http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/int/internationale.html
The Internationale
Words by Eugene Pottier (Paris 1871)
Music by Pierre Degeyter (1888)
Arise ye workers from your slumbers
Arise ye prisoners of want
For reason in revolt now thunders
And at last ends the age of cant.
Away with all
The Internationale [variant words in square brackets]
http://www.uv.es/~pla/red.net/intaoter.html
Arise ye workers [starvelings] from your slumbers
Arise ye prisoners of want
For reason in revolt now thunders
And at last ends the age of cant.
Away with all your superstitions
Servile masses
Back to Modern History SourceBook
Modern History Sourcebook:
The Internationale
The Internationale is the international song of both Marxist and
non-Marxist socialist parties. It was written in French by Eugene
Modern History Sourcebook:
The Internationale
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/internat.html
The Internationale is the international song of both Marxist and
non-Marxist socialist parties. It was written in
Charles:
Again, all human complex behavior has a
significant learning component, i.e.
experiential. Some of it
is entirely learned or experiential.
But different HISTORICAL epochs
have different experiences. So,
for something under the ancient
slave mode to be the same thing-
class struggle - as
Marxism still shares a commonality with theology. Claiming Marx method and
approach, requires propositions to be explained on the basis of the Hegelian
form. The tendency is to claim principles - Marx method, rather than a
convincing argument. For instance the negation of the negation - as a
It would be more accurate, in view of what is being criticized, to say that
marxism-Leninism bears a commonality with theology, though there too it would
be more accurate to substitute metaphysics for theology. It is well known
that Marx held a dim view of metaphysical Hegelian reasoning,
Indeed, the way that Marxism-Leninism was institutionalized and taught,
it was turned into this sort of vacuous metaphysical position that can be
arbitrarily mapped onto any given phenomenon. This, however, was not Marx's
practice. And Engels, while writing some confused passages on the
[Marxism-Thaxis] Superimperialism , Empire, Americofourthreich
Charles Brown CharlesB at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Tue Dec 11 09:11:20 MST 2001
Previous message: [Marxism-Thaxis] An old chestnut
Next message: [Marxism-Thaxis] Taliban screwed it up
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject
2. Lenin’s Five-Point Definition of Imperialism
However, Lenin went well beyond this fundamental proposition, that
modern imperialism is “the monopoly stage of capitalism”.6 He gave a
more elaborate 5-point definition of capitalist imperialism as follows:
And so, without forgetting the conditional
Materialism, Necessity and Freedom: Rehearsal of the Fundamentals of Marxism
A three act play with beginning,
middle and end, and non-dogmatic
improvisation. Several vulgar parts
Double materialist
determination; there are two
levels of
determination, in materialism
attitude toward
the
I am interpreting Marxist materialism
with respect to the Realm of Necessity
or class divided to society to mean
that biology determines society
in this area _indirectly_. By
that I mean, the provision of physiological/biological
_necessities_ - food, water,
shelter, sleep, air, protection
This is very helpful in specifying
the non-Marxist point of view on
this point. Marx's position is
the opposite of this. Science is
based
in discovering necessary
connections. Here necessary
is exactly as in
the logical _modus ponens_
or if-then, if p, then q, q is a
necessary
Frederick Engels Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German
Philosophy
Part 2: Materialism
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/ch02.htm
Third level of materialism
Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Fri May 30 08:00:16 PDT 2008
Previous message: [lbo-talk] Materialism, idealism, theory, practice, etc.
Next message: [lbo-talk] The Nation does CNA-SEIU
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Completely unrelated to the Martin Luther King holiday and the Second Coming of
Barack Obama, I have been immersed in black intellectual history for the past
few days. I've learned some things about the early history of academic
African-American philosophy as well as the history of street
The second Thesis on Feuerbach -
the test of theory is practice - is
pretty much the Mother witicism
: the proof of the pudding is in
the eating; or, even better. the
proof of the recipe ( theory ) is in
the
This quote alone contradicts your subject heading. Only the economic
conditions can be ascertained with the precision of natural science, and Marx
insists on a distinction between those and superstructural institutional and
ideological conditions. He also says in this preface that societies,
shag
oh. of course they ignored it. part of the deal is that they also argued
science itself was imperialist, racist, sexist, etc. In other words, the
antidote to ideologically driven science was not more science but questioning
the claims about science being the answer at all. people would
Voyou
I doubt anyone who studies political theory or literary theory would disagree
with your contention that economics, politics, history, law, literature, are
humanistic endeavors and are not ready, and may never be ready, for scientific
theory making.
CB: Of course, many who
Natural laws in _Capital_
Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Thu Jun 5 08:12:19 PDT 2008
Previous message: [lbo-talk] _Capital_ as science
Next message: [lbo-talk] Incredible vintage Bo Diddley clip
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Search LBO-Talk
Third level of materialism
Let me suggest a third level of materialist determination, derived from the
struggle between the Marxists and the structuralists/post-moderns, et. al.
The superstructure is _determined_ when it is changed. It is changed only
rarely, in revolutions. Revolutions
Butler
Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Thu Jun 5 13:48:15 PDT 2008
Previous message: [lbo-talk] Neocons' last throw?
Next message: [lbo-talk] Butler
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Search LBO-Talk Archives
Limit search to: Subject Body
[lbo-talk] Naturally organized sociality and symbolically organized sociality
Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Thu Jun 5 14:14:56 PDT 2008
Previous message: [lbo-talk] Butler
Next message: [lbo-talk] Naturally organized sociality and symbolically
organized sociality
Messages
Secondly, I am _agreeing_ with Butler. My statement pronounces the same
principle that she seems to make in her statement. I am agreeing with her long
sentence. She seems to be describing how a structure changes - a dialecticians
response to structuralism, perhaps the first post-structural
Does this mean you are defending the concept that the social is built upon the
exchange of women amongst men? robert wood
CB: No . This passage from Marx is not on that topic. By and large this is
referring to a one-on-one, an intimate one-on-one.
( As an aside, on that topic, note that
[lbo-talk] Butler
Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Fri Jun 6 08:17:23 PDT 2008
Previous message: [lbo-talk] Butler
Next message: [lbo-talk] Chinese defense minister thanks U.S. for quake aid
Voyou said:
I think Marx makes this point somewhere in the 1844 Manuscripts, but I
can't find the exact reference right now.
^^^ Here's where Marx makes the point about sex being doubly social,
both naturally and culturally(socially) social. ^^^
In the approach to woman as the spoil and
Ralph Dumain rdum...@autodidactproject.org 01/19/2009 6:31 PM
This is silly. Motherwit is just uncritical peasant common sense. It has its
virtues, but is inherently limited and superstitious. Secondly, lifting
undigested phrases from Engels, or Marx, proves nothing. Here Engels' point is
Ralph Dumain rdum...@autodidactproject.org 01/19/2009 6:27 PM
This quote alone contradicts your subject heading. Only the economic
conditions can be ascertained with the precision of natural science,
^^
CB: Wrong. Economic conditions are social conditions, thus their science is a
social
Ralph Dumain rdum...@autodidactproject.org 01/19/2009 12:15 PM
It would be more accurate, in view of what is being criticized, to say
that marxism-Leninism bears a commonality with theology, though there
too it would be more accurate to substitute metaphysics for
theology.
^^^
CB: This is a
It would be more accurate, in view of what is being criticized, to say
that marxism-Leninism bears a commonality with theology, though there too it
would be more accurate to substitute metaphysics for theology.
^^^ CB: This is a tired claim that I have refuted with argument often.
Obama’s inauguration has generated and revealed profound emotions of mass
support for his presidency unlike anything I have ever experience. I actually
feel good about him being sworn into office tomorrow. Obama as president is the
damnest thing to happen in my life, and none of the power of
BodyS writes:
Fetishizing, it seems to me, is the transformation of the thing
into a social entity. (end)
The problem is that Marx's view is the exact opposite. For him,
fetishization is the transformation of a social relation of power into a
thing -- for instance, the car is assigned the
34 matches
Mail list logo