Hello Experts,
Looking for guidance on this one.
How can we customize mailman to ensure that un-subscriptions are
automatically recorded.
Once recorded, we also intent to customize subscribe function to
automatically ensure that they don't get re-subscribed.
If they explicitly ask for
On 5/29/08, Bob001 wrote:
How can we customize mailman to ensure that un-subscriptions are
automatically recorded.
They already are. They're recorded in /usr/local/mailman/logs/subscribe.
Once recorded, we also intent to customize subscribe function to
automatically ensure that they
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still associating each
Message-ID with all 250 list subscribers.
VERP has nothing to do with
Good morning,
Until Wednesday night my Server was running like a champ then suddenly,
mysteriously, Postfix broke for no apparent reason.
It is failing to start reporting no local interface found for... and citing
some IP address which is invalid for my system. I have not been able to get
On 5/30/2008 7:32 AM, Dov Oxenberg wrote:
Good morning,
Until Wednesday night my Server was running like a champ then
suddenly, mysteriously, Postfix broke for no apparent reason. It is
failing to start reporting no local interface found for...
Sounds like you have a problem with your NIC...
Hi Charles,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
The reason my description is vague is because I was reluctant to post details
of a Postfix problem to the Mailman list.
Mailman is running fine...I can log in to the Web interface, manage my list,
users etc., and obviously Apache is running as well.
I
Never mind, I found it.
Please forgive the faux pas.
Dov
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mailman-users@python.org
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 07:57:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users]
re-install postfix? Hi Charles, Thanks for your prompt reply. The reason
my description is
On 5/30/2008 8:04 AM, Dov Oxenberg wrote:
Never mind, I found it.
Please forgive the faux pas.
No worries... hope you get it sorted...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Thank you for the information Brad.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 5:54 PM
To: Melinda Gilmore
Cc: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Queued mail
Melinda Gilmore wrote:
Is there any mailman setting that
On 5/30/08 4:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still associating each
Message-ID with all 250 list subscribers.
Dov Oxenberg sent the message below at 04:32 5/30/2008:
Good morning,
Until Wednesday night my Server was running like a champ then
suddenly, mysteriously, Postfix broke for no apparent reason.
It is failing to start reporting no local interface found for...
and citing some IP address which is
On Fri, 30 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
When you then get the AOL TOS e-mail, you can figure out who the list
recipient was as while AOL redacts the AOL recipient, they don't touch the
Return-Path.
I wish this were true, but it appears AOL gets to the Return-Path too:
Return-Path:
On 5/30/08 8:40 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
When you then get the AOL TOS e-mail, you can figure out who the list
recipient was as while AOL redacts the AOL recipient, they don't touch the
Return-Path.
I wish this were true, but it appears AOL gets to the
Is there a way to automate deletion by size of archives through mailman.
Has anyone done that out there. I want to delete any archives that have
grown large in size by date preferrably.
Melinda Gilmore
Systems Engineer
The Ohio State University
Enterprise Messaging/OIT
614-292-4953
Dov Oxenberg wrote:
I have not been able to get
anywhere since Wednesday night and am now considering uninstalling
Postfix and then reinstalling.
This sounds like a configuration problem. Uninstalling and then
re-installing the software isn't going
David Newman wrote:
Given the above, is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the subscriber that's complaining?
Or is it just a coincidence that that AOL user got listed first?
Since you're now sending just one message for each recipient, you will get
unique queue ids assigned by your MTA for each and every
Melinda Gilmore wrote:
Is there a way to automate deletion by size of archives through mailman.
Not with the standard software we ship, no.
Has anyone done that out there. I want to delete any archives that have
grown large in size by date preferrably.
Check the patches page on
David Newman writes:
Initially I thought the changes I made to mailman would result in a
unique Message-ID per recipient, but this does not appear to be the case.
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate
On May 30, 2008, at 11:00 AM, David Newman wrote:
On 5/30/08 4:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still
Hi,
In the Web administration interface, how do I adjust the number of subscribers
displayed in the table?
Previously I was able to view all the members but now that the membership
number has increased to over 30 subscribers the table is only displaying the
first three members and I have to
Dov Oxenberg wrote:
Hi,
In the Web administration interface, how do I adjust the number of
subscribers displayed in the table?
Previously I was able to view all the members but now that the
membership number has increased to over 30 subscribers the table is
only displaying the first three
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate RFC
2822. Message-ID ids the content, not the medium, and is an author
header: intermediate senders like Mailman must not touch it.
IIRC,
On 5/30/08 3:28 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate RFC
2822. Message-ID ids the content, not the medium, and is an author
header: intermediate senders
We just migrated all of our lists that we host from Listserv to Mailman and
several of the list owners and moderators who travel frequently and use
handhelds while on the go are wondering if there is a quicker way to accept
messages in a moderated list.
Right now, an email comes, you click on
Gents:
Nor sure where else I should post but at 5:27PM CDT I rec'd:
*
Your membership in the mailing list Mailman-Users has been disabled
due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated
31-May-2008. You will not get any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I would suspect that tomorrow is NOY here yet, thought
I should mention. -:)
That system is located in Amsterdam, and operates in the CET timezone. So,
for them, Tomorrow really has already happened.
As to why you got disabled, well, it could be the
26 matches
Mail list logo
