Re: [Mingw-w64-public] To 32 or 64, that is the question :)

2014-06-20 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Peter Kennard [mailto:pet...@livingwork.com] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 2:19 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] To 32 or 64, that is the question :) as the unified installer has options for 64 and 32 bit installs.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 may move to git in the future

2014-04-28 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: JonY [mailto:jo...@users.sourceforge.net] Hi, mingw-w64 may migrate from svn to git in the future, seeing that sf can now do multiple repos per project. Structure wise, everything under trunk will still stay together in the new repo, but any

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Experimental builds of GCC-4.9.0

2014-04-24 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: niXman [mailto:i.nix...@autistici.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:10 PM To: mingw-w64-public Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] Experimental builds of GCC-4.9.0 Hi guys! Just now I uploaded new builds based on the GCC-4.9.0-trunk(rev. 205009),

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Determining whether mingw dll is a debug build based on PE structure?

2014-04-03 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: TOCK [mailto:tock.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 12:59 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Determining whether mingw dll is a debug build based on PE structure? I think you can use objdump to

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Determining whether mingw dll is a debug build based on PE structure?

2014-04-03 Thread Koehne Kai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03.04.2014 14:42, Koehne Kai wrote: Hi, Anyone knows by heart what to check for in a PE header to decide whether a dll is a debug build, or not? Background: Qt has a neat tool to package all of the Qt/non qt dependencies together

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] build cross compiler mingw w64 gcc 4.8.2 on linux with winpthreads

2014-02-21 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: lh_mouse [mailto:lh_mo...@126.com] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:21 AM To: mingw-w64-public Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] build cross compiler mingw w64 gcc 4.8.2 on linux with winpthreads It CRASHES. Can you elaborate? Are you talking about

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] build cross compiler mingw w64 gcc 4.8.2 on linux with winpthreads

2014-02-20 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: JonY [mailto:jo...@users.sourceforge.net] [...] FYI dwarf2 exception is known to be broken for Windows. The only defect I know of is that it doesn't support throwing exceptions through native stacks (i.e. Windows handlers). Or is there anything else? Cause

[Mingw-w64-public] Memory alignment issue with _mm_loadu_si128 (gcc 4.8.2 32 bit / MinGW-w64 3.0)

2014-02-12 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi, I'm currently investigating a crash [1] in Qt that was caused by introducing SSE2 optimized code. My best guess is that, when calling _mm_loadu_si128 , the generated assembly actually chokes on non-aligned data. This is the code line (with annotated assembly, from gdb): __m128i a_data =

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Memory alignment issue with _mm_loadu_si128 (gcc 4.8.2 32 bit / MinGW-w64 3.0)

2014-02-12 Thread Koehne Kai
:56 GMT+01:00 Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com: Hi, I'm currently investigating a crash [1] in Qt that was caused by introducing SSE2 optimized code. My best guess is that, when calling _mm_loadu_si128 , the generated assembly actually chokes on non-aligned data. This is the code line

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mingw toolchains and Clang

2014-01-17 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Alexey Pavlov [mailto:alex...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:36 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] Mingw toolchains and Clang Long time ago we add possibility to build Clang into mingw-builds scripts.

[Mingw-w64-public] Conflicting C/C++ linkage in xmmintrin.h vs intrin.h

2013-12-04 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Alexey Pavlov [mailto:alex...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:18 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3.0 RC1 [...] Hi, I was asked by a user of my Arch User Repository

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Conflicting C/C++ linkage in xmmintrin.h vs intrin.h

2013-12-04 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Alexpux [mailto:alex...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 11:18 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Conflicting C/C++ linkage in xmmintrin.h vs intrin.h 04 дек. 2013 г., в 13:37, Koehne Kai kai.koe

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Conflicting C/C++ linkage in xmmintrin.h vs intrin.h

2013-12-04 Thread Koehne Kai
...@codeweavers.com написал(а): On 12/04/13 10:37, Koehne Kai wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexey Pavlov [mailto:alex...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:18 AM To: mingw-w64

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Conflicting C/C++ linkage in xmmintrin.h vs intrin.h

2013-12-04 Thread Koehne Kai
Well, for some reason the xmmintrin.h in I meant i686-w64-mingw32\include\intrin.h, sorry. http://softlayer-dal.dl.sourceforge.net/project/mingw- w64/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw- builds/4.8.2/threads-posix/dwarf/i686-4.8.2-release-posix-dwarf-rt_v3- rev0.7z

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Conflicting C/C++ linkage in xmmintrin.h vs intrin.h [solved]

2013-12-04 Thread Koehne Kai
[..] Well, for some reason the xmmintrin.h in http://softlayer-dal.dl.sourceforge.net/project/mingw- w64/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw- builds/4.8.2/threads-posix/dwarf/i686-4.8.2-release-posix-dwarf-rt_v3- rev0.7z doesn't seem to be from

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Trouble with libstdc++-6.dll

2013-11-26 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Ingo Maindorfer [mailto:i...@liquidcooling.de] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:42 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Trouble with libstdc++-6.dll Hi Ruben, Am 26.11.2013 14:35, schrieb Ruben Van Boxem:

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] mingw-w64 v3 release calling for testers

2013-09-13 Thread Koehne Kai
-- Kai Köhne, Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Anja Wasenius Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin. USt-IdNr: DE 286 306 868 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B

[Mingw-w64-public] Javascript switch statement misbehavior in QtWebkit - gcc 4.8 32 bit optimization bug ?

2013-08-29 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi, We've been dealing with a strange bug report in Qt Webkit: A javascript 'switch' statement that does fail to work correctly, but only in the mingw packages. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-31988 Apparently it only affects gcc 4.8.x , 32 bit, release builds. It's also no

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] End of rubenvb builds

2013-07-10 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Adrien Nader [mailto:adr...@notk.org] Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 2:31 PM To: Ruben Van Boxem Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] End of rubenvb builds Hi, Sorry for answering that late, I was away a bit and could

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] PRIu64 and uint64_t

2013-06-11 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Jim Michaels [mailto:jmich...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:23 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] PRIu64 and uint64_t why would I want to use __mingw_printf? what exactly is it? why shouldn't I

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] format check broken

2013-05-03 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Ozkan Sezer [mailto:seze...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 2:12 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] format check broken [...] Even then, it affects libstdc++ compilation itself. IMO, mingw[-w64] should

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] format check broken

2013-05-03 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Koehne Kai [mailto:kai.koe...@digia.com] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 2:29 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] format check broken -Original Message- From: Ozkan Sezer [mailto:seze...@gmail.com

[Mingw-w64-public] i686-w64-mingw32-clang-3.2-release-win32_rubenvb package missing dependencies?

2013-04-25 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi Ruben, Just downloaded http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains targetting Win32/Personal Builds/rubenvb/clang-3.2-release/i686-w64-mingw32-clang-3.2-release-win32_rubenvb.7z Anyhow, launching bin\clang after unpacking fails because of missing LIBGCC_S_DW2-1.dll,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Interest] Not getting large file support when configuring Qt 4.8.4 for win32-g++-4.6

2013-04-15 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: K. Frank [mailto:kfrank2...@gmail.com] [...] Is there some sort of log? Hard to tell what configure did to test without it. First, I don't know whether configure does a test. I saw some online comments that suggest it does, but nothing definitive.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Performance changes when switching to 4.8.0

2013-03-27 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal [mailto:etienne.san...@m4x.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:12 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] Performance changes when switching to 4.8.0 Dear all, Until a few days ago, I was

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Performance changes when switching to 4.8.0

2013-03-27 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal [mailto:etienne.san...@m4x.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:43 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Performance changes when switching to 4.8.0 I'm using the rubenvb with no dw2 in

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] SJLJ vs DW2 - fact checking

2013-02-26 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Ruben Van Boxem [mailto:vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:01 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] SJLJ vs DW2 - fact checking 2013/2/26 Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com Hi

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] SJLJ vs DW2 - fact checking

2013-02-26 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Kai Tietz [mailto:ktiet...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:00 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] SJLJ vs DW2 - fact checking Hello Kai, 2013/2/26 Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com: Hi

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW-builds toolchain

2013-02-01 Thread Koehne Kai
Subject: Re: [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW-builds toolchain 2013/1/31 Koehne Kai: E.g. the msvc package doesn't ship a toolchain. But that's just 271 MB of the 405 MB difference. It seems most of the difference is actually in the debugging info: E.g

[Mingw-w64-public] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW-builds toolchain

2013-01-31 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi there, The qt-project and Digia just released Qt 5.0.1 binary installer for MinGW! http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/01/31/qt-5-0-1-released/ The binary is compiled with and comes with the x32-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-rev8.7z toolchain from MinGW-builds. Quite a lot of you have been

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW-builds toolchain

2013-01-31 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: niXman [mailto:i.nix...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:05 PM To: Koehne Kai; mingwbuilds-us...@lists.sourceforge.net; Mingw-w64- pub...@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW- builds toolchain

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW-builds toolchain

2013-01-31 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: niXman [mailto:i.nix...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:48 PM To: Koehne Kai; Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net; mingwbuilds- us...@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingwbuilds-users] Qt 5.0.1 binary packages with MinGW- builds

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki

2013-01-21 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Ruben Van Boxem [mailto:vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 9:27 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki Hi, Hi Ruben others, Thanks for the fixes to the wiki! I have updated the Qt

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki

2013-01-21 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Koehne Kai [mailto:kai.koe...@digia.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 9:30 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki Actually all that should be needed for latest qt5/release branch (upcoming 5.0.1

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki

2013-01-21 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Алексей Павлов [mailto:alex...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 9:55 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki Hi, Kai! Does the issue reported on https://bugreports.qt- project.org/browse/QTBUG-28845

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki

2013-01-21 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: Suresh Govindachar [mailto:sgovindac...@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 11:15 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Qt wiki [...] My questions: A) Can one go through the getting started examples

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] abort() crashing for -Wl,-subsystem,windows

2013-01-17 Thread Koehne Kai
a stone-age gcc 4.4.0 from MinGW.org ... same behavior. Maybe it's really something on my machine (Windows 7 64 bit, though I just reinstalled it two weeks ago) ... Pretty mysterious. Kai 2013/1/16 Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com: Hi, Take following program: --- #include

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] New-B

2013-01-16 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: ext Arbol One [mailto:arbol...@hotmail.ca] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 5:24 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] New-B Humm, some how I felt that there was something very wrong in my installation. All I want

[Mingw-w64-public] abort() crashing for -Wl,-subsystem,windows

2013-01-16 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi, Take following program: --- #include stdlib.h int main(int, char**) { abort(); return 0; } --- Compiling it with g++ -o test.exe test.cpp and running it will print (both in a pop up and in a dialog): This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++.exe links with 32 bit libs

2012-11-19 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: ext JonY [mailto:jo...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 12:23 PM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++.exe links with 32 bit libs On 11/17/2012 19:17, deneme.true wrote:

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] incorrect syntax while building QT 4.8.3

2012-11-02 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: ext CanisMajorWuff [mailto:canismajorw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:49 AM To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] incorrect syntax while building QT 4.8.3 Hello! I have troubles building QT 4.8.3. I

[Mingw-w64-public] Problem with mingw32-make and long commands (x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.2-release-win64_rubenvb)

2012-09-28 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi Ruben, I ran into an issue with your mingw32-make and a really long compiler line: http://pastebin.com/h5tNV7x5 . We're obviously hitting a buffer limit here ... However, if I replace your mingw32-make GNU Make 3.82 Built for x86_64-w64-mingw32 With the one from latest mingw-builds: GNU

[Mingw-w64-public] Qt 5 and MinGW 64 - great progress!

2012-09-26 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi all, I wrote a while ago that 'I haven't found a stock native MinGW 64 bit package yet that can compile Qt 5 + Qt Creator.' And since I get cited on this I guess it's time to correct it :) Thanks to personal efforts of various people both on the Qt side (namely Jonathan Liu), as well as on

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Fwd: [Development] Choosing a new MinGW for Qt 5

2012-09-25 Thread Koehne Kai
-Original Message- From: ext Ruben Van Boxem [mailto:vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com] [...] I have now rebuilt gdb with --disable-nls and I believe this is the thing. Don't ask me why this is. The startup time reduces from ~19 seconds to 6-7 seconds, which is the same as mingw-builds