we just need to understand what's the difference between
your environment and
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson nat...@andersonsplace.net:
Ed,
Sure can (and following the chain).
ls -l / | grep opt
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 18 Oct 6 22:36 opt -
/targets/links/opt
ls -l /targets/links/ | grep opt
lrwxrwxrwx 1 maemo 1000 26 Oct 19 16:55 opt -
2009/10/21 Nathan Anderson nat...@andersonsplace.net:
Ed,
Sure can (and following the chain).
ls -l / | grep opt
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 18 Oct 6 22:36 opt -
/targets/links/opt
ls -l /targets/links/ | grep opt
lrwxrwxrwx 1 maemo 1000 26 Oct 19 16:55 opt -
Hi,
Short answer:
Change libltdl3-dev to libltdl3-dev (= 1.5.22) in Build-depends line
of your debian/control. It should help to fix your build.
Long answer:
-
I've debugged this situation a bit and found out that libltdl3-dev is
provided by scratchbox:
Hi,
Here are new categories suggested by community:
http://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Package_categories
Don't ask me why official SDK documentation contains another list :)
Regards,
Ed
2009/9/24 Luca Donaggio donag...@gmail.com:
According to [1], the allowed user/* sections are:
user/accessories
2009/9/9 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@maemo.org:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 9:43, Ed Bartosh wrote:
BTW, before removing it from extras-devel try to find all packages
which depend on it and after removing libssl reupload them to the
autobuilder. They will be rebuilt with proper openssl then.
How does
2009/9/8 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@maemo.org:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 24:58, Graham Cobb wrote:
Jeremiah,
I haven't checked this out myself but I **think** what Till is
seeing is that
the autobuilder builds his app with the libssl package from extras-
devel and
ends up with a versioned
2009/8/31 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
As I already said building in a proper order is already solved task.
There is no need to upload packages in build order if it can be done
automatically. It will only create extra job for developers
2009/8/31 Marius Vollmer marius.voll...@nokia.com:
ext Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com writes:
[To upload a multi-package build request] It might be enough to just
allow more than one paragraph in the .changes files, and make the
guarantees that packages are build in order of their
build
Hi,
It's available and works, but sometimes gives the same error to me
also. Last time I've asked admins they told me that reason can be
network load of the host or something like that.
2009/8/31 Fred f...@lefevere-laoide.net:
Hi,
Is the dput method still available for uploading to extras ?
Hi,
And what about libkpathsea4? Any chance for it?
2009/8/28 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
It has gone through the builder, but has not shown up in the file
system as a deb yet.
--
BR,
Ed
___
maemo-developers mailing list
, with the dependencies being
satisfied)
instead of this particular feature.
This should definitely be fixed first and soon. Thanks! :)
If everybody thinks that support of multiple package builds is more
important I'll do that.
Ed Bartosh wrote:
Submitting is the main problem. As far as I know dput can't
2009/8/27 Vlad Vasiliev v...@gas.by:
Graham Cobb wrote:
skip
...
This can be done through a web interface, but I don't think many of the
hardcore coders, needing this functionality, would use that?
I would if it meant the autobuilder would handle the dependencies! I would
even manually
2009/8/27 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Aug 26, 2009, at 19:52, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2009/8/26 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Aug 26, 2009, at 18:05, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 16:25, Ed Bartoshbart...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/26 Andrew
Hi,
I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
queue. They just need to tag the sources.
This is how i plan to implement it:
1. Svn hook will be creating description file or record in the
database if
2009/8/26 Anderson Lizardo anderson.liza...@openbossa.org:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Ed Bartoshbart...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
queue. They just need
2009/8/26 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:54:13 Ed Bartosh wrote:
I'm thinking about to add this feature to autobuilder. With developers
don't need to prepare package's source and upload it to autobuilder
queue. They just need to tag the sources.
How
2009/8/26 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:29, Ed Bartoshbart...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/26 Graham Cobb g+...@cobb.uk.net:
Personally, I would much rather the autobuilder dependency problem was fixed
(with some method for submiting multiple packages with build
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
