Anyone got any suggestions for getting this card started correctly? Seen
the question in older posts, but never an answer (running sparc64
generic). It seems supported in both the hardwarelist and generic kernel.
Can you try recompiling a kernel with the value of
QEC_XD_RING_MAXSIZE
this is on -current?
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:46:37PM -0400, Stefan wrote:
Can someone explain why this is giving a syntax error?
ike esp from 10.0.0.0/24 to 10.1.0.0/24 peer (remote IP CIDR) \
main auth hmac-md5 enc 3des group modp1024 \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
ip is from the iproute2 package. From the lartc.org manual, ``Why
iproute2?''[1]:
Most Linux distributions, and most UNIX's, currently use the
2006/8/15, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
does anyone on list have a nagios plugin that will check the status of isakmpd
on an openbsd machine?
Hi,
I used ike-scan (http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools/ike-scan/) to check
if a vpn is up.
Then a shell script exiting with 0,1 or 2 status if
On 16 Aug 2006, at 06:24, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If you are stuck on SATA, the Areca stuff is a few weeks away from
totally rocking. And it is cheap.
I can see that these guys also freely provide API documentation and
code:
http://www.areca.com.tw/support/index/dc1120.htm
Does this
Jeff Quast 16-Aug-06 02:29
if you had used tcpdump -Xs 99 you would have seen in the first few
packets of the negotiation, the wrap netboot client sent a request for
changing the packet length. This was silently ignored by the OpenBSD
tftpd, because it is not supported. When the wrap
hi *,
A few days ago, my notebook disk died... Good opportunity to reinstall a
fresh 3.9-GENERIC. My X environment is running fine (xfce4) but
Thunderbird gives me some headaches... (mozilla-thunderbird-1.5.0.4.tgz)
From time to time, when reading RSS feeds or HTML mails (Grrr), it just
closes!
Paul de Weerd schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:20:05PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
| On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:19:31PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
| I think you're looking for ifconfig(8). Wait, doesn't linux have
| ifconfig? What's ip for?
|
| ip is from the iproute2 package.
I had the same problem with 3.9, now I am running 4.0-beta with the
latest thunderbird package and I don't have that problem anymore.
But it still hangs (folder don't get refreshed anymore) from time to
time when running for several hours.
Hello,
I'm using Mozilla Suite 1.7.12 on OpenBSD 3.8-GENERIC. Yes, indeed,
from time to time it just closes. It happens with both the browser and
the mail
reader. Indeed, no core, no crash, it's the same problem. I've heard a
lot of
people having this problem with different
Hello,
I wonder if anyone has been successful
with running Adobe's FMS on OpenBSD.
I've got FMS_2_0_2_r51_linux installed
on -current the following way:
0) Installed redhat_base-8.0p8 package and
set kern.emul.linux=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf
1) Downloaded these 4 rpms:
Prabhu Gurumurthy wrote:
How about using login_radius feature by modifying login.conf to add a
new radius profile and authenticate against a RADIUS server. You can
compile freeradius and have rad_ldap plugin on the RADIUS server to
authenticate against AD.
Will that still require creating
Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
this is on -current?
Sorry, I should have mentioned it. It's 3.9 release.
-Stefan
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:46:37PM -0400, Stefan wrote:
Can someone explain why this is giving a syntax error?
ike esp from 10.0.0.0/24 to
We have a G3 mac here running mail/dns and this morning it died. I had
to reboot it, so I wasn't able to run trace or ps. Any clues as to what
may have happened? I don't see anything in my logs.
from dmesg:
===
kern dsi on addr 3c200068 iar 304430
panic: trap type 300 at 304430
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:46:18AM -0400, Stefan wrote:
Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
this is on -current?
Sorry, I should have mentioned it. It's 3.9 release.
setting the group was added post 3.9.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:12:45AM +0100, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
On 16 Aug 2006, at 06:24, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If you are stuck on SATA, the Areca stuff is a few weeks away from
totally rocking. And it is cheap.
I can see that these guys also freely provide API documentation and
code:
On 16 Aug 2006, at 15:58, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
If you are stuck on SATA, the Areca stuff is a few weeks away from
totally rocking. And it is cheap.
Does this mean that it will be supported by bioctl soon?
Is there any other way to understand Theo's comment? ;-)
Huzzah for open
Post it to me I need a project :p. I'd almost pay but I'm too poor haha. I
have a Sun Blade 100 running it.
On 8/16/06, stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does OpenBSD work well on a Sun Ultra 25?
--
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
--
On 16 Aug 2006, at 15:58, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
If you are stuck on SATA, the Areca stuff is a few weeks away from
totally rocking. And it is cheap.
I can see that these guys also freely provide API documentation and
code:
http://www.areca.com.tw/support/index/dc1120.htm
Does this
Steve Shockley wrote:
Prabhu Gurumurthy wrote:
How about using login_radius feature by modifying login.conf to add a
new radius profile and authenticate against a RADIUS server. You can
compile freeradius and have rad_ldap plugin on the RADIUS server to
authenticate against AD.
Will that
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:30:43AM +1000, John Tate wrote:
--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question:
I believe the question is 0x2b|~0x2b, and the answer is 0xff. This is
tautalogical and not restricted to 0x2b.
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Your reply is awesome though.
On 8/17/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:30:43AM +1000, John Tate wrote:
--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question:
I believe the question is 0x2b|~0x2b, and the answer is 0xff. This is
tautalogical and not restricted to
It wasn't original but I get and love it.
On 8/17/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:30:43AM +1000, John Tate wrote:
--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question:
I believe the question is 0x2b|~0x2b, and the answer is 0xff. This is
tautalogical and not
snip...
throwing stale nfs file handle errors. My assumption is
that these are the
result of ESTALE being returned by the server and that the
system doesn't
understand how to handle this gracefully and reopen the files.
What you need to do is mount the nfs state directory from shared
I think I understand but want to check before I do something silly.
I have OBSD 3.9 + chrooted apache + mod_perl after apxs.
Now, to actually run perl cgi's I have to copy /usr/bin/perl and all
relevant libs over to /var/www?
Is there an automated tool for this?
---
Jack J. Woehr
Director of
I've got this running just fine by copying a few files.
Also, ports packages unwrap nicely into the chroot tree.
But aside from that, I'm still curious if I am doing by hand
something that's already been automated.
On Aug 16, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
I think I understand but
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:27:35AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:30:43AM +1000, John Tate wrote:
--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question:
I believe the question is 0x2b|~0x2b, and the answer is 0xff. This is
tautalogical and not restricted to 0x2b.
Which
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:35:10PM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
I've got this running just fine by copying a few files.
Also, ports packages unwrap nicely into the chroot tree.
But aside from that, I'm still curious if I am doing by hand
something that's already been automated.
I know that
On 8/16/06, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/15/06, Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Steve B wrote:
Our company has a small OpenBSD box colocated with a local ISP that we use
for tertiary stoage of some data. I'd like to setup RAID-1 to provide some
On Aug 16, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:35:10PM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
I know that syweb has a script using ldd to do this.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~wpd/symon/
Thanks, Darrin.
---
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
We are not stuck on SATA. The whole data directory has ~ 80GB of data so
PATA would work just as well. I did not see any docs on the LSI site for the
150-2. A Google search on it had produced a couple of listings that
indicated it was not hardware RAID. I'll try and dig around some more on the
LSI
I'm putting a couple of MP servers on-line and am having some networking
problems with the GENERIC.MP -current kernel. (dmesgs below)
When booting from the MP kernel, I have no networking--no pings in or out
(other than localhost) no ssh, nothing.
In this specific machine, I have three nics,
On 8/16/06, Steve B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are not stuck on SATA. The whole data directory has ~ 80GB of data so
PATA would work just as well. I did not see any docs on the LSI site for the
150-2. A Google search on it had produced a couple of listings that
indicated it was not hardware
On 8/15/06, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:40:18AM -0400, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
On 8/14/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/08/14 17:59, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
In which case, the patchlevel needs to be bumped (eg. foo-1.0.tgz -
We are not stuck on SATA. The whole data directory has ~ 80GB of data
so PATA would work just as well.
I fear you missed the point. This is hardly about SATA vs. PATA,
but rather about ATA vs. SCSI.
If you do really need reliability, you should seriously consider SCSI
RAID. Yes, it
There are several differences between now and then.
Anybody using the software based raid cards, like the cheap promise/highpoint
stuff is asking for trouble, no question.
However, vendors have made 24x7 SATA drives available, they're just not
the ones you see at the cheapest prices on
I have an OpenBSD 3.8 device, running on Soekris 4801 hardware, sitting
on a private network. Its sole purpose is to NAT traffic before it goes
through an IPsec tunnel.
I am using binat and static routes to reach the
Two interfaces are connected to the network.
This is the pf.conf file:
#
Hi all!
My /var/log/messages is full of messages saying that spamd failed to scan his db
file. It says:
scan of /var/db/spamd failed
Somebody got some erros like this?
My spamdb has 63MB. Could it be the reason?
I am using spamd in greylisting mode.
Thanks,
Thiago
Greg - Thanks for that link!
Ingo - We are leaning toward ATA since the unit is used for tertiary
storage. Primary backup is to tape, stored off-site, and secondary backup is
to a SCSI based system in a different bldg. So yes, its a budgetary issue.
Though I do not understand why we need triple
I was over ruled.
Ok, it looks like your company has taken most of the decisions
and all you still need to decide is the ATA RAID brand.
We'll probably go with the 3Ware
I fail to remember hearing anything about that, either good or bad.
I do remeber the first brand Marco praised was LSI
Heck, you can get near petabyte storage arrays now from several top vendors,
and guess what? Most of them are using SATA. I believe Netapp is using
SATA drives in some of their systems, and anybody who knows Netapp knows they
don't release anything unless it's solid, and won't damage
On Thursday 17 August 2006 00:39, Steve Shockley wrote:
Okay, in that case login_radius offers no benefit to me over login_ldap
(other than it's in base). Aside from the nsswitch patch posted on
tech@, is there any auth method that does *not* require adding entries
to /etc/passwd?
Yes, NIS.
Jaye Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17 9:25 am
We switched from SCSI to SATA, and have seen no significant
difference in
reliability
You didn't looked hard enugh!
and a whole lot of savings in $'s.
Not on the long term, very bad purchasing decision!
But we don't buy the
I'm not arguing that in the highest end usage SCSI is still the way to go.
Still is, and will probably remain that way for another decade or so maybe
longer.
IIRC original question was appx 80GB of *tertiary* storage, not main storage
for a zillion row database cluster spread out over a huge
On 8/16/06, Ioan Nemes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jaye Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17 9:25 am
We switched from SCSI to SATA, and have seen no significant
difference in
reliability
You didn't looked hard enugh!
and a whole lot of savings in $'s.
Not on the long term, very bad
45 matches
Mail list logo
