On 2013 Jan 11 (Fri) at 15:44:44 -0800 (-0800), Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
:plus, last i checked, firefox was not even 64-bit friendly anyways
I am using firefox on amd64 for a long time. Works as well as firefox
does anywhere else. I think you are heavily confused.
--
To the systems
- Original message -
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/login.conf.in
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/mklogin.conf
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=login.confsektion=5
plus, last i checked, firefox was not even 64-bit friendly anyways
You're
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:10:16AM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I tend to recommend dump|restore, but those aren't on bsd.rd.
Really? I had feeling that the best way to do disaster
recovery is to use bsd.rd, make partitioning and
dump/restore... Quite pitty if dump/restore is not
included.
2013/1/12 Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de:
Constantine A. Murenin muren...@gmail.com wrote:
plus, last i checked, firefox was not even 64-bit friendly anyways
Bullshit.
Well, not FireFox but JavaScript JIT, IIRC.
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/slackathon2011_64bitandjit/index.html
--
Obvious Troll. blah blah blah..
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Christopher Vance wrote:
You would fail any system administration course I teach.
On 12/01/2013, at 15:34, Carlo Borelli carlo.bore...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/12 Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net
On
So guys, I perfectly understand (and respect) how much many of you use and
value ed. As much as others have a repulsion for it, but this is not my
point:
I mean, with respect for all viewpoints, I'm far from starting a religion
war on which is ur fave editor, but just trying to share a view on a
I do use ed occasionnally, when I have about no choice.
Specifically, glass console fucked up, no editing working... and no
vi in bsd.rd.
I don't know it very well, and I usually need another system nearby
to refer to the manpage.
I'm not a sysadmin, though.
I don't see any harm in putting vi
On 01/11/13 16:38, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
sparc64 machine, a neglected typo in fstab while changing a disk mountpoint
and boom! - no boot :(
ed(1) isn't hard to use, but if you haven't used it in a while, as
espie@ said, having another machine handy to hit the man page is
useful. Go play
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 07:17:25AM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
On 01/11/13 16:38, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
sparc64 machine, a neglected typo in fstab while changing a disk mountpoint
and boom! - no boot :(
ed(1) isn't hard to use, but if you haven't used it in a while, as
espie@ said,
On 2013-01-12, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I was trying to build a piece of software that uses Image::Magick, when I ran
into the following problem on amd64 -current:
$ perl -e use Image::Magick;
Can't load
On 01/12/13 07:25, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 07:17:25AM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
On 01/11/13 16:38, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
sparc64 machine, a neglected typo in fstab while changing a disk mountpoint
and boom! - no boot :(
ed(1) isn't hard to use, but if you haven't used
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:31:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-01-12, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I was trying to build a piece of software that uses Image::Magick, when I
ran
into the following problem on amd64 -current:
$ perl -e use
Thank you Scott!
Your tutorial is really nice :)
I'll star it in my gmail.
Nevertheless, even if at the time the problem was a typo in fstab (which I
solved with an s/// sed sequence), I appreciate your honesty when u
implicitly admit that vi would be more adequated for more complex tasks.
Btw,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:51:55PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:31:40PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Set LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libpthread.so
Thanks, it solved the problem for me.
Now, do I have to provide LD_PRELOAD in environment for any perl script
On 01/12/13 08:24, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
Thank you Scott!
Your tutorial is really nice :)
I'll star it in my gmail.
Uhm, you're welcome. Just FYI, it's bad form to reply to a private
email onto a public mailing list.
I'm no ed(1) expert. Since it's now on the list, maybe more
On 01/12/13 06:22, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
So guys, I perfectly understand (and respect) how much many of you use and
value ed. As much as others have a repulsion for it, but this is not my
point:
no, it's like the scissor jack and lug wrench in my Jeep.
If I get a flat tire on the side of the
Sorry for fwd ur mail in list Scott, didn't notice it was in pvt.
As for the tyre comparison, I agree with you Nick. Better getting your
hands dirty than being laughed at. Which is btw what I did in that nasty
event. But I also remember the cold sweat out of it.
Actually I drive an old car which
The core i3-3225 is ivy bridge based, which means the graphics only works
under \
-current and no DRM acceleration until the driver support improves.
Thanks for the answer.
I must be wrong defining what I want. I would like to be able
to do startx and have 1280x1024, with browser and few
On 2013 Jan 12 (Sat) at 16:23:42 +0100 (+0100), Zoran Kolic wrote:
: The core i3-3225 is ivy bridge based, which means the graphics only works
under \
: -current and no DRM acceleration until the driver support improves.
:
:Thanks for the answer.
:I must be wrong defining what I want. I would
On 01/12/13 09:19, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
Sorry for fwd ur mail in list Scott, didn't notice it was in pvt.
As for the tyre comparison, I agree with you Nick. Better getting your
hands dirty than being laughed at. Which is btw what I did in that nasty
event. But I also remember the cold sweat
I have Intel 4000 here, and I am unaccelerated, but do have native
resolution X, and lots of xterms and Firefox works as expected.
2000 should be totally fine, and accelerated if I remember correctly.
Great! Quick search revealed I could go after g550 for about
35 euros. It has hd 2000 inside.
On 01/12/13 10:27, Peter Hessler wrote:
I have Intel 4000 here, and I am unaccelerated, but do have native
resolution X, and lots of xterms and Firefox works as expected.
2000 should be totally fine, and accelerated if I remember correctly.
I also have an onboard Intel 4000:
vga1 at pci0
On 2013 Jan 12 (Sat) at 10:57:56 -0500 (-0500), Scott McEachern wrote:
:On 01/12/13 10:27, Peter Hessler wrote:
:I have Intel 4000 here, and I am unaccelerated, but do have native
:resolution X, and lots of xterms and Firefox works as expected.
:
:2000 should be totally fine, and accelerated if I
On 01/12/13 11:12, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2013 Jan 12 (Sat) at 10:57:56 -0500 (-0500), Scott McEachern wrote:
:
:I also have an onboard Intel 4000:
:
:vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel HD Graphics 4000 rev 0x09
:
Just works. I have no xorg.conf or any special configuration.
vga1 at pci0
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:34:44AM -0300, Carlo Borelli wrote:
2013/1/12 Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net
On 01/11/13 16:38, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
...
Btw, how many are really using ed everyday, now in 2013? I believe I'm
not
the only one who thinks this. My guess is that
On 01/11/13 22:51, Miod Vallat wrote:
The only editing available tool in bsd.rd, the infamous ed, made me sweat
cold with fear not to correctly spell its syntax or do some logic mistake.
I would have been way more lighthearted if I had vi available.
Actually, vi used to be in the installation
26 matches
Mail list logo
