exercise, yes.
BillR
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jim Cathey
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:13 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
> Does something that I could do nothing about
> au
> Does something that I could do nothing about
> automatically make me unfit to vote?
Not at all. But in that proposed system, it would.
You, sir, would have been caught in the cracks.
> is a soldier who did
> frontline work in Korea or 'Nam automatically more qualified to make
> international o
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:19 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
> I've never served in the military, so I should be
> excluded from the benefits of citizenship?
In that proposed society, yes. So far as I recall,
the _only_ di
> I've never served in the military, so I should be
> excluded from the benefits of citizenship?
In that proposed society, yes. So far as I recall,
the _only_ difference was the voting franchise. Those
willing to volunteer to be put in a position where they
could be placed in harm's way, should
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of R A Bennell
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:13 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
Ah, but there is serving in the military and then there is serving in the
military
andrew strasfogel wrote:
>
> His main "gaffe" was a foreign policy blunder - the Bay of Pigs fiasco, and
> that certainly cost him dearly politically.
That was more than a gaffe IMO. On the one hand, he resolved the Cuban missile
crisis without starting a war, on the other hand, the botched invas
I think the person in the White House who best fits that description was
a young woman, or perhaps the adulterer with whom she was communicating...
--R
Mitch Haley wrote:
> I wonder, was JFK (Kennedy, not Kerry) the king of oral communications
___
http://www.
His main "gaffe" was a foreign policy blunder - the Bay of Pigs fiasco, and
that certainly cost him dearly politically. His actions spoke louder than
his words anyway.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> andrew strasfogel wrote:
> >
> > You make him sound jus
andrew strasfogel wrote:
>
> You make him sound just like Reagan!
...or any other actor.
I wonder, was JFK (Kennedy, not Kerry) the king of oral communications,
or did he just have the fortune of living in an era when the media didn't
take pleasure in pointing out his gaffes?
Mitch.
_
You make him sound just like Reagan!
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LarryT wrote:
> > People are being suckered in by charm and being articulate.
>
> I don't even get the idea he's all that articulate when he isn't delivering
> a rehearsed speech.
>
> ___
LarryT wrote:
> People are being suckered in by charm and being articulate.
I don't even get the idea he's all that articulate when he isn't delivering
a rehearsed speech.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbpart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
> Well, he is about as far left to hitler as you are going to get in this
> country. He is by far the farthest thing left that has been
places where
the locals do their best to dispatch
you. Not quite equal is it?
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Royce Engler
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:01 PM
To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Sec
I don't feel guilty, just fortunate.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Royce Engler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John said
>
> ...There are folks who have earned the right to that wealth (ie, the folks
> who defend our country), but the rest of us (myself included) are just
> lucky.
>
> - Ther
John said
...There are folks who have earned the right to that wealth (ie, the folks
who defend our country), but the rest of us (myself included) are just
lucky.
- Therein lies the problem. Not content to just be thankful to have been
born here, the Liberals feel guilty because they were b
Stalin killed to keep his power. Hitler killed people to gain power.
Socialism and communism are two different things, I don't think I would
classify the Soviets as socialists. A fascist is a fascist is a fascist,
they are all pages from the same book in my opinion. My biggest
complaint about the
"Kaleb C. Striplin" wrote:
> Well, he is about as far left to hitler as you are going to get in this
> country. He is by far the farthest thing left that has been a top
> candidate.
I'd put him left of Dodd, probably left of Edwards, but both O'bama
and Klingon have said some very Marxist thing
ORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net
> 800-583-8601
> Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck Landenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Sent: Tuesday, June
1. It's surprising that this article was published in the WSJ, as one would
expect something like this in the NYT albeit with actual facts.
2. It's also somewhat surprising that a Republican (Mr. Inhofe) would raise
objections of this nature considering where they've placed their loyalties
in recen
world folks to
have another child they will do so as a means of survival.
BillR
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Robbins
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 7:11 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security
"
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
> And while we on the topic of "gummint", here's what is working its
> way thru the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (Sen. Biden is Chairman)
>
> S. 2433: Global Pove
rom: "andrew strasfogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
> The real anwer is to 1) agree we have a problem, and 2) do the hard work
> necessary to solve it, whi
l.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
- Original Message -
From: "Loren Faeth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:07:57 -0400 "andrew strasfogel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real anwer is to 1) agree we have a problem,
Yes, and that is a whole bunch of half-cocked, scientifically ignorant
publicizers trying to get rich off the anxieties of others,
> and 2) do the hard work neces
Chuck Landenberger wrote:
> elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the
> Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of
> people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per
> day. For more info Google S. 2433...
>
> In my opi
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Loren Faeth
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:11 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
No, that was not an oops. It was just a less extreme over-reaction
about normal climate
The UN DOES have a stellar record of getting the "stuff" to those who
need it. You just have the "wrong" point of view. The UN point of
view is that the people who need the "Stuff" are the UN Secretary
General and his relatives. The UN believes in trickle Down Economics
too. Once the Secre
No, that was not an oops. It was just a less extreme over-reaction
about normal climate variation than the current version. IF those
who believe in global warming or global freezing are Darwinians, then
they are acting and thinking counter to their own manifesto. We are
supposed to be able t
I like what a local resident had to say about Senator Osama:
>From Rock LaBerge of Clarksville: "I, too, have been struck by the similarity
between Mr. Obama's campaign, and that of President Kennedy.
"Both candidates make large promises of a very general nature. Both generate
much enthusiasm fr
And while we on the topic of "gummint", here's what is working its
way thru the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (Sen. Biden is Chairman)
S. 2433: Global Poverty Act of 2007 (introduced by Sen. Barack Obama
in December, 2007)
A bill to require the President to develop and implement a
compr
are you joking?
andrew strasfogel wrote:
> It's about time they did something useful.
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Rich Thomas <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Y'all might want to edumacate yourselves on this thing our
>> Congresscritters are going to do for us.
>>
>> --R
>>
>>
>> http:
nearly all of the terrorism we will ever encounter in our lives will be at
the hands of our own government.
and the more you let them get away with, the worse it will get.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> andrew strasfogel wrote:
> >
> > The real anwer is
Exactly, but the ones wanting to be like us want us to reduce our
consumption/standards/lifestyles/whatever so they will have more to get
our consumption/standards/lifestyles/whatever. They have been
sacrificing (in a manner of speaking I suppose, if "not having" is the
same as "giving up" but
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of andrew strasfogel
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:08 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] America's Climate Security Act
The real anwer is to 1) agree we have a problem, and 2) do the hard work
necessary to solve it, which must necessarily inc
andrew strasfogel wrote:
>
> The real anwer is to 1) agree we have a problem, and 2) do the hard work
> necessary to solve it, which must necessarily include at least some
> sacrifice for everyone on the planet.
The trick there is to actually have a solution, not just subject the
populace to pain
The real anwer is to 1) agree we have a problem, and 2) do the hard work
necessary to solve it, which must necessarily include at least some
sacrifice for everyone on the planet.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Rich Thomas <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would that were true. The problem I see wi
Would that were true. The problem I see with this is that it is yet
another thing created by lobbyists and those looking to raise taxes with
no clear point to it other than to screw the taxpayers, again, in a new
way under the scare of global warming or climate change or whatever is
the curren
It's about time they did something useful.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Rich Thomas <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Y'all might want to edumacate yourselves on this thing our
> Congresscritters are going to do for us.
>
> --R
>
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121244985951839615.html?mod=opin
Y'all might want to edumacate yourselves on this thing our
Congresscritters are going to do for us.
--R
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121244985951839615.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponso
39 matches
Mail list logo
