On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:19:56 +0200
Luca Corti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've setup hoststated for load balancing of some services, and it
works well. If I'm not missing something hoststated actually works
just for TCP. Is there any plan to implement UDP support?
Yes there is, I will
Hi,
On 6/27/07, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Various developers are busy implimenting workarounds for serious bugs
in Intel's Core 2 cpu.
These processors are buggy as hell, and some of these bugs don't just
cause development/debugging problems, but will *ASSUREDLY* be
Hi!
I've noticed that once in a while the nfe0 interface will stop
sending and receiving data. At this point I can not make it work
again. The only solution I have is to reboot the box. I have
installed a dc0 card in the box since. The problem seemed
intermittent and not reliably
On a freshly installed binary snapshot netstat -an -f inet6 shows
netstat: invalid address (3) ???
-
# netstat -an -f inet6
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state)
tcp6 0
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 27/06/07, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you make more money if your widgets break because your new widget is
vastly improved. new packaging, same great defects!
The best thing about computer parts randomly failing will hit us in a
few years, due
rough translation from swedish to english of:
http://strombergson.com/kryptoblog/?p=311
begin
Intel Advannced Management Technology - Rootkit's for everyone
intel just released a new x86 cpu, one new addition avaiding the news
is the AMT (Active Management Technology)
AMT is a technology
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:52:29AM -0700, Marco S Hyman wrote:
for FILE in *jpg; do
NEW=$(echo $FILE | sed -e 's/\.jpg$/_thumb.jpg/')
mv ${FILE} ${NEW}
done
There is no need for echo and sed. OpenBSD sh and ksh support
${var%suffix} which evaluates to the
* Gregory Edigarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-27 11:31]:
I am looking for a guide about driver writing for OpenBSD.
here it is:
look for a similiar driver, read understand it, start from there.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
* Lloyd Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-27 19:57]:
Does anyone know if Intel PWLA8391GT PRO/1000 GT desktop NICs are
supported on the i386 platform?
without knowing about that one explicitely, in all the intel PRO/1000
should work.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Adriaan wrote:
On a freshly installed binary snapshot netstat -an -f inet6 shows
netstat: invalid address (3) ???
thanks for the report, we can reproduce and are looking into this
-Otto
-
# netstat -an -f inet6
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 at 12:35, Artur Litwinowicz wrote:
O I think it is not good idea to change the code of OpenBSD by me.
Years ago I was coding in C++ (at the University but with best mark ;). Now
I am working for Oracle Corp. (PL/SQL and etc.) and I am a little out of
practice ;) with
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Gregory Edigarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-27 11:31]:
I am looking for a guide about driver writing for OpenBSD.
here it is:
look for a similiar driver, read understand it, start from there.
... and don't copy all the
Hi Valentin,
thank You very, very much for Your answer.
Your idea is great !!! I am very happy with this solution :)
Of course I have to recall that pleasure with C/C++ coding but for now this
is the best and fastest way for me.
Have a nice day,
Best regards :)
Artur
On Thu, 28 Jun
Someone posted on one of these lists asking about if this card works on 4.1...
I dont recall seeing any reply..
I use this card just fine:
em0 at pci1 dev 9 function 0 Intel PRO/1000GT (82541GI) rev 0x05: irq 5
-JD
On 28 June 2007 at 11:18, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], JD Bronson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone posted on one of these lists asking about if this card works
on
4.1...
I dont recall seeing any reply..
OpenBSD 4.1-stable (GENERIC) #2: Tue May 8 16:48:20 BST 2007
em0 at pci7 dev 4 function
i'm encountering a real performance problem since a recent update :
- previous snapshots dated around 22 may was working perfectly, launching my
session (xfce) took around 10-15sec. Launching firefox took around 5secs
- updated last week on 20 of june, launching my session takes around 1
Hi all,
I have quick question , i need not to create state on one of the rule but
once is done by default starting with verison 4.1 , not sure how to do it.
Any tips welcome
Thanku you
Jacek
On 6/28/07, jacek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have quick question , i need not to create state on one of the rule but
once is done by default starting with verison 4.1 , not sure how to do it.
Any tips welcome
Thanku you
Jacek
Read :
-- Forwarded message --
From: Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 27, 2007 10:38 PM
Subject: Intel Core 2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Various developers are busy implimenting workarounds for serious bugs
in Intel's Core 2 cpu.
These processors are buggy as hell, and some of
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#stateopts
no state
Prevents the rule from automatically creating a state entry.
On 6/28/07, jacek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have quick question , i need not to create state on one of the rule but
once is done by default starting with verison
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:07:41 +0100
Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm encountering a real performance problem since a recent update :
- previous snapshots dated around 22 may was working perfectly, launching my
session (xfce) took around 10-15sec. Launching firefox took around 5secs
On 6/28/07, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 27, 2007 10:38 PM
Subject: Intel Core 2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Various developers are busy implimenting workarounds for serious bugs
in Intel's Core 2 cpu.
Use no state in your rule.
jacek wrote:
Hi all,
I have quick question , i need not to create state on one of the rule but
once is done by default starting with verison 4.1 , not sure how to do it.
Any tips welcome
Thanku you
Jacek
I have a question about this..
Will NEW offenders be added to /etc/tables/scanners
as they are discovered and therefore not just remain in kernel?
It would be nice since doing a reboot wipes out kernel kept
IPs...
table scanners persist file /etc/tables/scanners
vs
table scanners persist
On 2007/06/28 15:45, Huzeyfe ONAL wrote:
Use no state in your rule.
and 'flags any' if it's TCP.
At 08:56 AM 06/28/2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/06/28 08:46, J.D. Bronson wrote:
Will NEW offenders be added to /etc/tables/scanners
as they are discovered and therefore not just remain in kernel?
No, pf does not write to files.
How about cron(8) and pfctl(8) instead?
so if it wont
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/27/intel_core2_duo_bios_fix/
Intel has released a BIOS patch for Windows machines running Core 2 and
Xeon 3000/5000 chips that addresses potential unpredictable system
behavior.
After reading the whole article, it sounds like Intel is attempting to
address some
On 2007/06/28 08:46, J.D. Bronson wrote:
Will NEW offenders be added to /etc/tables/scanners
as they are discovered and therefore not just remain in kernel?
No, pf does not write to files.
How about cron(8) and pfctl(8) instead?
I am using OpenBSD 4.0 and I am counting bytes with labels for most
protocols but with ftp-proxy I do not know how to proceed. How can I
do this? These are the rules I have in pf.conf:
nat-anchor ftp-proxy/*
rdr-anchor ftp-proxy/*
rdr pass on $INT \
inet proto tcp \
from
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:26:45 +0200, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reliability decay of low-lead materials may be economically
desirable for some consumer product companies because it provides a
mechanism to enforce planned obsolescence and replacement. Ironically,
this is the opposite of
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:54:04PM -0700, Steve B wrote:
The rule I've had in my pf.conf file to catch and block forceful SSH
attempts no longer appears to be working. I see the entries in my authlog,
but the IPs are no longer getting added to my table. I suspect I screwed
something up, but
On 2007/06/28 09:16, David W. Hess wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:26:45 +0200, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reliability decay of low-lead materials may be economically
desirable for some consumer product companies because it provides a
mechanism to enforce planned obsolescence and
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:02:43 -0500
J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:56 AM 06/28/2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/06/28 08:46, J.D. Bronson wrote:
Will NEW offenders be added to /etc/tables/scanners
as they are discovered and therefore not just remain in kernel?
No, pf
On 2007/06/28 09:02, J.D. Bronson wrote:
At 08:56 AM 06/28/2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/06/28 08:46, J.D. Bronson wrote:
Will NEW offenders be added to /etc/tables/scanners
as they are discovered and therefore not just remain in kernel?
No, pf does not write to files.
How about
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:45:17PM -0400, Eric wrote:
hello..
i just installed OpenBSD 4.1 from an original CD. My USB ethernet adapter,
a Linksys USB200M is a known good working adapter (verified on Mac OS X
10.4 and FreeBSD 6.2). I am building a gateway with OpenBSD and this
hardware has only
I've written a korn script (viagrad) that runs as a daemon and checks
that my ADSL router is up. If no hosts beyond the router are pingable,
it resets (via expect scripts) the username in the router to the telco's
default, then waits a while for a re-train on the gateway, reboots the
router,
J.D. Bronson wrote:
At 08:56 AM 06/28/2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/06/28 08:46, J.D. Bronson wrote:
Will NEW offenders be added to /etc/tables/scanners
as they are discovered and therefore not just remain in kernel?
No, pf does not write to files.
How about cron(8) and pfctl(8)
Guys...I was not the one that started this thread..
I just chimed in and asked for a tweak on the setup.
I have what I need for now :)
-JD
At 11:54 AM 06/28/2007, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
J.D. Bronson wrote:
At 08:56 AM 06/28/2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/06/28 08:46, J.D. Bronson
J.D. Bronson wrote:
Guys...I was not the one that started this thread..
I just chimed in and asked for a tweak on the setup.
Sorry for my mistake then. I should refrain from replying on lack of
sleep. (;
I have what I need for now :)
Glad it help you never the less.
Hi there,
I'm trying to install the newest clamav (0.90.3) on OpenBSD 3.9 . I updated
the
sources, and managed to compile it . But when i try to install the package i
get this error:
pkg_add /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/clamav-0.90.3p0.tgz
Can't install
I'v managed to compile curl (jsut had to remove the old one first)
but i still can't install the clamav package , i still get the same error
message:
test:/usr/ports/security/clamav{95}# pkg_add
/usr/ports/packages/i386/all/clamav-0.90.3p0.tgz
Can't install
On 2007/06/28 15:56, Marcos Laufer wrote:
I'm trying to install the newest clamav (0.90.3) on OpenBSD 3.9 . I updated
the sources, and managed to compile it . But when i try to install the package
i get this error:
this is a variant of http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun;
Can't
I'm trying to install the newest clamav (0.90.3) on OpenBSD 3.9 . I updated
The clamav package for 3.9 is clamav-0.88.tgz
For 4.1 it is: clamav-0.90.tgz
Don't mix versions.
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#Latest
I just worked it out, sorry for the noise !
Just had to compile clamav again with the newest curl installed , and the
resulting clamav package worked just fine.
- Original Message -
From: Marcos Laufer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:11 PM
openbsd gurus,
As the saga continues...
I have a newly built server with openbsd 4.0.
During installation, it did not find the onboard
lan interface, which I did not realize until after
the installation had completed.
I made sure the bios was set properly. There
was no LAN option in the BIOS.
Hello,
I was wondering what is the best way to immediately use a newly received crl
that contains a revoked certificate...
Basically if I have 3 firewalls and one of them is compromised I will push a
new crl on the 2 uncorrupted firewalls.
The thing is that (even when I send them a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John Mendenhall
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 03:37 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: openbsd 4.0 installed, need to add network interface after
install
openbsd gurus,
As the saga continues...
I
Thanks very much!
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 10:24:01AM +0200, Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:
rough translation from swedish to english of:
...
2007/6/28, J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
so if it wont write to a file...I presume it blocks
whats listed in /etc/tables/scanners permanently and then only
blocks NEW offenders via kernel memory?
(can someone clarify my understanding of that?
Do you really need a file? In my experience
Solved with 'eval', details below:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:50:54PM +0100, Craig Skinner wrote:
In the script I have:
this=$(basename ${0})
syslog=logger -t ${this}
syslog='logger -t ${this}'
..
ping_hosts()
{
..
..
# if our router is not connected to the
I've just updated one of our routers from an end of May snapshot to a
Jun 28th snapshot and have noticed that we seem to be having problems
with our multihop sessions since the upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgpctl -n s rib 80.252.127.0/24
flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A =
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:56:33PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/06/28 15:45, Huzeyfe ONAL wrote:
Use no state in your rule.
and 'flags any' if it's TCP.
You can set this explicitly if you'd like, but it's not necessary:
pfctl only applies 'flags S/SA' by default if the rule is
I think the passtime should use now + passtime not now + expire,
Is it correct?
Index: libexec/spamd/grey.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/libexec/spamd/grey.c,v
retrieving
53 matches
Mail list logo
