In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Would span class=date-published2007/span be acceptable, or
should we insist on the full ISO date?
I thought that both 2007 and 2007-01 were valid ISO dates...
--
Andy Mabbett http://www.pigsonthewing.org.uk/uFsig/
On 1/17/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Would span class=date-published2007/span be acceptable, or
should we insist on the full ISO date?
I thought that both 2007 and 2007-01 were valid ISO dates...
Yes, I
On 1/17/07, Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the following
frequencies of marking up a date:
publication date: 21
date accessed: 3
date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
I just added date-accessed to the working straw
Michael McCracken wrote:
Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the
following frequencies of marking up a date:
publication date: 21
date accessed: 3
date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples:
umich
ning
Brian Suda wrote:
publication date: 21
date accessed: 3
date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
--- the other senario is to strip this down to the basics for a
version 1 and NOT include those lesser used dates, then use hCite for
awhile, see what falls down and itterate?
I'm
On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael McCracken wrote:
Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the
following frequencies of marking up a date:
publication date: 21
date accessed: 3
date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
Actually, date accessed has
On 1/17/07, M. Jackson Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Suda wrote:
publication date: 21
date accessed: 3
date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
--- the other senario is to strip this down to the basics for a
version 1 and NOT include those lesser used dates, then
Michael McCracken wrote:
On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples:
umich
ning
Google
However, they use retrieved rather than accessed,
although it is the
same meaning.
What would be the right way to make
On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael McCracken wrote:
On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples:
umich
ning
Google
However, they use retrieved rather than accessed,
although it is the
same
