[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I would suspect that "tomorrow" is NOY here yet, thought
I should mention. -:)
That system is located in Amsterdam, and operates in the CET timezone. So,
for them, Tomorrow really has already happened.
As to why you got disabled, well, it could be the hacke
Gents:
Nor sure where else I should post but at 5:27PM CDT I rec'd:
*
Your membership in the mailing list Mailman-Users has been disabled
due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated
31-May-2008. You will not get any
We just migrated all of our lists that we host from Listserv to Mailman and
several of the list owners and moderators who travel frequently and use
handhelds while on the go are wondering if there is a quicker way to accept
messages in a moderated list.
Right now, an email comes, you click on
On 5/30/08 3:28 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate RFC
2822. Message-ID ids the content, not the medium, and is an author
header: intermediate senders l
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate RFC
2822. Message-ID ids the content, not the medium, and is an author
header: intermediate senders like Mailman must not touch it.
IIRC, wh
Dov Oxenberg wrote:
Hi,
In the Web administration interface, how do I adjust the number of
subscribers displayed in the table?
Previously I was able to view all the members but now that the
membership number has increased to over 30 subscribers the table is
only displaying the first three memb
Hi,
In the Web administration interface, how do I adjust the number of subscribers
displayed in the table?
Previously I was able to view all the members but now that the membership
number has increased to over 30 subscribers the table is only displaying the
first three members and I have to sear
On May 30, 2008, at 11:00 AM, David Newman wrote:
On 5/30/08 4:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still
assoc
David Newman writes:
> Initially I thought the changes I made to mailman would result in a
> unique Message-ID per recipient, but this does not appear to be the case.
Yeah, somebody actually said that, but they really meant the
Return-Path. Changing Message-ID on regular posts would violate R
Melinda Gilmore wrote:
Is there a way to automate deletion by size of archives through mailman.
Not with the standard software we ship, no.
Has anyone done that out there. I want to delete any archives that have
grown large in size by date preferrably.
Check the patches page on SourceForg
David Newman wrote:
Given the above, is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" the subscriber that's complaining?
Or is it just a coincidence that that AOL user got listed first?
Since you're now sending just one message for each recipient, you will get
unique queue ids assigned by your MTA for each and every m
Dov Oxenberg wrote:
I have not been able to get
anywhere since Wednesday night and am now considering uninstalling
Postfix and then reinstalling.
This sounds like a configuration problem. Uninstalling and then
re-installing the software isn't going to
Is there a way to automate deletion by size of archives through mailman.
Has anyone done that out there. I want to delete any archives that have
grown large in size by date preferrably.
Melinda Gilmore
Systems Engineer
The Ohio State University
Enterprise Messaging/OIT
614-292-4953
-
On 5/30/08 8:40 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
When you then get the AOL TOS e-mail, you can figure out who the list
recipient was as while AOL redacts the AOL recipient, they don't touch the
Return-Path.
I wish this were true, but it appears AOL gets to the Re
On Fri, 30 May 2008, David Newman wrote:
> > When you then get the AOL TOS e-mail, you can figure out who the list
> > recipient was as while AOL redacts the AOL recipient, they don't touch the
> > Return-Path.
>
> I wish this were true, but it appears AOL gets to the Return-Path too:
>
> Return-P
Dov Oxenberg sent the message below at 04:32 5/30/2008:
Good morning,
Until Wednesday night my Server was running like a champ then
suddenly, mysteriously, Postfix broke for no apparent reason.
It is failing to start reporting "no local interface found for..."
and citing some IP address which i
On 5/30/08 4:35 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still associating each
Message-ID with all 250 list subscribers.
Thank you for the information Brad.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 5:54 PM
To: Melinda Gilmore
Cc: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Queued mail
Melinda Gilmore wrote:
> Is there any mailman setting that
On 5/30/2008 8:04 AM, Dov Oxenberg wrote:
Never mind, I found it.
Please forgive the faux pas.
No worries... hope you get it sorted...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/ma
Never mind, I found it.
Please forgive the faux pas.
Dov
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mailman-users@python.org>
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 07:57:27 -0400> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users]
> re-install postfix?> > Hi Charles,> Thanks for your prompt reply.> The reason
> my descr
Hi Charles,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
The reason my description is "vague" is because I was reluctant to post details
of a Postfix problem to the Mailman list.
Mailman is running fine...I can log in to the Web interface, manage my list,
users etc., and obviously Apache is running as well.
I l
On 5/30/2008 7:32 AM, Dov Oxenberg wrote:
Good morning,
Until Wednesday night my Server was running like a champ then
suddenly, mysteriously, Postfix broke for no apparent reason. It is
failing to start reporting "no local interface found for..."
Sounds like you have a problem with your NIC...
Good morning,
Until Wednesday night my Server was running like a champ then suddenly,
mysteriously, Postfix broke for no apparent reason.
It is failing to start reporting "no local interface found for..." and citing
some IP address which is invalid for my system. I have not been able to get
any
On 5/29/08 11:37 PM, Jim Popovitch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, David Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hmmm. I must be missing something, as the system is still associating each
>> Message-ID with all 250 list subscribers.
>
> VERP has nothing to do with M
On 5/29/08, Bob001 wrote:
How can we customize mailman to ensure that un-subscriptions are
automatically recorded.
They already are. They're recorded in /usr/local/mailman/logs/subscribe.
Once recorded, we also intent to customize subscribe function to
automatically ensure that they don
25 matches
Mail list logo