Chris,
On 22/03/2020 20:41, Chris via mailop wrote:
> On 2020-03-22 16:20, Nick Stallman via mailop wrote:
>> I got one of these the other day and I'm scratching my head about it
as what's in the report cannot possibly be correct.
>>
>> The report was for a domain we host the website for, but
On 2020-03-24 06:36, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote:
I have great respect for you, but I didn't spend a considerable amount
of development time without actually being absolutely certain about what
I was doing. Your experience is not relevant because you do not have
experience with
Steve Freegard via mailop writes:
> On 24/03/2020 15:10, Chris via mailop wrote:
>> On 2020-03-24 06:36, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote:
>>
>>> I have great respect for you, but I didn't spend a considerable
>>> amount of development time without actually being absolutely certain
>>> about
Hi Micah,
On 24/03/2020 16:10, micah anderson wrote:
FWIW, we got a couple of these Abusix reports, checked them out and
determined they were all false positives. Every single one of them was
either an account that hasn't existed for years, or wasn't even a valid
account (like mailing list
Steve Freegard via mailop writes:
> I included the partial SHA-1 to be compatible with automation and
> tooling around the HaveIBeenPwned API - see
> https://haveibeenpwned.com/API/v3#PwnedPasswords
I understand that desire, but I wish the HaveIBeenPwned things were
better. As a provider,
On 24/03/2020 15:10, Chris via mailop wrote:
On 2020-03-24 06:36, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote:
I have great respect for you, but I didn't spend a considerable
amount of development time without actually being absolutely certain
about what I was doing. Your experience is not relevant
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:58:14AM -0500, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
> I'm not understanding how this intersects with spamtraps. What does
> this alert actually notify a network owner of?
> Failed SMTP auth attempt from my IP space?
> Or a failed SMTP auth attempt from someplace else TO my IP
Hi Al,
On 24/03/2020 15:58, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
I'm not understanding how this intersects with spamtraps. What does
this alert actually notify a network owner of?
Failed SMTP auth attempt from my IP space?
Or a failed SMTP auth attempt from someplace else TO my IP space?
Or door #3?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Atro Tossavainen via mailop
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:58:14AM -0500, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
> > I'm not understanding how this intersects with spamtraps. What does
> > this alert actually notify a network owner of?
> > Failed SMTP auth attempt
PSA: SSL for list archive site has expired
Websites prove their identity via certificates, which are valid for a
set time period. The certificate for chilli.nosignal.org expired on
2/27/2020.
Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE
--
Mark E. Jeftovic
Co-founder & CEO, easyDNS
On 2020-03-24 11:48, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote:
thraxisp@:16472
Sure - that's a totally useless password and I'm happy to report I
haven't seen that particular username, but without an IP - it's a bit
meaningless as I can't tell you if we're seeing traffic on it or not.
I checked.
On 2020-03-24 9:35 a.m., micah anderson via mailop wrote:
Steve Freegard via mailop writes:
I included the partial SHA-1 to be compatible with automation and
tooling around the HaveIBeenPwned API - see
https://haveibeenpwned.com/API/v3#PwnedPasswords
I understand that desire, but I wish the
On 24 Mar 2020, at 16:48, Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop wrote:
> PSA: SSL for list archive site has expired
Not the first time; hoepfully the last.
We are, albeit slowly, moving onto a new platform but world and personal events
have thrown a large spanner in the time available to deal with it.
On 3/24/2020 6:36 AM, Steve Freegard via mailop wrote:
Rob should have done the same
Steve,
The last time I even mentioned "invaluement" at MailOp - and it was an
on-topic post - I got very harshly criticized for allegedly being too
promotional and spammy. Someone had complained about a
On 24 Mar 2020, at 16:52, Michael Peddemors via mailop
wrote:
> Like others on the list pointed out, if you send 'noise' then people will
> simply 'tune out' to your reports. While I commend you for looking at ways to
> help address the problem, you might want to have a smaller set of more
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
